User blog:Sandgar-fduser/Should Admin Have Term Limits or No?

This is a concept some people have thrown around. It would be a way to bring in new admin or keep really good admin in power. I just want peoples opinions on if we should be able to have term limits, which at the end of these terms, there would be a reelection of an admin, and if an admin is voted out, then a new admin will be voted in. This is just an opinion vote, and does not have binding effects. The options to vote on are:


 * 1) All admin, including bcrat must have a term, and can't be reelected after the term for a certain period of time.
 * 2) All admin have a term that they are free from demotions or recalls, but when the term ends they must be reelected. They can be reelected as many times as they want.
 * 3) Admin do not have terms, but a vote can be posted to see if the admin is still fit to be an admin every two months if requested by a certain amount of users.
 * 4) No term limits and demotion polls only way to make admins leave their position other then resignation.

This is purely for opinion, and debate of what the perfect system is.