Thread:PowerCrusher04/@comment-17897872-20170909044015/@comment-3225604-20170909133805

It is great to know PowerCrusher04 apologizes. This is a good thing to begin with. Looking at the chat history, I agree PowerCrusher04 made some pretty rude remarks to 3primetime3. Not sure if you could clear PC's worries of Leo being demoted if he fails to rate levels, what would happen if others rated sooner than him? In my forgetful mind, I remember Leo was responsible to rate undetermined levels and try to minimize the number of undetermined levels we have now. I believe 3primetime3 is very lenient on Leo. Just to make sure that I would not be accepting the reason of the demotion of Leo to be failure of rating levels since admins are not only responsible in this area.

As for the demotion of PowerCrusher04, I would severely oppose this notion. This would become a very bad example on the wiki. Some wikis set off a wave of demotions because of chat behavior. In my opinion, actions on the chat should be independent from actions on the wiki as both platforms have different functions and different audience. Besides, bad chat behavior could not justify why PC fails to demonstrate his additional abilities as a rollback or an abuse of his rollbck powers. This independence is important otherwise it would become absurd if you behave poorly in chat and get banned on wiki when you are not detrimental to the wiki.

And just my two cents I hope you, PC, could be more considerate and careful of your words.