Board Thread:New Features/@comment-9605025-20190905195039/@comment-9605025-20190920194038

reply to #22 That is interesting. I assume you are talking about the YouTube video on the main page? It isn't autoplaying for me. - reply to #23 Okay, fair point regarding the test wikis. Also, I didn't actually check the ImportJS for each wiki. I just assumed if a post came from there the JS must be imported. I guess the user must just have installed it in their personal JS because the most recent update to any of the JS for the No Game No Life Wiki was all the way back in the beginning of August. - reply to #24 Andrewds1021 wrote: Another question: Do you know why it is optional to include a link to the wiki? That is the exact problem I was thinking of when I asked about the linking being optional. I can't think of a situation in which the link would be detrimental. That being the case, I see the worst case as the link being unnecessary. The benefit? No more of the "link please" replies we often have to give users. Now, in this case, Cheeseskates was able to guess the wiki. I presume by viewing the user's masthead and taking a look at the listed wikis.

Now, though, suppose this was an anon. What do you do? If you ask for a link per usual, will they even know you replied? As I said before, I doubt anons will notice the small note about needing to bookmark the page and check back later. - Noreplyz, I know, on your description page for the tool, you say to tell Rappy. As such, perhaps I could repost this to start a thread on his wall. However, since you seem to be kind enough to "pass it on" for us, I'll post it here first and start the thread only if you say so. Anyways, here is an idea to address the linking issue from that thread: rewrite internal/interwiki links. It seems like there should be some way to detect the internal link syntax as well as what it is linking to. Then, change all internal links to interwiki links to the request's source wiki. Interwiki links to CC could also be rewritten as internal links; but that seems like an unnecessary extra step.