User blog comment:MisterWoodhouse/Creating new wikis on the Unified Community Platform/@comment-29964201-20200303184623/@comment-1807002-20200303230907

"Do you have specific suggestions in mind? That type of feedback is very helpful. Comments which amount to "fix it" are generally not helpful."

Asking volunteer staff (which is just highly trusted users right?) monitor a wiki that is asking for adoption rights- even for a couple days to a week (depending on the wiki and it's activity) seeing how it operates or not (even if it is just a couple check ins a day seeing the wiki activity feed on user interaction activity and editing activity). If this becomes too much of a work load increase you could have those active/trusted on CC even not official volunteer staff be assigned a sort of trusted monitoring/observation volunteer. No special rights would be needed just that 'staff trusted' their findings as non-bias and truthful.

If there are "active" admins, a non-bias volunteer staff see how the "admin" interacts with it's current users and how they edit or not. Probably could be more insightful than a one 10 minute look over on a wiki. You have the one adopting, a non-bias trusted volunteer and a fandom staff as a cross referencing process.