Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-33668185-20181229231243/@comment-31863794-20181231022424

Noreplyz wrote: Perhaps the nomination process could be more transparent, in some way - and this may be something that we'll talk about and figure out with Staff. I fully agree that there should be changes to the nomination process. In my opinion, it should be more transparent and there should be some form of community input. No matter the situation, with a system where there is barely any outside input, groups always become biased over-time towards their own friends and rarely look outside their friend groups when new members are needed. Back in the past, users on Community Central used to nominate others users for adminship, and while I'm not saying this is a good idea for a wiki of this manner, I believe that there still should be some community input, such as a way to vote on users who have been nominated or voice feedback on various possible candidates.