User blog comment:AngrydroidForce99/Why people should not be blocked for incidents on other wikis/@comment-26037236-20151125203223/@comment-26228779-20151129073019

You seem to be in disagreement with the blogs author. I know I posted this as a comment above but I think you should read this as it illustrates just how badly convoluted blocks can be.

"One time I was banned on a wiki for going to the wikis chat and asking what was going on because the founder of the site came barreling into chat screaming that the users were trying to steal her wiki and they were falsely claiming she was underage to get her banned.

I got banned for "creating drama"... Because I asked what the problem was. It turned out the founder kept claiming she was going to leave the wiki and then would never pass beuracrat status over and all sorts of stuff. Yet, I got banned because I was the guy who asked why she was causing trouble in community central (I was alone in chat at the time).

I think that it would absolutely ridiculous for another community to ban me for that, especially when all I did was respond to someone's complaint in community central.

Also, the ban on that wiki says "disruptive behavior in chat and offensiveness". So, I really agree that using it as criteria is completely out of bounds. Unless yer on a wiki and you see what happened, you can't judge. Period."