Thread:Sannse/@comment-1807002-20160411002406/@comment-1807002-20160412210840

Communication sounds tricky since the first resulted in none from one admin and last attempt turned into conflict but I will forward this information on to those who stayed in the wiki, thank you :)

I told those who stayed to maybe hold off on this proposal too to let the last conflict gain some dust. Don't worry I am not volunteering for the position, I still probably won't go back- the other editors just are upset it resulted in me leaving, felt the admins were completely unfair/unreasonable and left them feeling as invalidated peasants and my parting gift is just some information.

I would not use the they are useless tone but, inactive (with only casual wall/forum activity - is one), unresponsive (most of the time unless they are telling people off, talking to people they like - is the other) or neglecting (both have done for too long without at least saying why) though strong criticisms it is the best way to describe the admins of that wiki and what I saw before the conflict and only seemed to jump in when they wanted a say or made a decision, at despite the community. That at least deserves a balance of an additional admin but the three most eligible were the three most disgruntled.

I still don't think removal is needed yet (but I can't say the left over community is thrilled about them either) but I think they should know that the community does have that right if pursued. Thanks again.