Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-27043274-20170109131725/@comment-27043274-20170109135353

Callofduty4 wrote: Wikia used to have "Content Warnings" applied to these wikis, such that a user will have to consent to viewing this material before being able to view it. For whatever reason, they're not used any more. I am pretty sure the content you have linked is permissible. I don't remember the last time staff commented on something like this; although the ToU has not changed it would be neat to have a new post that we can cite later on down the line. Thanks for bringing this up. I have a wiki about giant women: http://giantess.wikia.com/

I read ToU and I respect it. So, because some articles might be a little bit up-tempo in terms of sexual issues, I put a warning on the cover page of the wiki saying:

''' ATTENTION!!! ''' This wiki is about a matter that some people could consider a taboo & some consider it offensive, if the subject of giants or miniatures disturbs you, we recommend that you leave. Even so, we struggle to publicize the content (images, text, videos) as modestly as possible, respecting the rules of the Wikia.

My wiki prohibits pornography (both in text and in images), but it does have articles that deal with fetishism (these I have written in the most modest and harmless way possible).

For example: I also have articles about artists, of which the great majority are fetishists (this is an unavoidable truth). But what I write about them is more focused on their artistic style and the themes they use.

I say all this because when I asked for a content warning to the staff, they did not give it to me because they said it was not necessary, since my wiki was not "as strong" as others.