Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-4022888-20160122123443/@comment-5558012-20160122161443

An Admin should ideally communicate with fellow users, but everyone is different.

You could follow Dessamator's advice (which is what I began to write) though I wouldn't/didn't recommend such action for demote/promotion because policy on that wiki states you aren't eligible to be an Admin in the first place (so technically they aren't "failing in their duties"). If anything, you should debate the policy before mentioning demotion. If you were eligible based on the nomination requirement policy, I would of suggested a discussion to remove the Bureaucrat (though there are three, did you talk to the others despite them being less active? They could get an email notification.) and then the Admin could follow the adoption process for Bureaucrat status.

@Dessamator - I believe this is best regulated through a policy addition in which the wiki could discussion renewal after x amount of time. Having a position expire could cause more harm then good (say if there are less active Bureaucrats, more adopts may be needed to repromote the Admins that can't be renewed due to the inactivity of the Bureacrats. X amount of time would have to go on before adoption, leaving the wiki with no Admins).