Thread:Sannse/@comment-24270799-20190928153803/@comment-38953622-20191001125159

Love Robin wrote: "The line is not that Staff will *never* intervene, only that it is Rarely done."

It is above my paygrade to try and second-guess the motivations of a Staff member. I do not have access to Global-review Tools, cannot see what users do across the entirety of FANDOM, do not have access to S:C tickets and any links included in them.

What I *can* see is at least one blocking reason is for "you're a liberal!!". Which is discrimination. Which *is* a TOU Violation.

I'm Neutral. I don't do politics. I don't vote. I *do* believe that Politics (or Religion) should not be mixed with just about anything regardless of Left, Right, Middle, or whatev labels are used these days.

Being so blatantly political at least nudges considerations toward TOU "grey areas" if not blatant violations. To the first point:

Now you are just changing the goalposts. The dichotomy of rarely vs never is not the same as that of against the ToU vs not against the ToU, you should make up your mind and be more consistent.

Second point:

This is a logical fallacy known as appeal to ignorance. If you argue for something you should know about what you are arguing about.

Third point:  This is again blatant inconsistency. For instance using your line of logic, I can say the staff person who globally blocked me discriminated against me, when they did not block Blue in the Red Zone, because it is pretty inconsistent to presume that what I did was much worse than what he did. He called everyone on Moderate-Pedia "slightly Nazi/Nazi apologist." I was accused of calling someone a feminist who hates males ( but that was hyperbolic as I did no such thing.)