Board Thread:New Features/@comment-24739709-20150929231108/@comment-9645954-20160204222815

Dessamator wrote: If you know how to use javascript, then it is quite easy to generate numerous reports using the Mw:API:Query api. It is also possible to produce the reports that you want by changing and filtering the results. In fact, I've been using a slightly modified report script created by User:452 called [Maintenance] that generates custom daily reports that are easier to manage.

Changing the defaults can mean very time consuming and inefficient queries. For example, Lyrics wikia has more than a million pages, and if each of those contains something that needs to be reported, that's a considerable issue processing that many pages so many times. In fact, it is highly likely that some reports are deactivated on some wikis because of the effect on the servers (e.g. English wikipedia).

Anyway, as far as infoboxes, images and insights are concerned. Images from templates are also sometimes not useful to include in the reports because some wikis do include images in their stub or "notice" templates that aren't related to the article and not useful  for readers. But since we now have the ability to categorize templates by type, shouldn't we be able to use that so that we'd be able to acknowledge infobox images as images on the article, but images from other types of templates as not actual images?