User blog comment:MisterWoodhouse/The Official Discord Server for Fandom and Gamepedia Editors/@comment-5785681-20190709021451/@comment-5785681-20190717025855

In other words: the lack of association between a registered editor's identity with their DISCORD identity, off-topic agendas, lack of monitoring, private cliques, and all the concerns expressed herein are not being addressed on Wiki DISCORDS at all. These problems will remain on Wiki DISCORDS while FANDOM will have a general DISCORD that has such protections. Is this an accurate assessment of the new DISCORD?

If I am misunderstanding, I apologize and seek clarification. However, if this is true, it is shocking and discouraging. Are Wikis not a valuable commodity in need of similar protection as FANDOM itself? I find it hard to believe that space is the issue. The concerns are the same, yet private DISCORDS will be allowed to remain (in fact, flourish) on Wikis when they clearly violate the founding philosophy of Wikia which has always been transparent communication between all parties. DISCORD allows for private conversations between members and Wiki DISCORDS will continue to be un-monitored. How does this align with the new philosophy of better communication? To me, it mocks the principle and those who utilize an un-monitored app know this.

Unfortunately, my concerns which were relieved, are reignited.

Respectfully, Angelle 02:58, July 17, 2019 (UTC)