Thread:Simsilikesims/@comment-30698137-20161211231306/@comment-417288-20161217051347

What I meant by "low brow" is things like visual gags, occasionally pranking the reader, toilet humor, and other uncensored humor(that Wikia might censor were it hosted by them). What I meant by "high brow" is articles that strictly fit the encyclopedic or project format, have cleverness to them as well as comedy, and don't rely on toilet humor or need censoring. Compare the Wikipedia article on High comedy to the Wikipedia article on Low comedy, and perhaps you will understand. Also, liberal political satire is discouraged on the Wikia Uncyclopedia, but is neither encouraged nor discouraged on the other site. Speaking of lazy, the other site relies on donations for its existence, so may not have long to survive if not enough people donate to it (and no, it is not tax-deductible).