Thread:MakeShift/@comment-34138806-20200416143029/@comment-34138806-20200416171950

As per the best of my understanding, the "repeat offenders" section applies to users who made edits with malicious intent; I, clearly, did not. I understand that she is within her rights to be issuing a block, but was it civil and necessary? A warning would have evidently sufficed, and I'm not quite sure how an entire month is a more appropriate length when I am the most frequent contributor to the wiki and have been making otherwise constructive edits for the last six months, whereas users who purposely inserted false information were blocked for a mere week.

I have no doubts that my mass edits are only partly the reason for why she blocked me; I would presume that some of my past interactions with her are also the cause, hence, why I believe she is "out to get me." Unfortunately, as I've mentioned before, she is deliberately avoiding me, so I have no means of discussing the block with her; this is why I contacted you, the wiki manager, with the hopes that you would query her for me.

Also, as described in this blog which outlines some key points about the UCP platform, the block appeal process is being revised to better address bad faith administration. This is certainly a good thing, as the current policy enables certain administrators to mistreat other users and get away with it. I'd like to know if you have an approximation of when we can expect the alterations to be established, as many users, such as myself, have no assurance that we won't have to undergo further injustice until they are