Thread:DaNASCAT/@comment-4234382-20150819210341

Since I can't voice my opinion in the thread that you locked, I'm posting it here.


 * How will changes be processed? Will it work like Wikipedia's pending changes or will admins have make js edits via a reviewer proxy?
 * How will Wikia make sure that the new peer review system is done in a timely manner and doesn't result in massive backlogs?
 * Who will decide who becomes "code reviewers"? What will the prerequisites for these people be?
 * Who will be liable if bad/malicious code slips past these "code reviewers"?
 * How is all of this not just a knee jerk reaction to an isolated incident? 