Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-22224-20180521161500/@comment-168424-20180605211641

SeaTerror wrote: Fandyllic wrote: Wikipedia can't be used as a UI model for FANDOM. They have different goals and Wikipedia has tons of problems that people seem to easily overlook when it is convenient.

That said, there are elements of Monobook that are good, but overall it isn't better. I've read tons of comments about how great Monobook is but almost no specifics as to why. I even created a thread to ask about it and it was no better there.

I already said why Monobook is better in this thread. Also Wikipedia can be used as an UI model. There's no evidence it can't be.

Put it here then: Thread:1456488