Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-24739709-20151026190758/@comment-5917596-20151102145404

Does somebody want to explain why the admits are being exploited by wikia to fix the damage done by they poor attempts to plug security issues?

After any security issues are fixed surely all wikis should be intact as they were before wikia implemented the changes.

Also like others have pointed out why is wikia only obsessed with social websites? apart from the obvious reason of self promotion?

The JS review is poor I added some code which was reviewed and passed, but have now found that it conflicts with code in my personal global.js surely the review should be checking for conflicts as I'm new to JS I chose to remove the code as I would not know how to go about fixing it.

So I use the history to undo the last edit and even though I removed code I still had to submit the code for review, Why?

I have had to do this on 5 wikis.

Sad I think I must have lost a number of visits as I have not added any new content for ages as I have been trying to deal with the damage done by your poor security plugs.