Thread:Merrystar/@comment-184.151.37.85-20150822161117/@comment-10452902-20150822193346

1. A change in the Terms of Use which declares that all canditates for admins must have a through check across all of Wikia to see if they have good records. If they have commited serious offences on other wikis, then they are informed they cannot qualify.

Problem: What is thought to be unnecessary drama is a perspective, not fact so that can't be included. Also, the Wikia staff would have to be able to enforce this rule which would likely require more staff and there are just so many wikis, it may not even be possible. For example, I had a problem with the staff of the Bleach Wiki because they hand out harsh punishments and justify it by saying it is the rules but the rules are clear, their interpretation of the rules was the problem and they banned me without warning for disagreeing with their interpretation and method of enforcing the rules. This brings me to #2.

2. Admins also cannot hand out harsh sentences if the cause of the problem was due to a misunderstanding, and the recipient of the sentence must be notified of what was commited.

There are a lots of admins and it's all political so stopping them is very difficult as you know from my own difficulties described above. I've had this issue on another wiki as well so it isn't that easy, we need better people more than anything.

4. Admins that are biased will face punishment, such as a hefty fine, which I will explain, suspension from rank, or if it was serious enough, a block, depending on how big of an offence it was. Similarly, admins that don't compromise especially if a large amount of users ask for something like that, they can face a hefty fine.

While I agree with the first part, just because a lot of people ask for something such as a rule change, doesn't mean that it should be changed. It depends a lot on the variables but in the case of a despute, compromisis should definitely be tried for.

5. Admins and burecrats who fail to notify their respective communities of upcoming changes or something that would impact them, will face a serious fine, or should they spring it on them, will face a suspension from rank.

HUGE problem. First of all, NOT everyone will remember all the time to notify the community. For example, I mean to update the announcements on changes to rules or with upcoming events but I don't always remember, I got other stuff on my mind too therefore, some lenience needs to be present or this rule will cause chaos. Suspending a good admin or bureacrat for this is too harsh as well, it isn't that huge of an offense and should be up to the community to chatise them for their neglegance.

Edit: Fixed some spacing issues that I thought I had solved before.