Thread:Andrewds1021/@comment-45310000-20200417112550/@comment-9605025-20200420213359

It is great that you are getting things to where you want them. I am completely unfamiliar with the game but I can certainly browse around the wiki a bit.

As for the suggestion the other user gave you, about using Lua, you would just need to verify that Fandom's Scribuntu has those features. Fandom has a slightly customized version of Scribuntu so not everything mentioned in the factory's manual are actually usable on Fandom.

Again, I wouldn't expect new extensions to be added any time soon; especially if Fandom would have to make their own. The whole point of UCP is to get away from custom extensions and have one uniform set of features available to all wikis. Even if they did eventually consider adding such an extension, the decision would be made based on whether or not they think it is useful for most wikis. They wouldn't enable it just for your wiki and they wouldn't add it for all wikis unless they think it is broadly useful. I am not saying they won't add it, that is for them to decide. I just want to communicate Fandom's general stance on extensions so that you don't get too disappointed if/when they refuse to add it.

Listing the creator and most frequent contributor is certainly an interesting idea. There are ways you can get the first and last editors but I think getting the most frequent editor would definitely require some JS. I don't think it could be done with Lua, though I could be wrong. I am fairly new to Lua myself.

I am afraid I don't know much about bots; so I can't really help you there. What I do know is that they still require an account and the account must be logged-in in order to run the bot. It isn't something you can write on a page, logout, and leave running in the meantime.