Board Thread:New Features/@comment-10452902-20170128021601/@comment-26402117-20170205235845

Here's an example article and template I tested in Chrome, from w:c:de.supernatural.


 * Sam Winchester article = 408px, preview = 408px.
 * Template:Quote = 694px, preview = 694px.

At a quick look, alignment and font size is replicated 1:1. The preview is also exactly what appears before purging - I recall that a new portable infobox draft shows no infobox and a bold link in the preview. It is very safe at this point to assume that the OP's issue isn't widespread or replicable. reply to #28 I see this thread didn't exactly have a defined topic in the first place. Any tangents are not surprising. The New Features board gets used to discuss specifics of new features, not to complain about them. This new topic is not fit for the forum.

Having such a number of new products - including a User Activity feed, Insights, Portable Infobox elements, ImportJS for Dev scripts, a defined design system, a for-purpose mobile skin alongside an unrelated editorial platform - isn't just about mobile readers (and nobody cared about them before). I think that conflates different issues and makes it harder to address each one.

Seeing people here turn their roles into "camps" like "desktop users" and "wiki editors" annoys me. This site is about social collaboration. That's making the experience of interacting and working with other users #1, while finding ways to interface with your readers. There is probably an even chance that your wiki users are mobile users. We simply have to balance that.

If your readers are getting an issue with ads or the content adaptability of your wiki, you should definitely care. Yet it's been said repeatedly that finding venues to complain and unduly conflate is not going to work. You should adopt a mindset where you push for any fix or feature in the fastest venue and avoid making that harder.