Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-1409530-20150828021235/@comment-397677-20150831182049

Jdogno7 wrote:

66.87.116.193 wrote: In each of your blocks, you had either made unwanted changes (and were told this, had used improper grammar repeatedly (or tried to "correct" improper grammar that was actually already correct), or try to use your own terms to describe things that were never actually discussed in the topic of the wiki you are adding them to. The best case of the latter reason is your constant demand for deity to be used, but in almost every case deity was not used, and you were told to stop. You would then continue doing it anyway, despite being told not to, and would then be blocked. You can quote every sentence back to me because you "don't understand", but everything was clearly stated, so there really is no need. "In each of your blocks,...": Where specifically?

"...you had either made unwanted changes (and were told this,...": There were plenty of cases where nobody told me until I was actually blocked.

"...had used improper grammar repeatedly (or tried to "correct" improper grammar that was actually already correct),...": I disagree on that.

"...or try to use your own terms to describe things that were never actually discussed in the topic of the wiki you are adding them to.": I never made up the word deity.

"The best case of the latter reason is your constant demand for deity to be used, but in almost every case deity was not used, and you were told to stop.": Even you admit that the term deity was okay in some instances.

"You would then continue doing it anyway, despite being told not to, and would then be blocked.": Plenty of times nobody told me not to or even why not to until they blocked me. i understand your hurt friend,let me tell a personal experience that im passing in this moments,in inciclopedia the rules are so stiff and hard and let the administrators free road to commit several faults against the newbie users or even to tyranize some wikis,even shielding in the fact that Inciclopedia is a "spanish humor wiki" they use their internal rules as guns for banning anyone who let used to attack their personal interests.even if you deliver correct references and knowing about the theme the inciclopedian administrators treats you as a traitor according to their rules,one administrator called Argentoinciclope took advantage of this and like that time that i have been blocked in 2008 by another spanish administrator called Chixpy for the same personal motifs according to his humor,of course some school friends supported me but now i have been alone to deal with this abusive administration bureau of inciclopedia even if i have been put some effort investigating about a theme and having the necessary knowledge to make fun of anything(for example in rockabilly i have been researched a lot of things before i can put the satyrized article in inciclopedia,but the admins didnt want to research about the themes,so at certain point they could block you because this lazyness didnt permit to them to understand the article´s main line. to make fun of somethings you ll have to know about certain themes) he userblocked me by their own guts assuming that supposedly i broke the rules,but if you want to read them they didnt have updated to prevent this sever abuse of authority, so i can understand you friend,also i posted my complaint in original wikia because i didnt trust in spanish version of wikia because they could turn at favor of the inciclopedia admin without a pacific solution. i didnt have anything against Argentoinciclope because he was so aware that i was used to be a veteran user of inciclopedia even he was so patient with some newbies even supporting them and he´s an excellent person but the power had rised up to his head and let him took this userblock without thinking about it.. anyway i repeat this i can understand you. see ya pal.