Thread:Andrewds1021/@comment-45117243-20201111034700/@comment-45117243-20201117040910

I realized they may don't like it but I'll give it a try.

Maybe allowing only templates and using the "page" property for the parse rather than the "text" property is less expensive - I think the parsed version is already stored with the page, and they already allowed something similar with the WallGreeting script.

The problem with this method is that it's not a real transclution - it will show up &lt;noinclude&gt; parts and ommit &lt;includeonly&gt; parts, but maybe this can be worked around.