Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-3026053-20130621001540/@comment-3026053-20130621013838

So it is indeed basically an arbitrary and very subjective decision like SeaTerror said: "oh, this is animated, it must be for kids".

I very much doubt that the law allows for a distinction to be made between one wiki and another just based on a personal feeling of the one in wikia doing the blocking. The law is aiming to block all underaged wikia usage, that means all wikia usage, and not just on a few. By singling out only a few wikis, wikia is discriminating amongst their own communities, purposely letting some communities take the fall that will inevitably follow due to the blocking of anonymous users in order to avoid having to actually comply with the law as it intends to. How is that in any way fair? How is that in any way following the law?