Board Thread:New Features/@comment-26079046-20160930170455/@comment-5558012-20161005015101

TK-999 wrote: The way I implemented the new logic is that each tag has hardcoded importance, so it'd work as you said—rollback would only show if the user has no global groups and its second most important local group is rollback, or if the user has global groups and their only local group is rollback. I'll hardcode something into UserTags. On the wiki in question, 98% of users that are ever a rollbacker are part of a custom group, but not all of the custom group/tag consists of rollback editors (so editing the MediaWiki message is pointless).

How I see it is that if your highest user group includes all the "rights" of lower groups, the lower groups should never be shown. I'd love to see the day in which bureaucrats/admins can't appoint users to lower level local groups if they contain the same tools of a higher group the user's already appointed to. Avoid all this unnecessary duplication.