Thread:TotallyTinkerbell/@comment-28398720-20160617103715/@comment-7971816-20160717000056

I have told him that he should not have used my absence as a time-indicator of your ban. I have since requested he reviewed the situation for me - I did this because you're not the only one in a conflict with Skyzy and facts get a bit confusing.

Skyzy popped into the conversation unwantedly, and I told them that their pressence wasn't welcome, unless they could provide me with facts of your wrongdoing.

Now as you know she's accusing you of

- writing biased POV information

- ignoring the rules after you were warned

- harassment of an Admin (Skyzy)

Now my personal opinion is that these matters as a singular thing aren't much, but combined they just create a bad persona. I'm just telling you the facts that I have been given so far in all honesty. And I can not bend the rules just because the person accusing you is someone I do not like.

The only thing I can do is, like I asked Skyzy, asking you too provide me with any counterevidence. Since this is not a real court, the evidence can either include something (facts!) that prove your innocence, or something that shows that Skyzy was provoking you in any way.

Without any counterevidence, the case at this point is ruling in your favour and you will remain blocked (however not for 14 years like it is the case now, I will reduce it regardless the income of this)

Kind Regards, Taya

NOTE : I would like to clarify that I did relayed that message the day after your ban, but Panorama has not replied to you or to me about that so that is handled wrongly.