Thread:Varg2000/@comment-3367060-20130918034652/@comment-3367060-20130919000221

TurokSwe wrote: Well, don't get upset, but with all due respect I'm trying not to associate my wiki with Wikizilla. And bye the way, you yourself have copied information from The American Godzilla Wiki and put it in the Godzilla (1998 Board Game) article so then I would wonder why you havent attributed the content yourself? Have a nice day, my friend! (seriously, I mean it) Actually TurokSwe, you are wrong there. That article on Wikizilla was added on September 6th, and even though you have created that article before us again, you were not plagiarised as I did not copy-paste what you put there nor did I lazily reword or add a few sentences. The article was created unplagiarised and it stood that way. The picture in our infobox is not the same as yours as you can clearly see, and you added an infobox and a "Gameplay" section after us, so I am sorry to say you are in the wrong with that statement, and I politely urge you to retract it, as it is not true. Besides, you and I both know that you did not write that article yourself, that was taken from something someone else wrote.

TurokSwe wrote: Well, I'm trying my best at making them into originals. The reason I don't want my wiki to be anywhere near associated with Wikizilla is because of the horrible and hostile behaviours and the kind of content that they allow to include. And just to make things clear, about the licensing, that goes for mr. Titanollante too as he did the same thing. I am sorry TurokSwe, you are lying. We are not hostile at all to anyone, however, a small group is only hostile against you, which is rightfully so due to past conflicts you have had with that group of people that includes Hulkzilla, MrAwesomeness and of Spinozilla, among others. I am doing my very best to not take action against you, my swedish friend. Also, what "kind of content that they allow to include" do you talk about? Could you be talking about the legally proven Zilla Name Change you continue to wrongfully reject? Yes, that must be so, as we have no despicable content on our articles whatsoever.

Also my dear friend, I saw your most recent edits on the two articles we are talking about. Adding one sentence and adding one link does not change the fact that the articles you have there are still plagiarised. The thing is TurokSwe, you cannot change what you have copy-pasted there, because it already is such a perfectly worded and structured article, that you will find it impossible to rephrase and "make them into originals". I suggest you link to Wikizilla and forget our differences or I will take action. Again, I will repeat on the matter of the "Board Game" article: We created the article after you but it was never plagiarsing you as it was never even copy-pasted at all and it was more comprehensible and better set up than the mess that your article was before September 16th. So again, I suggest you attribute to us by the time you are asleep the first day you read this (Thursday afternoon for me, Friday morning for you or something), you cannot stand around and say you will rewrite it, and even then, you will still have plagiarism in your history. Thank you, Emil, and have a good day.