Board Thread:Support Requests - Community Management/@comment-26180812-20160701011102/@comment-26611127-20160701020119

Chris6d wrote: No, I blocked Spookez because originally, it said his account had 0 edits, not 30,000, and that he was inactive, like the screenshot I posted. Also, he had admin rights but was listed nowhere on the wiki as an admin, so I had reasoning behind it, because it seemed fishy. But whatever, I guess it's over with now, so. Why would you block someone for being inactive?

I just want to caution you: Do not block people for being inactive or because their account seems "fishy" in your eyes. To some, this might seem like an abuse of power.