Board Thread:New Features/@comment-5275700-20150722200934/@comment-5558012-20150724141939

I've had mixed feeling about anons for a while. Anons vandalize, new accounts vandalize. I understand why anons edit as anons. I think editing as an anon is a good transition for a non-editor to an editor (after you know you are going to edit regularly I think you should make an account to fit into the community better - it's not difficult; creating an email is easy and you don't have to post any personal information to the public). Since I think anon editing should be temporary (you either don't make additional edits or you do and should create an account), I think limiting anon editing ability as noted above as well as further advertising all the benefits of an account to anons is a good alternative to disabling anon editing at an Admin's whim or (less likely) globally if Wikia wants to promote more account creation.