User blog comment:MisterWoodhouse/The first migrations to the Unified Community Platform/@comment-45372202-20210108070244/@comment-1038387-20210108184410

1. That's vague

2. The choice to go for a non-MediaWiki solution was vital for the futureproofing of the code. Unfortunately, it no longer allows easy linking or templates, and the notification system needs some kinks ironed out.

3. Depends on the editor you use. It's easily doable, but can be a bit slower than you're used to.

4. You explained a solution to this one yourself. Chat's global usage did not warrant an investment.

5. The editor the Classic editor was based on was retired from the core software two years ago.