Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-33168089-20170821015513/@comment-27345308-20170918180918

Fandyllic wrote: Having a great editor for anons and new users is a good idea, but if it cripples or frustrates the most productive contributors, it is a net bad idea. Anons and new users may have enthusiasm at points, but the most dedicated and productive users rarely can rely on a pseudo WYSIWYG editor. That's why it's a test and not a released editor mode in any way. If they manage to replicate all source mode features in a WYSIWYG editor and make wikitext migratable to their syntax, would you really need source mode? If they don't, they'll probably mark the experiment as a failure and try work on a wikitext editor with features editors liked in Lucy.