User blog comment:JustLeafy/Feature comparisons./@comment-1929113-20170223214628/@comment-26923519-20170224192117

Thanks, even though I'm not really new, I joined about a year and a half ago, but I don't visit here much. :P

Anyways, at most times, while editing articles, I prefer VisualEditor. If I want to make new image galleries and add a few interesting features that can only be made in source editor, then I prefer source editor. Overall, I like VisualEditor a little bit more than source editor. Mobile editor is basically a way more simplified wikitext/ source editor, but not the best. Rich-text Editor sucks, it can't even accept complex mode, and infoboxes don't even appear. Good thing it does have a couple of quick buttons like re-doing and centering text.

In the wiki where I am an admin, in Pixel Gun Wiki, the chat is sadly so dead, that only 1 person visits there per 2 weeks. Can you imagine that? Despite the fair activity in Pixel Gun Wiki. That's why I prefer the forums. Discussions are just a Twitter rip-off, and blogs are, eh, pretty okay.

The new navbar actually seemed to look really nice, despite a few mistakes being made. However, I would not like to see it being a forced upgrade of the navbar. Instead, I would like to see it as an optional wiki feature (the same with Discussions).

Portable infoboxes are actually a perfect upgrade for infoboxes for people who can't make creative non-portable infoboxes. It is overall clean and has unique features like Article Names and Collapsible Headers and other features. I even like how there is an infobox builder, which can ease your work in making portable infoboxes (see Special:InfoboxBuilder, but not in here, since it doesn't exist in here).

It's obvious why the Wikia skin is the best. Because the Monobook interface is overall improper, IMO, and does not suit Fandom/ Wikia. It actually suits for Wikipedia, though. Mobile interface is, eh, pretty okay, but may suck at certain times.