User blog comment:Sarah Manley/Sneak Peek at the New Look - Community Activity/@comment-13301-20100826152901

Agreed with Dantman's comment: Having everywhere the name of the last person that contributed to an article would be tricked by some people to make useless edits with the sole purpose of having it's name appear everywhere.

The recent activity in the sidebar is just fine. People that spend hours in the wiki would probably be reflected there, in contrast of having who is the last editor of an article.

Image attribution: What?. About "Image attribution" I understand who made the image, or who's the copyright holder of it. The pink world that you (Wikia) are trying to draw to newbies is totally opposite of the copyright and license issues that admins should be watching when new images are uploaded.

That system gives visitor the false impression that the owner of an image is the first that could use it, and defeat the efforts of admins that give all kind of instructions in the upload form to help users to select the appropiate license and limit those images that would have no use on the wiki or wouldn't be used with the restrictions of the Fair Use. This would lead to probably more blatant copyright issues and probably the number of image takedown requests by copyright holders.


 * Recent activity feed: +1
 * Quick History: +1 (ok, I could live with that)
 * Prominent "last edit by": -1
 * Image attribution(misleading attribution): -1