Thread:Channeleven/@comment-30161214-20180306213144/@comment-26284408-20180306224650

Unnamedgoon wrote: Channeleven wrote: "Super Oppressed People is still there because an intentionally bad game is still a bad game."

That just doesn't feel right. Wouldn't making an article based on an intentionally bad game be redundant? I'd understand if the creator intended for people to dog on the game and they could joke about it at its expence, but the game was meant to give players an idea on how radical SJWs intend to portray gaming. It's over the top, but kinda the purpose for a game of such nature.

"There isn't a page about Miyamoto's fuck-ups because it's completely unnecessary. They belong to the bad qualities in his Awesome Games article."

Okay, that's well and good, but why haven't they been put there yet? I, in a way, brought this up when I made an article discussing the fuck-ups and since then not a single tidbit was included on Miyamoto's AGW article.

"Anything else you'd like to state?"

For now, all I could say is that you guys could've handled this a bit better, mostly the likes of MagnumFederal2 who's taking this further than necessary (to the point I wonder if he's taking any of this seriously.) Yeah, they were so accurate that the game actually sucks. If it sucks, it sucks.

Those things haven't been added because no one felt like it, simple as that.

And about your video, you called us idiots at the very start, how the fuck are you expecting us to not hate you? I just can't get that. What we're dealing with is a game that exists to fufil a purpose, to show just how inoffensive SJWs want games to be, I don't know what more is required to be put into that.

I'd be fine with that, had it not been for the fact that you guys acknowledged this. I don't think info like that should be ignored (because of what Miyamoto did, we couldn't play Star Fox 2 until well after it had been completed, it may be the reason we never got a proper GTA game on a Nintendo system and regardless of what game turned out to be better, he essentially went behind another developer's back to make Mario 64.

You all essentially hated me, or were indifferent to me, from the start, ever since I was negative about the creation of an article on a game whose only bearing was that the Angry Video Game Nerd covered it. As for me calling you all idiots, I felt I needed a blunt analogy. It's extreme, but really, you guys leave so much to be desired.