Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-1417834-20140208041633/@comment-1417834-20140209185209

The simple fact is that what matters is the actual CC-BY-SA license, not blog posts or a companies policy on the license. So separating such a simple amount of information through 3 clicks to link to the license on the article being copied, 2 clicks to link to the hidden history dropdown, does not follow the requirement to reasonably label it when it could be done in a single place with 1 link to each. Also indicating the license and indicating that the content is being reused under the license are different things.

"The credit required by this Section 4(c) may be implemented in any reasonable manner; provided, however, that in the case of a Adaptation or Collection, at a minimum such credit will appear, if a credit for all contributing authors of the Adaptation or Collection appears, then as part of these credits and in a manner at least as prominent as the credits for the other contributing authors.  "

Edit:

Also from section 4a: " You must keep intact all notices that refer to this License and to the disclaimer of warranties with every copy of the Work You Distribute or Publicly Perform"

The restrictions of the license are notices that refer to the license. So they must be kept intact and not broken apart.