Thread:DEmersonJMFM/@comment-26901681-20161208235123/@comment-5558012-20161209163458

Ripto22475 wrote: Luckily no one was promoted to bureaucrat by meeting the content mod requirement. Well to meet the Content Moderator requirements you had to meet the Bureaucrat requirements (for Bureaucrat you need to also meet the Admin requirements and the Admin requirements include having been a Content Moderator, in essence just a complicated way of stating no more promotions now).

Ripto22475 wrote: I think they would be better as admins personally (not fully removing them) ... The wiki technically only needs 1 active bureaucrat (maybe 2) so any duplicates on a "new-ish" wiki like TLH really aren't needed. I'd agree with this, mostly for Amerifreedom32706 given the previous issue with user rights. I haven't actually seen any real reason why Bouncing should be removed other than reducing the numbers hence why I believe a discussion could cause issues for some without additional reasoning (something to consider when constructing a demotion argument, not everyone sees the number of Bureaucrats as an issue in itself).

If you look at it that way, any wiki doesn't need more than one or two active Bureaucrats. The wiki may be new-ish though it's still pretty active.

Veenster7 wrote: I know I'm probably getting a little annoying by now.

I sometimes think the same myself but tend to believe people answering actually like to help people.