Board Thread:New Features/@comment-24739709-20150518230347/@comment-154566-20150522105843

Using the same names as HTML tags,  ,  , (the wrong but sometimes used anyway)  ,  , and   could be asking for trouble. Best case scenario, the ambiguity mildly confuses editors who see these tags in code view. Worst case scenario, MediaWiki's sanitizer whitelists these tags in the future and robots nuke the planet.

Different names, perhaps XML-style prefixes like  or , would eliminate ambiguity and avoid any namespace collisions down the line.

As for the HTML output, I love that a comparison is rendered as a, with each comparison set a  , etc., constructing clear relationships between data values. I'd like to see better relationships with the label–data structures, such as –  (within a , of course) instead of the current  –. Even better if the infobox has a way to accept or parse multiple data values for a label, and output them as multiple  elements for a.