Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-1409530-20170424120651

I was given this post concerning a block on the Law and Order wiki:

"This is the only post I will make on this matter: I might consider allowing you to edit your talk page a year from when you were blocked. I see no need to do so now, and believe it would be unproductive for everyone involved, as nothing I have seen suggests a high likelihood your behavior would change. You are, in fact, doing at this moment what others have said you have done to others- bothered people on other wikis to demand explanations of things that you should already be aware of. If you want to show evidence that you have changed or can change your behavior, start by accepting the block and request reconsideration in a year. That's the best offer I'm going to give you. I will have no further comment on this matter, and if you respond to this message, I will lengthen the time in which I will reconsider your talk page access."

"You are, in fact, doing at this moment what others have said you have done to others- bothered people on other wikis to demand explanations of things that you should already be aware of.": How unfair is that? To be accused of bothering other people to respond to obvious questions that I should already know the answer to. I can't even ask who those people are who have made such accusations against me.

"If you want to show evidence that you have changed or can change your behavior, start by accepting the block and request reconsideration in a year. That's the best offer I'm going to give you. I will have no further comment on this matter, and if you respond to this message, I will lengthen the time in which I will reconsider your talk page access.": I have been given a trial in absentia. The result of which is an unfair sentence which I cannot appeal until it is up. I am being threatened with a longer sentence if I attempt to appeal this one. 