Board Thread:Support Requests - Getting Technical/@comment-29457887-20150913150630/@comment-4356266-20150915145802

MichiRecRoom wrote: Pardon me if I'm intruding, but I don't see anywhere where they say they want to censor some code. The example you gave, UserTags, was allowed by Staff in the first place -- unless they found a security exploit with that, I don't see how or why they would suddenly up and not allow it.

The reason for the Javascript review process is an attempt to prevent what happened previously from happening again. If you don't think Staff will understand some part of your code (and you think that that may end with them rejecting the revision), I'm pretty sure a //comment will work. Otherwise, there isn't much to worry about. You might be right, but again we can't be sure until we get to experience it ourselves. What our community and Staff consider malicious code might differ, and that is what OP might be worried about. For example, stuffs like z̕a̶͎̟l̼̳̫͎̬͘ͅͅg̣͓̪̩͕͟o̟̦̺͇̜-̪̼͙̼̗̭̼f̮̯͙̙̺̩̀y̞̦͉ͅͅì̦͈̳n̻̖͖̦͉̣̳g̴̞̯̭̪̣ texts on wikis and so on.