User blog comment:Susanolivia/Fixed Width, Sidebar, and the Removal of Monaco/@comment-113335-20101005000033

All right, to refute Sannse's belief that I am a spammer, here's a legitimate, honest-to-goodness question:

Staff:

Why are you exempting Uncyclopedia from your punishment? You should force them to use Oasis just like everybody else. Don't play favorites if you want to assimilate and make transitioning easier. Just because it is a "parody" of Wikipedia, doesn't mean it deserves special treatment. If all communities are equally important, and if all communities "need" Oasis, and if you want to eliminate all confusion when going from wiki to wiki, as you so claim, you can't play favorites just because you like Uncyclopedia better than the rest of us. So please, don't be hypocritical. Uncyclopedia needs to assimilate into Oasis just as much as everyone else. Saying that it is a parody of Wikipedia is not an excuse to play favorites. You should have a more legitimate reason than that. Do not say that it'll mess up the site; everyone else has already said that. Do not say it'll damage infoboxes, because all of us are going to be hit with that, too.

Just answer the question: why does Uncyclopedia get special treatment?

-- † TurtleShroom™! Jesus Loves You and Died for You!! †    :)  :)  OASIS?! DO NOT WANT; DO NOT WANT!! Come, my friends! Together, we shall make a new look for Wikia! We shall make... THE OASIS!! 00:00, October 5, 2010 (UTC)

P.S.: Wouldn't someone seeing all of the Oasis using wikis be "confused" when they see Uncyclopedia using MonoBook when all of Wikia otherwise is using Oasis? Isn't this "confusion" exactly what you are trying to prevent? If so, why are you fostering it by exempting that site while assimilating every last one of us? Are they not Wikia, too?