Thread:Matthew Schroeder/@comment-38729545-20190724212729/@comment-38729545-20190928155346

“https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox

By informative definition, paradox is a logical statement that seems to contradict itself. It is a statement that, despite apparently valid reasoning from true premises, leads to an apparently-self-contradictory or logically unacceptable conclusion. A paradox involves contradictory-yet-interrelated elements that exist simultaneously and persist over time.

Ie. in all respective fields of each studies, there has been a increasingly amount of paradoxs used in all respective that could be considered self contradictory and yes even in philosophy, it was described in this way:”

“But one must not think ill of the paradox, for the paradox is the passion of thought, and the thinker without the paradox is like the lover without passion: a mediocre fellow. But the ultimate potentiation of every passion is always to will its own downfall, and so it is also the ultimate passion of the understanding to will the collision, although in one way or another the collision must become its downfall. This, then, is the ultimate paradox of thought: to want to discover something that thought itself cannot think.”

I myself as a philosopher in every sense of the word value free will and everyone has different opinions.

In these extreme cases, ”ignorance is bliss”  will be the phrase I will describe that one  subject of the proposal.”