Board Thread:Support Requests - Community Management/@comment-26079046-20150807150131/@comment-413936-20150820035354

If you feel that there's been a violation of Wikia policy, I'd suggest checking with staff directly via Special:Contact on your wiki, especially as this involves two admins. It puts the stress off of you and makes sure that the decision is impartial. Again, though, that's if you believe there's been a violation of Wikia policy.

If only 13 edits were made initially, with two-years' inactivity, I don't think it would have been unreasonable to remove rights, at least for the meantime. Should he become an actual and consistent editor on the wiki, you might reconsider him. However, if you were to take that route, I'd advise trying to keep amicable relations if possible.

Personally, one thing I look for in admins is activity. I don't think it too unfair to expect that those given admin access, at a minimum, meet the requirements for wiki adoption.

Additionally, please be aware that the Community Creation Policy prohibits the restriction of editing to any particular group (if that's the concept that was suggested) and that the Terms of Use prohibits the solicitation of personal information from users under the age of 18 (depending on what "proof" entails).