Adoption:Chipmunk Fannon Wiki

Adoption requests →

What is your username? Alvinfan25

Please link to the wiki here: http://alvinfanon.wikia.com/wiki/Chipmunk_Fanon_Wiki

How many edits have you made on that wiki? 8

How many days/months have you been editing there? 7

On the Special Pages → Special:ListUsers when was the last time an admin edited, and who was it? no one

Any other information: nope

The owner of this wiki was just active last week plus you said there are no admins when actually there are four. This wiki doesn't look like it's avalable for adoption. Im Yoponot and i approve this Message (talk) 20:23, July 24, 2013 (UTC)


 * Actually Yoponot, the wiki is eligable for adoption because there aren't any active admins in that wiki. It's because she has a low amount of contributions right now. If he reaches more than 8 and the admins aren't going to make one edit and/or some were absent. The wiki is likely to be adopted.--Gabby Fraggle (talk) 07:36, August 4, 2013 (UTC)


 * Actually, Alvinfan is unable to adopt this wiki. She only has 8 edits since first starting in January of 2013. Her last edit was about a week ago. Also, there are other people who have edited recently, as well as two admins who have edited in the past 60 days. If you would like to become an administrator, please: try to be more active, start a community blog and message other users about your adoption to see if they agree, or just ask a bureaucrat on there to give you the rights. Thank you. NinjaFatGuy (talk) 08:02, August 4, 2013 (UTC)


 * Making blogs are only if there's an already de-admined user contributing with the user and those are anonymous IP users. With the low amount of contributions, she can't adopt it.--Gabby Fraggle (talk) 08:16, August 4, 2013 (UTC)


 * Making blogs in a case like this is to let other people of the community to dicuss about her idea of adopting the wiki, and for them "vote" on the topic, think if it's a good idea. Although, she does have low contribution, as I already said, so it doesn't matter. NinjaFatGuy (talk) 08:22, August 4, 2013 (UTC)


 * It sounds like we're both correct. Shes not meeting the guidelines of the contribution amounts and others for adoption. But votes would support the request.--Gabby Fraggle (talk) 08:32, August 4, 2013 (UTC)


 * And by the way, (shrinks iris) speaking of rights changes, these become so crazy when changed by staff.EyeEmotionGFraggle.png--Gabby Fraggle (talk) 08:36, August 4, 2013 (UTC)