User talk:Helloher

Welcome
Welcome to Central Wikia, Helloher!

We're a friendly community here; most of us are active on an individual wiki, and many of us are active on more than one.

If you're looking for help, a help wiki can be found here, and you're welcome to ask the community questions on the Help Desk. If you need assistance from a staff member, you can contact the Community Team using Special:Contact.

You can get live help from community members and staff in our IRC channel. There are also channels for larger Wikia and their communities. Here you can socialize and get to know your community!

If you have an idea for a new wiki, please create one! Check out our list of new wikis and see if any of them interest you. A directory of existing wikis is also available.

Finally, please keep an eye on the recent changes to see what the community is up to here.

Enjoy! -- Cizagna (Talk) 21:19, November 15, 2009

Hi. Picnic Attack    (Talk to me, or I'll poke you!)  18:25, July 21, 2010 (UTC)

I'm not Sannse.
1) all of the community come to a consensus unanimously that the wiki is to be moved, is there any reason why we cannot have this wiki deleted?
 * Why? You agreed to license your contributions so that Wikia could always make use of them. You're asking them to spend time doing themselves out of ad revenue, which makes no sense at all. I can understand you wanting Wikia to meet you half way, but they are by helping you move your Wiki. To ask Wikia to be reasonable, you must first be willing to do the same.

1) Or at least have a message to say we moved?
 * WoWWiki have it written on their home page...

1) ...if the wiki becomes one that is full of vandalism, and as all the contributers have moved elsewhere - out of date, unmaintained and poor quality?
 * Why would it be full of vandalism? Seriously. I don't think you realize quite how many Wikis will be left barren during this period of time. Your Wiki is nothing but a number, as for the article count (what says if you're vaguely important to Wikia, or not) I have no idea.

1) Say, take the 'Forestry Wiki' ... Where is the logic and how is it fair for the wikia staff to then choose to get rid of this notice saying that the far-superior but inaccessible site exists - denying the common internet user of the information?
 * Again, be reasonable if you wish them to do so. Saying "lol we're gone enjoy an inactive wiki dumbasses" will never impress anyone, but a simple note saying the wiki forked (as per WoWWiki above) is factual and thus far more likely to be accepted (pro tip: doing this without mentioning it on the talk page of a wikia staff member = clever, but too late now).

1) Where is the logic and how is it fair for the wikia staff to then choose to get rid of this notice
 * Where is the logic? They get money from ads. There's the logic.

2) If this is what the people that spend almost no time on the wiki have to say
 * If they spend almost no time on the Wiki... find someone who cares about their input. Wikia is a for-profit company. They're not here to make you happy and hold your hand, they're around to make money. I don't agree with the way they're handling this (e.g. doing it at all) but you have to be realistic. If you choose to ignore their point of view you'll never get anywhere in discussions with them.

3) Did it ever cross your minds that because there will be so many people leaving because of the new layout - the percentage of user traffic will be so much lower, that your more prominent adverts will now be clicked on less.
 * I'm inclined to believe - but lack actual knowledge and am assuming - that Wikia would get paid for the ad being loaded rather than clicked on. You appear certain this is not the case. Might I ask where you got this information? Yes, by the way, Google is happy to facilitate you either way. Being paid for the ad loading simply means being paid less per ad.

3) You've lost almost 1/6 of your traffic from one wiki
 * Quantcast or similar statistics backing this up plz

3) WoWWiki decided to put messages out on all the WoW fansites that it had moved...
 * Nobody cares, people are more likely to go to the home page.

3) Does this make sense to you, that you will actually be getting less revenue?
 * Editors make up for less ad income than readers. By focusing on editors mostly (or totally) you're missing the bigger picture. Also... here's another idea. Say you double your ads on each page, and lose one third of readers / editors. You're still gaining money.

4) you are keeping Monobook as an option for people ... decision to not do this makes no sense in any respect - a financial or otherwise
 * Uncyclopedia would leave the day monobook was removed. That's why it's still around. Big Wiki, LOADSA ad revenue, BIG SAY in decisions. I imagine that no longer having Monaco up and running (updated or otherwise) saves them overheads, also they can't give in everytime they attempt to do something - they'd not be taken seriously.


 * You didn't ask me, I'm not Wikia staff, I don't care. But I'm closer to caring than Wikia, and hopefully my responses helped you in some way or other. If not I won't bother you again. A F K is pro-AWA! 23:44, October 25, 2010 (UTC)

About Talk Page
Hi Please stop massing around with other users talk page. Users have the right to change their talk page & take away old message. Than add new one. So please leave my talk page alone. I know Sarah Manley (One of the Wikia Stuff) & i could tell her you are massing with my talk page. Talk Page are used for new message & deleted old message. It not used to put back old message Also see the date of my message below: If it like 3 month old, You would deleted. That how it won't full up the talk page. Old message must be deleted to keep talk page short for new message. Thank You... ICarlyFan2009 (Edmund) 19:57, November 9, 2010 (UTC)