Thread:Thailog/@comment-1037137-20130824023712/@comment-47881-20130826195250

I did answer your question, it just so happened it's not an answer you like.

After everything I've put up with, you have the nerve to say I had no interest in hearing your appeal? I suppose that's why I sent Wikia a ticket to look into your Wall bug (when that was your problem, not mine)--because I had no interest in your appeal. If that was the case, I would have just ignored you and reported you for harassment.

I think you have our roles twisted. The AW community does not function like a pre-school in which when someone (a toddler) misbehaves, he is warned (by the teacher) time and time again but keeps crossing the line, either because he doesn't take the warnings seriously or because he wants to see how far he can break the rules, and when he is finally punished, he apologizes with teary eyes and promises to behave from there on in, if the teacher forgives him just this once. No, the AW is not like that. On the AW (and I assume any other professional wiki), when someone breaks the rules, a warning ensues. When that warning(s) have no deterrent effect, a block follows. You got plenty of warnings, then a block. You came back, fell back into the same behavior, again plenty of warnings, then another block. You came back again, same behavior, plenty of warnings and another block. Now you're apologizing as if you had offended or disrespected me. You didn't. You broke the rules continuously and failed to heed multiple warnings. This is why you are blocked.

Appealing to a block is not saying you are sorry and promising to be good if we only give you a 30th chance. Appealing means explaining why you think your block is unfair. That's why a last warning is called "last" warning. Two wrongs don't make a right, so whether or not someone else's behavior was incorrect, that is completely irrelevant to your appeal as it does not excuse your contravention of policy. And I'll repeat again, you were involved in five arguments since my last warning.

As for the comments proposal, read it, as you clearly are jumping to conclusions without knowing what you're talking about. And I'm not going to discuss this here either. That's for the AW.