Thread:Merrystar/@comment-25523075-20150821065124/@comment-26573805-20150822030848

Also, I heard if someone's blocked on a wiki they never edited, those blocks don't count. But I see how if they have edited and have several blocks, they can wait it out without getting blocked on any more wikis, and Merrystar states in her blog that if someone was blocked a very long time ago for something but is doing fine now, that won't get them pushed back from being eligible for adoption. So it isn't like a random user can create a wiki and then block you first thing, and then you're instantly ineligible to adopt a wikia, because you wouldn't have any edits. If people create multiple wikis and blocks someone several times to make someone look like a criminal, I don't think those blocks are counted, because then you wouldn't have any edits on the wiki, and there would be no reason to have been blocked.

I think wikis that people don't have edits on, I think one of the reasons those blocks would count if it counts as a block on the adoption requirements (like in rare circumstances where a user deserves to be blocked even if they haven't edited yet) is if the blocked target is known for vandalizing a ton of other wikis or something if the reason for the block is to prevent said user from vandalizing the wiki, because vandalizing wouldn't be acceptable behavior for an admin.