Thread:Asarta/@comment-188432-20200624181736

Hey there! While we know that your additions to adoptions requests are well-intentioned, it's super important not to add content to the application itself, as you did at Adoption:The Buds Wiki. We want to see the application as it was delivered by the applicant themselves. If applicants begin to believe that someone will be there to "fill in the blanks", lower quality applications will inevitably result.

The applicant's ability to fill in the very short application is actually something we take into consideration.

Also, please don't indicate whether you think someone's "contributions look good" or that you "think the application will go through". There are certain things we can see as staff members, which you can't, that instantly disqualify people. It'll be confusing and disheartening if people are led to believe everything's fine, only to be immediately disqualified by a staff member. That's why it's better, if you're going to comment on adoptions, that you merely point out what the rules are, rather than making a judgment about the applicant's adherence to those rules.

Thanks! 