Thread:TheV1ct0ri0u5/@comment-184.6.159.83-20160205081935

You know, you really shouldn't accuse people falsely. All you're doing is stirring stuff up ( also against code regulations ). You know, staff/admin cannot ban at will. They have to have a reason. They even tell you that when you sign up. I might be an undercover staff member and you would never even know. There's more that goes on than what you think you know. You try and accuse me for going to multiple walls posting the same thing, but have you read all my other posts? Sactage received a different post than anyone else. Even if there are similar statements, don't nmake me out like I'm some kind of bad guy. You posting what you did on a reply is going to do nothing except cause problems. You might be a regular user, but you're not a staff/admin so you don't know what you're talking about. There is a specific rules and guidelines that must be followed. There is even a page on it. You are not allowed freedom of ban. There is no entrusting a ban to someone. It doesn't work that way. The ban is decided upon multiple staff/admin users. It must be agreed upon. If Sactage were to ban me, it would have to be listed under disruption and that ban would be over in a couple days. I'd be back in less than a week. The purpose of returning was to get a hold of some friends and apologize. I didn't come here to start a dispute. Anyways, if I wanted to come back badly enough, I could have easily went onto a different computer and start off new. There are too many loopholes and right now, Wikia doesn't care about that. Since my ban was concluded and expired, they would have to re-look into everything before re-concluding the same thing and this time it would take alot longer to look into than it did last time. So, disruption would be the only thing that could possibly be listed. Anways, you never know if I'm a secret shopper ( undercover staff member ), so be careful on how you use your analogy to others. 