Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-22224-20180521161500/@comment-195370-20180527233021

Of course they care about money. Don't begrudge them that. As a community of users and admins dissatisfied with the removal of the only alternative skin, we should be taking this opportunity to give feedback about Oasis, the things we don't like, and how we think that it can be improved, based on the understanding that FANDOM needs to have dedicated space for advertising.

For instance - the information available on load of an article is tiny because of the restricted screenspace; the forced fixed-width, the side-rail and the huge title/navigation sections mean that only a small percentage of an article is visible.

The FANDOM links in the side-rail and lower rail (in my opinion are garbage spoilerfests) should be curated by admins to link only to wikis with pertinent relations to their own, if they're REALLY necessary at all.

The FANDOM block at the base of each page is thoroughly unnecessary and can be condensed into something more professional, so users aren't cursing FANDOM branding being vomited all over their screens (a logo at the top, links to the community in the navbar, a copyright at the bottom and the name in the web-address should be more than enough).