User talk:Bryce53/Archive 2

Message me if you may.

Irrelevant template
Hi, I just left a message on the talk page for the Ireelevant template. Since you participate in blogs a lot and sometimes post this template, I thought it would be good to let you know. Please let me know your thoughts there. Thanks, Sarah (help forum | blog) 18:25, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I appreciate it! Annoying  Orange  andClassical Piano GABS 05:01, May 11, 2011 (UTC)

ASAP?
Hey,what do you mean by this:"Wikia Staff will get to you (me) ASAP " What ASAP mean?You also write "to you" instead "you to" I just want to know what ASAP mean.Write your answer in my talk page.

-Brian

Sweet Victory! 15:11, May 10, 2011 (UTC)

Never mind.

Sweet Victory! 15:33, May 10, 2011 (UTC)


 * Okay... Annoying Orange  andClassical Piano GABS 04:46, May 11, 2011 (UTC)

Your recent activity regarding commenting on and tagging blogs that are a year or more old
Please don't tag random test blogs, I will simply revert such pointless and trivial efforts. As for commenting on old blogs, definitely do NOT do that. Necrobumping will get you in trouble. -- 04:42, May 11, 2011 (UTC)


 * Okay; go ahead and tell the other people the same thing. We're discussing this on Template talk:Irrelevant; feel free to state your suggestion. Annoying  Orange  andClassical Piano GABS 04:46, May 11, 2011 (UTC)


 * That has nothing to do with old test blogs, which are doing no harm. I am telling you not to do it, you are being counterproductive. -- 04:47, May 11, 2011 (UTC)


 * I already said I wouldn't do it anymore; I'll make you delightful and I'll give you a break from deleting my tags. I feel that Wikianswers needs to be improved; I think sharing my suggestions about that is more useful than tagging unintelligent blogs with the "i" template; wouldn't you agree, Charitwo? I apologize if I made you angry. I know you are a great contributor, and I agree with that. Annoying  Orange  andClassical Piano GABS 04:53, May 11, 2011 (UTC)

Re:Hello
Hmm, because I have a slight feeling of a troll in this situation, no. My quote "ironically" referred to "h8rs" written by the original poster (if that helps). H8rs generally has reference to people who have an opinionated dislike towards one another or ownership of something to another, in this case I took your 'deletion template' as the ironic tie. --Imdill3 20:40, May 11, 2011 (UTC)

Soliciting user talk pages and blogs to further escalate a trivial issue
Hi, you were blocked as a temporary measure to prevent disruption to Central Wikia. Spamming random user's talk pages and user blogs is not helpful when you have already reported a wiki via Special:contact. This is NOT an urgent matter, no matter how much you think it is. Filling up the community team's inbox will not help the matter be looked at quicker, it only creates MORE work for a trivial issue. Wikia staff are not even in the office today and those that do happen to check the mail during the weekend will simply tell you the same thing I am. The user is already blocked, and you can simply ignore this wiki until staff have time to look at it. Thanks for your cooperation. -- 12:56, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * No. Please unblock me. I reserve my rights. I was just so mad at me being offended I really wanted it to be through and over. I promise I won't do it again. Annoying  Orange  andClassical Piano GABS 13:19, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, I will unblock you as long as you fully understand the procedure for situations requiring staff help and things are not as urgent as you may think they are. One message via Special:contact is sufficient in 99% of situations. Leaving messages on random users talk pages isn't going to get you anywhere because they are just regular users and cannot provide the kind of support you can get from staff. Same thing goes for user blogs. It's simply unnecessary. -- 13:26, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
 * You have my approval to delete my blog post. Thanks for unblocking me. Annoying  Orange  andClassical Piano GABS 13:28, May 15, 2011 (UTC)

When something is blocked by the spam filter, that does not give you the right to bypass it. The content that is blocked is blocked for a reason, and intentionally going around it is grounds for a global block. The user I am referring to, do not talk about them, do not discuss them. The fact that you have autism is not relevant. The more you discuss this user the more unneeded attention they get and the more incentive to continue disrupting Wikia...by doing so you are facilitating such disruption and that is not allowed. I am trying to give you a LOT of leeway here with ample warnings, so please cooperate and continue your Wikia experience as if this user does not exist. Follow this guidance when you see such disruptive behavior from anyone on Wikia and report it to the VSTF so it can be dealt with accordingly. Thank you. -- 11:52, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I will not bypass it. Annoying  Orange  andClassical Piano GABS 11:55, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Thanks
No problem. Sir Wikilot  (talk page) 22:33, May 16, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Message
Thank you for the message. Wish granted, as always. You worked so hard on your musicology project, you deserve anything. :-)

I know and I understand your frustration. The bottom line is, don't worry about it. I am frustrated, too. I have wasted way too much time to get Charitwo into understanding your real intentions, but, with a lack of good attitude and mannerisms, just removed my posts and ignored them. How rude it is, don't you think?

It's always that people who have special abilities on a wiki always have a "I'm always right, you're always wrong" attitude and just ignores ANYTHING, without actually listening to anyone. Charitwo just feels and thinks he is above everybody without realizing he is actually very low. It's not your fault you're blocked. Obviously, that so-called "volunteer" just obviously blocked you to "punish" you, which on Wikipedia, is certainly disallowed.

Via email, I talked to M. mendel about this, who also disagrees with the way Charitwo acts with his "powers", so he generally avoids Wikis he administers; you should do the same. Charitwo always gives bad reasons for bloks like yours and mine; he blocked me for "abusing multiple accounts". WHAT?!?!?!?!?!?!?! I did NOT abuse ANY other account! The username "X2" was the only account i even registered! Man, i'll have to tell you my Wikia life in 2009 was excellent, but this volunteer is basically ruining our Wikia lives.

I can compile a WHOLE list of users who were supposed to be blocked for "trolling" but weren't. Obviously, Charitwo only blocked you with one thing in his mind: making you feel down. Don't be so frustrated about it. There's too many bad people in this world that, you know, you can't handle. Just pretend that they don't exist, and move on. Never come back to the Community Central. The community is so uncivil to you. I know how much this hurts. Just leave.

I do not know what I have to say to Charitwo, but obviously his out-of-line manners and bad atttitude will lead this place into nothing. Even M. mendel wonders why Wikia can hire such people? M. mendel wished he knew where these people came from. Just don't worry a thing. You'll get over it. He just errs too much to the side, and does his job incorrectly.

I know you made an attempt to justify yourself, but obviously, you didn't have access to your talk pge. it's kinda bad when that happens. even people on WIKIPEDIA who commited even worse crimes, still get to edit their talk pages. and if they couldn't edit their own talk pages, at least they still have Email. See?

Best wishes, X  treme  2 questions? 08:52, May 27, 2011 (UTC)