Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-168424-20180521212704/@comment-1940096-20180823213452

Citrusellaeditswikis wrote: That'd probably be hard to read when not colorblind. You should be able to address that with administrators to get it changed, unless they're not receptive, same as if someone made that change to Monobook (not all wikis' Monobook skins were using the default colors--the wiki I admin, for instance, used a color scheme close to its current Oasis scheme, though it looked better in Monobook). I presume you could theoretically do it yourself, too, if you could mess with the proper CSS in your personal CSS file but not every lay-user can do that and it's pretty complicated (and not as far reaching) compared to the theme editor for the overall site.

I've been trying to hammer in the accessibility angle, though, since there is a lot in Oasis that doesn't mesh well with my brain. PseudoMonobook and some other edits help some but not completely. But I'm pulling my hair out over every change I'm seeing from Wikia now that I'm actually considering broaching the idea to the wiki I run of moving to another wiki farm so maybe I won't have to worry much longer.

Oasis has less issues running now than it did some years ago, but I notice that even on my relatively-current computer/browser, certain actions that would be speedy on Monobook take appreciably longer in Oasis.

I still say ease of use is the biggest issue. If something use to take one click in Monobook it shouldn't take 2-3 in Oasis.