Thread:C.Syde65/@comment-39977730-20190818175101

I don't know how to tell you this, but innocent children have been brainwashed by C.Syde65's salacious agendas. Before I launch into my rant, permit me the prelude caveat that C.Syde65's inveracities are based on a denial of reality, on the substitution of a deliberately falsified picture of the world in place of reality. And this dishonesty, this refusal to admit the truth, will have some very serious consequences for all of us when you least expect it. If you ask C.Syde65 if it's true that its theatrics do not pass muster by any objective standards, you'll just get a lot of foot-shuffling and downcast eyes in response. Once it becomes clear that by an odd twist of fate, with C.Syde65's morals, simple credos like "check your sources" and "argue the other side of the question" have gone out the window, it becomes apparent that C.Syde65 will stop at nothing to devastate vast acres of precious farmland. This may sound outrageous, but if it were fiction I would have thought of something more credible. As it stands, it's our responsibility to increase awareness and understanding of our similarities and differences. That's the first step in trying to explain a few facets of this confusing world around us, and it's the only way to carry out the famous French admonition, écrasez l'infâme!, against its publicity stunts.

Should this be discussed in school? You bet. That's the function of education: To teach students how to purge the darkness from C.Syde65's heart. Let's conduct a Gedankenexperiment. Suppose we could create a hypothetical population free of muzzy-headed immoralism enthusiasts. Let's assume, furthermore, that C.Syde65 were powerless to treat people like craven, drossy rakes. In this hypothetical situation, wouldn't we all be free to fight to the end for our ideas and ideals? Let's make this dream a reality. Let's get people to realize that the picture I am presenting need not be confined to C.Syde65's politics. It applies to everything it says and does.

C.Syde65 just keeps on saying, "We don't give a [expletive deleted] about you. We just want to distract attention from more important issues." According to C.Syde65's distortions, distractions, and outright deceptions, anyone who resists C.Syde65 deserves to be crushed. Fortunately, most of the people who are seriously interested in preserving our civilization know that the reality is that C.Syde65's intent is to prevent us from asking questions. It doesn't want the details checked. It doesn't want anyone looking for any facts other than the official facts it presents to us. I wonder if this is because most of its "facts" are false.

Wanting to misdirect our efforts into fighting each other rather than into understanding the nature and endurance of avaricious radicalism is one thing, but why would anybody possibly want to pit people against each other? Any honest person who takes the time to think about that question will be forced to conclude that all the deals it makes are strictly one-way. C.Syde65 gets all the rights, and the other party gets all the obligations. To get even the simplest message into the consciousness of self-absorbed lackwits, it has to be repeated at least 50 times. Now, I don't want to insult your intelligence by telling you the following 50 times, but by refusing to act, by refusing to pursue virtue and knowledge, we are giving C.Syde65 the power to violate its pledge not to cause wishy-washy subversion to gather momentum on college campuses. C.Syde65 has called innocent children scary, flippant shirkers to their faces. This was not a momentary aberration or a slip of the tongue, and hence, we can safely say that it believes that those of us who oppose it would rather run than fight. The real damage that this belief causes actually has nothing to do with the belief itself, but with psychology, human nature, and the skillful psychological manipulation of that nature by C.Syde65 and its snotty stooges. The irony is that C.Syde65's most judgmental snow jobs are also its most self-aggrandizing. As the French say, "Les extremes se touchent."

C.Syde65 can go on saying that a richly evocative description of a problem automatically implies the correct solution to that problem, but the rest of us have serious problems to deal with that preclude our indulging in such drugged-out dreams just now. Under these conditions, I once overheard C.Syde65 say something quite astonishing. Are you strapped in? C.Syde65 said that space aliens are out to lay eggs in our innards or ooze their alien hell-slime all over us. Can you believe that? At least its statement made me realize that the main dissensus between me and C.Syde65 is that I believe that C.Syde65 is allergic to any idea that isn't confused. It, on the other hand, contends that merit is adequately measured by its methods and qualifications. C.Syde65's ravings are a house of mirrors. How are we to find the opening that leads to freedom? Here's the answer, albeit in a somewhat circuitous and roundabout style: C.Syde65's list of sins is long and each one deserves more space than I have here. Therefore, rather than describe each one individually, I'll summarize by stating that if it would abandon its name-calling and false dichotomies it would be much easier for me to make a cause célèbre out of exposing its double standards for what they really are. Now that this letter has come to an end, I hope you walk away from it realizing that C.Syde65 plants false evidence to incriminate its adversaries. 