Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-38517772-20201013160631/@comment-38517772-20201013175026

Fandyllic wrote: Perhaps your standards are low and not other people's standards are too high.

You can't compare UCP to Message Walls... that's just imbalanced and ridiculous.

I mean how long have you even been on FANDOM? Are you an administrator for any sizable wikis? Are you responsible for fixing any of the problems that UCP has caused? You need to have some experience and some responsibility to have credibility.

Think of this as your favorite carmaker deciding to completely redo their cars, but the new model is buggy, unreliable, and unpredictable, but with no real manual. You're telling me you would be fine with that? Perhaps you were too quick to jump to conclusions about me.

Are you saying that I apparently need to have been on Fandom for a specific amount of time, and I need to be an admin on a specific amount of wikis in order for me to have a say in all of this? What are your predictions about my "credibility", hm?

I am not, in any way, trying to compare Message Walls to UCP. Of course that's ridiculous. I'm loosely comparing the feelings people had about them when they were first introduced. Not once in my original post did I compare the actual features to each other. I simply compared the "situations".

When did I say I was ok with UCP? I clearly stated at the end of my post that I don't really like the new editor and I preferred a lot of things in the old editor. From what I've gathered from your post, it seems as if you jumped at the first sign of the word "overhating" to come to a false conclusion about what my intents what this post were. I'm not saying that UCP is perfect. I'm not saying it has zero problems. I'm saying that the way people are reacting to it is irrational and won't help make it better in the slightest.