Thread:MtaÄ/@comment-44395178-20191119184938/@comment-38078079-20191120200748

Kemurikage wrote: All I am saying is that Cocopuff2018 should not have that much power in his hands. In fact, he shouldn't have any power at all! He abuses, he acts like a dictatorship (i.e him banning others just for standing up to him, etc.), he threatens to ban you on other Wikis, and he is just overall rude and annoying. I know it sounds like I'm just saying that because I want him to be demoted, but I have proof and a FANDOM Global Discussions Moderator also wants him to be demoted, and he also blocked him. That's fine.

You can want him demoted, and you might even have fair points. I'm just saying I really don't think global staff will listen to those points, as they don't break the ToU, and dozens and dozens - if not hundreds - of people get blocked on wikis unfairly. Every single person on Fandom has probably ran across an admin they dislike, but those admins often stay in power, because it's just how the site works (staff just haven't the resources to mediate every single issue).

If you're still blocked, you're allowed to run a vote via your wall on Community Central, and that could be an alternative, too. Other users can also run votes, as well (just try to make sure it's just one thread, so multiple people aren't making multiple voting threads)

Cocopuff2018 wrote: "Kevin thanks soo much for the help can u please go over the wiki ill link it below and review if anything was tou vilolated i will also link the vote wich all i did was locked the post is that aginest TOU since i didnt delete it"

I haven't really time tonight to go over someone else's wiki like that, but I will say that none of his complaints sound like violations to me. . . I think the only thing of concern is the vote; if anyone votes to demote you again, as much as it sucks, I would just let the vote run for a week (only deleting comments that are abusive or threatening, etc.). If you're a good admin, most people will support you, and staff can see if anyone there is a sock-puppet or not, too.

You won't just get demoted for 'getting enough votes against'; staff will make sure they're regular members of the community, that they're not sock-puppets, that they're not otherwise abusing the system, etc. It's why letting a vote run can be the better idea, as interfering can cause more trouble than it's worth. I'd not lock any threads that call for a vote.

If he didn't specificaly ask people to vote, you might be okay on a technicality.

If he did, I'd probably unlock it and let it run its course.