User blog comment:MisterWoodhouse/The first migrations to the Unified Community Platform/@comment-31617896-20201024194528/@comment-45977082-20201026144037

Yeah but most people edit their discussions to add the things that they forgot about, rather than just delete everything they say and reword it. Therefore misinterpretations of past words would most probably be possible in very few cases, so I personally believe that due to this discussions (which are not accessible on Ipads with older OS' probably but are on PC, as I have to contribute to discussions on PC if I want to contribute to them) should in my opinion have an accessible history, as I think rewording a and misinterpretations could only occur with controversial discussions, however I have come across very few of these. So I'd personally argue & support an accessible history existing for Discussions board posts via UCP.