Thread:Kavpeny/@comment-452-20150817192613/@comment-30333252-20150818082632

@452: Thank you for your praise.

As I have stated previously, I find it is ridiculous that MediaWiki js is subject to such a ridiculous amount of scrutiny. People who know coding will find it highly frustrating to have every minor change "approved".

The suggestion is ludicrous, and will be likely proved as such when the communities deemed "active" will receive rapid responses, but those not as "active" will have extremely delayed responses. Not to mention, waiting even 5 minutes to make a minor edit is way too long.

Also, I agree with you on the Wikia lock-down policy is highly frustrating. I can respect the Wikia's decision to respect online security, but the increasingly totalitarian method of doing so is what I find distasteful. Not to mention, the ever-increasing red tape is complete BS IMO.

I would personally rather not argue battle with the staff members. Given their ridiculous amount of power, which is completely unchecked might I add, I fear that talking back to them in any way will result in a global block, along with removal of all Wikia contributions. Who knows, they might even misuse personal information. Best to keep your head down and let them do whatever they want.

I have noticed that, which is why I said: The new review system's execution will fail spectacularly, simply because it will cause prioritization of some wiki over others. That's all good and dandy for people on important wiki such as Comunity Central, but us regular contributors might as well kiss JS editing goodbye.

Agreed. Using blanket statements to justify a course of action is foolhardy at best.