Thread:Will Hardy 117/@comment-33779247-20180214180233/@comment-33779247-20180226202541

They even accused me not liking Max for pointing out the facts of her own actions and how she is treating and interacting with her friends.

However, their are the ones that side with or support people who don't see a problem when someone like Nathan Prescott or Frank Bowers either berate, bully, harass, and even physcially attack Max, Chloe, or Warren for petty or no good reasons. Those same people even side or don't see a problem when that same person has a problem when Max, Chloe, or Warren attack Frank and Nathan or do "bad" stuff when Max, Chloe, and Warren are forced to do so. They don't have a problem when Nathan enters because they side or defend people who doesn't have a problem that Nathan trashes Max's room for no good reason, but they side with people who has a problem when Max enters Nathan's room to investigate.

Batman investigate other people's places a lot so what is the difference with Max?

Why is it not okay for Max, Chloe, and Warren to attack Nathan and Frank when they are in a situation to defend themselves, especially when Nathan and Frank physcially attack them first and even with deadly weapons... but it is okay when Nathan or Frank does it just because they can?

Something about that logic doesn't make sense.