User blog comment:Rupert Giles/Layout Changes: Breakpoints and Typography/@comment-11387016-20150418185140

I can understand extreme stuff like triple monitors isn't supported, but making wikis look like they are printed on the width of toilet paper when you're looking at it on a 1920*1080 is a bit far going I'd say. I also don't really see the point of this update. The lay-out works fine, then why change it so it uses less than half of your screen?

I also have my doubts with "which we are calling Desktop XL, currently defined as displays wider than 1575px."

As far as I know, 1920*1080 is standard for laptops these days. (figures come from http://www.laptopshop.be/ if you'd like to verify):

normal laptops:

1280 x 800	(3)

1366 x 768	(71)

1600 x 900	(31)

1920 x 1080	(92)

2560 x 1600	(1)

124/198 or 63% would be considered to be "Extra Large"

Ultrabooks:

1366 x 768	(3)

1440 x 900	(2)

1920 x 1080	(12)

2560 x 1440	(2)

2560 x 1600	(1)

3200 x 1800	(1)

3840 x 2160	(1)

17/22 or 77% would be considered to be "Extra Large"

I see you mention the traffic numbers, not gonna argue those, as I have no way to verify them or prove them wrong, and I see no reason why they would be wrong. It would however also be nice if those numbers would mention how many percent of the editing traffic uses what resolutions. Usually, the editors are the people that spend most time watching the wiki. Either we're patrolling, searching for missing stuff in articles, making community features or just good old editing. It takes a lot more time to make the pages and keep them top notch, than it is to just check the location of a specific item in a certain game.