Thread:Matthew Schroeder/@comment-38729545-20190717050223/@comment-38729545-20190718005703

However, I won't deny that we shouldn't just be focused on just that theory alone.

The whole reason for this revision: [//vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Thread:3262225 https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Thread:3262225]

Is based on those theories that Aeyu is firmly convinced by since I assume she believe it to be the absolute truth.

However, I will like to point out that isn't strictly something that is mathematical in its entirely since that isn't what Plato meant regarding his views of how Theory of Forms might work out since this involve philosophy and like to point out that it isn't necessarily the absolute truth since I seeing that Aeyu has convinced Ultima of her views on how 1A work.

I am uncertain regarding the Dark Tower revisions as this ties to misunderstandings and differing interpretations of how it might work.

The usage of multiverse seems to be used a bit too much and hence why I will like to point out we do have our own page regarding the usage of multiverse: [//vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Multiverse https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Multiverse]

Anyway this part is what have me concerned: "Exists outside of the Dark Tower in a void beyond that which Maturin resides in; Maturin himself exists in a void which lacks physicality/direction, and predates both the concept of time and the multiverse's existence as a whole."

However, this serves to prove the point that higher dimension space that is actually independent of our 3D space.

Yes, I am aware that The Dark Tower are likely tier 1A, but then comes the problem of using the term "multiverse' as this term is open to interpretation as I say earlier.

I don't know how Aeyu has done it, but it look like she convinced some people regarding her views based on a scientific theory made by one Max Tegmark.

Which I like to mentioned it is a scientific theory in its entirety.

His very page itself mentioned physics: [//space.mit.edu/home/tegmark/crazy.html https://space.mit.edu/home/tegmark/crazy.html]

Theoretical physics mind you.

Quite frankly I can understand on where Aeyu is coming from, but these views of the person in question are subject to interpretation by another person like myself.

Like the theory of forms in philosophy itself: [//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_forms https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_forms]

This theory that came from Platos was never accepted due to conflicting views to how our "world"/universe work and because it isn't the absolute decider on how a Tier 1 structure would work out.

In the end, whatever or not, it is true or not, we can not disprove it nor prove because it is a theory that can not be tested.

A lot of multiverse theories didn't mentioned the mathematical stuff a lot since it does involve a lot of physics being applied to it.

Anyway I will encourage some open end discussion with Aeyu regarding her views as it isn't the absolute truth.

I not holding a grudge against Aeyu since her views is very firm and i myself don't necessarily agree with her per se.