User blog comment:DaNASCAT/Template Types: A Smarter Categorization System/@comment-24930713-20151125100824

I don't like the forced "must do" attitude of this feature, as it blocks changes to a template until an option is chosen; which isn't at all apparent. While I like the idea of better features pertaining to templates and how they display on mobile.I don't understand how more of these aren't already on your radar beforehand. I've been to some wildly different wikis, but most of the time their templates either stay the same as when the wiki was made or they follow a similar path as other wikis. For example, most of the wikis I've seen, and random people that tend to edit, use the defualt 'blockquote' format.

Regardless, I agree with a lot of other people. Documentation needs its own type, dumping it in with non-article just turns it into a miscellaneous repository. At the very least, there needs to be sub types for non-article templates, so it can be categorized better. And a log of some kind needs to be added. I'd hate to have to try and keep track of people's edits on the off chance that they may change something they're not supposed regarding a template's type.

So what exactly does this mean in terms of how it displays on mobile? Will it finally look like a smaller version of our wiki pages?