All posts by
The design or the panel? The design is done by an entry in MediaWiki:Wikia.css (look for "Recent Activity"), and the panel itself should already be on the wiki in some shape or form.
There are plenty of wikis that only allow someone to use 1 single account, and there are only a few scenarios where you can use multiple, such as the use of bots for admins. Even if you forgot your password, there is a button in the login form that you can click to reset it, it doesn't require creating a new account. In that sense, you did "(ab)use multiple accounts". You can always ask the admin on their message wall on Community Central (or any "neutral" wiki, but those are generally not moderated) about the block or even appeal to get unblocked.
The new vs returning users is only on the new platform, not specifically a new feature of analytics and it has been available there since the beginning, but only after migration.
WAM is not officially supported on the new platform, so scores and logging doesn't really work. Both new and old wikis are included in the WAM rankings, but the list has been known for not being accurate either.
If this only happens on Fandom, you can contact staff to report it as a malfunctioning ad.
There was a previous reply in this thread that encouraged to break the Terms of Use that has been deleted.
There are quite some issues with the template. The first issue is that the <infobox> tag wasn't closed, so it wouldn't get parsed as an infobox. I fixed this for you. The second issue is that there are a lot of strange group tags, a few of which are not closed, and others that don't contain anything. This does mean that it will still look strange, and you might need to look into it. There is more information about the group tag on this help page.
A link to the template would help, but in general, unclosed XML attributes means that the number of <title> doesn't match with the number of </title> (in this case). It could also be the case with <data>, <image>, <group> or many more, but the error should indicate on which line this happens. Any time you open such a tag, it will need to be closed.
This is a duplicate of this thread.
Generally it won't count, but it might be better to check with the staff member who is supposed to handle the request or just to create an adoption request and see what they see.
Unofficial adoption responses were not removed, but they weren't helpful either. Quite the opposite, they were retired(?)/prevented(?) specifically because they were often misinforming the user who tried to adopt a wiki and giving false information, and often got in the way of staff trying to answer. It's not possible to give unofficial responses anymore.
I at least edited the links so that it links to the right wiki.
Template:Navbox used to be a default template on new wikis (and still is, I believe), which has a similar purpose to what you're trying to achieve. The default version of it is also very basic and allows for a lot of customization.
As far as I know, the uploading process (both video and image) has not received any major update. You need to "upload" this video through Special:Videos on the wiki you want to use it on by posting a link to the video on YouTube, Vimeo, or Dailymotion. Then you can use the title of the video to insert it on a page.
In general, family tree structures on wikis are incredibly complex and I personally wouldn't recommend using them unless you know a thing or two about coding. They often include many different templates that are all dependent on each other and even the current version of the tree template on Wikipedia (which is from a Lua module) has quite a lot of instructions. There is a documentation there, which I'm not sure is the same/similar to the one on the Game of Thrones Wiki, but I don't really expect them to have it much different.
The Fandom app is by no means deprecated, but I've seen the issue above often as a hiccup in internet connection (or if the post was deleted). Does the same thing happen when you try to reload it? Are you able to access the post in a browser? Does it only fail loading with a specific post?
The user who made that thread had already been warned for repeatedly spamming threads on these boards, with a recommendation to read the pages on https://c.fandom.com/wiki/Help:Contents first. In general, threads about tables (in this case) are completely fine, but not when you're not asking for help and the OP knows this. "How does editing work" or "what button do i press to go to the main page" are perfectly valid questions, but when you've created tens of such threads with exactly the same question or similar questions, they'll get deleted
Almost no one here can decide or weigh in on your block, we are not involved in the wiki and asking us to contact them is asking to get around a block through others (so generally not allowed). Spamming as you say doesn't have to mean adding links or useless information in quick succession, but the definition that the anti-spam/vandalism team uses is that of advertisements. If you solely added your own videos as references, I can see how that could be considered self-advertisements and thus spam. Even if you use this wiki specifically to advertise your YouTube channel, there's a chance that you will get blocked as well for the same reason.
If I search for "Junonio" in an incognito window in my non-default browser, the wiki is the second result that comes up, both on Google and Bing, behind the actual game. However, it's very normal that the big majority of visitors on your wiki don't contribute or edit - and honestly, if you were looking for a specific piece of information (say who the main protagonist is of the Harry Potter books, obvious example), I'm assuming you won't be motivated to start commenting or editing on the Harry Potter Wiki. So how to get people to start editing? A part of it is luck, but also think about what you would do, in which exact circumstances would you start editing? What kind of triggers do you need? Would you be more motivated to edit on a wiki that is very plain or default like a new wiki, or on a very complicated, almost "complete" wiki, such as Disney or Star Wars?
To get more visitors in general, just start working on the most relevant topics, such as the ones in Special:Analytics. Do some research and look for relevant search terms, and make sure that those pages look good and the information on it is valuable. From Special:Insights, I can see that /help is a popular page, which you already mentioned, and Controls was also well-visited. Build those up, make sure that you are happy with them.
Adding such a formatting to an infobox is a bit complicated. Assuming the "shiny" always appears, you would need to go to the template code and use something similar to
<data source="shiny">
<default>${{#expr: 7*{{{normal}}}}}</default>
</data>This would also allow you to enter another value if it's not exactly 7 times "normal" (you would need to do this manually though). The images in the example would need to be added in that coding as well.
You should see a reason when you try to edit, but it seems like you were blocked almost two months ago. Being blocked on a single wiki and then immediately going to such accusatory words as power abuse and justice isn't helping your case. Even worse, immediately going to such accusations makes others think that you have a history of socking or are just trolling.