User blog comment:MisterWoodhouse/Social Activity, the 2010 Editor, and Unpausing Migrations/@comment-37371166-20200922174318/@comment-44236894-20200923182234

I think you're blowing this out of proportion. An edited comment is usually only edited because of typos, updated information that is essential to the main post and etc. Not whatever this ungodly terror you seem to be talking about. And honestly, I can't make head nor tail of what you're saying. Basic English, please.

The issue is that this indirectly encourages spam on Discussions and that it creates unnecessary hurdles to get through. I don't think you seem to be reading a single post I've made, because I've made that clear from the get-go.

I'm not the one making this out to be the worst thing ever, I'm pointing out that this is an unnecessary feature to Discussions that only hinders regular users and encourages spam. There are definitely worse things with this platform such as the health concerning blinding white background, but I'm simply pointing out that this improvement really isn't an improvement. To be completely honest, I feel it's you whose being rather absurd and coming here, telling people that their criticism on this subject is invalid - the people giving out their criticism on Discussions have valid points, even if they're going about it in ridiculous ways. I find it honestly saddening that you're really quick to dismiss these points over a few strongly opinionated people.

Look, I'm of the opinion that UCP isn't completely bad, nor is it completely good - there are valid points on both sides, but both sides need to listen to the others' points. I have been taking your words into consideration, now please acknowledge mine.