Forum:New IRC channel/Votes For +F

Since the last several attempts at a vote have broken down, let's try this. This will be done RfA style. Each candidate will have a section with support, oppose and comments sub sections. No neutral section. If you are neutral on a candidate, just don't support or oppose them and just say why in the comments. Discuss why each person would or would not make a good candidate.

As a general guideline, successful candidates should get at least 85% support. If no one receives 85%, the candidate with the most support will gain the flag. After two weeks, the votes will be closed by a neutral user.

Comments
I'd like to withdraw this entry for +F and show the participants and community that I'm not just telling them what they want to hear and gladly continue as a long-standing channel operator. -- 03:39, October 31, 2011 (UTC)

Support
- Active, trustworthy and has shown in the past an ability to moderate #wikia appropriately. --Callofduty4 18:09, October 31, 2011 (UTC)

- I've seen him in action many times and can trust his ability to use the tools well. 18:41, October 31, 2011 (UTC)

- Per CoD4 and ajr. Cpl.Bohater 20:46, October 31, 2011 (UTC)

Support
- Active, trustworthy and has shown in the past an ability to moderate #wikia appropriately. --Callofduty4 18:09, October 31, 2011 (UTC)

- he is active and has a good track record of using the tools appropriately. 18:41, October 31, 2011 (UTC)

- Probably not a walrus. Making good faith vote here. -- 20:56, October 31, 2011 (UTC)

- Per Charit --  Random Time  21:01, October 31, 2011 (UTC)

Per Charitwo Cpl.Bohater 21:04, October 31, 2011 (UTC)

Support
- Godisme is active, helpful and mature. I don't see any reason he wouldn't help the channel with these flags. Cpl.Bohater 20:47, October 31, 2011 (UTC)

- Trustworthy with a history of good on-wiki and on-IRC moderation decisions --  Random Time  21:01, October 31, 2011 (UTC)