Thread:Lunaraemaemae/@comment-43747849-20191119013303/@comment-26907577-20191119163605

Well, well.

Here we are.

"I confessed to using ONE anonymous guise to evade a block, ONE not TWO."

Ah. My mistake. You've been confused with a different anonymous rager.

"Also, I really hate being judged on by my past."

I'm sorry you feel that way. In this case, if not others, it's the only way. It's going to be difficult to appeal the block precisely because of your past: You have shown before that these things don't seem to stick, at least not immediately, and that's a second thing that needs to change- and be proven changed- if you hope to get unblocked. I'm trying to state facts here.

Regardless, that's not the reason I'm here. The reason I'm here is because Lunaraemaemae insists on treating this thing like a court case, and Kocka is shutting down the original thread.

First off, the evidence against FloweyWick is damning. You can try to lessen it by pointing out that there was only one alt, that they may have changed since then, but you can't destroy the base claim that they flipped out and evaded the block. I kinda hoped the confession would kill that discussion, but Maple is stubborn.

Seeing as FloweyWick ought to be blocked, for some time, beyond a reasonable doubt, the "court case" is "closed." If Maple wants to keep with the metaphor, then an appeal at this point is equivalent to requesting a parole board. The defendant's lawyer isn't invited to parole hearings. Does that make sense?