Adoption:Weegeepedia (3)

Adoption requests →

What is your username? Pickleodeon and Theuser9

Please link to the wiki here: http://weegeepedia.wikia.com/wiki/

How many edits have you made on that wiki? I have made 4,448 edits, Theuser9 has made 1,655.

How many days/months have you been editing there? I have been editing there for 3 years, Theuser9 has been there for a month.

On the Special Pages → Special:ListAdmins when was the last time an admin edited, and who was it? SwiftVisionX and Alphaguy left a single comment on a forum on September 4th and September 5th, respectively. (Swift also edited his comment.) edited it. These should be considered exceptions, as forum comments are not real edits and do not contribute to the wiki. Plus, both comments were relatively off-topic, and if you look at the admins' recent behavior it is clear that they no longer care about the wiki. Other than that, no admin has edited since June 30th. Please understand!

Any other information: I have been on the wiki since May 15th, 2014. It's always been a nice place, but in 2016 it was hit by sudden inactivity. This dismotivated me in being as active as I once was, but I have inspired to return once again. Theuser9 has only been on the wiki since August 4th, but during that time he made more than 15 hundred edits and got ranked #10 out of all users on the wiki. (I am #7) In a present where there is no administrator support, the wiki is in ruins and new users are very discouraged. Theuser9 and I would like to change that. We request that we both get Administrator and Bearucrat rights. If I am not qualified, just promite Theuser9 on his own. If you need confirmation that he is indeed in on this, please contact him. Likewise, if Theuser9 is unqualified, promote myself on my own. Please, Weegeepedia is in a stalemate, and this is the only way we can save it. (Alphaguy cannot promote me due to his lack of interest in the wiki)


 * If SwiftVisionX and Alphaguy have just posted two comments, this means that they are not inactive, regardless the type of the edits, so the wiki is not eligible for adoption. Besides this, what does "Alphaguy cannot promote you due to his lack of interest in the wiki" mean? You didn't even asked him to promote you. If you really want to become an admin, you have to ask him first. If he doesn't answer you in 60 days, meaning that he's inactive, you can make another request here. --
 * If SwiftVisionX and Alphaguy have just posted two comments, this means that they are not inactive, regardless the type of the edits, so the wiki is not eligible for adoption. Besides this, what does "Alphaguy cannot promote you due to his lack of interest in the wiki" mean? You didn't even asked him to promote you. If you really want to become an admin, you have to ask him first. If he doesn't answer you in 60 days, meaning that he's inactive, you can make another request here. --


 * It's very difficult to explain. Most if not all of their posts/edits in the last year were all shitposting, and they haven't done any real admin work. Look at their contributions if you don't believe me, and if you read what they are saying or doing you'll understand. The guy who owns the userpage this link goes to is AWESOME (talk) 19:48, September 7, 2017 (UTC)


 * I've understood what you're trying to say, but it doesn't change anything: if he's active you have to ask him for the rights. FANDOM Staff will take action only if there isn't any active bureaucrat who can promote you. --


 * You don't understand. If you knew Alphaguy's personality, you'd know he wouldn't promote me, and not for the reason you think. He's just stubborn and seriously doesn't care about the wiki. If another bearucrat was active I'd ask them instead. The guy who owns the userpage this link goes to is AWESOME (talk) 23:47, September 7, 2017 (UTC)


 * If he isn't going to promote you, there's nothing you can do. Adoption is not a solution in this case, because Staff won't give you the rights if he's not inactive and they won't probably demote him even if he's a bad admin, and this is this is why. As long he doesn't violate the Terms of Use, he's going to keep his privileges. --

That is not true. You can vote to have his rights removed. What you do is create a blog post and have the users of the wiki vote to have him demoted or not. No polls. Everyone has to state their vote. After a week of it being up, if the majority votes to have him demoted, you can contact Staff about it at Special:Contact/general with a link to the blog post, they tally up the votes and go from there. If the admin deletes the blog post, you can contact Staff to have them undelete it and keep it that way. Check out User blog:Mira Laime/How to Deal With a Bad Bureaucrat for more details.--


 * Hello. I see that a third admin has been active recently; while I agree that the admins there are not curating the wiki, it is also true that three of them have edited in the last few weeks. Annabeth and Percy is correct - you will need to have a community discussion about demoting them and, if that happens, then you can choose new leaders.  -- Wendy  (talk ) 04:32, September 22, 2017 (UTC)