Board Thread:Support Requests - Community Management/@comment-26079046-20150807150131/@comment-385629-20150820010030

Hi. Yes, the original SubGenius wikia did not use forums nor any of the 'social' features, as we used our pre-existing fora hosted elsewhere. Wikia is (was?) a platform for us, and while I happily watched new content added, I didn't jump in until the site was adopted.

I most certainly understand the technical operation of a wiki, especially mediawiki. As indicated, we weren't using the social aspects so that was very much a void.

I have NEVER demanded a proof of identity, only a proof of membership in the Church as the wiki itself is by and for SubGenius ministers. It would be useful to know if the folks who have taken over control of content and gatekeeping are actual ministers. I'm concerned that once I've been stripped of privileges, the site will cease to be relevant to SubGenii. I've never stated that the Church overrules wikia, merely that the *purpose* of the wiki's existence (as noted in http://subgenius.wikia.com/wiki/SubGenius_Wikia_Clench:About ) is to be used by and for SubGenii.

"Very few" is an understatement. There are precisely three active editors, myself (#2 from the founder) and two folks who came in together from the Discordian wiki. They are friends, worked together on Discordian wiki and sexuality wiki, and flatly just seem to be interested in forcing me out. I've just given up as I don't care about wikia politics, just used to care about providing good content.