Thread:Xulrev/@comment-24503208-20180801050412/@comment-24503208-20180801055554

Xulrev wrote: >Your judgement as I say earlier is still subject to interpretations and perceiving no matter what you say here. Your denial of the evidence show your bias against the evidence at hand.

You keep repeating this and I do not believe you understand what you are implying.

You are saying that my mere act of dissent means I am flawed in my dissenting, because refusing to agree with what you deem truth is bias.

I do not believe this will go beyond this point as we disagree fundamentally and I would enjoy ending this discussion on a positive note :)

Your mere act of dissent is what caused the drama on the blog made by an Fandom staff.

I do not considered everything as truth you know, but you certainly make it clear on what you think is truth and factious to you.

I am uncertain if you are young or you simply has never been exposed to terrible experience. Quite frankly I think it is the latter.

I am saying you should look at the evidence and tried to think on what other people came from and how they felt about it.

It is call looking from a someone’s own perspective other than your own.

I don’t know why you decided to perceived my words, but it seems to cause a lot of misunderstandings.