Please be aware this is all fan-made and is not canon, to add words use Latin or Hebrew words spelled with Cuneiform letters for best results. Because Laputan sounds like Latin and looks like Cuneiform as shown in the film.
=== '''<big>Phrases</big>''' ===
*𒆪𒀉'''𒁹'''𒀝𒄑?(Kuid Agis?) How are you?
*𒋼'''𒁹'''𒀀𒀖𒄩(Te Ahaba) I love you
*𒀾𒊹𒅔𒌝'''𒁹'''𒌔(Utinum-uh) Uh oh or Oh no
=== '''<big>Places</big>''' ===
* 𒆷𒁉𒀾𒀀(Lapiuta) Laputa
* 𒋫𒀝𒅆𒅅𒊍'''𒁹'''𒋫𒅈𒌦𒆍𒄉𒍑(Tokasikus-Turunka-atis) Toxic Jungle*
* 𒈬𒋫𒆜𒉡𒌝'''𒁹'''𒅈𒆤𒂠(Motabulum-Arkes) Moving Castle*
* 𒊍𒀉𒌝'''𒁹'''𒆷𒆪 𒍑(Acidum Laku-us) Acid Lake*<br />*These are places that are believed to be in the same universe/world as Laputa, due to the use of airships and architecture in those films.
=== '''<big>Characters</big>''' ===
=== <big>'''Numbers'''</big> ===
* 𒈿𒆷(Nula) Zero
* 𒌦𒍑(Unus) One
* 𒌅𒀀(Dua) Two
* 𒌅𒊑𒅁𒍑(Turibu-us) Three
* 𒄖𒄉𒌫(Guatur) Four
* 𒆭𒅔𒆭𒂍(Kuinkue) Five
* 𒊺𒆬(Seku) Six
* 𒊺𒌈𒊹𒌝(Se-eptium) Seven
* 𒅅𒊹(Ekti) Eight
* 𒈿𒂠𒌝(Nu-ubum) Nine
* 𒉈𒂠𒌝(De-esum) Ten
* 𒍣𒇷𒌅𒌝(Se-entu-um) Hundred
* 𒊩𒉌𒀀(Milia) Thousand<br />
=== <big>'''Shapes'''</big> ===
* 𒀀𒍣𒂠(Asies) Line
* 𒌅𒊑𒅁𒂵(Turibuga) Triangle
* 𒄖𒄉𒌫𒂵(Guaturga) Square
* 𒀀 𒁕𒈠𒂵(Adamaga) Diamond
* 𒆭𒅔𒆭𒂵(Kuinkuga) Pentagon
* 𒊺𒆬𒂵(Sekuga) Hexagon
* 𒊺𒌈𒊹𒂵(Se-eptiga) Heptagon
* 𒅅𒊹𒂵(Ektiga) Octagon
* 𒈿𒂠𒂵(Nu-ubga) Nonagon
* 𒉈𒂠𒂵(De-esga) Decagon
* 𒆪𒌫𒂵(Ku-urga) Heart
* 𒌋𒁀𒆷𒂵(Ubalaga) Oval
* 𒊺𒉌𒂵(Seliga) Star
* 𒆷𒄖𒄉𒌫𒂵(Laguarturga) Rectangle
* 𒂵𒆷𒂵(Galaga) Cylinder
=== <big>'''Animals'''</big> ===
*𒁍𒇻𒉿𒋛 𒅆𒆠𒌋𒊒𒋛(Bulupesikiurusi) Fox-squirrel
*𒇲𒊺𒅕𒋫(Laserta) Lizard<br />
=== <big>'''Colours'''</big> ===
=== '''<big>Images</big>''' ===
File:Totoro wallpapers - stream.jpg|thumb|𒇥𒇻𒈨𒂗(Pulume-en)
File:Ponyo - Sea Life (7).jpg|thumb|𒉿𒄑𒆠𒄑(Pi-is-ki-is)
File:Ancient Laputa robot with fox squirrels.jpeg|thumb|𒁍𒇻𒉿𒋛 𒅆𒆠𒌋𒊒𒋛(Bulupesikiurusi)
File:The Red Turtle.png|𒊒𒁍𒊒𒌝(Ruburu-um)
File:Spirited Away (036).jpg|𒇥𒇲𒁀(Pulaba)
File:Castle in the Sky 005.jpg|𒀖𒅎(Abem)
File:Totoro hugs Satsuki.png|𒂵𒊑𒊺𒌋(Guriseu)
File:Arren and sword.jpg|𒅈𒍣𒂗𒊹(Arze-enti)
File:Sootballs and Konpeitō.jpg|𒅈𒆪𒍑(Arku-us)
File:Ponyo on Jellyfish.png|𒇷𒆤𒀉(Lige-et)
File:Little Totoro spirit moving.gif|𒀩𒁍𒌝(Albu-um)
File:Toxic Jungle 02.jpg|𒋫𒀝𒅆𒅅𒊍𒁹𒋫𒅈𒌦𒆍𒄉𒍑(Tokasikus-Turunka-atis)
File:Acid Lakes.jpg|𒊍𒀉𒌝𒁹𒆷𒆪 𒍑(Acidum Laku-us)
[[Category:Laputa: Castle in the Sky]]
When a wiki is migrated, the admins retain their status. They will be unaffected.
The only status affected is chat moderator. [[[User_blog:MisterWoodhouse/The_future_of_Chat|Chat will not be moved]], so any user with chat moderator tools will lose that status.
