User blog comment:WikiPim/Wikia, what are you trying to do?/@comment-2200849-20120305144303

Per Randomtime's arguments, this issue appears to be a tempest in a teapot. The responsibility clause for content was already present, while the impersonation, which has no legal definition in the document, appears to be, as RT said, a boilerplate protection against issues that, if present, will probably be judged on a case–by–case basis.