Tag: sourceedit
Tag: sourceedit
Line 48: Line 48:
[[fr:Aide:Bonnes pratiques pour les administrateurs]]
[[fr:Aide:Bonnes pratiques pour les administrateurs]]

Revision as of 04:59, 21 May 2015

Administrators, also called admins, are users with additional tools to help with more advanced wikia maintenance (such as deleting and protecting pages), as well as policy enforcement tools like the ability to block users. That gives admins a lot of power, but there's often a question as to what the role of an admin should be and how that power should be used. Are admins meant to be the boss of a wikia, or are they meant to be something else?

Admins should serve the community

This idea is an ideal scenario, and it's one that may not be the most practical if you have a very small group of users working on a wikia, but this is the goal you should shoot for. What this means is that admins don't make the rules and don't make unilateral decisions, but rather they use their tools to carry out the will of the community.

Communities should come together to discuss issues and make decisions, rather than being done by a small group of admins.

Let's take Star Wars Fanon as an example. One of the central policies there is the Manual of Style, which overviews how articles need to be formatted and put together on the wikia. This was not a policy created by the admins alone, but one that had input from the community and was voted on by the community before it ever became policy. When a Star Wars Fanon admin enforces that policy, they're not enforcing their own arbitrary ideas about what you should do. They're saying "this is what the community would like you to do." That's very important, because it brings a form of democracy to the wikia.

Just like in a democracy, when a Wikia community votes on decisions rather than decisions being made by an admin, it sets up an important relationship between admins and the community that says the community is the most important decision-maker on the wikia. Admins have lots of extra editing tools that non-admins don't have, but it puts admins into the position of not being the most important part of a wikia.

Admins should always be thought of not as bosses or rulers, but as guides who are no more or less important or influential than any other user on the wikia. All users on wikias should be equal, even those who have a few extra editing tools. After all, if admins were the only important people on the wikia, then there would be no need for users. That would certainly make building a community difficult! The title of administrator would not mean anything were it not for the non-administrators that make up most of a wikia's community, because admins are there to serve the community.

Admins should be friendly guides

We've established now that admins shouldn't be rulers, and that decision-making should be something done by the entire community of users. You may be asking, though, if admins aren't there to make all the decisions, what can admins really do except push buttons?

Admins are often those who interact with the largest number of community members. This may be to give out warnings, provide corrections or in some cases to block users. Before an admin ever gets to that point, though, it's a good idea to remain helpful and to try and guide users, even one on one, to an understanding of the community-decided rules. That's what I mean when I say admins should be guides - they should be willing to provide in-depth support for users as they learn to contribute and better understand local policies.

Admins are friendly helpers who can guide users towards becoming awesome editors.

Let's create a scenario here where a user isn't formatting a page correctly. Perhaps there are certain items that need to be italicized, or maybe there are specific spelling and grammar rules (American English vs. British English, for example) as there are on Star Wars Fanon. Let’s take at one way an admin could engage a user about that:

Hello. Please read our article guidelines. Your recent edits have not followed our rules, and you need to read them and follow them when you make your next edits. Further infractions may lead to an official warning from an administrator, or you may be blocked for a short time. Thank you for your cooperation.

Here is another way:

Hi there! I've been following some of your edits and you've done a really good job so far, but there are a few things that could use some improvement so they follow our article guidelines. First you want to make sure that you are using the preferred spelling. We use American English here, so a word like “armour” should be spelled “armor” in articles. You also want to be sure to italicize the title of any movie you reference in your article, such as Star Wars instead of Star Wars. I know the rules can seem overwhelming, but I'm here to help. Feel free to leave me a message whenever you want, and I'll be happy to lend a hand. Thanks!”

If you were to take a look at those two styles, which do you prefer? In terms of being helpful, the second one is undoubtedly better than the first. The first one makes a general statement about how someone is not following the rules, but it does not say how. It threatens the user rather than offering assistance, which can be pretty discouraging - especially for new editors. It also feels very mechanical and not at all personal, as if a robot had written it instead of a real person.

The second one, on the other hand, is much more helpful. It tells someone exactly what it is that they need to improve upon, as well as how to improve upon it. It offers a clear sense that they can get help when they need it, and doesn't include threats. If someone ignores you after multiple attempts like this to help, then you can of course move on to warnings. Just never do that in the beginning. This way, you can help users and guide them towards becoming great contributors.

Admins are important!

Totally. You don't want to mistake deference to the community for unimportance. Admins are equal partners with users, but they still play a crucial role in making sure that a wikia operates smoothly. They may not make all of the decisions, but they can certainly be very helpful in making sure that users know how to follow local rules and that's in addition to basic admin tasks like deletions and blocking, which can sometimes make the role of an admin seem mundane.

What if I need more help?

There are plenty of resources for you! Our Help pages provide great overviews of all sorts of aspects of wikia management. Feel free to check out our community forum where users from across Wikia can give you the assistance you need. You might also consider joining Community Central Chat.

See also

Further Help & Feedback

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.