Thread:Blueoptic/@comment-38004172-20200801110452/@comment-38004172-20200802001550

Blueoptic wrote: Some of your reverting edits are appropriate at times. But alot of the time you are disapproval of other editors to make changes on articles youve worked on. These typically turn into "revert edit wars". This causes big issues.

For example the article Komplex. You had a revert edit war with Zak only just days after your unban which was one of the leading factors of you getting banned in the first place. You had said even that you would stop continuing this when I asked you on Tess's wall. You and Zak reverting edits lead to nowhere.

Second example, Susan did not revert your edits on the Bubble Bomber page, all they did was change some words. Susan removed the Shrek reference and removed the sets from trivia as Zak who also made it clear on your message wall that its clustered having that. That is why we have a category for the set. Soon after you did revert back to its original state for the Bubble Bomber article after I told you on Zaks thread in your message wall that the Shrek reference was essentially unreliable from where youre using your source. It is not a proper cosmetic review. Your review of the shrek referance was actually removed in may. You only just recently added it back all the way from months ago. So yes you reverted back to your edit of march and ignored the previous edits that had removed the cosmetic review of shrek. Zak removed some important parts of the review, I was just adding it back. As for susan, I have explained so many times that it is reference.