Board Thread:Support Requests - Getting Technical/@comment-1194893-20150620045801/@comment-6475116-20150623222409

452 wrote: That is an incredibly inefficient implementation. Not to mention, when is it even run? Are you just planning on running it on a timer? (That was sarcasm, running it on a timer would make it even worse than it currently is.) Just a simple thing that a user could run. The only way to make it work would to be setInterval.