Thread:Antvasima/@comment-31488154-20180403040734/@comment-31488154-20180403045638

Antvasima wrote: I am not even involved in deciding almost any statistics. I mostly just try to help out with keeping the content revision threads on track.

Anyway, I will quote your post to see if the others change their minds. I noticed you said I had crude language

would you not describe those sort of discussions as crude? how is there a polite way to describe what people have said?

how many  ways are there to take those sort of comments? literally 3/3 of my complaints all came from moderators that is a 100% ratio

moderator A says she will be on the top and he is on the bottom and moderator B says " As long as she can manipulate the boundary between fatigue and energized,"

how many different ways can you take that statement besides being a clear innuendo for sex?

should mods NOT be held up to the same rules as the users if not be held to even HIGHER standards than us?

where are THEIR warnings/bans?

why can moderators just go around and say whatever sexual bullshit they like about these female characters and its ok?