Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-46091064-20200615220033/@comment-35000920-20200627181617

Orythius wrote: In my opinion, if you don't stop after a first warning and keep violating it, then it's right to ban the user after the second time without a warning, it's really not that cruel. And since the wikis have policies of their own... if you come to a person's house and violate the rules they set, they don't have to give you a warning, much less a second or third chance, before kicking you out of the house. Many of these admins forget the wikis are meant to be fun for fans. That is why this is called "fandom". Unfortunately, these wiki admins make it hard to be a fan and they treat it too seriously. I do believe that we as the community should be allowed to question admin decisions and there should be guidelines set against admins who abuse their authority across the board. They are given too much autonomy and many times they can put inappropriate things if they want (but other people can't) hypocritically so. That's not a fair system. If Fandom does make updates, we should be able to file complaints or report admins who do not abide by their own rules and who abuse the system making it impossible to be apart of the fandom. Especially if they are one of those admins that were appointed and did not actually create the wiki in the first place. Those type of admins should not be given so much power.