Thread:Jenburton/@comment-24117543-20150420061802/@comment-24117543-20150420083126

It's only one sided when you don't have proof, or it isn't officially verifiable. I have logs, but you can't verify them because administrators and moderators aren't required to keep sufficiently detailed logs.

Am I right?

The chat interface supports this plausible abuse. Say you're in a private chat with a mod or admin and they ban you. You don't have access to the chatlog now and nothing requires them to log it either.

Now you can't ask for help from an admin on the wiki, you have to email the support team directly. Support team/Andrew Nasland ignores your appeal. You can't use wikia.

But, what I have up my sleeves isn't just logs. What if I said I could capture this behavior in action?

Catch such a mod/admin red handed?