*I know that I should not suggest it here, I already suggested it to fandom, using the contact button, I just wan to get opinions.

Whats you guys opinión to a user-right (will refer to it as rank) that gives users the ability to edit protected pages, get there edits autopatroled, and maybe even rollback, but nothing else. Some good editors don’t want any real responsibilities, which you have if your a content moderator, while that rank, would not give any extra responsibilities, while allowing good editors, to edit any page.

So, you know how wikis have Moderators and Admins? I think an Owner badge should be added to a wiki's owner to differentiate between them and a normal Admin.

You think you can go on articles and simply spam comments as if nobody knew you're a "Community Admin"? No more!

..has gone? I can't see it anyway. Why?

As far as I know, there is no way to make it so that anonymous users can only comment. You're only able to allow them to both edit the wiki and comment, which isn't what I want. Lmk if there's any way to do this as Fandom is really limiting.

I don't understand why there needs to be an extra click in order to show the categories on a page. Is there a setting that automatically enables them to be shown? What's the idea behind this change?

Will the discussions be receiving an update too? I'd honestly be surprised if it did, because they got a big update last year.

On mobile, whenever I use FandomDesktop, it zooms in for some reason. Then I'd have to zoom out. It's just a bit annoying, that's all.

Okay so I was making a discussions post on the BGT Wiki informing every editor and/or visitor on the migration to Fandom Desktop. At the end of the post I linked the wikis rules for anyone interested in reading them, but before I did that I checked what the protection on the page was, but when I clicked that I noticed another button between the Move & Protect Button known as Purge. As an admin on that wiki I clicked the analytics in order to look at them and clicked the lighting button expecting to be taken to a lighting settings, but it just changed the lightings so I changed it back to the original lighting. But I hadn't tested or looked into the Purge button and I am wondering what it does, however I don't care to test out clicking on said button until I know for certain what it does in case it's some other form of delete or anything else that I don't want to click for any kind of reason. Granted, I could create a blank page and press the Purge button on it, before deleting it, but I don't really want to do that, but if I were to do that and make a page that already existed and click Purge on the new variant would it possibly work as a merging button and merge the two together?

Edit: For anyone else who is interested and is yet to test what the button does and is confused as to what it does, I've just tested myself by creating a page known as Test as I changed my mind after making this post. For anyone interested the Purge Button takes you to a settings screen of sorts and asks if you want to clear the cache of the page, if you change your mind click back and go back on the page but if you still want to purge click Ok. Beneath this is a message which states 'Purging a page clears the cache and causes the most current revision to appear', so if your reading a page and someone else is editing if you click the purge button and click ok when just as they complete their edit the page will have their edit added to what you were previously reading.

It would be very cool cuz not all posts are on topic

Could "tab" could be one of the default templates? It's basically a block that links to a page about the topic that isn't worthy of just being a section of said page. An example of this is a gallery. Another idea I have is vehicle.

Hello,

I'm not sure if anyone has asked this yet, but is there a way to add videos on the new layout? I'm receiving a lot of messages from users stating that they can't add videos in any way when on the new layout, and as my wiki relies heavily on videos, my wiki is essentially broken until we figure out how to add them.

Thanks in advance.

It's so large that it necessitates sidescrolling to see the whole thing, and the M at the end hangs over the margins.

Because the way you have it set up now makes any meaningful discussion impossible. Just a straight line scrolling down, from newest to oldest. And I have a lot of trouble figuring out why this design would be used at all. Only reason I can think of is it being intentional, with the goal of making it hard to find things anyone has posted about before.

But that would be a pretty awful thing to do to fans, so I figure it must just be an oversight. And you guys really should consider a forum design that actually promoted community discussion, rather than hindering it.

Hello, I'm a Content Moderator of the Mope.io Wiki, and our coloured usernames have not been showing anywhere on the wiki. I also can't see the CSS of our wiki through the admin dashboard, even though I previously could in Oasis mode.

Were the features I listed included in FandomDesktop on purpose, or is it an error?

Fandom got a new look

It’s fine. They could have done worse and made it a bright white. Fandom is one of the only platforms I use light mode instead of dark mode.

There should be a way to remove the sidebar/put it up like how they did in oasis, since it can be kinda distracting to the user. Like a button of some sort?

Also, I think we should keep the sidebar design to look like this for both light and dark themes. The new one just doesn't look nice imo:

Does anyone else think an counteract against an automatic reset of an achievement Gem 💎 would be useful like if you accidentally missed one day of editing. Because then you can make up for the missed day and your attendance won’t be distributed. Do yinzs think that’s an festable ulitze feature that Fandom could give us.