User talk:Mr. Anon

Welcome
Hi, welcome to Community Central! Thanks for your edit to the User talk:Sannse page.

If you're looking for help and have questions about Wikia, you are encouraged to visit the community help forums here for help and advice. —Dopp (help forum | blog)

Hi there

We're big on transparency, so you can just leave me a public note on my talk page... as you just did. You can also go to the help forums: http://community.wikia.com/wiki/Forum%3ACommunity_Central_Forum or use our contact form for our support team at:  http://community.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Contact    I hope that helps! Gil 10:51, July 14, 2011 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure this is a personal attack: http://donkeykong.wikia.com/index.php?title=Donkey_Kong_Wiki:Requests_for_User_Rights&diff=24530&oldid=24131 I did something without permission awhile ago, but that doesn't give him the right to threaten me like that... *sigh* :( -- 23:14, October 29, 2011 (UTC)
 * While technically not a personal attack, that summary by TW is unacceptable. Wikis are run by communities, not individuals. We don't assign "projects" to individual users, and everyone is welcome to contribute. For this reason, I have blocked Technology Wizard for two weeks. I hope he improves his attitude after that, or else I may have to resort to a month-long ban or a permaban. Mr. Anon 00:27, October 30, 2011 (UTC)

Discussion about CT de-sysoping
Hi,

First of all: i fall short on experiences with Charitwo about his actions in the past. I am also not a supporter yust because of supporting him.

But i do have my doubts about your 'issues' and i wanted to understand it a bit better, because you use quite some language regarding his actions, where i cannot find that same tone or reason in the links you brought up.

You brought up this link and i agree that it isn't the most subtle way of handling issues with another user, i fail to see your 'adminship throne' there. ChariTwo is making a viable request (and i can tell you, important question if you have been in a situation that search results can be having a very negative influence on your personal life) and he gets someone interfering with statements as 'rules are rules'.

When you have been in such a situation that search results can have a deep negative impact on your personal life such a statement is so absurd, so far off any understanding the reasoning behind and grossly neglecting personal privacy and safety, i can hardly believe you to even quote this against ChariTwo.

Yes, it's not very tactical and subtle the way he handles it. But come on. You haven't, as far as i see it, asked yourself the question WHY he asks that. I for one know such a reason, altough i don't know if it's a reason legit for ChariTwo or not. It could be a completely different reason. I simply don't know.

That said, i support him because of the fact that i cannot see the discussion or issues which where happening with ChariTwo and therefor cannot comprehend why such a very drastic powerplay takes place. I have dug into his contributions and have dug into any negative comment. It was very hard to even get even a glimpse of chat between staff and ChariTwo. Therefor it was for me hardly comprehensible which led to the decision of JenBurton. And with a public figure being demoted it requires transparancy, or people are going to think of a strategy to shift to a different course or another type of hidden agenda.

I wanted staff to be more open about it. I hope they will take that as word of advice.

I also do hope you take this (long) comment as word of advice to try and seek behind a reason when someone makes a request which might not be easily done or seems strange at first. Communicate and ask them why so you may understand better then to reply with 'rules are rules' or ignore it. Especially hard when you felt hurt or when someone behaved rude/ bad towards you. But it shows you to be a strong person if you can pull that off.

Thanks for reading this. Hope you can understand a bit why i disagreed with you on that page and lashed out a bit. It's not meant personal.

Greetz


 * I do not think you fully understood the situation I was talking about. How is saying this ever acceptable? This statement is not out of context. Charitwo requested deleting his page; that is not what I have a problem with. Another user pointed out that deleting talk page content violates established policy; at that point Charitwo should have stopped what he was doing. Charitwo did not even fully clarify his reasons for deleting his talk page; "not wanting to turn up on search results" is quite a vague reason, especially since Charitwo edits on hundreds of wikis. Even so, that is not what I had a problem with; if you look into the situation, you will see that we ended up reaching a compromise, where Charitwo used MediaWiki coding to make his talk page unlisted on results. Hope that clarifies my statements. Mr. Anon 01:17, November 8, 2011 (UTC)