Board Thread:Technical Updates/@comment-24006128-20200415134023/@comment-9605025-20200417032020

I know I am a bit late to the party, but I have a few questions. - reply to #8 Different people have different ideas about what code format looks "nice". It would probably be difficult to create such a feature without catering to only a small portion of the community. Even then, it might be pretty hard as the feature would need to be able to parse and "understand" the text on the page. Yes, the syntax highlighting already has to do that to some extent. However, the syntax highlighter isn't always correct. In cases such as those, it would be very annoying to have it mis-format the code.
 * 1) Code Editing
 * 2) Does this mean that site CSS is now enabled? If so, what is the structure? By that, I mean things like (but not necessarily limited to) the following:
 * 3) *Names of CSS pages that are automatically loaded
 * 4) *Hierarchy of pages (legacy example: Common.css v. Wikia.css)
 * 5) *Hoisting of @import (legacy example: @import used to not work on Wikia.css if Common.css contained actual CSS rules)
 * 6) Is personal CSS enabled? If so, when will global personal CSS be available?
 * 7) Is CodeEditor really the primary reason CSS was delayed? Why not just let wikis add it without CodeEditor; like how they could add portable infoboxes before InfoboxBuilder was available?
 * 8) Semi-related: Will there be an option to turn syntax highlighting off in the editor?
 * 9) Mass Uploading: Will Special:MultipleUpload or some equivalent be added?
 * 10) Interwiki Transcluding
 * 11) I assume this allows transclusion from Community Central only. Is that correct?
 * 12) Does this mean SharedHelp will actually transclude the pages rather than redirect to them?
 * 13) Official Wiki Marker: Nice touch! I like it a lot!
 * 14) The Remainder: No Comment
 * 15) Known Issue: Glad to hear.
 * 16) Procedural Update: Thanks so much for this change. It was getting hard keeping-up with all the different threads.