Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-22224-20180521161500/@comment-679780-20180522040554

Citrusellaeditswikis wrote: Their excuse is that any skin that could replicate Monobook would present them the same logistical needs that they don't want to have to put in work/time/money to meet. Then don't remove MonoBook! Why is it regarded wrong NOW and not the 13 years they've been using it? This is bullcrud! I've been browsing wiki's with MonoBook longer than Wikia itself! (Technically true given Wikipedia was the go to encyclopedia of culture at the time.)

MonoBook was originally Wikipedia's skin, so why not replace it with Vector now?