Thread:Sannse/@comment-1747445-20120829001051/@comment-4712589-20120829121533

IcecreamKitten : Noone has bullied anyone. Not one bit. The reason why I believe you have no right to an opinion is that you have no understanding of the issue at hand. Members of the Fallout wiki had joined the chat, it was assumed to be another chat invasion. Moderators acted as they were expected too, tried to calm the situation and banned those who had refused to comply, members were then blocked for their harassing behaviour following the ban. All our members are free to contest a chat ban, but the contest must not be offensive, or accusative; which is what half of the contests were. What made the issue worse was that Fallout admins had come to the chat to contest a ban on another users behalf, this is against our policy. Diplomatic conversations were held with Fallout admins in an attempt to fix any cross-wiki issues, and a statement by myself was made that users could use the wiki email system to contest the ban in a polite manner, where it would be reviewed accordingly. We have followed protocol accordingly, and have given each user the option to have their ban removed if they were banned. But, being as most bans were actually only two hours long, and intended to prevent the users from rejoining the chat for a short period of time whilst the disruption was delt with, the bans have now expired.

GarouxBloodline: If we are going to define discrimination, it would be allowing members to abuse and insult the Halo Nation community due to the few actions made by only a few members. The fact that Halo Nation was labeled as an abusive community who are all stuck-up assholes is discrimination, and does not differ from judging a civilasition based on the acts of a group of people.