Board Thread:Support Requests - Community Management/@comment-3551372-20150701020125/@comment-24846733-20150705000650

DEmersonJMFM wrote:

Edit: The key to that paragraph is "This idea is an ideal scenario." The reality is that this is not always practical or in the best interest of the community. Each wiki is different and given latitude to determine where they wish to go. I support community involvement, but not actions that promote mayhem and disorder. You. But you're not in the community of the wiki in question. That wiki has a REASON to be democratic. Heck, they got the abusive founder down for his bullshit and gave reign into the hands of the community. The community that at the time had three real members. Those that became admins. There is no reason not to stand on democratic ideal. Doesn't matter if Mrs. PinkeMcAussie disagrees. That's how it always worked and how it SHOULD and HAS TO work.

Unless the community decides otherwise, of course. But who would go against his own interests? Right, no one!