Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-22224-20180521161500/@comment-17600586-20180524091033

Romartus wrote: Dogman15 wrote: Romartus wrote:

Raltseye wrote: Indeed. We should all follow WikiDex's example and call it FANDOOM to differentiate it from all the actual good Fandoms out there stained by this corrupted company's presense. You're welcome to Uncyclopedia to create an article about the evils of Fandoom. http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Wikia or https://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/Wikia will do nicely. Aha, I am aware there is an article in existence. An updated one the talks about Fandoom would be interesting. We have something like this on the désencyclopédie, but it is more about censorship.