Forum:Image Info Page Redundancy

I noticed when you click through to an image information page now, it says right beneath the image, "Featured on" and lists the articles in which it is linked. But this already exists beneath the File History in the "File links" section. We don't need both. -- LordTBT Talk! 17:03, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't know what it is, and the odd thing is not all wiki's/files have it... Probably some kind of bug, as it can't even be translated. Mark  ( talk ) 17:18, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
 * If someone wants the new links to be removed, you can use this script: http://wikia.pastebin.com/P97zkBTg --Ciencia Al Poder (talk) -WikiDex 09:01, July 4, 2010 (UTC)


 * Appears we have another of the Wikia 'improvements' of something that was NOT broken, from the 'Not very bright ideas' dept again. which we then have to have some extra bit of code to sort it out for the Wikia that dont want it !!! - (or is it another case of 'testing' some idea thats escaped the Wikia lab again, like moving the line above the headings we had appear last month) Fix the real faulty bits instead of playing with the user interface & adding stupid things like following instead of 'Watch list' & the stupid 'Hearts' for rating so the 'star' can be 'borrowed' for the Follow pages idea. - BulldozerD11 23:57, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * It's not even valid XHTML...sigh. -- 00:23, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Validation hasn't mattered on the Internet for a while -- Random Time  00:24, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * So let's just ignore standards, yay! -- 00:26, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * It's not that simple. If you have a standards-complient site, there is no guarantee that all the browsers in the world will adhere to them. Internet Explorer was really bad at being standards-complient, and as it's installed on most people's computers as a default, web designers had to design pages to work in IE, even if they weren't standards-complaint. It's almost impossible to get a page to work in the relevent versions of Trident, Webkit, Geko and Presto (the 4 main layout engines, most commenly associated with IE, Konquerer, Firefox and Opera) and still have it complient with standards, especially as you have to have backwards compatibility with earlier versions. -- Random Time  01:59, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * There is a difference between being XHTML compliant and "standards" compliant. It isn't that hard. -- Fandyllic  (talk &middot; contr) 9:22 PM PST 5 Jul 2010