Thread:Logo12/@comment-24478603-20140521155404/@comment-28857013-20140530092546

Commando Conceptor L5 5.12.159.141 wrote: Logologologol wrote:

Said*

Okay, done some research. Here are some people who is called Genu much earlier than you: More to list. (443978 found)
 * Babu Genu Said
 * Camille R Genu
 * Janine P Genu
 * Glaudine N Genu
 * Janine P Genu
 * Micolle I Genu
 * Yvonne J Genu
 * Ernestine Marguerite L Gènu
 * Genu (http://prntscr.com/3liom8)
 * Jean Genu
 * Pierre Genu
 * Elizabeth Genu
 * (Another) Genu (http://prntscr.com/3lioqs)

As I have seen, most of them are born before 1900. So unless you are 80 something years (By subjective perspective you are underage anyway), you can't be the original "Genu". And even your nickname, "Genu" is taken from the game "Enigmata 2: Genu's Revenge". Now who is the impersonator now?

Now for the "no such law as copyrighting words", I might be wrong here. But claiming one thing is copyrighted doesn't make you own a copyright. Go ahead to register the name GENU online. oops!

Again, not sure how many times have I said, but a Wiki ToU doesn't affect another wiki. You have been illegally removing content from other wikis, Which is truly "vandalism".

~Logo (Temporary signature) The game continues... 14:06, May 22, 2014 (UTC) To know,as that message has been deleted,but you break this rule!Being an admin of that evil BCoW is a zero tolerance crime that leads to infinite ban.I banned you for the following reasons: I ENSURE THAT YOU WILL STAY BANNED!
 * BCoW admin
 * Copyright violation
 * spam/harassment
 * ignoring the report
 * ToU violation
 * advertising ToU violation site

--http://images4.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20140425164513/genupedia/images/thumb/5/5d/Sign.png/81px-Sign.png (talk) 07:35, May 25, 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Being BCoW admin is unreasonable as a crime, but that only shows your subjectivity.
 * 2) Copyright Violation, as I have explained and Reexplained, you were ignorant about the reasons and directly stuck the "copyvio" thing into me. This is again no way reasonable.
 * 3) Spam, as a matter of fact, definition and historic proof I was only reverting your edits, for the reason of your copyvio issue. You were being frustrated, constantly adding a "blocked" quote in my userpage, and adding deletion templates reasonlessly on different pages. All subsequential edits from me were and only were reverts of your edits.
 * 4) Harassment, by definition is "intentional offense that is found threatening and upsetting", which by your sense, I understand why you said so. I have been reverting your edits, but that is only for rules. To be straightforward you were the one harassing me, first by adding "blocked" quotes in my userpage, then by sending "warning" to my message wall, and now posting here for further debate. This is really what harassment means, as you are threatening me, more than 5 times for "blocking" me, according to the aforementioned definition.
 * 5) Ignoring the report. For firstly there are no (Wikia-wise) legal power to the w:c:nexxon:Reports on this wiki. It was only:
 * 6) Ranged in your wiki, which I had no power to edit since long, for the reason of the above(s).
 * 7) Unreasonable, for the reason of the above (regarding copyvio)
 * 8) A mere report. Ignoring report isn't what a crime is. Report is only to submit information to something (which on your case to no one), but not to warn users things.
 * 9) ToU violation. We.. *sigh* Have explained this for a lot also, but you were also ignorant against it. So I'll say it once more. The ToU of your wiki is, the rules of your wiki. That said it has no legal power outside your wiki again. This proves all already
 * 10) Advertising ToU violation site... Okay, I assume you meant the official copyright registration site, which is held by the US Copyright Office, with real US laws protected. If you wanna challenge it, challenge the US law, challenge our chronological sense. Challenge the whole world about it.

That's all I wanna say for now, delete this if you wish, we still have proof. You are merely attacking a fraction of my statement, which has to be false.