User blog comment:Semanticdrifter/Digital Protest Against the FISA Improvements Act/@comment-24317070-20140214010622/@comment-24459455-20140226224528

"You are paranoid to the brink of insanity." - Argumentum ad hominem. Of course you can claim to the contrary and the situation is my word versus yours, except for the fact you've both attacked Edward Snowden and Wikileaks as disinformation (the irony is you call me paranoid), despite the fact it's clearly obvious even the US government acknowledges Edward Snowden's leaks as being true (they blocked the guardian on the grounds it was "classified information").

Now a member of the general public would have little interest to attack either Snowden or Wikileaks, but I don't think they would go so far as outright lying that the information from Snowden is false when there's plenty of evidence to the contrary. Unless of course, the individual in question had a motive to lie. And who would have motive to lie and mislead Wikia's clear anti-surveillance movement?