Send them a message on their wall warning them about edit-warring. (they also edited the template to remove info)

If they continue after that, you should block them.

Alright, thank you

I didnt want to over react.

You're welcome :)

Is this good?

"Hi there!

Please do not edit war. If you want the page deleted or if you'd like to add information, you can, but edit warring is not the way to go. If you decide to continue, you run the risk of being blocked."

> "When does blocking someone who keeps undoing an administrator's edits become okay?"

When there is such a rule in that wiki's blocking policy.

Usually there should be a warning first.

Did you talk to the user?

To Oot42,

I warned them just now.

As Noon said, they also edited the infobox and removed several fields. This infobox is used on over 100 pages which now do not show the removed fields anymore. This doesn't look legit to me and you may want to revert that.

Generally, a wiki should have some kind of blocking policy. I could not find one for your wiki, but you could also add something to your wiki rules. As an example, see rule #9 of my home wiki's community guidelies here.

If you block someone for something that is not explictly noted to be not allowed, they can technically appeal the block with Fandom staff:

Quote: "Blocks may only be issued for violations of your community’s written rules."

=> Wiki Rules and Blocking Policy

See also: Help:Blocking

MorganaSenpai wrote:

someone who keeps undoing an administrator's edits

Usually on Fandom an edit made by a local admin is not more important in itself than any other edit made by a regular user. In that regard, and judging by your post here only, you are edit warring as much as the other user is, and you should not do that.

Instead, you should present the reasons why the edits made by the other person goes against the rules or guidelines of your wiki, for example:

• Removal of valid content with no justifiable reason

Another good practice when there's an edit war between an admin/mod and a regular user, is to call for the help of another admin/mod that's not directly involved on the editon of that particular article. And the other admin/mod should give their opinion with impartiality, considering the rules and guidelines of the wiki only, and not the fact that one of the user is an admin.

MorganaSenpai wrote:

I'm unsure if the user is that gachatuber herself

Your problem started way before that, because you are probably violating a content policy of Fandom.

The mentioned article reads:

Spark Tanya is a gachatuber with 5 subscribers. she’s new and start doing memes

While Fandom's Community Creation Policy - Living people instructs:

Please do not create communities or pages (even humorous ones) about living people who aren’t publicly notable, including classmates and teachers, gaming clans, forum communities, YouTube or other social media personalities and more. Even positive articles about people can cause unnecessary drama and may become a tempting target for personal attacks, cyberbullying, unwanted exposure of personal information, and other violations of Fandom, Inc.’s Terms of Use. Remember that any article that uses a person’s real name, username or pseudonym can show up prominently in internet searches, and may become a target of pranks or malice long after the original authors have moved on.