Thread:Eladkse/@comment-452-20120927231609


 * Insulting volunteers

I did not insult anyone. I clearly stated that what I was writing was my opinion by using the word "think". If I had intended to insult VegaDark, I would have omitted the words "I think"

I think that someone who deletes a vandalised page without first checking the history of that page is either too irresponsible or too incompetent to have the rights to delete pages.


 * assuming willful or deliberate action

Again, he deleted a valid article which had been vandalised without first checking the page history. He willfully and deliberated deleted the article without verifying that the article needed deletion.


 * you can politely and properly bring up the situation on the VSTF wiki and the page can be restored. Speaking of which, you failed to mention the place or any specific details so nobody can really address the real problem.

I bought it up on VegaDark's talk page. He refused to accept responsibility for his actions, and has now erased the conversation. I did not see any reason to mention specific details, and you're free to request them if you want them.


 * Please do not create any new topics in this fashion, it is bad faith and immature.

I never created a topic. I started a talk page discussion, I do not know why it was moved to the forum namespace.

I acted in good faith in this situation, I first contacted VegaDark for more information, he would not admit that what he had done was wrong, and has since erased the conversation.

If you had acted in good faith, you would have not have accused me of starting drama and being immature without first asking for more information.

(This response was left because I deserve the right to address your accusations. I expect no reply from you, although it is your right to reply.) 