Thread:AustinDR/@comment-15895329-20170925135052

I am appealing the block you gave me on the grounds that I do not believe that I harrassed. I put forward my arguments on your wall, and then asked for an argument when I didn't get one in response. That is not harassing. Nor is sticking to my guns when I was unconvinced by the arguments I was given (as you stuck to your guns in the face of my arguments).

Now, if you felt harrassed (or intimidated), then I'm sorry, but that was not really my intent or goal. I simply wanted arguments so a discussion could be had, and I wasn't really getting that. I see you since did give arguments, including one on my wall, but how can I respond to them if I've been blocked? If I am unable to respond to what you've told me in any way or discuss it, doesn't that defeat the purpose of making an argument? Because I have no way to say anything back now. At all.

I don't see why my not conceding to arguments I found unconvincing makes me guilty of "intimidating behavior" or "harassment". How did my behavior, in your mind, constitute either of those things? 