Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-180.191.95.15-20200908075313/@comment-9605025-20200918180905

If there are even more skin changes to come, then I don't understand why they bothered to make a new one for Fandom in the mean time. The current Fandom UCP skin already has some significant differences from the legacy skin. I guess we'll just have to wait and see on this one. If what you say it true, then that is good news for Gamepedia. It would make the transition a bit more gradual. I think the simultaneous change in functionality and aesthetic is a significant contribution to the backlash Fandom UCP has encountered.

Even if Gamepedia interwiki maps get restricted, I would imagine that they would allow wikis to keep what they currently have. Having custom entries in the map doesn't do much harm unless the prefix conflicts with one in the standardized map. As it is not all Fandom wiki have the same "standard" map because it changed over time and Fandom never, to my knowledge, updated the maps on older wikis.