Thread:Lolseriously?/@comment-46370557-20200726004837

Or at the very least, give community managers to fandoms that ACTUALLY need one, like the Jurassic Park wiki

Before you tell me to use special contact, already have, and it is already in the process of being ignored and dismissed by staff, so this is just for the opinions of the community than it is me asking for help that never comes.

Today, I tried to add some trivia to the Jurassic park wiki triva section for the upcoming film Dominion. The triva was the fact that the Dominion film would include more animatrionics than Jurassic World and fallen kingdom. Here is the article I read that proves this and why I decided to add it in the first place.

https://collider.com/jurassic-world-3-animatronic-dinosaurs-colin-trevorrow-interview/

An admin named Diablosaurus127 then removed the triva stating that it was not usefull infomation, I argued that as animatronics are a big part of the production of the JP series it deserves at least a mention, I also reminded him that trivia sections were made for this very reason, for all the tid bits that dont warrent a place on the main article. He then tried to change his reasons for reverting it from not useful to not proven, claiming the article was fake news pretty much  ( It seems he just did not want to allow me to add trivia and was thinking of reasons on the spot right? This is the first contact I have had wioth this admin by the way, there was no previous bad blood )

​​​​

so as he claimed the article was unreliable I decided to find the comicon panel in which he, the guy who is actually directing the film, states there will be more animatronics in this film than the other 2, here is the video that prooves this. Listen to what he says after 24 minutes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4y69aamh0H0

and here is proof of me showing him this video, a video that SHOULD prove I was right all along and my reverts of HIS reverts were pretty warrented, right?



You may notice that another user named Battleshipman gets involved at this point, he is also an admin. Now despite the fact that I had posted a proof video before he got involved, he clearly did not watch the proof video and instantly sided with his admin friend, telling me that its all speculation and not proven, despite me posting a video of THE DIRECTOR HIMSELF saying this.

He then wrote on MY wall pretty much telling me that Diablosaurus has been here longer than me and is better than me because of it ( for the record, I was disscussing it as calmly as Diablosaurus, I dont know why he said this tbh, it is why I think it could be racial ) Now, if I was RIGHT about the animatronics and Diablosaurus ignored or dissmissed my proof and continued to revert my edit, dont that make HIM the person who started the edit war? So why am I the one getting a talking to on my wall? he said nothing to his friend and fellow admin about this, dspite admiting that I was right all along.



He even continued to blame ME after he admits I was RIGHT



And Im here to ask, is that fair? do you see this as toxic as I do? This has been going on there for a while now. I asked Battleshipman to at lest give Diablosaurus a warning aswell, and instead he just tried to find ANY reason for my trivia to be wrong and diablosaurus justified, even claiming that YOUTUBE is not a credible scource....This video was UPLOADED to youtube yes, but it was not made by some youtuber in his undies, it was a legit panel from comicon that included THE GUY WHO IS DIRECTING THIS FILM.



It got me thinking, perhaps these 2 admins are actually the same person? if YOU was an admin, would YOU side with Diablosaurus despite all the proof that was given? would YOU call me an edit warrer in this situatuion?  