Robert Mcneary wrote: The source is Wikipedia of all sources. Lol Wikipedia is not really reputable, as anyone can edit from there. Also, everything you just linked still views sex as either male or female.
*Look at the walls of references*
Yeah, anyone can edit there.
God made us with countless number of particles and they can only decide on two genders. Wow. I can call you crazy with that logic.
Today they are considered as syndromes. What will future learning see them as? Consider that medical advances have moved past leeches and drilling holes in heads for the old reasons they were done (trepanning to relieve cranial pressure instead of "letting out bad spirits").
What we call a "syndrome" today may be classified as something else. Maybe these syndromes are incomplete and *functional* examples are not diagnosed because they are not having problems and "you don't fix what is not "broken".
Still, makes you wonder about when some claims to be "x gender trapped in y body"…
I like how you just write very few words and use them as counterarguments. No wonder you got blocked as a nuisance. Before you can start labelling things as left or right, maybe you should properly label things as right or wrong first? Ya know? With reasons?
Robert Mcneary wrote: I did properly label things as right and wrong. You're just deluded.
Yeah, because still being self-righteous on top of getting blocked for being a nuisance somehow isn't delusional. "You're just wrong." taking precedent over reasoning is somehow called proper. You're like that Snyder over here in this wiki that just labels things what they are according to his mom and he also got blocked multiple times for being a nuisance. Let that sink in for a bit.
You have such a roundabout way of saying things and it's pretty impressive that you can talk and say nothing at the same time. What I mean is you have zero substance in the things you say. Not one bit of substance. Also, make a bloody account before talking to me.