User blog comment:Kirkburn/Technical Update: October 1, 2013/@comment-3441771-20131002121836

&ldquo;Tables wider than the available content space will now allow horizontal scrolling in-place, rather than relying on a pop-up system. Please let us know any feedback you have on this new style.&rdquo; Thank you; previously that was hideous IMHO. Since I don't like popups, you won't hear me complaining. &ldquo;Images wider than the available content area will now be cut off at the right edge, rather than overlap the right rail.&rdquo; I'd do an all-caps "thank you", but I'll restrain myself and stay in character. Suffice to say I'm very pleased we'll be able to continue to use pages where another user has stuffed up made a common mistake with image embedding Wikitext. &ldquo;The 'Read more' section has been updated to better support the fluid Darwin layout.&rdquo; This is a great fix (yeah, "fix"). It looked like part of the user written content being above the cats before; now, being below them, it's outta sight; outta mind.


 * I've been far too praiseworthy in this post, so I'll use this opportunity to point out that it should really be "Related pages". Why? "Read more" suggests that there's more to be read, but for an article only in genus categories, there could be, and most often is, no reference to our subject (article) in the "Read more"s.


 * Plus, something I find ROFL funny, is your class for it: .RelatedPagesModule . I'm just going to assume Wikia would have no objection to JS reworkings here, but should this not be a MediaWiki message?