User blog comment:Kirkburn/Introducing the Community Page - a hub for community info/@comment-3218221-20160629064603/@comment-3218221-20160629154756

I am perfectly aware of what wanted pages are, and I assure you that I intend to address all wanted pages (I was dealing with double redirects last night and I've long since dealt with broken ones) at some point in time. And I have started dealing with the template:noneselected links as we speak.

I wouldn't say that it's going too far to suggest that admins have some way of choosing which items do and do not appear on the list though, would you? As I said, I doubt that most users (at least, the ones who visit our wiki) would know what to do with "template:noneselected" or care to try. I brought it up in the first place as an example of something that would be not all that useful to the general readership.

Thus - wouldn't it make more sense if the admin could remove it from the community page entries and replace it with a more accessible problem/needed thing in the meantime? The admins would still be aware of it, but it wouldn't be taking up unnecessary space. Besides, not all redlinks can be dealt with in the same day/at once.