Thread:Ducksoup/@comment-27086573-20151212074506/@comment-23523342-20151220205407

Sid92 wrote: @ SniperKing1 & @ FrenchTouch

Thank you for your response. After a few interactions, I've found that he has some good and bad qualities - he is frank, a quality but unfriendly when dealing with people, similarly he is diligent but monopolistic or absolutist whereever he can. I've visited some of his other wikias' where he is active as well and come to this conclusion. He also has been on wikia for a long time.

He probably has been admin on various wikis for a long time. He doesn't value most people unless they are a level above him. And he seems normal on the surface but I've seen that his actions are many times likely to offend people unnecessarily. He probably has forgotten to treat others as equal contributors as he has been an admin for a long time. Well, all-in-all this is my conclusion about the person but this is still a personal opinion.

I recently saw this page (1 - http://gakusen-toshi-asterisk.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:3872) which was mentioned about in the thread discussion (2 - http://gakusen-toshi-asterisk.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:3856 ) and found that this admin (Angelo) did not even bother to discuss it properly with even an admin (TheNoraShinki). He only discussed with the admin+bureau (Rose). This shows his hypocrisy in his words when he showed himself willing to listen to others' opinion in (Link 2) and not in (Link 1).

While I'm not particularly interested in spoiling his image over the wiki, but I also don't think that a person with such an attitude should hold any position of power which can misused be passively in a way that is ambiguous as such actions will not be openly be suspected by a web of such actions over some time do cause trouble to others. My only motive in bringing this to everyone's notice was so that other wikia contributors who are new as well as those who are old don't get discouraged by people like him and by such actions. There probably is no way such things can be dealt with right now. But maybe the 'Wikia' staff and the community itself will consider such situations for future references to prevent such incidences having around, (by probably creating some support or regulations for monitoring it).

I again would like to thank you all for taking out the time to look into this matter and reply here. Sid92: I'm guessing the admin's actions have lessened fellow editors' opinions of him?

1) How many admins and non-admins are active on this wiki ypu are having problems with this admin? 2) Does anyone else not approve of his methods?

My thoughts about the admin form what I've heard: he's maintaining wikis to some personal schedule and get heavy-handed about things at times. The admin is just like some other editors I've seen on the Thunderbirds Wiki, mainly WeltonArsenal (former account Meoldgee1956). It's just horrendous how some people are. Honestly. I've been through it all before many times.

Listen to me go on again... :) Getting back to the admin, it's bad form what he does. It's not the professional conduct I expect to see from any editor.

French Touch: can you show me (and others) where this is stated? I don't remember reading anywhere that admins have to agree to the demotion on a forum for establishing a vote/consensus.