Board Thread:New Features/@comment-20644-20170522203248/@comment-1370845-20170529095427

Ursuul wrote: If you cared to read the replies, you’d see that most of these comments have cogent points & are not simply knee-jerk reactions to titles. And none of them respond to the content at all. It's just "q_q customization going away", then whining about a slippery slope and how customization makes wikis special. I'm fairly sure Fandom Staff know that that's the case, but as the thread stated, there are very clear reasons why CSS and JS, as well as fourth/fifth level navigations, do not make sense anymore (btw, it's extremely easy to make a font for a wiki and use CSS to prevent the font affecting the top nav or the bottom of pages).

Belittling people & comparing their outcry to childish irrationality doesn’t make your points any stronger nor does it make our points magically go away, it just makes you personally look insulting. Of course not, but do you not see how, when you fail to interpret the other point of view, and basically rage post about customization just because of the removal of one feature, you will rarely ever receive a response? This is standard Community Central practice, they flip out over the removal any tiny customization feature lost, even if they demonstrate very clearly how said feature is actually a detriment to the wiki, and entitled users complain about "no, we'd rather keep it and drive readers away, also remove all ads and let us remove the Fandom banner". After this, they collectively barrage a thread with dozens of responses (often including flaming), whine about some "corporate dystopia" in which Fandom has control over everything, and turn around and claim they have "community support" and that therefore staff should give into their (often unreasonable) demands.

It's happened every time for the past few years and it's why I wish Fandom didn't even announce things to Central and just went ahead and made the changes anyway. You're not going to get any constructive feedback here.