User blog comment:MisterWoodhouse/Social Activity, the 2010 Editor, and Unpausing Migrations/@comment-39707429-20200922174446/@comment-32704847-20200923141454

Not a joke at all, C.Syde65 it is the meaning of simplicity:
 * navigation bar with 1 (ONE!) explicit link to content page
 * non-existing category organization
 * Templates actually used:
 * 1 infobox (very simple) created with the visual editor, no source code customization.
 * 1 navigation table that seems to be complex, but its just big. Complex would be if it had parameters, to adjust to pages. It's just the same table for all pages in the wiki. HTML with colors plain and simple.
 * ALL articles are basicaly a couple of paragraphs, the one infobox, and a gallery tag.
 * only custom CSS is for the main page and user links, no CSS for templates, types of pages...
 * 4 sripts from dev wiki whose maintenance is not the local wiki responsibility.

If it could be more simple than that, only if it had no content at all.

But hey, wikis created yesterday are certainly more simple than that. It all depends on your parameters of comparison.

This is the only wiki he administrates that has migrated to the UCP, at least according to the links shared on his user page. And it's based on that experience that he comes here to share his enthusiasm about UCP. I respect that, each user can have their opinion. But let me share my point of view (that is no a joke), and say: his point of view is very limited.

Maybe you were the one "joking"? ;)