Thread:DaNASCAT/@comment-1474707-20120530202124

I'm sorry if you think an unanswered direct question to you doesn't merit a response, but I would like one. In case you were unaware/didn't bother reading jen's response, it was to a completely different question than the one you removed the staff needed tag from. Background takeover adverts are no longer "rare". They used to be uncommon, but recently I've tested it and on about 90% of page loads when not logged in the background is replaced by an advert. It essentially means whatever background you choose is pointless for non-logged in users. Other users report similar experiences. Is that "expected behaviour", seeing as you seemed to believe their occurrence was rare 6 days ago? 