Thread:Matthew Schroeder/@comment-38729545-20190724212729/@comment-38729545-20190928070302

“I still see we got supposedly Low 1A. While one can argue this is a argument of semantics, I now understand the appeal for it is rather lacking in term of design.

There is no true Baseline for Low 1A as scientifically speaking and legitimately speaking.

There is no mathematical equation in the attempt to explain it in a way that goes with infinite dimensional space ie. it is completely relevant for High 1B in the first place.

Now in regards to Tier 1A since I see people are severely discussing that particular part of the proposal to death.

I would recommend a new thread as the arguments back and forth is annoying with me trying to read it back given the fact I decided to reread the entire thread to broaden my perspective of the matter at hand.

While I look at this.

Now before anyone says anything, I do like to note that while the theory behind infinite dimensional space is there, it is.... Well how do I put it?

Severely complicated as a lot of work would have to been done if we decide to revise the tiering simply for 1A and as much as I hate to say it.

We do have some verses that is currently 1A at the moment.

Using Size in a 1A cosmological structure is... How I put it illogical and paradoxically speaking.

Yes it is true size can be used, but in the case of size being judged in higher dimensional spaces. Well... again it is simply not something to being used as at that point size is rather trivial to those beings.

I get that size is being used and all, but size is a measurement stick that should not be used in the case of higher dimensional as it is again simply that. A measurement to begin with.”