Board Thread:Support Requests - Community Management/@comment-35355617-20180501232000/@comment-1267828-20180508002752

Fandyllic wrote: Anons can be the life blood of some wikis, but you can't generalize. I've never seen anons make major contributions consistently for more than a very short period of time. I'm talking about encyclopedic wikis and not fanons, RP, or wikis based around conversations or original stories. My wiki is an ecyclopedic wiki, and I do get frequent views and edits.

I did specifically state that they are the life blood of my wiki, the situation can differ, but I can only offer an opinion regarding my situation, and I do not feel, in my case, that anything I said is misleading since it is true for my wiki and that's what I'm talking about.

The situation may differ person-to-person, but I'm just giving my two-cents on the topic. I'm not trying to intrude on anyone else's opinions, I'm just giving my side to allow OP to factor it in.