Thread:SleepyKitty0/@comment-33560844-20190721150055/@comment-33560844-20190818123428

Almost one month later... >.> They were pretty clear to me, it helped me to understood your side of the story more (part of my problem is I can normally see both people's perspective and what they're trying to do >.> So I'm reluctant to step in and "take a side", hence why I didn't come in until the very end. buuut I should really use this to help people not have arguments yes >.> ) I'm still sad stating your opinion on a possible improvement ended this way >.> [And I would have done the same ^ (opinion stating) in your place too... perhaps with a slight pause as I worked up the courage].

I think you or Hussat wondered if CatLady usually uses Visual Editor in one of the convos? You're right, she's never used Source Editor before ^ [though I didn't realize Visual Editor editing summary was different, if I had I would have told her ^^' I ditched visual for source pretty soon after I joined wikia, so the only thing I remember is that I thought it stinks] I had the same problem, I didn't leave it a lot of times before I got the hang of it. Even now, I HAVE to have that thing on in my settings so I don't forget.

I didn't really view anyone as *the* negative factor. Even reading through now, I don't blame any one person. Whenever CatLady and I have a discussion, it is... sorta like the one that happened (and I am more to the point), but we don't get upset with each other because we know this way is a faster way to get to the thing we both want. BUT, we have both known each other for a while, and the same could not be said for this (PLUS it's on Discord, which is instant messaging). So I don't view them negatively, because for me it's the way we normally communicate (but remember we don't get upset, I'm not trying to imply we have a bad relationship with many arguments, 'cos that's not true], but I can see why others would view it negatively and would not like that form of communication? I'm NOT trying to make excuses btw, it's simply how I view it ^^' [I agree with your Assuming Good Faith (not really sure how to phrase that welp), I wonder if I can somehow bring it up to everyone 'cos I *try* to follow it (when I first joined wikia, I read through a HEAP of help pages on here) but I'm not sure if everyone else has seen it. Agree agree it's the way things should be done; I know I was so nervous when I joined, but Trunkuza was so kind to me (despite my mistakes) and that helped me to continue my editing and here I am...]

(I've been wondering about stuff like that ['would it have been prevented if...']. I've thought out multiple things and... I don't know >.> If I had have done more, would this have been averted? If the edit hadn't been reverted, but a message left on HH's wall, would this have happened (what I would have done, agree with CatLady's reasoning and don't blame her for reverting, it's just not normally the first thing I think of unless it's vandalism or incorrect info)? If there hadn't been a delay...)

PS: The Summer Event Page. Don't think you wound up hearing the last on this. We admins didn't talk about that before it was locked. BUT we did agree previously that it was fine if CatLady locked it after someone messed it up (there were people who didn't look at ANY event pages, didn't say what they're doing), since it made her job harder and didn't help. CatLady did agree she jumped the gun on Hassat's edits though.