Forum:Offering user rights

Is there anything at issue with saying to a user I think they're good editors and would be able to help more if I gave them rollback rights? I only ask as there's plenty of info about people requesting user rights, but not so much about just offering it to users (I'm an admin by the way), and as the user(s) haven't requested it is it...a bit odd? --Tangerineduel 14:23, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * If you feel a user is good enough, then give them the rights. If an crat thinks that they are good enough to deserve the rights without requesting them, then give them to the user. I have often given out rights to users as I feel that they could use them well (I have even made someone admin without them requesting). ☆ The   Solar   Dragon  ☆ 14:26, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
 * Rights aren't about deserving them, they're about being able to positively use them. If a good user is undoing a lot of edits, then giving them rollback probably will help the wiki and him by making it easier for him to help. Rollback, sysop, bureaucrat etc, aren't a 'level' or a 'prestige', nor a reward, just extra tools that can be utilized to help the community and wiki. Be cautious. It's usually best if a wiki has a system for assigning user rights, so if you don't have one to follow, you should create one. Happy editing, Joey (talk) 20:14, September 18, 2010 (UTC)