Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-209674-20140225224507/@comment-5578690-20140315060033

Love Robin wrote: some of the best topics if you take the time to actually look around have at most one wiki - battlefield (no idea what the others are), kung fu panda (has attached answers wiki), Avatar wiki (has attached answers wiki), arthur (with strangely named fanon wiki), league of legends (with international). the first exception that i found when searching was call of duty which had multiple wikis. there's a lot more but i'm not going to list them all. the point already been made, having one main content wiki with perhaps a fanon and answers covers everything that would ever be needed, what other purpose would there be?

is it necesarry to create a wiki for each new lineup/series or brand of an entire topic? to prove this, there's at least one nerf wiki regarding that and some that even have dups of those. most of those are simply to get the url and nothing more. most of the wikis gamegear360 listed on his profile have zero content, its an empty shell. mostly people creating wikis for no reason or purpose, just for fun. and that's how you start to accumulate excessive wikis.