User blog comment:MisterWoodhouse/Social Activity, the 2010 Editor, and Unpausing Migrations/@comment-1967967-20201001141931/@comment-1807002-20201001192406

As much as I'd like to give staff the "try to work on highly complex wikis/infoboxes/templates like I do" it usually backfires with "that is not how wikis/infoboxes/templates were intended to be used" -.-; and when I have given a rebuttal "ok, then do what I do- in same or less effort with same result". And in the past not only could they not provide and/or they stopped responding.

I have a feeling one or more of my old wikis will completely break beyond worth repairing and the only reason I am not up in arms is that they are retired app games (how many will care on getting info on an app game 1-10+ years gone) anyways but still.

And I have been trying to advise staff since day 1 that high edit count users need to be better considered (and biggest win so far is the 2010 editor- I complained a lot over that other source code editing in visual mode). I am imo a lower high-count-editor (I take long breaks some cases years at a time) over 160,000 edits in 10 years (over 100,000 May 2019 to now). Some of it is getting through but not when I told them before the migrations- only after with heads exploding XD