Thread:Simon Peter Hughes/@comment-35860218-20201029193610

Hello Simon,

May I ask which specific part of my edit summary you considered unsatisfactory to you? I find it strange that action was taken arbitrarily, despite there not being any message or proper warning beforehand. From what I can see alone in Literawiki's Special:Log, this appears to be a reoccurring situation.

An opinion of mine is that any leader, whether it be the leader of a nation or the leader of a group of friends, should be able to accept and appreciate constructive criticism.

Know that I am not accusing you of not being able to accept suggestions. I am just wondering if and how you might've taken my constructive criticism the wrong way.

There was more to the edit summary that got cut off (as you may be able to tell from the abrupt ending of "anyway") which included more suggestions with good intentions. If you are curious about what I have to say, I'd be happy to voice those opinions, but I'll wait until you give me clear permission/acceptance beforehand.

As for the page that you deleted — may I ask why you believed that no one else would contribute to the page? And why is that a reason to delete the page?

Just clicking Random Page once brings me to the page Horowitz Horror (novel). That page only has 1 contributor (not including you) and is dramatically small, and has been for 8 years.

The Wings of Fire community is not a small group of fans. So why would you assume that no one else would contribute to the page?

These questions are not accusing you in any way or sort. I just want to hear your point of view.

Regards,
 * Bloodfrost 