Forum:What's the point of spam?

I think spam is pointless. The reason is because, well, Thomasfan blocked two friends of mine on the Thomas wiki and he called their edits spam, yet they were actually telling the truth. I think admins are using spam in the wrong way. Plus, I don't think it's fair for talk pages to be blocked either. Both spam and blocking talk pages should be illegal on the wiki community. Henryfan65 13:02, January 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * Read Help:Spam for what we consider spam --  Random Time  13:06, January 24, 2012 (UTC)


 * I did and I saw nothing about truth. Henryfan65 13:14, January 24, 2012 (UTC)
 * Then he called it the wrong thing, he might've meant Vandalism --  Random Time  15:54, January 24, 2012 (UTC)


 * Well, unless the pages with the edits from your friends were deleted, you could post some examples. Otherwise, it's all just vague descriptions of something that could be totally biased. -- Fandyllic (talk &middot; contr) 24 Jan 2012 2:25 PM Pacific


 * Well, here's something Stanley642 added onto the talk page for Edward the Blue Engine:


 * Hello, I'm new. And just to let you know, anyone who put down that there's no proof that Edward's model wasn't finished in time for TATMR is actually right: there really isn't. Rumour, however, says that he was either with Sir Topham Hatt or at the works. And this isn't spam: it's true. Stanley643 00:11, January 20, 2012 (UTC)


 * See? It's not spam, but Thomasfan thoguht it was for no reason at all. I think spam here should be made illegal. Henryfan65 22:43, January 29, 2012 (UTC)


 * Spam is considered "illegal" on most wikis. --


 * That's not what I meant; I meant, calling things spam should be illegal, not spam in particular. Henryfan65 00:41, January 30, 2012 (UTC)


 * Or it should be used where appropriate. Also, sorry if my comment above sounded inflammatory. That is the reason why I removed it. --