Forum:You have new messages!

I like what was done with the you "have new messages" box, now you don't have to check more than a single wikia to know if you got messages, nice. However, it's not working propperly. I still get it after I checked the talk page hundred of times and there's no new messages anymore. Should I report it to mediawiki's bugzilla?

BTW, are we running mediawiki 1.8 now? Can I block I.P ranges from creating new accounts alredy?--Rataube 12:36, 17 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Kernigh writes: I first noticed the inter-Wikia "new messages" feature on 17 July 2006. I do not know how this feature came into existence, but I find it very useful. There was that one time when it failed to notify me until I visited the correct Wikia, but I have never had the sort of problem that Rataube is describing.


 * I can confirm that we are not running MediaWiki 1.8. I did not know that there was a 1.8, http://www.mediawiki.org says that 1.7.1 is newest... --Kernigh 20:01, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * 1.7.1 is the latest stable version of the MediaWiki software, not the one that's actually used. Wikimedia's wikis always use the latest SVN version. You can see the revision version in the brakes after the MediaWiki version here to see the revision, currently used to run Wikia. DCLXVI 21:00, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 * "1.7.1 is the latest stable version of the MediaWiki software, not the one that's actually used." Seems true enough! I have not been editing Wikimedia's wikis, but some wikis that I do edit are running 1.3.9, 1.6.6, 1.6.8. ... I remember when I was active at en.wikibooks.org, back when they ran 1.6alpha. I would get all some latest MediaWiki news. I left partly because as a "non-Wikipedian Wikimedian" I felt estranged from the dominant Wikipedians. Now I am missing my chance to use 1.8alpha! --Kernigh 21:17, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

At least two other people have complained about the "You have new messages!" thinghy not going away. One of them said tha it's fixed when he reload the chache, but I guess that's not the way it's suppused to work, wasn't that way before.--Rataube 00:47, 22 August 2006 (UTC)