Thread:Merrystar/@comment-34517467-20180801171849/@comment-11001-20180802055057

No, I do not believe it is necessary to renew your offer to shorten his block. You are well within your rights to block him, and you are in no way "ruining" the wiki as he claims.

There is absolutely no rule that says you cannot create stub pages; if the wiki were all stubs, or you never went back and filled them in then it might not be very good but most wikis have at least some pages that still need expanding, and a few that have no categories, and it does not do them any harm. It's part of wiki maintenance to go through and clean these types of pages up periodically but there is no shame in having them in the first place.

And as I said before, there is no reason why you cannot layout pages the way you want them to be laid out, or name them the way you want them named. Just because wikipedia makes a choice about these things does not mean that your wiki has to follow the same convention.

Wikis are about collaboration. A good admin is part of that collaboration -- they listen and make decisions about wiki policies with the rest of the community. However that does not mean they have to give in to the opinion of every user who complains about something on the wiki -- both sides should be listening and working to find a compromise or solution as well. If a user is not willing to listen or to follow local policies, does not accept the admin's decisions or is deliberately disrespectful, then it is okay to block them.