User blog comment:JustLeafy/Wikia VS Wikipedia/@comment-25240518-20170918180338/@comment-26923519-20170918181616

For the first paragraph, I sort of expected that too, but almost half of the people of voted for Wikia, voted for Wikipedia. Also, the default/desktop UI doesn't look too modern, but the app version looks minimal, modern and materialized, which is quite surprising, but good for a site that hasn't updated their web UI in years (mobile view is fine, but the desktop version might need a change).

For the second paragraph, Wikipedia is better in general information and article structure. It provides endless-like information, structured almost flawlessly, about general topics. I'm not saying the information itself is almost flawless, it's the structure and the fact that the article structure is quite clean and consistent.

For the third paragraph, Wikipedia does have a steep learning curve, but the thing is, it is the reason why Wikipedia is generally consistent with the article structure and formatting in general.

Also, thank you for the time you have read on my topic. I wouldn't say my topic is too original, since there have been a few minor conversations about comparing both sites in the past, which weren't usually a main thread's topic, but the originality in the topic is the benefits and drawbacks about both sites and general conversations about them.

I do not expect a community highlight for this blog. It'd be nice if it did get one, but the goal for this topic is to give more information of comparing both sites.