Thread:Assaltwaffle/@comment-24503208-20190329172524/@comment-24503208-20190329182222

Oh the reasoning for the first point is incorrect.

Let me rephrase the first point :

"1. We should not assume that destroying a universe is equivalent to destroying all of space and time. The reason is for this, we don't know if the character is destroying just all matter and space or they are destroying space and time in conjunction."

Anyway beside that. I should add some more points to this: "Wait a minute about this part: Because we shouldn’t assume that when a character says “I’ll destroy the universe” they are referring only to the observable universe, which is just a region of the universe (space time). We shouldn’t have to see a statement about time to be considered Low 2-C, time and space are two sides of the same coin."

They are not two sides of the same coin. Where did you get that from?

Like I get the whole "Space and time interact with one-another part while if separated from one another, they are physically meaningless.", but that only happens applied to physic where time is treated as a measurement. The other definition of time according to Wikipedia is this : "Time is the indefinite continued progress of existence and events that occur in apparently irreversible succession from the past through the present to the future."

Thus I have doubts about this.