Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26321732-20160216183027/@comment-5558012-20160217132003

Nerfmaster8 wrote: ok so basically based on those search results is staff going to keep this forced change considering it actually Harmed SEO ratings rather than helped?

i mean a drop from like 7.2 to 6.1 isn't much but since those numbers correspond to above average to average, I would consider this to be unfortunately a failed project... Isn't a lower position (number) really a higher position in searches?

Ciencia Al Poder wrote: ...most wikis have an important natural increase of traffic between December 20th and January 10th... Most definitely true. Munkapedia was higher during that period due to Christmas and a new film (three of the top queries shown related directly to the film). Higher traffic was already expected and can't really be attributed to the change in page titles.

My question is what are the more historic numbers?