Forum:CSS edits from inexperianced editors

I am the only active administrator of Zombiepedia and I have been seeing an increasing number of edits done with some sort of template or WYSIWYG CSS editor. Almost without exception, these edits are done either on contributions of entirely poor quality, or simply to "spice up" existing pages with unnecessary/hideous color, fonts, tables, or margins that quite simply do not meet Zombiepedia standards. I would like to make it policy that all usage of CSS will be immediately reverted unless the editor has sent me evidence of (1) His/her understanding of the proper format of the wiki and (2) an example of his/her skill using CSS. But to be honest, I don't even know how to convey this policy to my user base, which, as you can imagine, is mostly quite young. In fact, I don't even know what they are using to make these poor edits, so I don't know what to tell them not to do - I've asked, and no one has told me why their edits are different.

Do any other admins have this issue? Any informed guess as to what the bad editors are using, because I couldn't recreate any of it in Visual mode, and we don't have those kind of templates.

On a seperate note, I was contacted twice in as many as two years about the possibility of having Wikia overhaul my wiki's design. I've always offered my thoughts and cooperation, and was promptly left hanging. As my wiki is primarily about the book World War Z (which generated a film due out in 2013 starring Brad Pitt - trailers are widely available), I figure it would be wise to take advantage of the expected traffic spike, and get Zombiepedia looking as great as so many other wikis. Any advice would be helpful. Thanks

— &lt;&lt;— Philodox —&gt;&gt;  talk 18:56, November 30, 2012 (UTC)