Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-3184244-20200117005313/@comment-14250-20200121150910

VanityFiend wrote: Tycio wrote: Coco's been editing since 2017, so they can't be younger than 16.

That is a bold assumption to be making, considering no one prohibits people under the age of 13 to make an account by lying that they are at least 13 years of age. My humor is too subtle :( Honesty aside, even if someone were 13 by Oct'17 they might actually be under 16 in Jan'20 if born between February and September.

Anyway I do somewhat agree in that volatile editors may be rare/slow to change tune, but I like to keep the possibility in mind.

I think if the sole edit someone made upon returning was to nominate an admin be stripped of rights over a bad block and then admins blocked them, that would be a good thing to show staff.

If it didn't succeed (perhaps people are scared to voice opposition, or several admins form an active cabal) at least it would be on the record if the nominator is punished later.

Coco I agree that it was wrong of Vanity to target you like that, and I should've have taken the bait, but I hope we can still focus on the content of the discussion and move past that railroad.