User blog comment:Rupert Giles/Layout Changes: Breakpoints and Typography/@comment-1250011-20150527041809/@comment-4189499-20150528101051

Having a small computer doesn't mean you have an ancient washing-machine style computer with 720px width. I've got a 6 month old Surface which is 2160px wide in pixel terms but only 12 inches in physical terms, which gives me an amazingly awesome and beautiful pixel density, which I bet is much higher than your desktop. Please don't speak down to people who choose smaller screens. It's really starting to piss me off how many bloody desktop users feel they're so superior because they have an oversized screen which can't be used in any place other than a single desk, give crappy images where every pixel is the size of Jupiter, probably isn't touch screen, and forces you to use a separate machine at work/school/uni. Users of smaller screens are not a poor minority who should just accept that their screens can't display pages properly. They are a growing force as better and better computers can be included into smaller and smaller casings, and the trend will only continue. If you haven't been formatting your pages to suit smaller screens, then I have zero sympathy for you for having your layout now "broken". The reason such a high percentage of the comments here are negative is because those who benefit from the change can see no reason to comment, which is why I've made an effort to post a lot on their behalf. This update, although it doesn't change anything for small screened users in the small term, is of huge benefit in the long term by forcing the selfish bastards who believe that pages should only look good on large screens to remake their pages to look good on all screens.