Semanticdrifter

That should be ok, since you're giving credit, but I'll check with staff just incase.

The merger between Zeldapedia and Zelda Wiki was not forced - it was a mutual decision of both communities for Zeldapedia to be archived and its community to move to Zelda Wiki.

Part of that decision also affects policies. Zelda Wiki's policies remained unchanged after the merge, and the Zeldapedia community chose to follow ZW's policies instead of trying to implement a new, combined one.

I recommend contacting the staff either on Zelda Wiki, or through the combined Discord server: https://discord.gg/eJnnvYb

Hi,

Semanticdrifter isn't with Fandom anymore, so won't answer.

Please continue your discussion with MannedTooth rather than trying to get other staff involved. His replies are correct (as are previous replies you have had on this topic) .

I have not discussed anything with MannedTooth on any Fandom site. The only person I have contacted using that handle is on the Gamespedia side of things.

I am trying to get Fandom's official stance on importing information from one site to another that both use the same creative commons licenses.

If MannedTooth works for both Fandom and Gamepedia, I was not aware of this -- as the two sites presented the image that they are separate entities.

Haya. Gamepedia and FANDOM have been merged now for over a year, so yes, they are the same entity. As for presenting differently, this will change given time, especially as FANDOM continues to upgrade UCP.

Yes, although people tend to work either on the Fandom side or the Gamedpedia side, we are part of the same company now. So your discussion on Gamepedia would apply to Fandom too - especially as this is about a merge between the two wikis.

how about minecraft.fandom.com to minecraft.gamepedia.com

That is being addressed in what is known as "Project Crossover" where wikis on both sides covering the same topic are being merged.

Although some wikis don't want to merge, and that's okay too

Please send this to Special:Contact/General as you will have a faster reply on weekends.

Send this to Special:Contact/General.

Why the heck does everything gotta be sent to Contact/general?

Me: Hi! How's everything going? FANDOM staff or some user: SEND THIS TO SPEACIAL:CONTACT/GENERAL

It is faster on weekends as staff don't look at their message walls.

But doesn't it take like 3 days to be answered?

And wouldn't message walls be faster for that? In my opinion, contact thing should only be used for private things like password changing or username changing, but not for things like:

-Help! Idk how to edit!

-Use Special:Contact

No Special:Contact/General can sometimes be replied with in 24 hours.

Oh. But everytime I use it, it takes like 3 days for a staff to answer.

It is normally faster on weekends.

First do you mean on that wiki or the website.

See? I kinda knew you always say the same thing about Contact Staff, but it has to be reported at VSTF.

Also, as an answer to you, I just went to that account contributions, but no contributions were done with that account.

I like fried chicken

SEND THIS TO sPeCIAL: cOntaCT

Hi I will be contacting an admin to remove this as Special:Contact/General is used for important things.

xDDDD you get it.

-How do I use Special:Contact?

-SeND thIsS TO spECiAl ContACT

v

r/woooosh

don't care

Apple, are you just, I CAN'T BELIEVE YOU'RE SAYING THAT! I'm sick of these answers! Everybody has the right to talk in all the conversations. It's simple.

Please use Special:Contact/General to find out more as I have checked and you are indeed not banned from the network.

mobile IP probably blocked cuz they did all kinds of superblocks on cellural data IPs hehehe

If you have any questions regarding the closing of a wiki please see Special:Contact/general.

It got closed for false claims. The wiki does not promote sexism nor racism.

Please contact S:C to talk to Staff about why it was closed down. I'll be closing this thread.

Please don't close this thread

In order to comply with COPPA, yes.

More specifically, their account has to be disabled. Global blocks can be revoked more easily and still allow tracking the globally blocked users if they are logged into their account while browsing Wikia (which COPPA prohibits) whereas disabled accounts cannot be logged into.

Should also probably be noted that if users don't publicly admit they are underage, Wikia does not need to disable their accounts.

Wait, so what happens if someone doesn't publicly admit that they're underage? Just curious and all.

FANDOM doesn't know whether someone is underage, unless they publicly admit it, therefore as soon as it's out in the open they will disable their account.

*as soon as it's out in the open and FANDOM notices/someone notifies them they will disable their account.

Ah, ok.

K

It doesn't seem like Donald.no wiki is very active. That being said, it appears the active community is very small, and thus just a few requests for demotion (whether they be held on a public vote, or requested via email, the latter in special cases), are sufficient enough to warrant a demotion for any reason.