Thread:Sophiedp/@comment-34832619-20200608031937/@comment-5163932-20200608095530

Sophiedp wrote: Yes, unless fandom staff have already said something that aligns with what they're saying. They have, I have spoken to two fandom staff about this situation and they are in agreement with us, one by email and the other by message on here. Here is a recent one saying that I was well within my rights and acted as most admins would. https://community.fandom.com/wiki/Thread:1883403#4

I have no problem with Jaxter wanting his discussion and I am not trying to dissuade him, but if he is going to prepare for his arguments, which we are willing to talk it out with him, he needs to stop using misinformation and slander, he also has a habit of misquoting our policy as he will use parts of it to favor him whilst ignoring the rest that show his behavior to be inappropriate. For example, our policy clearly states not to remove discussions from talk pages which inclues user talk pages, but he did so anyway and he then used another part of the policy as a defence, ignoring the fact that part is meant to mean removing offensive and inappropriate content from user talk pages, and not discussions or warnings. At the very least he is severely misinterpreting stuff but I find that unlikely given how much context he is ignoring.

As for a global block, I would presume that using misinformation, confirmation bias, slander and other underhanded tactics to get admins removed would come under uncivil behavior as well as abuse of the rights that fandom staff gives users to make a discussion. I would think staff here would have something to say if a user was abusing the "remove admin" rights.