Adoption:Gumbapedia Fanon wiki

Adoption requests →

'''What is your username? Tonio 321''' Please link to the wiki here:Gumbapedia fanon wiki

'''How many edits have you made on that wiki? ''' 1,081

How many days/months have you been editing there? 2 months

On the Special Pages → Special:ListUsers when was the last time an admin edited, and who was it? 17:50, 05 de julio 2013

Any other information:




 * Hello there! There are currently some other active editors on the GumbaPedia Wiki so that means you'll have to start a Community Discussion with the other editors on the wiki explaining that you are looking to adopt it. After you make a discussion topic please leave a link to it here.  Also I added your username and I fixed the number of edits you have made.


 * Cheers!


 *  •Corey Chambers•  •My Talk•  •My Bot•     21:01, August 29, 2013 (UTC)

Hi there. Per Corey, please begin a community discussion so other users can help decide whether you should become an admin on the wikia. Make sure this discussion is on public such as on a blog or forum thread, that way we can see who said what. Once the discussion is over, please post the link here. Thanks! - Brandon Rhea (talk)  21:11, August 29, 2013 (UTC)


 * This all seems like a vandal trying to get different admins. He didn't leave his name and those are some very impressive two edits to get over eight hundred pages. And the wiki activity is pretty full and has a lot of recent edits besides the two he talked about. --No signature for you from BZ (talk) 12:43, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * Edit, he said he only made two edits, then why should it get adopted? If he is the founder, than he should make admins and bureaucrats any ways. Edit, I just checked and it says that you have over a thousand edits. Right, those two edits sure went a long way. --No signature for you from BZ (talk) 12:45, August 29, 2013 (UTC)


 * He has over 1,000 edits in total. Plus, the admins there are sort of inactive (last one edited July 5, about close to 60 days) and also, why do we have the Adoption talk pages? They're actually pretty useless. -- 13:28, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
 * So we can see if the adoption has inaccurate information. The whole thing seemed very suspicious and like if someone was trying to get different admins because he said he had a low edit count of two and did not give a reason or a name. I looked into the user and saw that he had plenty of edits and had a good reason. Long story short, talk pages are mostly for pointing out what is wrong with the adoption reasons and maybe it could be a real vandal getting different admins. --No signature for you from BZ (talk) 13:08, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
 * TBH Adoption talk is rather useless indeed, considering that adoption is a public forum on which anyone is free to comment. I've moved these comments (by Bioniclezilla76 and Deviantserpent) from the adoption talk page for this request. Thisismyrofl (talk) 13:17, August 30, 2013 (UTC)