User blog comment:DaNASCAT/Template Types: A Smarter Categorization System/@comment-25648422-20151121153933

There have been early classification of templates. People would often place mostly at the bottom-most part of the format coding of the template. Does that count as classifying templates into types?

"With our minimal CSS approach to mobile"

Hold on. Does this mean that we will soon edit CSS that will change the physical appearance of a wiki when viewed in mobile?