User blog comment:MisterWoodhouse/Social Activity, the 2010 Editor, and Unpausing Migrations/@comment-43855536-20201106181617/@comment-1807002-20201106204438

It's hard to hate something in progress (or it should be in theory). But many criticisms and issues are true and real.

At this point ripping the Band-Aid Legacy off caused a lot of kneejerk reactions and upset. UCP to many looks like a sad replacement but it is claimed once phase 2 happens (and bugs and performance fixed) it is suppose to be superiorly better in many ways.

I wish they had a better receptacle for wishlists and input besides contacting staff and hoping staff reads comments (or takes them seriously) on staff blogs and staff threads (they claim they do but I am not convinced... yet). I am thinking about making a blog (mostly for my own reference) but I doubt staff are going to users' blogs for input.

Originally, they didn't even have a UCP progression report until a User edited version updating on known bugs/issues (and their status), missing/removed features and changes. User:Noreplyz/UCP is updated by very helpful volunteers.