Board Thread:Support Requests - Community Management/@comment-38078079-20200115104002/@comment-38078079-20200115125535

We have a clear rule about leaving edit summaries already, and taking them on face-value requires a lot of trust, so they should still be looked at (until it is known a user can be trusted).

Regardless of our definition, stubs are not the issue here. They have never been an issue here, and I merely brought them up as an example of why it's been awkward with this user and so many of their edits (with that as an example of why some of them were 'bad' edits, compounding the issue). The root issue being the sheer number of edits.

It seems your advice is simply: "let them do it".

Advice noted, thank you.

On that note, we'll take Sophie's advice that addressed our issue.