Thread:Nbajammer/@comment-4143277-20140708075716/@comment-691135-20140708082233

Flamebaiting, by definition, is "is the posting of a provocative or offensive message, known as "flamebait", to a public Internet discussion group, such as a forum, newsgroup or mailing list, with the intent of provoking an angry response (a "flame") or argument over a topic the poster often has no real interest in.". Notice who the first person to post in that thread is. Then take another look at the post(s) in question. Someone who wants to be left alone is not going to provoke someone to attack them  who is already attacking them . In other words, in order for me to flamebait the user, I would have to be looking for an angry response from them - contrary to the responses you see which dictate the desire for the user to not contact us about his blocks or his having created multiple accounts. Aside from my intentions, this does not even fit the definition of flamebaiting someone. If I am looking for something to stop, I am not going to respond in a manner that says I want it to continue. The user is only posting on my wall, Digi's wall, and Digifiend's wall because he cannot and will not accept the fact that he is not allowed to edit our wikis. Thus we do not need a reaction from him.

Conversely, however, it is the user and his multiple accounts that looking for reactions - that he is not getting. He is coming here attacking us (I will let you have the honors of searching our walls for the multiple death threats and suicide threats the user has left us under one or more of his accounts). Clearly, based on the evidence presented in that thread, on our own wiki, and our multiple messages to Wikia support, the user cannot be ignored. Again, the only way to stop this user is to give him exactly what he does not want - kindness. So I will say it again - "I haven't attempted to flamebait anyone. So please do not contact me and tell me to avoid doing something I am clearly not doing. Thanks."