User blog comment:DaNASCAT/Technical Update: November 22, 2011/@comment-1298786-20111124232028

Hmmm. Scary. TMI (too much info) for a general audience. Seems you are writing for somebody with the same interests in the technical details as you the bug fixer has. That generally will not be the case.

It would help if you could flag the useful distinctions. As I read I get the impression the fixes will fall into one of several categories.
 * 1) Thing that were recently broken and that are now recently fixed.
 * 2) Long standing things that were broken and are now either recently fixed or recently made worse. No way of telling until the feedback comes in. You of course will believe they are recently fixed.
 * 3) Improvements that apply to one flavor of wiki but not another. Please help me quickly filter what applies to me from what doesn't. I.E. Clump changes and let me know upfront what flavor. I don't need to spend time on things that do not effect my site.

I could also use some insight and guidance about the reason a fix is considered important. For example when you allow me to do something useful or nifty that I could not do before.

This is all immediate feedback from first impressions. It is good that the this information is here. Thank you for inviting us to look and comment.

Yours in curiosity and service, Rej 23:20, November 24, 2011 (UTC)