Thread:SLScool/@comment-45571174-20200707030203/@comment-31440879-20200709223317

Patience, please. You aren't the only one on this Earth who complains about my actions.

It makes no difference if you are joking, if the other person swore first, or if someone else is being outright obnoxious: it is prohibited by our Discussions Guidelines to swear or harass others regardless of the situation. You do not get to break the rules just because you think someone else has already done so or because someone's post is "not good enough" or because you simply feel like it. This is not a PvP match where self-defense against the assailant is allowed; this is the Minecraft Discussions on the Internet, where showing kindness (or neutrality) instead of hate will not get you killed. This is also not a writing contest; putting others down for the quality or style of their content will not be accepted. don't play dumb with me. I know you knew what I meant when I said that. That was me accounting for the different possibilities. "Who cares about the feelings of some stupid human who doesn't care about anything but spamming us with Money71" (hence the "to block you" part of my response) and "who has any interest in/pays attention to this user" ("to report the accounts" and "to comment on every single message") were my two guesses as to what you meant. You can scroll to the beginning of this thread to see how much I care. did you actually think someone was actually offended by that. Currently, neither of us has any way to know for certain, so we go with the option of guessing how the user feels in conjunction with considering what you said. If the person is not a kid or is pretending to not be a kid, then the person is almost guaranteed to be offended because calling someone a kid is degrading in this scenario. It doesn't matter if you were joking/being sarcastic because you can't make a bad post good just by calling it non-serious. If it's unacceptable when it is not called a joke, then it's unacceptable when it is called a joke. Giving it that label, especially afterwards, doesn't change anything. And for Jeekipro the Greatness, really? A one week block for a death treat? And I get a one month block for being "rude". A death threat could get you in serious legal trouble, and he only gets a one week block? Something's not right here. The one week was intended to be enough time for staff to review my Special:Contact message about it. If staff thought that the threat was serious, then the user would be globally blocked by the time my block expired; if not, then I'd agree with their judgement and let the threat slide. (Earlier today, staff globally blocked the user.)