Forum:Should IPs sign posts?

I'm aware that it's proper Wiki etiquette for registered contributors to sign their posts when leaving messages, but what about IP addresses? I've been curious about this for quite some time. A few months back, Nitrome Wiki had an "IP scare" where users began scoping other users' talk pages to remove signatures (ex. here) of anonymous contributors. There was a concern that an IP address could be traced to a location that could reveal a person's whereabouts, so all evidence of an IP signatures on talk pages is usually erased on Nitrome Wiki. 07:25, September 20, 2012 (UTC)


 * IP addresses are rarely accurate enough or consistent enough to give a reliable location. IPs should sign their posts. --Callofduty4 (talk) 07:33, September 20, 2012 (UTC)


 * IPs should sign their posts - it's still recorded in the page history revision, so there is no point in removing it from the current revision Any users who are concerned should simply register an account. It is very easy for anyone to obtain someone else's IP address regardless. -452 02:32, September 22, 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes. As stated by Callofduty4 and 452, it is generally recommended that IPs sign their posts because - although it is recored in the page history - it makes things easier for the receiver of the message so they know whose talk page they should leave their reply on. On Message Walls, however, you don't need to sign; it is automatic.  Love and Lust  22:57, September 28, 2012 (UTC)


 * Also, many if not most ISPs these days use dynamic IP allocation, so if the user is with such an ISP (as I am, I'm on Three UK), posting from there is the equivalent of phoning from a public call box; the post can be accurately traced back only as far as the ISP, not to an individual user thereof. -- RobertATfm (talk) 13:09, September 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * It's worth noting that your ISP keeps logs, so a court order could reveal your real details if there was a legitimate complaint, although this won't happen unless you do something that might be illegal. If you have an account, the court would also have to ask Wikia to reveal your IP details.
 * If you edit on Wikia in any way (comment, use a talk page, whatever) without logging in, your IP address will be revealed permanently - it doesn't matter that it's not on the talk page because people can see it on the history page and on Recent Changes. The suggested way of working around this is creating an account, which will make your contributions anonymous, with an account, only Wikia staff and Volunteers have access to this IP data, and the lookup of such data is logged and only used in certain circumstances (for instance, abuse of multiple accounts or cross-wiki spam or vandalism). --  Random Time  14:35, September 29, 2012 (UTC)


 * How is it possible then, that a user on Nitrome Wiki was able to trace an IP address to deliver the results of a street address the user lived on? 06:44, October 13, 2012 (UTC)


 * Dear Random-storykeeper, I would like to express my concern about your revealing of this event on a particular wiki. Perhaps it may have happened, but by quoting details, such as Nitrome Wiki, IP address, street address, "IP scare", history revisions et cetera it makes it easier for an individual to search for the event(s) in question. Everyone has the (read) right on Community Wiki. It would be unfortunate if, in addition to busybodies, this forum attracts the attention of evildoers who may in the future use this information here to their advantage.


 * In reply to your question: As stated above, many ISP allocate dynamic IPs to their subscribers. The user whose location was traced could have been using a static IP address. Another possibility is that the IP address is common to residents of the street, which made the user easier to track down. SQhi(talk)Ruby 07:13, October 13, 2012 (UTC)