User blog comment:Rupert Giles/Prototype for a new article layout/@comment-5070188-20141214153450/@comment-188432-20141214173418

You know, this is a really interesting comment, and I've been mulling it around in my mind for a few minutes. Why is the current Oasis better than the proposed article prototype ''for fandom'? Obviously, we honestly want to appeal to fans at Wikia, so knowing more of how you think the prototype does not appeal to fans would be valuable.

Is it really just the presence of ads? Cause I subscribe to Doctor Who Magazine, and it has ads. But it's still the geekiest, most fan-servicing magazine on the planet. Ads don't negate the fact that it's an incredibly pro-fandom information source.