Thread:Kirkburn/@comment-24901686-20201116103416/@comment-8-20201120160015

Hi SJB1995,

Jumping in here because it's me who deals with reviewing images.

Firstly the image itself. We generally don't allow full nudity. But as you say, we do allow some art when the context is right. We definitely wouldn't allow this image on the Simpsons Wiki for example.

"Classic art" is one of the area that is hard to judge, and we are actively looking at where we should draw the lines there. At the moment we generally tend to accept old masters rather than more modern ones. But as I said, we are looking closer at that.

The uploading problem you have is due to a very annoying bug. The bot tries to delete a version, and roll back to a previous version, but goes back to one that's the same as the "problem" image.

It seems to happen when there are multiple uploads of the same image. I've reported the bug and am pushing it when I can.

On this image, I'm going to allow it as qualifying art, so there should be no more problems with uploading (a long as I notice it in the review queue, which I usually do). It's in context, so that helps a lot.

It is possible that other images on the Mythology wiki will be caught in the review, I only see context if I actively look for it, and most rejected images are strong enough to delete wherever they are.I'm happy to review any images where you disagree with the deletion though.

But I would ask you to try and keep away from nudity when you can. If there is an alternative image that you can use, please do!

I'm going to remove the images from your post here. The are definitely not suitable for this wiki.

Let me know if you need more help or information.