Thread:DarkLK/@comment-24503208-20190301215021/@comment-5562995-20190302032741

The topic is already closed. I just glanced at it and in general I do not see anything particularly problematic.

Although about geometric values. The volume of the hypercube can be measured, but the units will also be multidimensional. We cannot measure the volume of a hypercube in cubic centimeters (or something similar). The same problem with an example about systems A and B. You can divide system B into any number of objects with parameters (1 1 1 0) and then connect them to any number of objects with parameters (999 999 999 0).

And yes, dimensions in Umineko are not a metaphor for higher Layers. These are generally different things.

Perhaps in the comments already talked about this.

For the rest, I do not see any particular problems. This system has always been a system of qualitative perspectives, where instead of dimensions we can use anything else, for example, levels of reality and fiction.

If someone thinks that an 11-dimensional object can automatically destroy an 11-dimensional multiverse or even a three-dimensional construction with larger three-dimensional parameters than this object itself has, then of course this is not the case (if it is not stated directly in the work). If the article needs clarification about this, then why not.

Antvasima is really overreacting.