TreeIsLife, as Tupka217 said, Feeds is separate from MediaWiki. It is MediaWiki that keeps a log of everything so it therefore does not keep a log of Feeds. It is possible that Feeds has its own log. However, if it does, Fandom has yet to make it available to admins/mods.

Spakster, I would suggest you submit this as feedback to Fandom using this form. I believe this issue has already been mentioned to them but it never hurts to give them a reminder.

Last I heard, there is no log, not even an internal log. If they had to get a previous version, an engineer would have to dig for it.

If that is really the case, the design is even worse than I thought.

History in Discussions is definitely a highly sought after feature, so do send in the feedback and hope for the best.

@Andrewds1021 I already said that. MediaWiki are independed from MediaWiki, of course. But i wanted to say, that feeds could have also independed database for history.

I think main question was already answered.

@Andrewds1021 That's definitely one way of looking at it. But perhaps we've been too accustomed to MediaWiki. A lot of forum systems don't have visible history.

I know a lot don't have visible history but I would have thought they might at least have logs that system admins can look at.

Also Fandom is somewhat at higher risk. Many forums on Fandom are social rather than proffessional, yet users don't have control on who is in touch with them like other social media.

That is along the lines of what I was thinking. If they ever needed to provide content for something like a harassments lawsuit but don't keep logs...