Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment--20150814190019/@comment-2200849-20150814223215

DEmersonJMFM wrote: I'm not a JS programmer. I don't write scripts from nothing therefore I don't need a console. I can, however, follow directions with scripts that others have written and allow users to use. Having to get someone to review use of scripts that already exist or when someone forgets say a comma is a negative of code review. If that review takes as long as it takes for a response from Staff (even longer over the weekend), it's not worth Staff having to go through these tedious reviews or subjective users to the wait to an update (or fix from lack of comma).

Staff have stated that commonly used code snippets will be grouped into a kind of code library, allowing for easy reuse. This should make the whole JS editing process smoother in the long run as the library gets populated with scripts for all kinds of purposes, all verified by Staff and easily includable.

As for those annoying minor bugs, I'd argue that pasting the script into your console before saving is a rock-solid way of squashing them. Your console will always throw an error if you messed up the syntax.