Board Thread:Support Requests - Getting Technical/@comment-1807002-20160330204758

While updating to the new infoboxes and use of commonly used icon templates, a wiki I have been recently contributing ran into issue aparently a known bug with the Classic Editors. Because those using that editor was minor (and not that active in actual article edits) and so far the consensus was to not accomodate/use band-aides for an obsolete feature that it was clear, don't use it.

That I am aware they haven't even ticketed the issue, despite me asking them to. But sadly both admins use it and the most active editors use source, and we have a bit of a clash going on how to proceed, it turned into classic vs. source debate, to accomodate broken feature just for 2 editors (it looks like) or that I broke the wiki. (Please do not post suggestion on work arounds I am in contact with the Portibility guys and that wiki, I need no more P's and Q's, thanks).

My question is, Staff aparently you are debating on fixing the bug because it is on an obolete feature. The band-aid work a rounds to accommodate this bug, so classic editors can use classic editor is in my honest opinion ridiculous to indefinitely dance around. So I want know are you going to fix or finally retire completly the Classic editor. I am pretty sure at least one of the admins is ready to burn me at the stake as a witch for updating to the new infoboxes blaming me for breaking the wiki, and I am really starting to get annoyed here that the Wiki staff has let this get that far.

Fix or ban this feature please! 