Thread:Sannse/@comment-14250-20160720083031

In reading User_blog:Sannse/Why_Staff_Don%27t_Remove_Bad_Admins this part seems a bit inaccurate:
 * If you are unhappy with an admin and you feel they should lose their rights, you can propose this on the wikia itself. Then the community as a whole can decide whether the admin should stay or go.

The problem is bad admins are the type to block users and prevent them from making proposals like that on the wiki. This makes it impossible to open community discussions on the matter. Bad admins also might delete such discussions.

Is there a way to implement a way that even blocked contributors can propose discussions viewable for to the entire community of that wiki for things like admin review which are very important?

I just got blocked for 100 years for proposing a redirect from w:c:ProWrestling:Draft to w:c:ProWrestling:WWE Draft. Dean27 and Wagnike2 have both contributed a great deal with 392k and 332k edits but even if together they compromise the majority of them, but as can be seen at w:c:ProWrestling:Special:ListUsers others have still made thousands of edits and it seems unfair to let these guys own the whole of wrestling, particularly since this owns redirects like w:c:WWE and w:c:WCW. The simple act of discussing ideas with them is labelled "poor edits". They also leave misleading summaries in their log, like accusing people of inserting 'gibberish' when it actually isn't. talk2ty 08:30, July 20, 2016 (UTC) 