Thread:Reg Boy/@comment-26092363-20180420123048/@comment-24971252-20180420141653

Just because you think your edits were good doesn't mean they were in fact good. When someone reverts an edit you have made and you feel like it was done for "no good reason", you should ask them why in a polite way and try to reach consensus instead of resorting to snide comments and cheap threats saying you want to punch the user in the face (which is far from being "critical" as you so lightly put, and cannot be justified).

You can't just go around throwing shade at every person who you think has some sort of personal vendetta against you just because they happened to revert edits that you made and thought were good. You are expected to have common decencies and to follow the rules which repeatedly state that you are not allowed to cause disruption of any kind or taunt/provoke/disrespect/insult/abuse/harass/flame other editors.

Also: nothing says "I wanted to solve the problem in a civilized manner" like starting your appeal with the word "lol" and then simply ending it with a screenshot of the issue in question like you don't even care. Stop being so disingenuous.

And when I say your history, I mean your past violations which led you to your first block. Your block log plays a factor in how long you get blocked for the next time you commit a rule violation.