Thread:DaNASCAT/@comment-5973717-20150815170949

I read that Wikia is thinking about setting up a system where all Javascript edits get audited before going into effect. I think this may be an issue for the frequent coders. With that in mind, here's my idea: we have a hybrid system based on reputation. If you have a history of making safe and useful edits, then you should be able to bypass the code review system; and if you don't have as much reputation for JS edits, then the code should have to undergo reviews.

Eventually, when a user makes enough safe useful edits, they should have enough of a reputation to skip code reviews. I think this would be a good way to satisfy the power users, but keep everyone safer.

Thoughts? 