Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-3123413-20150710073456/@comment-1267828-20150710150243

Lukisiak wrote: Good morning, I've came here with some, important matter.

Few days ago I applied to the support wiki about degradation of ExtroyerBlackTiger on Max Steel Wiki. They told me that I should come here and discuss with you, what do you think about this.

Here is reasons why he shouldn't be an administator of their Wikia:
 * Copying/Stealing CSS code from another projects (and the most important, without any question for allow to do this and without giving any credits or attribution in code section)
 * Banning me for fake-reasons (in my case it were "Intimidating behaviour/harassment", what of course I never did)
 * Banning my friends for no reasons (2 users and one unregistrated contributor, that were on my side)
 * Calling me 12yrs old child
 * Calling me invader and insulting me by suspecting me for vandalize, when I came with clear purposes to their project
 * Giving blockades in rule of "because I can", "because I wanted"...
 * Blocking person for "Revenge" (BlockList from their Wikia)
 * Prohibiting my activities on this wikia, when I didn't break any rules. :/
 * Maybe not very important, by closing my thread, where I pleased for giving credits on my copied CSS code, what is for me not counting with the other person and his opinion

I really don't know what to do. Help me. Say what you think about this whole case. Also I'm really sorry for my english. Here's actually a very well written blog by Sannse that can reply to a lot of what you said: User_blog:Sannse/Why_staff_don't_remove_bad_admins.

I also must say the same as the other two, admins can ban for any reason, or no reason. Now as for the coding thing, I do believe they are required to give you credit for it since it is your code.