User blog comment:Semanticdrifter/Updates to COPPA/@comment-4321828-20130624210413/@comment-3026053-20130624231531

TK-999: no worries, I have no intention to indulge in a childish discussion with someone who choses not to understand the other person's meaning and to mock a typo rather than just ignore it. I have better things to do, and as said in my previous post: we got a possibility to an answer my repeated posting, so for me personally, I was right not to follow whatever 452 suggested.

To this topic specifically: whatever the answer is to the mail, it would be nice if the answer could be made public here, cause even though I'll find out via KK anyway, 452 is the proof that there are users from other wikis who came up with the same idea, so likely, there are even more.