Thread:DarkDragonMedeus/@comment-38729545-20190727171638/@comment-38729545-20200105163819

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Thread:3276215

“I 100% agree with keeping High-Godly, but I'm neutral on removing True-Godly. It seems like there is a lot of disagreement as to how it would be handled, but I imagine there is some kind of agreement that could be reached as to what should justify True-Godly. And I also don't find it hard to believe that there would be things that you could not regenerate from even with regeneration from conceptual erasure.

If no conclusion can be reached, then I'm fine with just removing True-Godly entirely. But I think it's worth looking into it.”

I do think overall that True Godly no longer serves much of a purpose since it actually strays from that purpose at this point.

However, I do think that there is where the Golden rule of NLF have to been implied as the assumption of a few things being able to negate conceptual regeneration to be quite fallacious as even I have such skepticism of such claims such as that.

Anyway I like to note this borders on the line of speculation and theories that may not been backed up by anything that will do anything.

At the very least, there are regeneration negation which is true, but to a extent since not all regeneration will rely on the same principle as this is the case by case method is used in such extreme cases.

Ie. In order to counter regen, they have to be sealed or something else. Also in additional to that, we don’t generally have most if not all series showing a being that is more than capable of negating High Godly Regen as again this goes back to how they treated the regeneration and the nature of the said counter to said Regen/Regen negation ie. the authors themselves.