Thread:Fandyllic/@comment-27075564-20170724155029/@comment-1077307-20170730164349

No.

The coords are relative to the map, the rest are just implementation details. But being relative to the map wont change. The rendering of the image was squished, that will be fixed.

The X at 23.2% and Y at 56.7% should stay relative on the visual map regardless, if you ever have seen or end up seeing differently then its a bug.

On the first question, at a minimum the wiki editor will have an opportunity to provide detail about the image or more likely a set of images at once, just has already been done for markers, to get the effect they want without having to add css or have someone come rework the maps layout engine.

Toward my comments just before, the inability to communicate before caused the design rules, which cause the soul breaking requirements for Map from before. If they could have done auto-layout fixes that lessoned the requirements, and that be all that would have fixed the rules, I'm sure it was tried. But without knowing the final bottom of the actual image you can make the light-box limit correctly, so you make rules.