Message Wall:Charitwo-fduser

Archives: /2007 /2008 /2009 /2010 __NOWYSIWYG__

my wikis layout is a mess
hi mr Chariwo,i want to report to you that the layout of my wiki is a mess,can you please restore it to default?Thanks

Slvrsamurai 10:56, June 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * Hello, I have undid the change that caused the CSS to break. -- 11:02, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

Reverting
Ok. I revert because the user remove messages here. Moreover the talks owner (Michaeldsuarez) said that not censor his talk. 14:13, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * I think that I revert 'cause my first impression is a vandal edit, away. Next time I'll consult if is a vandal edit. 15:10, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Revert
Alright. Can you please tell User:SynchPedro86 to move the dispute elsewhere? I doubt that he would respect my opinion. --Michaeldsuarez (Talk) (Deeds) 15:23, June 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. --Michaeldsuarez (Talk) (Deeds) 16:01, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

Note
SPAM on User talk:JenniferRose11 16:17, June 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * Deleted. -- 16:19, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Arguing
Hi, I had a conflict with Michael on ED. I couldn't post there as I was IP blocked and it was awkward finding ways round the ban. He didn't mind me posting on his page. Not at all, actually. He seemed to be enjoying every minute of it. However, I won't do it again.

I'd like it though if you could blank or delete the argument so it cannot be traced. I wouldn't want them (as in Michael and this "Snaisybelle" person) using it as fuel for the ED article they made about me. Anyway, I'm pretty much retired from internet forums, this wiki and other sites where I'm traceable, and I wanna get back to my 'retirement' peacefully.

Best regards, Peter.SynchPedro86 22:36, June 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * It's up to Michael to clear his talk page, if you'd like a second opinion, there is an outlet for that. -- 22:37, June 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * I rather not have have information from my talk page removed. I don't see any reason to censor my talk page. There isn't any personal or private information that needs removal, and it doesn't violate any Wikia terms or policies. --Michaeldsuarez (Talk) (Deeds) 00:32, June 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * Okay. It's settled then. No more discussing it here please. (this doesn't need replying to) -- 01:05, June 2, 2010 (UTC)