User blog comment:JamesTheNerdKing/Magnificent Qualities Administrators Should Possess/@comment-5558012-20171209065129/@comment-30930384-20171210051241

Your bias statement is more or less what I am saying in different words. I never said anything about Admins retaining their opinions, although I believe all opinions should be tolerated. I am an Administrator on other wikis, and have been relaxed the entire time, with the only two blocks issued by me involving about three days for one user, and one month for another, both of whom simply posted porn in discussions. Yes, they are held to higher standards, but they don't need to let that get to them. The favoritism statement relates to the bias statement. I am not saying they are royalty, I am saying some like to think they are. Yes, wiki's don't need a king or queen ruling it, but some staff on some wikis believe that they do need one. Some new editors who ask sometimes do become Administrators, but have a usually lower rate of being a good Administrator. Most Administrators already understand the community and have respect, otherwise they'd have not gained rights. Most Administrators, aside from the arrogant ones, realize the position can be revoked.