Board Thread:Support Requests - Community Management/@comment-24460960-20200810104852/@comment-25014407-20200810142308

It might not be directly related to the original situation, but it still might be good to keep in mind that some sources are more reliable than others. If you're looking at a lot of fan-created content or forums which all say one thing (not official), then there are quite some wikis that will not allow it on the content pages. There are wikis that don't allow fan theories (or non-confirmed assumptions) on the wiki at all, but that really depends on local policies. In regards to not removing old speculations, as Tupka said, there is a chance that it is just missed; I am admin on a wiki with a lot of (long) pages, and it's just not possible to check on them all every day, and even if I check on the pages themselves, I mainly look at the headings that need improving.

The line between confirmed content and assumptions is very fine, and it is possible that one thing in your eyes counts as confirmed, while for another it's an assumption. Most admins, especially ones who have been on the wiki for a long time, are very specific with things like that, and with all the first-time users thinking they know better and add stuff like that on pages repeatedly, admins can get annoyed quite quickly.