Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25818071-20150707184123/@comment-1267828-20150709195219

TheChickenLawyer wrote: it depends n where you go. people need to lear that we have free speech and you cant get upset over peoples opinions. no one is going to sit there and be controlled. not everyone likes what 1 person likes. they dont want to hear the TRUTH about certain things. yes the wiki i was on was about a shw.. point is i said what needed to be said. Most people were raised not to like bad people or criminal  activity. there is a character that acts "bad" & i told the truth! they didnt like it. why idk.

would you like someone if they forced 12 girls to take nude pics for money then framed their friend for the crime? we both know the answer to that. Firstly, Freedom of Speech does not exist online. The Freedom of Speech only extends to Public Domain, entities which are government operated. Wikia is not government operated, nor are most websites, and that means your Freedom of Speech is incredibly limited, and most of it fails to apply once you come online. For that matter, over half of your rights as a citizen of any country are stripped from you once you enter cyberspace.

Secondly, a question with an obviously bad answer is incredibly one sided when you're applying it to a given situation. If I was involved in a car accident with a deer and some animal rights activist said "Would you just run puppies over for fun?" Well of course I wouldn't do that, but hitting a deer by accident isn't the same as something inhumane like what I said. By making a rather stupid question like "Would you let someone force someone else to take risque photo's", then obviously it's a bad situation, but your question is so basic and bare bones it's obvious you're trying to trail the answer to your benefit. If you're going to make ego-stroking comments like you own diamonds and it takes bear tranquilizers to stop you, then fine, but don't debase bad admins like they're evil and clearly not right in any situation. There are bad admins out there, but a lot of these 'bad admins' aren't actually bad. Maybe strict, maybe rude, maybe even rough and tumble, but debasing them to 'evil' is incredibly asinine.

That kind of thing definitely upsets me, when one part just outright assumes and insults another on the basis that they're totally wrong and should be punished or talked bad about. Admins are volunteer individuals who don't come to wikia with the intent to destroy wikia (at least most of them), and Staff and other users are the same.