Thread:Sera Loveheart/@comment-24503208-20180212232421

Hey Sera, there is something I want to discuss with you about cosmology. I think Aeyu forget to address the criticisms that the MUH have faced criticisms before.

Not to mention I have look into the issue about the Type IV Multiverse.

http://space.mit.edu/home/tegmark/PDF/multiverse_sciam.pdf (

While I not sure how this works, but this article mentioned this argument:

"So should you believe in parallel universes? The principal arguments against them are that they are wasteful and that they are weird. The first argument is that multiverse theories are vulnerable to Occam’s razor because they postulate the existence of other worlds that we can never observe. Why should nature be so wasteful and indulge in such opulence as an infinity of different worlds? Yet this argument can be turned around to argue for a multiverse. What precisely would nature be wasting? Certainly not space, mass or atoms—the uncontroversial Level I multiverse already contains an infinite amount of all three, so who cares if nature wastes some more? The real issue here is the apparent reduction in simplicity. A skeptic worries about all the information necessary to specify all those unseen worlds."

Then in the Wikipedia article: "But the great power of the scientific worldview has always come from its insistence that one should accept ideas based on experimental evidence, not on metaphysical reasoning or the truth-claims of authority figures.

Trying to balance both positive with negative views of the work, Amir Alexander wrote in The New York Times:[2]

"It is difficult to say whether Dr. Tegmark’s mathematical universe will ultimately be deemed an Einsteinian triumph or a Cartesian dead end. His conclusions are simply too far removed from the frontiers of today’s mainstream science, and there is little hope that conclusive evidence will emerge anytime soon. Yet Our Mathematical Universe is nothing if not impressive. Brilliantly argued and beautifully written, it is never less than thought-provoking about the greatest mysteries of our existence."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Our_Mathematical_Universe

Basically it is a radical metaphysic theory that have no to little evidence for the time being. Admittingly I was lurking when I came up that thread back at VS Battle Wiki.

I probably wasting my time with this. 