Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-45661568-20200818150744/@comment-44697621-20200819010200

Greenbeanl0rd wrote: the founder started to edit my comments, and I told him to stop. he banned/blocked me from the wiki, and                   he added in random reason. I asked him for proof, and I easily countered that, since their 'proof' were pictures of people being rude (to me) in live chat.

I only edited one comment, and it wasn't a big change. You see, we have a YouTuber under the name, Bellasaurus. I had taken on a bet to make an "imposter" account and see how long I can go without the YouTuber noticing that it was actually me. It was a harmless prank. But, since Greenbean was no longer in the prank, she tried to give me away, but I and a few people still wanted the prank to go on. That why I edited the comment. If I am wrong in doing this, then the staff from Fandom can tell me and I will not do something like this again.

But the reason you were banned was not this, for a month+ already, I have been receiving reports about you. But I was lenient as I currently didn't see these as bad violations of the rules and didn't ban you. These things continued for a month, and I choose not to ban you (against my other admins orders). You were telling me how I was an liar and was abusing my powers. In dms, others were pleading for you to be banned. And this time, I did listen to my staff. And banned you only for a week, when a great many people and staff want me to give you a month ban.

You spammed, you brought several users to complete tears, you ranted at my staff, you brought around several discussions about subjects no one wanted to talk about even after requests to stop. If the fandom staff see anything wrong with my and my staffs decision to ban you, then they can tell me.