Thread:Sannse/@comment-201159-20121216183415/@comment-201159-20121218205222

hmmm, I'll accept what you're saying as I'm new, but ... how about the inconsistencies I'm seeing:

1) Aren't they a negative

2) Isn't how the same information exists in multiple places and there really isn't a clear way for a "publisher" to know or find all of them exists - a negative?

3) Isn't the time to update and keep consistent the same information in multiple places a negative, which needs addressed (at some point)?

What I'm saying is if these points / issues aren't important to the future, then I'm wondering why aren't they? I'm just trying to understand and have the best system we can have - nothing more or less. (I'm just trying to make this all good for everyone and not cause problems.)