Board Thread:Technical Updates/@comment-24006128-20200423160701/@comment-9605025-20200430202949

Regarding that, how is it going to work long-term once Gamepedia gets UCP as well? As far as I can tell, Gamepedia currently allows local admins to control the interwiki map and scary transclusion at will. This is the complete opposite of Fandom. Will the two farms keep that difference or will one change over from its current approach to the other approach? - reply to #80 What I meant by "deafualt" was really more along the lines of "common" or "normal". Yes, there is a plaintext one that is called the "default". However, the page clearly explains that it is intended for when JS is disabled. If JS is enabled, as it typically the case, they expect that wikis will use the one that UCP is. At least, that is what the page makes it seem like. The fact that it requires a separate service does not mean it is not supposed to be the norm. Sort of like how Fandom is now expecting Discord to be the norm for chatting rather than the chat extension. Perhaps I should have put some more thought into my exact phrasing.