Forum:AR:Adoption request for AVP Wiki

Forums: Index &rarr; Adoption requests &rarr;

'''What is your username? The Cruentus.'''

Please link to the wiki here: http://avp.wikia.com.

'''How many edits have you made on that wiki? 700'''

'''How many days/months have you been editing there? I have been there and remain active since June 4th 2012.'''

'''On the Special Pages -> Special:ListUsers when was the last time an admin edited, and who was it? The last time the head admin/bureaucrat Nightmarizard edited was july 30th 2012, though other admins have edited recently, Nightmarizard was the one to adopt the wiki and was head admin, he currently is inactive. The most recent edit (16:06 October 22, 2012) by an admin is me, The Cruentus.'''

'''Any other information: Since Nightmarizard is inactive and for so long, I believe the wiki needs adopting as the wiki should be in the hands of someone who is very active and I monitor the wiki daily even when not logged in. There are decent admins on there but they are not always 100% active and they are entitled to have a life of course and can't be expected to be there 24/7. The wiki I am requesting to adopt was adminless when I joined and was in bad shape, it was only through Nightmarizard adopting the wiki and appointing us as admins that we were able to improve the wiki, I like to do the same by making sure that the wiki is in active hands and should the admins ever go inactive for a very long period or permanently, I will then be able to appoint new ones to keep the wiki safe and make sure it never becomes adminless again.'''


 * Do not allow this user to adopt the avp wiki. He doesn't belong their and he has done lots of very bad things. These are links showing him insulting me, allowing people to insult me, him harassing one member other than me. He has unjustly blocked me over 8 times.


 * He is also not the highest ranked person on the avpwiki he is overstepping his bounds trying to adopt this wiki.


 * This is a very complicated matter read all the links.


 * 


 * 


 * 
 * --WAVE (talk) 02:40, October 25, 2012 (UTC)


 * The user WAVE was blocked for uncivil behavior and after his block was over he continued to be uncivil and edit warred, he refused to provide sources as well thus it was in my right to warn and block him. now his last block was for indefinite because he has a history of uncivil behavior and arguing and so I made the choice to prevent further disruptions. Here is a link to some of his past behavior and recent ones. there is never an excuse to threaten someone, its completety uncivil. http://avp.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:Ultimatex#Links. I may delete my reply and wave's post above soon as this is not the place to start arguing or make complaints as this is just an adoption request thread not a place to reply and argue.

The Cruentus (talk) 10:40, October 25, 2012 (UTC)
 * Please leave all messages on this page. Objections to adoptions are allowed, and Staff will look at any situations in order to make a decision.


 * Ah I see, my apolgies, I did not know that, I do not go on wikia central or post here except recently. I even asked an admin about it mins ago. The issue with WAVE is going to be sorted between at least three admins, he should respect that, If he fears that me adopting the wiki will mean that I will overule the other admins and prevent him from coming back then he is wrong, he can breathe a sigh of relief as I am a man of my word and the decision will still be between three admins and ANY decision regarding him will be final and respected. My intentions to adopt the wiki is make sure it is in active hands and so I can appoint new admins should the others become inactive for long periods of time and to make sure the avp wiki does not become adminless again. The Cruentus (talk) 11:53, October 25, 2012 (UTC)

@Eladkse/SigReal: This guy is misleading you, you have too look at all the information that has been presented. I will also point out that Bert from Community Central has said that not all the things this guy does is productive.



He has allowed one to many bad things to happen against me on this wiki. When someone tries to report him, it wasn't just me look at the links, he snowballs the report and makes it imposable to report him. Very similar to Gestapo tactics.

He has gotten away with making personal attacks at me. He reverts good faith edits, again I am not the only but he loves to target me and replace it with his canonbreaking material.

MOST troublesome of all is he is practically helping a very bad stalker that has stalked me from a nonwiki website to every freaking place I have ever been.

The Cruentes quote False accusations so far.

claiming you are being stalked with no proof. (if he is evidently stalking you on another wiki then deal with it there by talking to the admins, no sign of stalking here so far.)



Since the guy is a sociopath this is all he needs to freaking see to counter anything I do involving the FBI cybercrimes division.

--WAVE (talk) 17:54, October 25, 2012 (UTC)

Wave be patient, the decision about you has yet to be made, so respect the fact that we are all coming together to sort it all out, which is actually what Bert suggested a while back on ultimatex's page.

I did not revert your "good faith" edits, I reverted non-sourced info, had you provided a source then it would have stayed, I even asked you to provide sources but you threw it back into my face. We work on a wiki remember, you cannot just add everything you want. As for the stalker, I did not aid or help any stalker and you know it, I asked you about it and you pretty much told me to mind my own business and so then I told you not to bring the trouble to the avp wiki and deal with it elsewhere.

Wave, you have got to stop calling me and other admins canon breakers because I am not, as I have no doubt said before many times, canon or non canon is not what matters to me, its whether or not it can be sourced, there is no bias in me and I hope there none in the other admins either. I do not love to target you, I don't even hate you, you just happen to keep getting yourself in trouble, uncivil behavior is against the rules. you have called someone a troll, called those who walk away from fights spineless, and cowards and in the past threatened to knock someone's teeth out and not too far back, you attempted to threaten me into getting rid of someone you did not like. If someone insults you, you do not insult back, you report them or ignore them, Instead of participating in his blogs which much later you found offensive, you should have either ignored the blog or told daniel himself that you were offended, you did neither If I recall, you just ended up calling him a troll.

A troll which is someone who gets amusement from constantly provoking people with obscene messages, daniel large actually closed his blog to prevent further arguing and disruption. His only crime was not closing it sooner or perhaps starting a sensitive (canon issue) subject blog in the first place, one of our upcoming wiki projects is to address if canon subjects in blogs should be disallowed or monitored by at least two admins due to how things can get out of hand.

We could keep doing this back and forth but I rather not, its not civil and its not the right way to do things, you can object to my request here all you want but lets not bring arguments here, you can complain to the admins here if you want, that is what talk pages are for or at least can be used for or message walls these days but the whatever is decided for this request, the decision about you will still go ahead and will be done in a fair manner, I give you my word. If you respect any of the admins there at all, you will be patient and allow us the chance to sort it all out, but you must accept the decision and its terms even if it turns out not to be the choice you wanted, is that fair?The Cruentus (talk) 20:10, October 25, 2012 (UTC)