Thread:Lolseriously?/@comment-46370557-20200726004837/@comment-26231129-20200726031213

BattleshipMan wrote: YouTube is not a reliable source as I told you. Hey, I'm not going to comment on anything else on this post, but in regarding the the veracity of the video, I would argue that YouTube is a reliable source in this instance. You seem to be taking your reasoning from Wikipedia policies (technically WP:RSE/NOYT is an essay, though), and Wikipedia would take this specific YouTube video to be reliable, as: However, official channels of notable organisations, such as Monty Python's channel, may be acceptable as primary sources if their authenticity can be confirmed, or as a secondary source if they can be traced to a reliable publisher. This video was published on the official Comic Con channel, which would make the source authentic and reliable.

You could make the argument against using a primary source, but the issue's definitely not the YouTube website itself.