Thread:Hollytuft/@comment-26382471-20151128142107/@comment-6548012-20151128153436

You've read all about what? Just watched the videos, the art is been turned to ridicule, and given new æsthetics, which would in theory, be a fair use of the art. But the changes aren't significant enough to give it new meaning, so, it is copyright infringement. What she could do though, is just give attribution to the authors of the art, since the wiki's licence is CC-BY-SA 3.0.