Board Thread:New Features/@comment-27546251-20160501201027/@comment-5558012-20160507123713

Everyone has opinions, even on smaller wikis. You can still have Admin-specific areas for discussion while preserving organization (such as an Admin talk page). Everyone can see it easily but the Admins (if the wiki is structured that way) still have a way of having a closed discussion. Dependent on the issue, this may not be the first place to have such a discussion anyway. A community discussion may be better. Spam is housekeeping and, for the most part, policy is meant to clearly guide what to do about a user in 'x' situation.

Edit: Admins say much about the community. If I can't assess an Admin's actions, how can I assess that wiki? Why would I want to edit on such a wiki when I don't know how the representatives of the community act toward other users or how they deal with problems because discussion is hidden away on an unrelated website?