Admin Forum:Chat button styling

I'm trying to style the chat button in the right rail at w:c:tardis. But I'm not quite understanding the CSS element name. It's. . . different to how the other buttons are in the rail. Could someone who knows a little bit more about CSS please take a look at the "start a chat" button and tell me what element names I would use to style it? Thanks 21:24:57 Sat 10 Sep 2011


 * Try using . On a sidenote: the amount of custom styling you're using, CSS3 in particular, makes the wiki run slower on weaker computers - box-shadow is known to slow down a page. — Sovq 06:48, September 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I've been trying to scale back the box-shadow-y-ness for Firefox users, because I understood they were particularly affected. Is it your understanding that other browsers have an issue with it as well?  It's hard for me to see it, because I've got an old computer and browsers, and I'm not noticing horrible load times.


 * In any case, div.chat-join button was one of my initial ideas, and it's not worked. (I've tried it both as .div.chat-join button and div.chat-join button, cause i'm still not quite sure when to apply a prepending "." and when not to.  Neither case has worked, though.)   16:56:14 Sun 11 Sep 2011

If by “re-styling” you mean changing the wording, you do not have to use CSS/JS. You can do it by editing the relevant files in the MediaWiki namespace. Hope this helps! — Spike Toronto  07:20, September 11, 2011 (UTC)
 * w:c:tardis:MediaWiki:Chat-start-a-chat changes the text on the Start a Chat button.
 * w:c:tardis:MediaWiki:Chat-join-the-chat changes the text on the Join the Chat button.
 * You can see most of the relevant system messages for the Tardis Wiki’s Chat here


 * No, I mean the actual style of the button — though every bit of knowledge helps. What's throwing me, I suppose, is that if you inspect another button in the right rail, you get a specific class name, like "wikia-button-upphotos".  But the chat button doesn't seem to have a class attached.  It seems to be created by something that looks more like "raw" JS:  


 * Anyone got any ideas? 16:56:14 Sun 11 Sep 2011