Thread:FatBlockingBitch/@comment-4851119-20140211175612

Minor complaint. Would complain to a higher authority on the wiki where the issue occured but I have been (in my eyes) unfairly banned and am unable to, and the issue in question is to do with admins anyway.

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/User_talk:Slug_gunner_fan#Signature

I have been banned on this wiki for using a signature that violates their signature policy, which as far as I know is not standard across wikia and certainly does not apply on the other dozen or so wikis I edit.

I recieved a week-long ban for not immediately altering my signature to meet this policy, which as I have said seems to be exlcusive to this wiki, and have been told that the wiki in question "has higher standards" in a manner which suggests to me that I'm dirt for not meeting those standards.

I was also accused of "insulting the wiki" (not my intention and not what I did in any way as far as I see it) and of "poorly debating my point rather than just meeting the policy" (seems unfair that I can't argue my side of the story and got banned for attempting to).

Should I have to alter my entire signature to meet the polcies of one wiki? Should I have been banned for attempting to argue my point?

My recommendation for this wiki to modernize its forums and enable chat was also dismissed as an early April Fool's prank, completely ridiculed by multiple users who haven't even considered the benefits and dismissed away as "un-democratic" which seems quite hypocritical when I have never seen a single vote in action on this wiki despite its claims to be a community-driven democracy.

This is not me whining nor is it, as I see it, a biased account. This is a direct complaint which covers the entire story as I see it. I have not left anything out from my point of view. 