Board Thread:New Features/@comment-4151266-20150615172420/@comment-4151266-20150620172104

Ripto22475 wrote: I feel like that feature could be potentially unfair to certain people, if it were not an appropriate admin. And since admins have the say on their Wiki's, no one could really argue with them. Not to say all admins would abuse that, but having the possibility to remove people as they please without any consequences is a small flaw. I could see removing people from leaderboard as a Staff request (similar to how you request a Wiki to be closed, and list your reasons why).
 * Have the ability to hide users from leaderboard - This means that admins can remove inactive users or users who cheated their way on the board and just show the users who actually try


 * Have the ability to add and remove specific achievements - A while ago I had a user complain that they had edited everyday, yet were not given the achievement. I was able to confirm that they had done so, but I was unable to help them. If admins had this ability, they could very easily fix these situations.

Same as above. A feature that could potentially be abused.

Otherwise, your other suggestions are quite nice. Again, as I've said before. Being admin in theory and hopefully in practice should be a very high honor. If the community has decided that a user has done so remarkably well that they deserve the extra responsibility and abilities, then that admin should not abuse their power. That is, if they have been chosen well. But then again, if an admin were to go rogue, it is not like these features are the only things that could be abused. The admin could go around deleting and renaming pages causing terrible damage, yet those are features that are not staff requests.