Thread:Garfield1601/@comment-25117913-20140719204717/@comment-5222734-20140720013523

Indeed. Dan is still a villain, but I do agree with the fact he does have good in him. For example, he stopped a street-gang of thuggish kids (as in Dan Vs. The Lemonade Stand Gang), and even though he blew up the animal shelter, he rescued all of the animals (including his kitten Mr. Mumbles) before the explosion (as in Dan Vs. The Animal Shelter). He definitely needs pages on both the Heroes and Villains wikis, because many times he is a Jerk with a Heart of Gold, and at other times a great example of a Villainous Jerk. In my views of character alignments, I would see Dan as Chaotic Evil, but Chaotic Neutral (or even Chaotic Good) on his better days. Maybe I could see Dan as either an anti-hero or an anti-villain.