User blog comment:Sarah Manley/Sneak Peek at the New Look - Community Activity/@comment-761251-20100826155241/@comment-168424-20100829210033

From my reading, this new feature is violating the letter of the license, not just the spirit. Having a credit where the the image is most likely to be seen that does not attribute the correct author is in clear violation of the prominence part of the license. Having no attribution is better and more a gray area. With no attribution, the user is more likely to look in the place where the attribution is at least in the spirit of the license.