Thread:Sannse/@comment-14640999-20140526013921/@comment-14640999-20140531062958

452 wrote: Cheese Ausar, read Sannse's reply more carefully: Sannse wrote:

If the community as a whole feels that an admin has overstepped the line (or more likely, keeps doing so) they can have a community discussion about removing them. What an admin is allowed to do is decided by each community, and it is up to each community to decide whether an admin has overstepped the line and should be removed. According to the (now removed) admin that made the rule, any discussion involving an admin doing wrong or even implying an admin had done something dissagreeable counted as disrespecting the admins. In short, he actually admitted that part of this rule was to silence that community discussion about whether or not that particular wiki's staff had overstepped the line.

It's the exact reason I came here: the community was not allowed to even discuss without risking a months-long block. :/