Thread:DEmersonJMFM/@comment-26901681-20161208235123/@comment-5558012-20161209042522

The criteria editing issue was one of those strange moments. At times he also seems a little like a loose cannon, suddenly coming in with some dramatic remarks. Despite these issues, he's still pretty active; maybe not the best Admin in terms of assisting others (sometimes referring users to other people), but it's clear he tries.

If there's a desire to reduce the number of Bureaucrats from the six currently, he is an option though he's the most active of the three least active. These three aren't really inactive so any chosen to be demoted must be done carefully. Is it just the point of reducing numbers or are they unfit or did something wrong? The latter could create hard feelings if there's strong disagreement.