Thread:Simsilikesims/@comment-30698137-20161211231306

Hello,

I hope I'm messaging to the right page haha, I was advised that it might better to speak to an Admin from Uncyclopedia other than Spike. I recieved your message on mytalk but  cant respond on there. I'm not trolling Spike but just think he's judging my article a bit harshly, that's all it is. I have made edits that he suggested  and try to always sign and timestamp what I write although I've only used Uncyclopedia for two day's having spent the rest of the time banned. I'm sorry if it came across that I demand immediate responses from Admins, I don't know if admins get notifications when users write on thier own page so just seemed more straight forward to send direct also I know it will be seen. Spike has critisized my article a lot, although just saying he finds the article "unfunny" is not very helpful and he seems to thinks he's the ultimate authority on what is and isn't funny without taking into account other people's sense of humour. I dont think " CLLMCK is a live one, who might need intervention from an independent voice before I ban his little ass." or " Unfortunately, we've noticed that your " work so far " has not met our  standards  for the main encyclopedia. In other words — not to put too fine a point on it — it has been crap"  are appropriate ways of talking to or about other users and is very rude, especially when it's an admin saying these things. I think Admins should listen to users even though they are volunteers, just as users listen to them without taking offence and acting like they know everything. I dont agree with the ban because it appears to be purely for the reason that Spike doesn't understand the joke. If I do manage to get my article up to Spike's standards he has "salted" the jack whitehall page so it cant be used. I'm not sure what can be done about this, all Spike seems to be interested in doing is deleting my article or banning me with no explanation other than "I've had enough".  