Robin please u don't understand! Latin915 is putting me in a really bad situation, he keeps on throwing the blame at me and keeps going into full victim mode. I respect u Robin, I just don't wanna keep getting blamed for nothing. No one shouldn't even buy Latin915's story about me, I'm the one that's telling the truth about him. I did nothing to him, I've never threatened or harassed him ever.
I do appreciate u try to help out, but I think I might have no choice but to close my account. But I can't take this stressful situation anymore, it's putting me in a really bad place for what he's doing to me. I'm sorry, I just don't have any other choice. But thanks anyways.
Listen, I understand that you are sorry, I understand that Idea Wiki, Villains Wiki, Villains Fanon, The Evil Wiki and Heroism Wiki were blocked by Coolot1, Jester of Chaos, BrandonDarkOne47 and B1bl1kal, but I prefer that he accepts that to block me, it would be necessary that you kindly ask them to these three main administrators of these three Fandom that they quietly unlock me so that they forgive me and to tell these three main administrators that they will never block me, because on Idea Wiki, I my pages to finish, on Villains Wiki, I have to correct errors and on The Evil Wiki and Heroism Wiki, I have to make modifications on these two Famdom for me, frankly, I have no choice, I know that you are there to protect myself and as a Fandom user, I don't like having my work touched. Please....
Indeed I am sorry. Of those wikias I have influence on only one. Of the admins named I can maybe chat with two.
However, the line "never block me" is nearly impossible. That's just not happening. Not even I can never be blocked. And "don't like having my work touched" is likewise a no-deal. No articles in mainspace pages belong to any one user.
Note how he likes to use the word "evil" to describe anyone who opposes him.
(also this was also back when I went by Muppetlover16)
and how he acts like he is superior to everyone else, I do believe Mr. Hartnett has a messiah complex, and an unhealthy obsession with logos. As all I've seem from him is false info about production companies and grandiose pompous threats that seem like something out of a Saturday Morning cartoon villains mouth, the guy talks and acts like he may be a bot. And I don't like bots (unless they're actually helpful) so what I'm saying he needs a reality check.
His most recent post however...still makes me question if he actually has changed.
All that guy does is spout useless drivel about mergers for companies/corporations
And did also mention he has this weird obsession with Judy Garland?
How old is this guy? (apparently he's like 1000's of years old) when last I checked he said he was 18, methinks he's trolling. And you know Fandom doesn't like trolls.
Arik is either a bot or a severly mentally handicapped adult on a power trip.
That behavior just screams schizophrenia. But what do I know.
No, I'm talking about Idea Wiki, not Idea Central, Villains Wiki, Villains Fanon, The Evil Wiki and Heroism Wiki, that's the problem where I'm blocked by Coolot1, Jester of Chaos, BrandonDarkOne47 and B1bl1kal, but when I'm blocked I can't to send messages to administrators, but I need you and this is my chance so that I can calmly modify my pages.
Haya. It is for any reason provided that reason does not violate TOU. For example, a block can be "because I don't like you" BUT not "because you're [ethic/social group]".
I'm trying to ecall exactly where, but your example of "blocking usernames which begin with […]" was actually given in an official place. Might have been a Staff blog as I can't easily find it on any help pages. Point was made that while an extreme situation, it was more or less a valid one (provided it wasn't an attempt to make the wiki private). This is *sorta* suppoted by the common default "unacceptable username". Depending on an admin's experiences, "Debbie" could be unacceptable and always blocked.
Extreme example. Though if brought to Staff's attention, they'll probably give the entire situation a lookover to get a feel for if there is anything else deserving of attention before asking other Staff for second opinions. "Rarely" can also mean "case by case".
That sounds like a really interesting situation I'd like to look at. It'd be one thing to ban accounts because you suspect they are sock accounts of a disruptive user. I had this one user who kept making about 20 new accounts this one time... can't seem to remember where though.
Even something like "I don't like you" doesn't seem like justifiable grounds unless some explanation is given. It's meant to be behavior-based after all. If it's not somehow linked to edits them it could very well be unspoken opposition to ethnic/social/gender group.
If we're talking about all involved being balanced and mature, sure. But as the quote goes, individuals can be smart, but *people* are stupid panicky animals…
AND, many online subscribe to a myth that they are entitled to "fairness". The problem is, "fairness" is most often individual-centric; "fairness is what is best for me". Especially in Western societies where the individual is elevated above the group.
See, wikis are like countries. No two have exactly the same laws and community makeups. IRL, we accept that when we go to another country we should take a look at the laws there, but when most change from one wiki to another, there is little thought given to Rules maybe being different. Thus the myth of "fair treatment".
Would it be nice? Definitely. Will it happen? Mostly. But not always.
And same goes for the analogy of Admins=to rulers. Not the same, wiki/country to wiki/country.
One key concept there is having established (ie printed on a page somewhere) localized rules. Admins who punished users for violating unwritten rules they had no way of knowing could potentially get comeuppance from staff if it's very clear.
I think the largest boundary here is most users don't try to do a lot of the grunt-work (linking history diffs, for example) and make a low-effort complaint to staff, expecting them to spend time understanding a vague complaint, or to have some kind of unrealistically intuitive knowledge of ongoing patterns. It's very understandable when staff have limited time to do a lot of work that they're not going to necessarily be able to tell what's going on there.
Reason given: He literally ruined a RP and just made me mad because he literally caused Donaldo to get all emotional. He can vouch for me
Start of block: 19:23, January 13, 2020
Expiry of block: indefinite
Block ID: #9753
Current IP address: 2601:586:C203:7780:86F:3872:B52:8278 He's literally using his "friend" as his defense for him being a butthead. Listen I'm not telling him how to RP, but can he not be so...open about his fetishes, like I don't need to know what you get off to.
When I met him he seemed cool, but then I realized something was off.
I think he might have APD or BPD
Every other day, he goes on these long tirades like "I am worthless, I don't deserve anything"
He likes to use me as his personal punching bag. I am usually the cause of the conflicts on the wiki (that I admit) but if the dude would actually talk calmly to people and actually communicate, instead of throwing a temper tantrum like a kid who didn't get what he wanted for Christmas, then maybe I'd understand how he feels. He clearly has no empathy for people that don't have his condition. I'm disabled too, but I don't see him mocking me for having Cerebral Palsy.
He thinks, because he is autistic, then people shouldn't be mean to him, true.
But you can't blame every mistake you make on your disabilty.
Dillon, if you can see this, I don't know what you have, but it's not only autism/low-self esteem, you can talk to someone that'll understand you. Maybe ClarentBloodArthur can help...oh wait, he's inactive, maybe SecondOpinion...oh wait, it'll only make it worse.