Thread:Sannse/@comment-1807002-20160401022418/@comment-1807002-20160401215937

There is no point any more, I left (but other editors seem to be discussing the poor admin behavoir) also talked to another wiki staff Thread:1017035. And if the other editors want to vote out their admins or make a new wiki on the same topic, they will have to decide as a community (then I'd come back). But it was mostly not allowing consensus/community discuss to even happen (silencing us), is IMO the abuse/remove worthy (as mentioned by one of the admins, "you are only non-admins"), we weren't allowed to discuss - so if we did put up a forum post we'd be told it doesn't count or possibly to be deleted - which is back to your blog posting on bad admins.

Belthazar451 wrote: What you're asking the consensus to do is to simply redefine "not working" to be the normal state - and by "consensus" you appear to mean just yourself and the two non-admins who happen to be this month's most frequent editors...

But I clearly said:

Hollowness wrote: BunsenH please write a ticket to Wikia, I do not get that error, I edit visual fine and so does Qwerty. If it only effects some visual editors those editors should at least contact wikia to see if it can be fixed. I mean is it 50% of visual editors, 80% or under 5%. Are we going to have the entire wiki dance around a minority of editors who may only provide the least amount of contributions that refuse to edit in source? To me the most frequent contributors are Qwerty and Forevakill. If our rolls were reversed I would try to see how they feel on this, then a forum community discussion so even the minor editors can have a say.

Edit: Especially, all that work around for something broken and possibly only used only by the minority! The minority who can just in the meantime edit in a mode it does allow for the articles in question (which may be a rare occurrence already), I swear the admin fighting this has on purpose started editing on those pages more only to fuel their point (I checked their contributions they usually only edit the articles in question to rollback vandalism (which doesn't require going into edit mode), and other housekeeping on pages that it doesn't effect) until it is fixed or Classic mode is removed. I just feel we are accommodating 1-2 admins (who hardly edit on the pages effected) over a community (but we won't know till they allow community discussion).