Thread:Lolseriously?/@comment-46370557-20200726004837/@comment-46370557-20200726033916

Jessepinky wrote: BattleshipMan wrote: YouTube is not a reliable source as I told you. Hey, I'm not going to comment on anything else on this post, but in regarding the the veracity of the video, I would argue that YouTube is a reliable source in this instance. You seem to be taking your reasoning from Wikipedia policies (technically WP:RSE/NOYT is an essay, though), and Wikipedia would take this specific YouTube video to be reliable, as:

However, official channels of notable organisations, such as Monty Python's channel, may be acceptable as primary sources if their authenticity can be confirmed, or as a secondary source if they can be traced to a reliable publisher. This video was published on the official Comic Con channel, which would make the source authentic and reliable.

You could make the argument against using a primary source, but the issue's definitely not the YouTube website itself. He knows all this, but he is doing all he can to try and justify the actions of him and his friend, admins HATE being proved wrong and they cant accept it. That is literally what this is about, they knew it was legit.