Thanks for all that you do for the Fandom community! I am requesting that the Ginger Snaps trilogy wiki be included under the "Horror" movie footer category . The wiki was very recently created (29 July 2020) and is currently undergoing organization and a theme overhaul so as to be a professional wiki resource about the trilogy. What are the requirements to be included in the footer category?
I apologize for the late reply, but thank you for nominating the wiki.
To address your message, here is my response.
The content look good. More content added by you so that is pretty good. Lists look good.
However, there are only two things I’m concerned about.
1) Background, can you consider adding a background to the site?
2) some pages are literally infoboxes, such as Winnie and Ben, pages where the only words are on the infoboxes.
Perhaps can add a bit more information to at least the two pages written? It would help readers know what they are and what they do. It also, lets search Engines such as Google, Bing, etc, index them and attract from people.
As for now, I suggest you add a little more information to the pages before the Ginger Snaps Wiki can be added, but the site looks promising. Thank you for reaching out.
I was about to leave you a message to explain but here is it.
The content policy you created was created over on the Steven Universe. Word for Word. Heck, even the formatting from the wiki was copied over down to the last detail. And on some of the pages, it even said Steven Universe, without even a hint that it was altered in a way. All of them were witohut attribution, something that is mandatory. That is worth a block on its own.
In addition, the rules on the wiki are not carbon copies of another wiki's rules and certain it has to be created and honoured by an admin. Notice the word *and*, meaning one of the three admins has to create the rules for any semblance of endorsement.
I would like to manage and control Movie Footers and make sure that the requests fit the criteria needed on the page (if you can provide them), The new template I’m referring to is one for each of the film production companies (Paramount, WB, etc) to provide those wikis with increased awareness and traffic from editors.
I saw that you removed that comment. I wanted to say that I wanted to provide hope for that user that he will eventually receive the rights with a legitimate reason and plenty of experience. I understand it may be false on the presumption that he isn’t as active as typical to people within the council. He has potential for that role if he follows advice. I won’t revert the comment, but I just wanted to point this out to you.
Hi, MQ, I know we haven't met but I want to show you a trick. Jdogno7 may require your answer for his questions or demand you to unblock him, whatsoever. So this trick, what is possible is blocking the person from your personal view, but you have to add some code in your personal CSS in order to do so. For example, this would completely hide all the messages from a user called "Jdogno7 test" from the Forums, message walls, comments and more (not Discussions though):
Hopefully we can adress this calmly now that we have had time to cool down.
In relation to the thread below this one.
"This is your only warning and message. Stay Off My Wall, here on Community Central, on any wiki, and certainly everywhere.
I will not unblock you. I repeat, I will *NOT* unblock you. The other administrators will not unblock you.
"I explained the reason for a block and gave good reason to, since you did not listen to me before.": You did not full explain it.
"Personally, I would have unblocked you, provided you had been more receptive about it and waited a few months.": Receptive how? I was confused as to how I was supposed to be in the wrong a the time. You never told me that it would be for a few months. You stated clearly 100 years and blocked me from even being able to use my own talk page.
"Instead, you took offense to it, and broke down my thoughts and words, and hammared it pretty hard.": I was only trying to understand what I was supposed to have done wrong.
"Several other people told you what was the stop, yet you couldn't stop trying to get your point across. People tried to tell you, even User:Love Robin tried to reason with you about why, yet it only aggravated you even further. you *knew* many times from rather lengthy prior experiences that won't help you. I suggest you sit back and think about it. Despite that, your thread was terrible to the point where staff had decided to scrub the entire thread without a trace from the board.": Yes I did speak to Love Robin about it and ultimately accepted that I could not do anything more at that point.
"However, you honestly threw away any good will with the creation of this account. oh it was so so so so so obvious it was you.": Obvious it was me? "No one else has any "issue" with Penny's page at where it is, without the Hofstader name.": Is that why it was "obvious it was me?" Maybe I am not the only one who thinks that it should include her married name in the places I have indicated? Ever consider that?
"What made it hilarious was that you consistently *denied* and lied while people told me and others that the account is yours.": What people? Based on what evidence?
"Let me make this clear. For the arguments and the sock account (which isn't your 1st account), the block on your account will remain with an expiration date of 2119 CE.": When you say "For the arguments...", you are saying I am being blocked because I inquired as to why I was being blocked.
"For heavan's sake. STOP ASKING ME, nor any other admins, for unblock.": Nobody is ever allowed to question why they have been blocked?
"One reply, and I will ask staff for you to be banned (2nd time). This time, it may not have a time limit, but permanent.": Are you threatening me now? Are you saying you will move to have me permantly banned from wiki community central?
I am just trying to understand what I was supposed to have done wrong that warranted my permant block on The Big Bang Theory wiki (I was never given a warning or a fair chance to explain myself before it happened or after for that matter either.). Is that so wrong?
I am not trying to upset other people, just seek understanding for why my edits were considered controversial or problematic. That being said, I apologise for upsetting anyone. Yes, I would like to be unblocked fully but this is not the way I wanted to achieve it. I wanted it to be settled once and for all by a calm, rational discussion whether I was unblocked or not. Will you at the very least go over the specifics of the block with me? Even if if it is here on the wiki community central?
Lets start with the first point.
The wiki's point of view centers on the 7 main characters. Penny, Sheldon, Howard, Leonard, Amy, Bernadette, and Raj. It means, the fans know they the most, and will think to these characters as the core cast and may not necessarily remember any other character.