User blog comment:Rupert Giles/Layout Changes: Breakpoints and Typography/@comment-24844472-20150525075654/@comment-2126441-20150527205516

@ 452; Just read my stuff and you would know.

@ Tupka; Of course I am "obviously" wrong. Odd how it doesn't seem so obvious for over thousands of people. Not exactly the definition of obvious I would hold.

There are far more people who complain. You don't see everyone here, I already know 4 people of my Wiki complained here, and I know a few others who complained at 'home' but not here. You only see the tip of the iceberg here. Not the other way around.

And again, if the majority according to you "see nothing different" what's the entire POINT of this update? Please, do tell me. Cause I'm tired of this 'improvement' or 'It's for the tablets!' crap.

Tables have a gigantic use in providing large sums of information in an easy overviewable payload. Everyone knows that. That's being learned at basic school. Yes, it's not *the* primary way for information, but it's damned useful. So why harm their usefulness with the font increase etc.? If you don't know when to use a table and when not, you should not run a Wikia or other information page.

Then perhaps the sollution would be to have tablets use the mobile skin... being mobile at all.

You know... instead of THIS?

Tablet doesn't use mobile-skin = they're desktop must be the stupidest way of thinking I've seen on this discussion thus far. Though it does seem to confirm with the ideas and thoughts of the Wikia staff.

"this is better than Fluid Layout was on all of them" HAHAHAHA. Oh, you crack me up man.