Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-46091064-20200615220033/@comment-35000920-20200627180713

Orythius wrote:  Yeah, but I think at least 5 warnings would be fair. This is FANDOM, not your house. But...it's their own wiki. As long as they don't violate COPPA law, post racist comments or things like it and violate other rules I forgot about, they can set their wiki's rules as they like. Quoting Mendes2's comment: ''It's a very bad practice to assume that warnings are always necessary, otherwise you could almost get away with murder twice. '' Some of these admins are not the original creators of the wikis, so I disagree that it's their own wiki. Some of them were appointed admin and began abusing their power and setting unfair rules. Just because they can doesn't mean they SHOULD and that is what we are discussing.

And I do believe that the punishment should fit the crime, so to speak. Making a minor edit does not merit being banned for life. But you have admins who are abusive and arrogant in their positions, especially if their wikis are one of the biggest sources of information.