Thread:ProfessorLumius/@comment-26453067-20190202185004/@comment-26453067-20190204014418

ProfessorLumius wrote: He broke Rule 2 many times, which says that all articles gotta look the same

He broke Rule 7 two times, which says that deleting information is forbidden

He constantly acted like a grammar god; i mean its fine to correct grammar mistakes, but everytime he used to say 'bad' or 'horrible grammar' every single time he edited something. Sometimes it about like two or three mistakes and he gotta say bad english, tbh this actually offends me. He once said horrible grammar because of one mistake, like seriously?! ONE mistake! This also offended more people.

He used to say that i make articles look stupid or bad because i make them look like how i want. Appereantly he forgot that we (Me and another admin) decide, how the articles gotta look like. NOT him.

He was acting like an admin by giving people reminders which is not his job.

He has removed names from the Cut Content article such as Awesomejoker or RazorDaBoss, without any reason even though they found out about most of the stuff. Even if he didnt know he could have asked them before. Plus he did not credit the pages where he got the informations from. it's not right to take someone else's info and put it onto your article without source.

Pretty much we were all more or less pissed of him - He said he would not break a rule again but guess what one day after our discussion he replaced actual information with false information which means he broke Rule 7 again Well, I am replying to you, Lumius:

I am not a "grammar god", but no way I could put the summaries like "What the heck are you trying to say?" or  "Learn to write better". That's unacceptable as directly flaming to them.

No, not all pages look bad, but the only thing that makes it to look bad is poor organization, poor grammar, formatting, etcetera.

I know it's not my job, but all non-admins have the right to give reminders, warnings, or last warnings to other users except admins.