Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-4042639-20161205153203/@comment-9605025-20170131151933

reply to, , and

Like I said, in the particular case you presented, and assuming your representation is accurate, I agree with you; the admins could have handled it better. However, you provide no evidence that a single user's experience, having made only 3 edits to a single wiki, is somehow representative of all admin-new user interactions across all of Fandom; which is what you would have us believe. Furthermore, giving up after 3 edits is rather quick, in my opinion.

'''Here is the biggest thing. Neither Poco123 nor the original poster of this thread have actually been banned. In both cases, we have been presented with only anecdotal evidence from one side of the case.''' With regards to Poco123, I see no attempts on his/her part to address this issue with the admins directly. With regards to the original poster, I am unable to fish out the thread stating that s/he must ask for permission before making changes. In fact, most of the interactions I see appear to be of the friendly nature. We aren't saying you're wrong, we are just saying we find your conclusion difficult to believe given the lack of evidence. Furthermore, there are already avenues for such issues to be dealt with assuming the claims are legitimate.