Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-31863836-20190115223148/@comment-9605025-20190116230041

reply to #9 I am not sure how it came across, but that is not what I was trying to imply. My statement was just meant to be an observation that, for some reason, the earliest accounts don't have a timestamp associated with them. I am not sure which DB was used. I was getting this information via api.php. I suppose I could see if Api/v1 gives me anything different; probably not though. - reply to #11 Or Hugrim could have never used this wiki. - A note regarding one of my earlier comments; it seems that the usernames for which I was previously seeing ID set to 0 have now been removed all together. For example, [ Ripto22475] doesn't show at all in |Riptoze|Ripto22475&format=xml the api results.