MisterWoodhouse

I did close that wiki because you were abusing it to coordinate cross-wiki harassment, as you know from your global ban that ended in December.

Please contact Fandom Staff for such a request. My wall is not a support channel, per my disclaimer.

Okay, thank you.

Heya, you'd have better luck by heading to Discussions to request help with that.

Ok,I will

Try this:

a[href$="User:(insert username here)"]
{
color:(insert color name or hex code here);
};

And just to clarify where that would go - head to MediaWiki:Wikia.css on your wiki, and paste it there.

See wikipedia:Web colors to find the right color or hex.

A selector option isn’t possible. They run on two different installations based on software that is 8 years different. That’s like asking for the option to open Netflix on Windows 95 and Windows 10

Well your screwed. Good-bye!

why is community central the only wikia to maintain the classic look but all others have changed without having a say in it? and why fix something that is not broken to begin with?

As I have explained several times, Community Central is host to a number of tools which serve the legacy platform as a whole and moving this wiki requires changing those tools. We are in the final stages of preparing Community Central for migration.

The old platform is based on software which cannot be kept up to date with MediaWiki due to core customizations. It is, in that way, broken and would become even more so over time. By moving to a new installation of a much newer MediaWiki version, we are able to rebuild the platform in a way that can be more efficiently maintained and kept up to date.

I know this conversation is a week old but why make UCP like this? You know you could’ve done better and a head staff member should know that. Nobody will hire someone who doesn’t know that so tbh Will, you and your team are looking really suspicious. In case you are not lying then how about this, why not recreate the removed stuff from Legacy into a UCP form if you guys can but before we get to that, I’ll start a deal. I bet you guys are working on big UCP updates and by 2 weeks 1 should be good because you’ve been working on this platform for nearly a year now. Choose a big update that you can finish within 2 weeks, tell me about it to confirm the deal. In 2 weeks if I don’t see this update wasn’t shared that means you guys are lying and I’ll share this wiki to wiki so those wiki’s can share it to others and then other social media sites will be talking about it till you guys are fired but if you do then I’ll apologize (but still keep and eye just in case). You don’t want to uncover the truth if there is one, do you? So do we have a deal?

You can go ahead and review blogs, threads, and help pages we've made about development decisions. Many legacy features left behind were either incompatible with the direction for the platform, due to the custom code modifications of the core software, or - quite frankly - obsolete.

Big updates don't happen in 2 weeks and we don't make development decisions based on uninformed demands coupled with threats of defamation.

Ikr

You can use the WikiActivity script.