Admin Forum:"Pounce!" Secret Achievement

This has been a issue for awhile at Ghostbusters Wiki, but I debate if anyone has gotten the Pounce Award. We are getting the Caffeinated award tho. I have went out of my way a few times trying to get it with no dice. Rules stated for Pounce award:
 * for making edits on 100 pages within an hour of the page's creation!

But I never seen it yet. Is this badge doable? Has anyone done it? Please post links if true to user page on wiki that did it. Devilmanozzy (Talk Page)  09:23, January 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * It's definitely possibly, but just very hard. You have one hour on a new wiki to make 100 edits... pretty hard. User:Randomno Admin on the w:c:simpsons:Simpsons Wiki   10:30, January 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * http://images1.wikia.nocookie.net/common/extensions/wikia/AchievementsII/images/badges/40/pounce.png (128px version) Seems a bit of a waste trying to get something like this. Getting 100 edits in on a new page within 60 minutes post-creation seems like it would be a ton of nonconstructive edits. Not to mention that's going to be a lot of edit conflicts. And there is no secret achievements, all can be found here. 11:01, January 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * Ryan, that is what they call the three. Sure it may seem pointless but my question is have anyone actually got the badge. I don't think I've seen it at any wiki so far. Devilmanozzy  (Talk Page)  11:10, January 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * Doesn't seem to work at all on any wiki. Did 100 appends by AWB to a test article that was just created. The problem must either lie in the DB or here. Might be that someone forgot a hash or wrote something as plain text when it should have been . Otherwise, it might be time to file a bug report.  11:35, January 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * I just wrote them with a link to this thread and the issue. I think the simply forgot to turn it on. I tried to get this last summer and it didn't work then, but they were still fixing the Achievements feature believe it or not. I waited and actually forgot about it til the other night when a admin was like I didn't get it. Even if the Badge is viewed as silly, it should either work or be removed to get rid of confusion. Devilmanozzy  (Talk Page)  11:50, January 8, 2012 (UTC)
 * Randomno also tried at 100editsagain Wiki. Devilmanozzy  (Talk Page)  12:12, January 8, 2012 (UTC)


 * I don't think this is a particularly good award to have, since it would seem to promote vandalism/mischief/nuisance edits/unreadable histories, and give people a shiny badge to point to that would encourage others to do the same. ForestMonthZero 11:22, January 9, 2012 (UTC)
 * Sigh. This is not a debate about the merit of it. If you think its silly that is fine, but this is not about that. You can go wrote a blog about that. This is about if it is working, not is it worth having. debates go elsewhere.  Devilmanozzy  (Talk Page)  12:10, January 9, 2012 (UTC)