Board Thread:Support Requests - Community Management/@comment-32442968-20170702015114/@comment-184822-20170703034007

WarBringer (ArtistOfTheDaleks), if you are truly Anon, as you suggest, then you are a Prime example of why the reigns of accountability need to exist in societies. You pretend to observe an example of injustice while having limited to no facts on an event, and then suggestively threaten that someone will burn as a witch on a rote accusation. You start off your war cry post perfectly with the question of user wrongdoing, but then immediately seem to jump the shark.

I'm not going to pretend to understand the Fandom hierarchy, myself. If an unjustice truly has occurred, then I agree that it should be handled. If there is a hierarchy that allows for actions to be taken, then the first step should be to determine whether or not an injustice truly has occurred. This is probably a thing that would require poring through edit histories... here's what I've found so far:

Looking at the users' wall page shows them being told that their edit (although, the edit in question is not directly mentioned; his contribution list suggests that it's referring to the edit war on the Chapter 870 page) is currently in discussion on the talk page. A cursory glance at the Chapter 870 history page shows an edit war between User:to love this and others on the wikia, including admins, initiated by an edit made by this user (most of the changes that suggest this to be the case are reversions of edits made by this user). Upon scanning the talk page, it also appears as if this user created a new account, User:Diseal97 (its profile page shows a creation date of June 30th, compared to his original account ban date: June 30th) to avoid the initial ban. Looking at the blocked users page shows a third attempt, a day later, wherein an autoblock by IP address was initiated by the system.

In short: I, personally, am not seeing an abuse of power, here. I'm seeing a typical edit war based on a disagreement in opinion regarding subject matter, that ended -- as many of them do -- in one or more users being given a temporary ban.