Board Thread:Support Requests - Getting Technical/@comment-4151126-20200119175841/@comment-9605025-20200120073628

To be more accurate, make sure you have some sort of logged activity at least once a month. As previously stated, no admin/bureaucrat activity for 60+ days makes a wiki eligible for adoption and the adoption process does not require that you be notified. Even if a staff member mistakenly allows an adoption, at least you could go back to them and point out that you were, in fact, "active" and that, therefore, the adoption shouldn't have been approved.

While I can understand why Wikia would have this policy, it also concerns me as well. I am admin of a wiki for a game the closed years ago. The only reason I am still active is because everyone else left the wiki a mess and I am the only one who still cares enough to at least try to clean it up. While it will be a happy day when that task is complete, I also wonder what will happen afterwards. With no new content and nothing left to clean up, there will be nothing left to do; nothing to keep me "active". So what happens then? Just leave it to vandals?