FANDOM


(Created page with "Interesting. I don't see why Monobook would be less GDPR-compliant than Oasis', specially since Monobook has zero social tools (which means zero or almost-zero privacy concern...")
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Interesting. I don't see why Monobook would be less GDPR-compliant than Oasis', specially since Monobook has zero social tools (which means zero or almost-zero privacy concerns compated to Oasis').
+
Interesting. I don't see why Monobook would be less GDPR-compliant than Oasis', specially since Monobook has zero social tools (which means zero or almost-zero privacy concerns compared to Oasis').
   
 
FANDOOM has a lot of reasons to ditch monobook, being ads and its maintainability probably the most important ones. But GDPR? Come on
 
FANDOOM has a lot of reasons to ditch monobook, being ads and its maintainability probably the most important ones. But GDPR? Come on

Latest revision as of 16:38, May 21, 2018

Interesting. I don't see why Monobook would be less GDPR-compliant than Oasis', specially since Monobook has zero social tools (which means zero or almost-zero privacy concerns compared to Oasis').

FANDOOM has a lot of reasons to ditch monobook, being ads and its maintainability probably the most important ones. But GDPR? Come on

This, however, no longer affects me, since I don't edit here anymore :)

Good luck!

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.