Thread:Sannse/@comment-233706-20150718220045/@comment-25428589-20150719145232

Spike-from-NH wrote: By the way, on several occasions, users from a community of self-styled vandals have edited my wiki anonymously in the style of a user I had just banned, baiting me into increasing the ban. So not every charge of sockpuppetry is valid. Of course not every charge of sockpuppetry is valid :) I would hope that the admins of the wiki where he/she is banned do have proper evidence. I know that at Creepypasta Wiki (where I am an admin) we almost always get check-user confirmation before banning for sockpuppetry, unless it's plainly obvious they are socking (eg: they admit to it).

Oh yeah, that's another thing, "I Believe!", if you weren't socking, you can always ask staff to perform a check user on your own account as (sorta) proof that you don't have any alts. Some admins will accept check user evidence as proof of your innocence, though of course, that will only disclose socks from the same IP.