Thread:Sannse/@comment-1807002-20160401022418/@comment-1807002-20160404212504

BunsenH's solution and yours is not a solution it is a work around to accomodate the bug (a bug for an obsolete editor that is already banned on some wikis! And it looks like only 2 people use it they just happen to be the admins). In the end admins are saying they are banning templates within infoboxes and templates within templates. Which should be a community decision! That is and always has been my argument. I know I was no peach in the matter but advocating that it should have been a community desicion and not an admin alone desicion, was not a bad thing to do.

I really don't want them removed (re-read my first post here), I just wanted to know if not allowing consensus when the community demands it, is bad admin practice (remove worthy). I actually do not want admins removed but if the community does for not then letting them have a vote then they should be aware they were being bad admins. I just wanted to let the remaining community know their rights.

As for import/export yeah, I pretty much did contribute to every page and the ones I didn't I am sure the other editors did. But the other editors hasn't gotten back to me so I figure she has moved on or taking a break to decide what to do next.

Don't bother to mention your work around (BunsenH pretty much out right refuses to edit in source and it looks like the source editors left) in the end admins are saying it's their way or the highway, and consensus doesn't matter (and it looks like at the cost of the three most active editors). I am confused why you and them want to accommodate a bug at the cost of limiting template use to us source editors without getting community consensus on the matter.