User talk:Guesty-Persony-Thingy

-- 17:23, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Adding a new channel to irc.wikia.com
Hi there!

Sorry for not replying on IRC, but... I did in fact reply. Just haven't noticed that I wasn't identified to nickserv. :P

Anyway: yes, I can add your channel to the CGI interface. However, it's probably best that you go through the Community team with this request. Once they greenlight it, I'll try to add it ASAP.

Happy editing. --TOR 14:11, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Calendar
Have you seen google/calendar? It is close to what is needed - but a little cumbersome for numerous calendars intersecting. A hybrid of the one I mentioned in the post, and it, would probably be a good thing.

Which IRC would I find you on?

Ianm

hi
hi

Thx
Thanks for the welcome. But I'm not exactly new. :) Maurreen 11:51, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Me on Halopedia
Erm... is that United Kingdom article still in existence? cos i added it 2 wrong Wikia XD. i was gonna add it 2 da Royal Family Wiki when i noticed it wasn't there. scrolled 2 far 2 notice the Halopedia Logo. so nif its still in existence...delete it. oh and incidently most UNSC weapons featured in halo are rumoured to be decen ded from Weapons produced in UK.

Like... the Sniper Rifle was invented in the American Civil War. Confederate troops equipped with barrel-length three power scopes mounted on the then premium British Whitworth rifle had been known to kill Union officers at ranges bordering 800 yards, an unheard-of distance at that time. Also Roosevelt asked Churchil if he liked an idea for a gathering of Allied nations (similar to the Legue of Nations) Churchil decided he liked United Nations (and thus UNSC has its name from UN) Also UK was a founding Member. Forerunner P.S. when banning someone... it says that you should talk to the person who banned you. Actualy the only place you can edit is your talk page. (but only if the small '=' sign is present). PPS. didn't i tell You the US page will suffer constant Vandelism. You are getting a little stressed out take a few days off or somat...you banned a person for vandelisin 1ce, and as i have his MSN, he told me a friend of his (not me i'm ot his friend) dared him. also i DID say that Anti-Americanism is on the rise. F

sorry :(
I'm Sorry Mr. Thingy..-- Cometstyles 11:51, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Help
RR says reason # 1 whyhe blocked me was 'Personal attacks on users due to...' he is talking about when i got rid of ur comment and u blocked me then we called it even. yet he says he will not drop #1. Thats the only thing close to 'personal' attack. Also... Although i'm banned on halopedia... when u put the = signs, i can click on the smaller edit button and edit. Only on my talk page sop how come when u get banned it says that you should talk tot he admin that blocked u. you'd have 2 go on a neutral wiki wich will be all 2 conusing.

My sig thing
could u go on the template my sig is on and change it? i need it 2 say 先行者招呼那些不显示坚持不懈 the messege is a joke messege. it reads...'The forerunner greets these not to demonstrate relentlessly' I'm guessing you know what that means?

actualy i can edit!!! then exacly how is my talkpage different? if u go on history. u will know muhahahhhahahahaha. You didn't say that. Also DO NOT edit my talk page by putting the 'this user is blocked' thing on as all u need 2 do is go on Userpage 2 find that out. all i said was that if u eva use the user blocked template, don't put the on user pages as it could make da user think he/she can't edit his/her talk page either (neva said u did)

Halopedias Sidebar update
How did u lot get it to have arrows on sidebar to show da stuff on? cos RE Wiki needs one of those.

why?
why did you remove a Vote! [F]
 * K

#gearspedia
This has now been changed as requested. :) TOR 06:51, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Marathon Game
I've undone your edit on Gaming reguarding the naming of the wiki for Maraton Game. The justification of my action is best explained by quoting the Hubs FAQ:
 * Wikis are sometimes listed under the topic rather than the actual name of the wiki -- for example, "Scroogepedia" might be listed as "Charles Dickens Wiki". A new reader who's browsing through the hub listing might not recognize the clever name, so we try to make it easy for them to find what they're looking for.

Hope you don't take offense to my actions. -PanSola 08:13, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

hubs and stars
Hi GPT, thanks for the hub suggestion. PanSola and Toughpigs have been working on the hubs so I suggest you post a note about this on the hubs talk page and get a conversation going! angies (talk) 16:46, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Stars
Guesty, did you look at all these wikis you've been ranking? A lot of the stuff in the entertainment section was wrong. --Dragonc laws (talk ) 07:07, 25 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I've been going through it based on the statistics page in each wiki. I noticed coming in from Boy Meets World, which was incorrectly marked as silver. --Dragonc laws (talk ) 07:11, 25 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi GPT - Thanks for the three star system. Unfortunately, it appears that this broke a template so now c: is showing for many wikis. (for example, see the New Wikis Hub). Can you fix that up? Thanks, -- BillK   (talk ) 16:08, 25 October 2007 (UTC)


 * I took care of that... The three "special hubs" didn't get the updated templates, so GPT's first drafts on the original templates left those broken. I reverted Template:Link2 and Template:Star2, so now the special hubs are fine. -- Danny (talk ) 17:09, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Star colors
Hi, GPT -- Wow, awesome job on the new hub template! I really like the idea of giving the wikis different "ranks" -- I think it'll encourage some of the wikis to keep pushing up their page count, and earn a higher star. You had to do a lot of work with those, too -- that's a lot of wikis to check, and it looks like it took you a few hours.

I'm not sure about the colors, and I'm wondering if we can tweak that a little bit. I understand the bronze - silver - gold concept -- but when you look at it on the page, your eye is drawn to the dark stars more than the light ones. The bronze stars stand out, while the silver ones sort of fade into the white background, so visually, the ranking looks like the bronze is best, followed by gold, then silver.

I know the explanation is written across the top, but people are more likely to just look at the stars and figure it out visually... The sentences across the top are kind of the "instruction manual", and who reads instruction manuals? :)

So I'm trying to think of another color scheme that would indicate the ranking visually. Maybe the same color, but getting darker -- pink - light red - dark red, or light yellow - yellow - deep gold. Another possibility is something like yellow - orange - red, going from one end of the scale to another.

What do you think? Would any of those work for you? -- Danny (talk ) 17:09, 25 October 2007 (UTC)