Adoption:Gaming Creepypasta Wiki

Adoption requests →

What is your username? Metafawker.

Please link to the wiki here: http://gamingcreepypasta.wikia.com/wiki/Gaming_Creepypasta_Wiki

How many edits have you made on that wiki? 133 edits.

How many days/months have you been editing there? Probably 2 or more than that of months. I know I have been editing there since September 2013.

On the Special Pages → Special:ListUsers when was the last time an admin edited, and who was it? There are no admins other than me and the founder. But, founders count as admins as well, so the last time the founder has edited was November 18, 2013.

Any other information:

None.

Hi, Metafawker. Perhaps it would be good if you were to start a community discussion to notify everyone of your intent to acquire bureaucrat rights and gather their opinion to see if they support you. Good Luck. (The Great Lord David (talk) 18:42, September 18, 2014 (UTC))

Hello! Disregard David's comment. There isn't an active enough community to warrant a blog. But, you must be actively editing (making new pages, fixing up articles, adding content, building the wiki) for 1 solid week in order to be eligible to adopt the wiki. If you keep editing while you wait for this request to be processed, (which can take from 7-10 days), you'll be all set. Good luck!


 * Well technically I never mentioned any blog, with a community discussion I meant a message on the other active contributor´s wall to know if he supports your adoption but then again nevermind. Follow Joseph´s advice and everything will be fine. Good Luck. (The Great Lord David (talk) 14:49, September 19, 2014 (UTC))


 * Ah, my mistake then. I assumed "community discussion" meant an announcement. In regards to the other "active contributor," that user only made 1 edit, and isn't an active contributor to the wiki, so a message really isn't needed. But, it can't hurt if you wish to leave him one.


 * Nobody´s mistake actually. Technically, both Metafawker and this new user are the community so a message between both of them would be a community discussion however the community discussion term is associacted with a blog or a forum so the word just had two meanings in this case. (The Great Lord David (talk) 15:54, September 19, 2014 (UTC))