User blog comment:Big the cat 10/A Veteran Admin’s Concerns Regarding FANDOM and UCP/@comment-44721605-20200823213251

You've forgot to mention Gamepedia. What was that thing, which made staff thinking about MediaWiki 1.33? What was that, what made UCP. And with what platform there is compability with Fandoms platform? I've asked that questions.

"My past experiences with the FANDOM Staff have been quite positive"

You're probably first person, who written, that exoeriences with staff were above 0. Because other users were absolutely angry on FANDOM staff, it's removal of Monobook and most of game wikis migrated... that's right, to Gamepedia.

"makes me wonder why the FANDOM Staff have decided to completely remove them from their network rather than giving communities the option to choose between their older and newer features or at least replace the Forums, Chat and Wiki Activity with somewhat similar features that communities who have previously been reliant on said features can easily adapt to."

Try use logic. Why? Because newer MediaWiki! What did you thought?

Forum is thousands line of code (try using php), Chat has no users, who uses it, and Wiki Activity? Because it is duplication of Recent Changes.

Please, also remember, that now, you're protesting, but if you are Oasis PRO fan, you should start signing petition oppose replacing it.