Forum:The new answers skin

Yes, I know that skin changes can make wikis more usable, but this new skin that's been forced on answers wikis is a joke. From about 10 seconds of using it, I have come up with these comments:
 * The good
 * WikEd works.
 * The bad
 * The buttons are white-on-white (edit, history, etc.)
 * There is no sidebar, it's replaced with a tag cloud of links (Irrelevant, a sidebar is much more relevant for editing)
 * The "Ask a question" button goes over the page title (FF3 on http://unanswers.wikia.com)
 * On the dark "crystal" skin, there is a large blue stripe around the logo.
 * The ugly
 * Some very nice custom CSS now doesn't work, which is a pain as it made the original skin even nicer
 * this seems to be a better, more usable skin at this time. Random Time  21:52, April 29, 2010 (UTC)


 * For the sake of clarity, use a skin such as Carbon to ensure encountering what RandomTime is talking about with regard to white-on-white text. A_F_K_sig_2.jpg A F K When Needed 21:54, April 29, 2010 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately most Wikia assume light backgrounds and dark text, so skins like Carbon are basically broken there. However, with a few people testing dark skins, you can fix most of the problems pretty quickly. -- Fandyllic  (talk &middot; contr) 4:39 AM PST 5 May 2010


 * I've come across several cases of 'bad' skins colour choices which result in the history / diffs pages being nearly impossible to read when trying to fix other problems that users have asked for help on, here at the Forum. - BulldozerD11 16:43, May 5, 2010 (UTC)