Thread:Merrystar/@comment-209674-20151014231110/@comment-4551144-20151015084303

WikiMan wrote: Hello. Yes. Another issue regarding the wiki-that-should-not-exist.

Wiki admin RetroGameFan9000 banned me for 100 years under the argument that "I thought that some ideas are made by little kids".

Now, I've been "hating" those ideas almost since I started participating there. But during this month, all that I did was mostly categorization and adding a few good ideas to the wiki (like a bunch of ideas for a bike with a charger, ideas for a new Microsoft Windows feature, phone-related ideas). I believe that my behaviour was better than when Sannse banned me for a year, since I didn't say what is obvious (i.e. this wiki needs to change) as often as, idk, 2012? Because, IMO, RetroGameFan9000 banned me way longer that he should, and even longer than Sannse did back then. I think that was disproportionate in relation with my actions. Not to mention that 100 years from now, both me and RGF9000 will be six feet under and Wiki might be a thing of the past (he should have chosen to ban me infinitely then).

Now, the "some ideas are made by little kids" is sadly true. Let's not get to that point because nearly everyone knows how true this is.

I wish we could talk this out (and with RGF9K if that's possible) whenever possible.

brb checking mindlight out -wm It also applies to admins banning every user from the wikia too as she stated above. Sound of Sky forexample had the right to ban one, multiple or everyone from the wikia for any reason they wish. Even though it might not be fair to everyone who recieved the ban, but it's the wikia's decision to ban everyone from the wikia to make it to where only he and his other account can edit on the wikia. But when issues such as vandalism occur, then it gets removed.