Thread:Lady Lostris/@comment-1169150-20160213201439/@comment-1169150-20160213235316

Let's first establish what has transpired.

1)  I researched Unity and found it to be, essentially, a dead guild with a legacy, vanity, four year old WoWWiki page of hopelessly outdated content.  Therefore, I removed it per: http://wowwiki.wikia.com/wiki/WoWWiki:Editing_policy

2) You reversed my edit thinking it vandalism, likely because it seemed to follow a pattern.  (See: http://wowwiki.wikia.com/wiki/WoWWiki:Vandalism_policy) Feel free to correct me if I misinterpreted your action.
 * (cur | prev) 19:52, February 13, 2016‎ Lady Lostris (Talk | contribs)‎ m . . (9,006 bytes) (+9,006)‎ . . (Reverted edit(s) by 75.40.81.57 (talk) to last version by Lady Lostris)

3) After you reversed my edits, I opened a dialogue with you to document them per http://wowwiki.wikia.com/wiki/WoWWiki:Text_removal_guidelines  (And, I think you would agree with me that vandals don't do that.)

You wrote me back saying stating:

1) You are a member of the Volunteer Spam Task Force (VSTF) http://no.wowwiki.wikia.com/wiki/Hjelp:VSTF

2) You are not interested in validating content changes by stating "it's not [your] job to gauge the relevance of content."

3) You state, "I see indeed is someone blanking out a page. If that's how the Wow Wiki deals with such pages, you're more than welcome to discuss this situation with a local administrator." Somewhat confusing, but you then go on to admit the block is indeed yours.

So, let's take the above in turn.

First, you have a noble job, making sure that the content remains undefaced. I salute and thank you for your diligent work. But, in this case, you have made a mistake. My edits are based on facts not vandalism. Facts you may be blind to, but facts none the less.

Second, by your abdication of content validation, my argument for the edit prevails.

Therefore, either remove your block or, if you are undable to do so, remove the content yourself as my argument for the edit has won.

Thank you. ;)