User blog comment:MisterWoodhouse/Social Activity, the 2010 Editor, and Unpausing Migrations/@comment-26587726-20200930195731

So, how are choices of removing Classic Editor, turning Wiki Activity into graphical vomit, and getting rid of tabview, thus turning thousands of pages on numerous wikis into mush, "good" decisions to update this platform? How does this new format manage to ruin both usability AND appearances of wikis? I can hardly call remotely any of what this changes improvements, they're just downgrades and downgrades layered ontop of one another, breaking entire wikis worth of pages.

I'm so baffled, and confused, and frustrated, and the phrase "thank you for all of your continued feedback" makes no sense because all I've heard from others is that negative criticism in regards to this new format is not cared for and completely ignored. I honestly don't mean to be passive-aggressive, but all of these feels incredibly spiteful, like we're intentionally not going to be given alternatives for what's been removed or changed, and that's the farthest thing from a good look for this platform.

Even if not used by everyone, the Classic Editor is necessary in creating pages, because what we have now is not at ALL simplistic to use.

Wiki Activity looked clean and simple to manuever. Recent Changes is legimately hard to look at. Why is everything tiny? Why are different activites separated into unneeded columns?

Tabview is an ABSOLUTE NECESSITY. There's HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS of wiki pages that used it and depended on it for years. Removing it honestly feels like the equilvalent of amputating the dominant hand of a grown adult.

Please give us alternatives.