Thread:Anzu-TLK/@comment-32786456-20191109220114

https://roblox.fandom.com/wiki/Thread:382635

Following our discussion on Discord, I feel the need to put this in writing- breaking the block notice peice by peice.

> attacking one or more of our indivuals

Okay, this is probably copied and pasted, but (as I said on Discord) the definition of Censorship is the suppression of speech, public communication, or other information, on the basis that such material is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or "inconvenient."

Supression of speech includes removal (or suspension for) speech if it is considered harmful (or attacking).

> a fake consensus is not provable as true or false and therefore cannot be seen as attacking

> see an IRL election (or even what FANDOM deems consensus), you don't get denied at the polling station for the reason you like/dislike a candidate.

Statement that also cannot be seen as attacking

> EDIT: there are still many oppose reasons that aren't valid. this is blatant abuse lmao.

Probably the closest thing that can be seen to attacking, however, this is blatant abuse is clearly an opinion.

# Block Length

A block length of 3 months for this is ridiculous and unnecessary.

According to the Policies and Guidelines for the RW

''> 1-6 month blocks: Repeated policy violations or first-time infraction of a major policy with previous warnings. Violation of Wikia's Terms of Service or other Fandom policies (ie: making death threats); any sort of vandalism will receive a sanction no shorter than 1 month. Due to COPPA laws, underage editors on the wiki will have their accounts blocked until they are 13.''

Reviewing this policy I see no violation that fits within it's bounds

-> Repeated policy violations; (nope)

-> first-time infraction of a major policy with previous warnings; (nope)

-> Violation of Wikia's Terms of Service or other Fandom policies; (nope)

-> any sort of vandalism; (nope)

-> underage; (nope)

You even said yourself that a block duration of 3 months is aggresious.  