Thread:Tupka217/@comment-29970809-20200609034043/@comment-29970809-20200609072439

And I did contradict that and explained he was wrongly claimimg warning me - he claimed to block me because of editing disputes and forums. Thing is I editing disputes are common on wikis and there's nothing erong as long as you try to discuss a dispute. Only edit-wars are wrong as well as verbal escalation over them or endlessly disputing them.

I never once endlessly disputes over any editing dispute. Tupka however "solves" his own editing disputes by his adminship status and refuses to ever listen to others - opposite of how disputes should be resolved.

The other part about forums. Tupka did warn me about my behaviour on forums and I did listen to him. Now I did get involved on forum arguments but later I did start backing off many times if the argument got out of hand. I even reduced my forum activity.

However, Tupka didn't care. He just made up a reason to block me. You cite his first reply, but that just means you're trusting what he said and not me. Even if I tried to take most of the blame on me (though in actual I could easily dispute that), he's acting like I robbed someone. Not to mention, he never admits his own behaviour problems, otherwise the one who needs to be banned is him.