Thread:Rangerkid51/@comment-27059900-20200118011447

You banned me for a year for "Removing content from pages". I left edit reasons explaining why I removed those categories.

For [Jared Fogle's profile], I simply deleted the category misopedists while leaving a note stating that there was no logical reason to apply that category to him, as a misopedist is by definition someone who hates children. Being sexually attracted to them and having sex with a child prostitute does not in any way indicate that Fogle hated children. I removed the same category from [Bianca's page] for the same reason. Labeling her a misopedist is saying she hates children, when nothing supports that. If anything, the two should have Child Abusers or Statutory Rapists or something listed under them. Misopedist is a misnomer, and I always get ticked when I see misnomers, like when someone who is prejudiced against the LGBT community is called homophobic when the actual term would be heterosexist.

I left notes explaining why I removed that category from those pages. I was perfectly willing to discuss the issue with you so we could come to an accord, but instead you banned me for a year and reverted my edits without any warning or edit reason, and you made it difficult for me to contact you. Every user for every website ever is supposed to always be allowed a chance to appeal their ban. It's the law. Even if it's for something way worse than what I did, everyone is entitled to at least one appeal. No exceptions. You banned me for a year to the point I couldn't even edit my own talk page, so the only way I could appeal was by contacting Community Central and having them direct me to your userpage on CC. I would appreciate it if you gave people more of a chance to make appeals. I would also appreciate it if you didn't issue year long blocks without even bothering to contact a user first.

Now that I have managed to contact you, I would like to appeal my harsh year long ban without warning and request that you please allow me to discuss the issues with you about those pages. I'm willing to debate with you. I would like us to come up with a new category for those who have sex with children that does not use a misnomer. I am open to discussion and will hear you out. All I ask is that you are willing to do the same and revoke or lower my banning so we can discuss it. I hope we can come to an understanding.

Also, the other categories on Bianca's page I removed: Arrogant, Egotist, Emotionless, Tricksters, and Faux Affably Evil. How is she an emotionless, arrogant egotist? How did she trick anyone? It can't be the kids because they agreed, even if it still didn't make it okay. How do we know she's faux and not genuinely Affably Evil? I deleted those categories because they confused me. We can debate these all you like. Just please hear me out. I was not intentionally doing any harm. I was trying to provide accuracy. Please, I don't deserve a year long ban.

If you haven't responded after several hours, I will contact the CC to have them advise you to read and respond. Please consider what I have said, and please don't be mad about anything. 