Board Thread:New Features/@comment-24458012-20170209201536/@comment-24458012-20170210191212

But is it? Is it not a chicken and egg question? Is there really such a natural tendency towards visual media everywhere or is the promotion of those images creating that impression? A case of them being the ones who are shouting the loudest, metaphorically speaking, maybe?!

Listing thousands of images when a film is involved, is really no big deal, you could add them over the course of a couple of days. They are mostly not informative content but decoration, eye candy. It does not tell you anything about the quality of the informative content of a site. They do not provide solid substance.

Anyway - I am not saying that visual media should become invisible or even tone down... but it would cost next to nothing to expand the homepage to include access to a wider variety of Wikis.

I am a regular Wikipedia user and I will happily skip all over the Wiki, following a trail of interesting links. That is really not feasible here. Having a wider variety of Wikis visible and easily accessible would mean users would be looking around more. Having such a narrow focus when a wider one would be just as easily accommodated - that does not make sense from a business point of view.