User blog comment:Mira Laime/Update on our plans to bring Gamepedia and Fandom together/@comment-64.111.36.62-20190306010741

"As we stated when we first announced the two companies were coming together, we have no plans to force any communities to do anything."

Except, y'know, pressure several communities such as the dungeons and dragons wikis to strip themselves of just about all the content that made them reliable to double check non-SRD information, even from UNEARTHED ARCANA, which is by NO means paid content and thus would not violate content policies. There was no problem with this before Fandom became the wiki domain, and they announced there would be no planned changes, and yet... terms were changed, policies were changed, and questions were ignored. On top of this, as soon as the domain change was made, leaving pages open even overnight slows a computer to unusability as it loads more and more advertisements without prompting. What parts of the content policies were being violated by Unearthed Arcana? What parts of the policies were being violated by the paid content? Did fair use guidelines cover it? Is the full text of your policies available to the public, without being buried in a frustrating maze of redirects? Why are the questions asked by the people who run the 5e wiki being ignored? I used the wiki extensively to check for unearthed arcana, proper rule documentation, and specific references to where in which books rulesets were so I could confirm if I was used the RAW (Rules As Written) correctly. Unearthed Arcana is not paid content, and it deserves to be able to be hosted since its use is not restricted by WotC.