User blog comment:Endercat TM/The Admins and Mods/@comment-27345308-20180811174255

I've a few things to note, including grammatical corrections (as you mentioned you don't mind them :P) and some personal opinions: You covered a wide range of information about user groups in the blog, and that is really awesome! Though, sometimes when topics are this extensive you may want to write about certain parts of them instead of trying to capture all information in a single blog. It makes it easier to research, analyze and be accurate about things you're writing about and your readers will be less afraid of smaller walls of text! :)
 * "Namely findings right Admins and Mods, how to giv them privileges or take it away if they are being unfair." &rarr; "Namely finding right Admins and Mods, how to give them privileges or take them away if they are being unfair"
 * "Mod is a Modertator" &rarr; "Mod is a Moderator"
 * "Then there is of course roll back" &rarr; "Then there is, of course, rollback"
 * "if neccisary" &rarr; "if neccessary"
 * Wikia sites crashing has nothing to do with rollback duties, actually. When a Wikia site crashes, Staff will bring up the server as soon as possible and in 99.9% of the cases without any content losses. Even when there are content losses, there are database backups Staff can use to bring back content and rollbacks don't play any role in that.
 * "want them to adpot the wiki" &rarr; "want them to adopt the wiki"
 * "Sabotoging" &rarr; "Sabotaging"
 * "even though they miss behave" &rarr; "even though they misbehave"
 * The "not obligatory" section contains three dotpoints already mentioned in the "obligatory" section :P
 * "list with stuff like Adminastrator, bureacrat etc" &rarr; "list with stuff like Administrator, bureaucrat etc"
 * "come back to the beggining of the page" &rarr; "come back to the beginning of the page"
 * "Admins can only give mod titles to the user." As EarthlingnAkumi mentioned, this should probably be changed to "Admins can only give discussions mod and chat mod titles to the user."
 * "This doesn't work on Community Central" or really any other official wiki, such as Dev Wiki or Portability Wiki.
 * "You also can't change the title of a staff member or give anyone staff rights. Bureaucrat is the highest title on a wikia." is kind of inaccurate, depending on who are you writing the blog to. What you probably wanted to say is that bureaucrat is the highest local user group and that users without certain global groups cannot promote to any higher user group than bureaucrat.
 * "isn't the righ fr your lovely wiki" &rarr; "isn't the right for your lovely wiki"
 * It should probably be noted that if you promote a bad user to bureaucrat, you can contact Staff about it to remove their rights. In general, even if you did not assign the rights to a bad bureaucrat, you can start a community vote on the wiki and if the majority of the community votes supportive Staff will strip them of their rights. See also User blog:Mira Laime/How to Deal With a Bad Bureaucrat
 * "I do not know if Admins or Mods can protect pages." Yes, administrators and Content Moderators can protect pages.
 * "how series it is" &rarr; "how serious it is"
 * May be opinion-based, but the terminology used in the blog post is not very consistent with the "official" terminology used on Help pages.
 * "wikias" are now referred to as "wikis" or "communities"
 * "puppets" are referred to as sockpuppets, if they are evading a bad. In very rare cases there are meatpuppets, users that act on behalf of another blocked user, but in the blog post it seems that "puppet" actually refers to a vandal, not specifically to somebody evading a block.
 * I've heard "vandalize" much more often used than "sabotage"
 * I've also never heard the term "suspend". Are "suspensions" temporary blocks, or chat bans?
 * "rank" and "title" are called "user group" (or "user right", but that would be less technically accurate) on Help pages
 * Blocks can be undone through Special:Unblock.