Thread:Chi Scarlet Fever/@comment-14158558-20140208164422/@comment-14158558-20140208200923

TarrlokUltimateWaterbender wrote: Did I call you a conspirator, traitor, or anything homologous to that type of name? I did not. Okay, then I don't get why you're sounding like you actually want administration rights, because I told you time and time again that you could have the rights. I've known for you a while, no less than I've known Lyman2. I offered up many times to make an exception for you, but you declined. As for Lyman2, she wanted it, so, I gave it to her.

As far as Chi and the other kids know, I know damn well that I'm not giving any administration rights to them, because I still don't know them well the way that I do you or Lyman2. That's what I've been saying. And, no, that's now why Steph called you immature. She called you immature, because, instead of simply talking to me about it, you had to do this. Also, you said that every time that you tried to get administration rights, I would either block you or laugh at you, calling you too young and inexperienced, but I did offer it up to you a surfeit of times, so, it's not true that I don't take your requests seriously. As for why no one else is getting it, it's not only due to being too young, but me not knowing the others as well as I do you and Lyman2. Alright? Let me clarify: ''nobody outright called us conspirators. ''Steph did say: Don't be so secretive about it and talk behind backs; it looks like mutiny. Furthermore, on the Rules thread: don't go on other wikis to talk about it (that statement you approved). It is along the same lines as the first statement in implying that it was similar to mutiny, which is along the lines of conspiracy, correct?

Before today, you only offered me rollback rights. Please expound on ''how I suggested that I wanted admin rights. ''As I say repeatedly, I was just consulting with Chi about the admin rights, since he wanted to know more information about them. Just because I support a cause on behalf of another, not myself, doesn't mean I'm simply being deceiving(again, I know you actually didn't call me that)

The second part of your reply, I will be replying to on a separate post, because I have a quote to go with it.