Thread:Ducksoup/@comment-3215268-20141119123111/@comment-3215268-20141119181541

Yes I do in fact. If you mean this bullet point: The images are not pornographic nor abusive nor obscene. They do NOT depict sexual acts of intercourse or genitals either. The very first description of "obscene" by google is: "adjective  (of the portrayal or description of sexual matters) offensive or disgusting by accepted standards of morality and decency." I do not believe any of the deleted images depict acts which would be considered digusting or offensive in the moden world. If you would like consider those in such strict standards half of the antique sculptures and painings would have to banned from various wikis as well (like Venus de Milo etc). Overall the word obscene is a pejorative term which simply does not apply here. Due to the above I implore you to review your point of view and allow me to fix the deletion made.
 * Post or transmit any content that is obscene, pornographic, abusive, offensive, profane, or otherwise violates any law or right of any third party, or content that contains homophobia, ethnic slurs, religious intolerance, or encourages criminal conduct;

Peace, Ͽ †yræl pl Ͼ 18:15, November 19, 2014 (UTC)

PS.

I am not avoiding any rules in my opinion the rules are not violated in any way.