Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-168424-20200313173237/@comment-1807002-20200408005214

Original Authority wrote: Hollowness wrote: Original Authority wrote: Hollowness wrote: Noreplyz wrote: It's a bit of a mess, to be honest. Feel free to rearrange things. Just something I'd like to point out but don't know it it really matters cause a bug is bug. But edit count isn't a global edit count or else my edit count would be over 180,000 globally but on the UPC has it as 32,194 atm. Known issue; a bug report exists. I know it is a known bug, I made that reference, but the details of the bug are incorrect. Hence, my usage of "don't know if it really matters cause a bug is bug". Do you fully read replies? How do you know the details of the bug report are incorrect, have you seen the report? No. Stop assuming those who file the bugs don't investigate them beforehand and don't know what we're doing.

It is a known bug that the edit count doesn't sync with either local or global edits. Of course I do not know the bug report, I am referring to the details originally stated on the page linked in this thread User:Noreplyz/UCP, which is user edited and may be user (not staff) created detail that might not be a fact- so I thought I'd mention this might be an error.

"User edit counts show global edit count instead of local edit count."

I stated that it can't be global since I have over 180,000 global edits and UCP states 32,194. I am in no way assuming the official bug reports; I am however reporting to other users in this thread- that User:Noreplyz/UCP details on this bug might be incorrect.

I know it is a known bug (I thought I made that very clear), but there is/was a detail about the bug (being based on global edit count) which I thought I'd point out incorrect.