Thread:Semanticdrifter/@comment-155735-20130723075926

MastaMic Issue
Dear Sir,

Thanks for your message. Let me translate the content to you:

"There is some discussion on the sexual affair of MastaMic with girls in internet. But Uptil now noone know the fact."

The picture attached is about the discussion, and also the link. Evchk just illustrate the discuss appear in internet and give the source. And we haven't give any conclusion on it. Please point out what's wrong on it.

Google is sue by a Hong Kong Rich as the search result offend him, and Google defend that "What exist in internet, what the search result is." That is the same standpoint of Evchk. We haven't create any content, it is the real discussion exist in internet. Of course MastaMic himself don't like the record, as his commerical Singer's life is just about to start and it may not good to his image. But the omit it is against the freedom of speech, we can't erase any fact just because anyone don't like the content.

Chinese have over 3000 year's experience on history recording, There is a story that, even several history writers is killed by the ruler, they insist to record the truth. Hope you understand what we Chinese stress on, we wish to write the real history of HK internet, not  the history make anyone delighted.

I will try to use some more neutral wording, such as some discussion "how MastaMic talk with girl in internet". And give more pictures to prove, such discuss is really exist in internet. Do you think it is a better idea? Please give me the instruction to solve this problem.

Best regards, Ydog (talk) 07:59, July 23, 2013 (UTC) 