Thread:PKMNLivesNew/@comment-2196387-20180908164711/@comment-2196387-20180909005109

Are you 100% sure that the Wikis you reported (Crappy Games Wiki and so on) are legitimately supporting the Gamersgate conspiracy? I've dug up the comments you left on CGW: Here's what you said on February 27th: '''Your articles on Corruption in Game Journalism, especially Gamers Are Dead and Quinnspiracy, are almost entirely based off of Gamergate conspiracy theories. I know...'''

Your articles on Corruption in Game Journalism, especially Gamers Are Dead and Quinnspiracy, are almost entirely based off of Gamergate conspiracy theories. I know better than to believe that Kotaku is unethical with the central argument being based of off misogyny. I am NOT someone who falls for the "OOH IM FRIENDS WITH SOMEONE WHO'S A [INSERT MINORITY HERE] BUT [INSERT SAME MINORITY HERE] IS STUPID" argument anymore, so don't use it. It is my belief that your claims on those articles are straight up hate speech, which is not very nice. Here is a link to an RW article on this so called "corruption": [CLICK THIS]

There. I've made my point. Please retract the misogynist and racist claims on these articles.

Can you explain clearly why you consider those offensive?