Thread:Merrystar/@comment-5059106-20140608161446/@comment-5398287-20140609143740

HowlsMoon wrote: Xilinoc wrote: Allow me to step in as a member of said wiki who contributed to said decision. Sal blocked you because you had been posting patronizing and somewhat insulting things on the thread in question, and then you removed a post that detailed a counterargument to your claims, which is just petty. At that point, we were sick of you being so aggressive in your assertions, and you had unjustly removed content from a page (something which normally results in a month-long ban, as seen here, but we added other "charges", so to speak), so Sal decided to act accordingly. It's as simple as that. Excuse me but all of that is lie. That is not right. Those other added charges are not even true and you know it. Those charges are all lies. I was not posting patronzing and insulting things at all whatsoever. And I was not being agressive at all whatsoever. All I did was simply state my opinions as I am allowed to do and I was having conversations with certain people. Then salubri comes along and adds his two cents in with an insulting offensive comment to me which is why I deleted it. Then undeletes it and blocks me indefinitely. I did not do any of those things that you said I did at all whatsoever. Well, since you were so kind as to be extremely redundant in your posts, allow me to post exactly what I'm referring to when I say "patronizing and somewhat insulting":

HowlsMoon wrote: But I already clearly so obviously know that. I already clearly so obviously knew that. I am way ahead of you on that one. I beat you to the punch on that. Don't tell me something I already clearly so obviously know. Don't tell me something I already clearly so obviously knew. Just saying XD

And as for Sal's comment:

Salubri wrote: The First post you made makes no sense. Your basically saying he is interested in him because of a special group Yhwach himself put Ichigo in. Thats like saying you like oxygen because its one of the components that allows you to breath. His interest in him is the reason he is the group not the other way around. Secondly it is never said anywhere about why ichigo's bankai cant be taken, its basically determined by what the content showcases to the reader. In universe they have not acknowledged it. Third your taking the point too literal about what was said. As the "creator" of the Quincy, his connection is one of power which Ichigo has through heritage. The literal interpretation of lines are allowing misinformation, never once has anyone said who ichigo can defeat in this instance. Then following someone addressing this you made a second post where you specifically said "Yhwach does Not want him on his side due to his power and yhwach does NOT want him on his side at all whatsoever." This appears to be the part of the story you wrote yourself as everyone else in response to you clearly have read him mentioning on at least 2 separate accounts his intentions toward ichigo be it willingly or by force, therefore whether he asks him or not is irrelevant as his intentions in regard to ichigo are clear. Then you say thats why his power cant be stolen. Im not sure what story your reading but its not bleach. That was not even remotely given as a reason for anything let alone the incorrect statement you made about him not wanting ichigo on his side. That may have not been your point but thats what you said. So whats actually clear is that you obviously dont know what your talking about in regards to the original users question or the material in general.

A counterargument isn't inherently an insult, and someone having a different opinion ALSO isn't an insult. Sal was outlining why, exactly, your thesis and reasoning was flawed by providing facts from the story itself, and his general temperament leads to him saying things like "So whats actually clear is that you obviously dont know what your talking about in regards to the original users question or the material in general."

If you feel offended by his word choice or tone, that's too bad, but he was simply explaining why you were wrong, and you took it too far by removing his opposition from the thread. That constitutes an infinite ban because you proved you weren't willing to hear out another side of the debate, in addition to being patronizing, redundant, and rude during the course of the discussion.

(For those interested, this is the thread I'm using as evidence)