Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-180.191.95.15-20200908075313/@comment-40517619-20200915235153

I'm not certain what dishonesty you are talking about. In that case, I believe the WM had reasons to ensure the damage to the wiki was minimal, especially given personal involvement with it.

I also read "feedback" to mean "reports to developers about issues discovered", did you mean something else?

As for hitting like a ton of bricks, it kind of already has? The login system migration and the image host move weren't exactly smooth, though it seems most of the issues from these two have been worked out. I believe Fandom got hit by UCP hard due to UCP being in a far earlier stage, but also because this is an upgrade that included 14 major MediaWiki versions, and custom Fandom features needed special attention when porting. Neither of the latter two applies to Gamepedia.