Thread:Ollie231213/@comment-304947-20200912012654

FYI, I am copying my reaction to the reply by someone called "White Eaglet", because I never questioned the rules, only the block, and you know why:

1. I have no problem with this at all, only with the fact that he immediately blocked me for an entire month and this without any warning or whatsoever, hence!

2. That's exactly because it is personal: he has a grudge against me, hence: after a normal person (i.e. "Richard Monkey") told me that this has something to do with the diacritical letters by renaming the few articles again I understood and complied to this, but still Robert unlawfully blocked me, and not for let's say a day, or so, but even an entire month, as you know, for a first "offence" => it wasn't vandalism at all though, and I do know even then nobody gets blocked for that long to begin with!!!

Bart

White Eaglet

@Bart Versieck,

Your problem is with two things:

1. Lack of ability to accept the rules on which the majority agreed - the spelling is standardized using the English alphabet, which does not contain diacritical letters; however, the full spelling of names, including respective diacritics is included (in bold) in each article if applicable.

2. Lack of ability to restrain oneself from attacking Robert Young. Bart, Robert is not the only admin on the Gerontology Wiki. All admins agreed on the rules in articles' naming. Yet, for some strange reason you put all your focus on Mr. Young. Cut it out, or you'll face even longer suspensions. You should better solve the issue in private, rather than bring it up in front of everyone.

Sincerely. 