Thread:CosmicChronos/@comment-26102182-20181113101209/@comment-26102182-20181114013918

Oh phew! Now knowing that it was indeed closer to my latter interpretation, I'm really glad I didn't reply in the original thread bahaha lol. Sorry for the confusion (I won't deny, I do think I'm bad with words; it's a shortcoming I recognize and have been trying to improve.) (And no, I didn't think you had any ill-intent with the comment =D)

I agree 100% that what I wrote wasn't welcoming, and I said so as much in my reply; I know it is just a name (what where I wrote the statement was called), but I think "bio" is officially what one would want others to know them for; and while I don't mind people knowing I'm sick of certain somethings, I would definitely not want to be known as the someone who's sick of [...]; as in, I would have not put out the statement where it was, had it been labeled as "bio", and it was not on my end.

I think the intention is slightly different, even if it's minute; I feel like I was being told that what I wrote was not suitable to be put in a "bio", and I do actually agree with that; the problem is, I hadn't intended for it to be in a "bio", and it really was not, on my end. I hadn't really mind the first time when it was brought up, but it was said a second time, to me looking like emphasizing that is of great concern, and it could be, but I think it is somewhat misleading, and for people who're just reading the thread and may not actually click onto my User page to verify the statement, I very well may be known as someone who put something inappropriate on their "bio", and I don't think that's fair for me, especially because I did put thoughts into what I knew to be the actual "bio".

At that point I also feel my contributions within the community were completely disregarded, the actual part that should be measured when it comes to qualification was not touched upon, and for some bizarre reason, my personal liking was brought to the forefront and being discussed. I'm not the nicest person, but I didn't think the thread was the most relevant place for my character to be called into question, especially when, purposefully or not, the positive changes I made were left unsaid. I don't want to brag, because I think actions should speak louder than words, but if reading the thread alone, with the statement that has already been laced with personal interpretation, I think I've been cast in a negative light in a way that has little to do with the crux of the application. Hence the response, the least I can do was to point out I had not put it in a place that on my end is called a "bio," nor do I think my so-called lack-of-maturity would let me be incapable of properly deleting duplicates. I'm not saying they are "wrong" to think that, I'm saying "I disagree", if that makes any sense.

And... yeah... I'm horrible at expressing my thoughts. xP I'm not saying "I'm right" and am not trying to convince you to think that "I'm right" (because there is no right and wrong? there's just opinions,) but since the purpose of my response seemed unclear, I figured it wouldn't hurt (much) trying to explain the reason behind it. (well, I supposed I could be further proving the whole lack-of-maturity thing, but I guess I've accepted that lol.)

If you finish reading this, thanks for indulging me xD. (and I hope I haven't upset you with this longwinded reply)