Board Thread:Support Requests - Getting Technical/@comment-3225604-20150614103358/@comment-3225604-20150706080936

Catinthedark wrote: It's ok. In fact, I just looked at Joey's code, specifically the loop in which your errant replace statement is located. Looks like that string would get too big to transcribe. I initially thought it was just a line in the log... but it's whole log! :O

I wonder tho about performance issues with replace on that size, and with the concat too. Just doesn't give me the warm fuzzies. One of the edits was ~7Kb. Not massive, but hardly trivial.

Have you noticed if it crashes when there's been a lot of activity? If so, or if you aren't sure, you could you try reducing the write intervals say every 10 mins or even 10, instead of 30... to get the size of that string down.

Actually it did crash without much activity around.