Thread:Sannse/@comment-27849086-20190419050405/@comment-2001:67C:289C:0:0:0:0:25-20190419222910

Sannse wrote: LyricsWiki has not been removed, so your work is safe. We have just closed it to editing because of problem content. Tfw you continue to butcher the biggest wikis—actually, at this point, all wikis that aren’t completely related to fans dwelling about things—while more and more wikis are forking; also doing your best to drive away the most users you can in the process even though you do not even consider the slightest possibility that those users make you money in the first place and that they’re kind of an integral part of the wiki sphere. I get that y’all think this “100% advertiser-friendly” dumbed down content with nothing sensitive™ will improve your money flow, but I don’t think you get that with the dumbed down approach, you will continue to lose users and therefore, lose money (as if Fandom isn’t losing money already). But then again, even before this aggressive dumbing down, you have shown absolutely 0 care for the users, you think the users here should just suck it up and you’re the emperors, which is not exactly true. That’s evidenced by the fact that long-term abusers have more leverage than long-term members who happen to disagree with how this site is being run. An LTA getting blocked months after actually earning it, meanwhile, a noted, respected member who has been here for over a decade gets blocked infinitely for an actually funny meme about the staff? Or how a bureaucrat who spaned his bureaucratship for over a decade got demoted just because he dared to disagree with portable infoboxes? Not to mention the global blocks of admins after forks, what’s the point, what will it solve? Oh wait, it won’t solve anything, it’s to show off your e-power. Don’t you think that’s kind, uhm. . . Sad? Remember, just because there are Fandombots who just nod their heads to everything and annoy others about their arguments, it doesn’t change the fact that you have very much to lose with the frequent, unreasonable, global blocks, alongside stuff like this and the uncyclopedia closure, just to make it “family-friendly,” while you’re actually shooting yourself in the foot.

By the way, thanks for the permanant global block for “spam,” whatever that meant. I would’ve left myself, but with the global block, I officially have the “don’t come back” label. I have no idea why I was subjected to it, but I don’t mind it. Not like I want to be in a place where unreasonable checkusers, outings, piggybackings, editing people’s comments and making it seem like they’ve done it themselves, and permanant global blocks are the norm just because you hurt a volunteer’s and/or staff member’s feelings, note that actual trolls and vandals have not been subjected to the noted unless they’ve done the thing again even after everyone got fed up with it, while you (yes, you, who is reading this essay) can be subjected to the noted even if you just once say something that isn’t the same opinion as a staff member’s or a volunteer’s. I’d just like to remind you that if you keep this up, Fandom will pretty much just be vandals and spammers. But it seems like you want it to be that, at this point.