Thread:Sannse/@comment-10389276-20140816035802/@comment-26505747-20140817153443

I'm not wearing hockey pads wrote: However, the admin who last edited there removed all of the inactive admins rights and I feel that is wrong. I can´t actually agree. Inactive admins are usually not so good for wikis. I agree they should be warned and given some time to respond before they are actually demoted but there is no use in keeping inactive users as administrators. As for adoption, it doesn´t make sense making an adoption now, the wiki is active and there 2 people who can promote you back to the admin status. That is why the adoption should only be done in case those two users also become inactive and no other bureaucrat or administrator returns to the wiki, because there is no need for it when other users can do the exact same thing. Good luck.