User blog comment:Semanticdrifter/Digital Protest Against the FISA Improvements Act/@comment-75.164.227.241-20140205235438/@comment-23.115.232.79-20140206013746

It sounds like your using child abuse as way to justify the loss of privacy. Sure sure sure, there can be cameras everywhere an the government can promise it's just to "protect the children from being abused" because "they will always come when called" but how true is that? I mean, I heard a story how a mother and her kids heard an intruder break into their home and they called the Police but the Police didn't show up until 3 hours later and by then the guy was long gone. I was taught that if someone breaks in, go get a weapon, call the police, then prepare to defend yourself whatever the cost. You can't depend on the government for everything, why do you think we have so many unemployed people? People now-a-days are too lazy to take steps and do things themselves. The government can only do so much and, unfortunately, some politicians take the governments duty too far. If we had camera's everywhere, imagine how many could be arrested just because their opinion was different from the politician's? While child abuse is horrible, it does NOT justify a non-online version of PIPA or SOPA. For child abuse, lets focus on helping the children heal by seeing a phycologist and getting some therapy...No it wont solve the problem completely but it might be a step in the right direction.