User blog comment:Brandon Rhea/Battle for the Net: Internet Slowdown/@comment-5537325-20140911052350

What kind of blog post is this? Who in the right mind would want to be putting deceiving loading icons on their site and how can that communicate anything to people not aware of its significance? And why would you make a LETTER hard to understand with all that jargon? Plus, no examples or evidence are stated in the letter so I doubt that that letter will persuade, convince, or compel the Chairman. YOU NEED TO ADDRESS WHY NET NEUTRALITY SHOULD BE DEFENDED IN A CLEAR, PERSUASIVE WAY.

This includes but is not limited to:
 * Critically explaining and justifying why giving power to cable companies is bad
 * Critically explaining and justifying why the "fast & slow lane" division is bad
 * Critically explaining and justifying why requiring fees to deliver website content is bad
 * Critically explaining and justifying why FCC is attacking OUR rights

I am for defending 'net neutrality', but this blog post is proving less than it should be.