Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-1474707-20170213121709/@comment-168424-20170214190118

M67PattonZippo wrote: I generally don't run my articles past the community before sending them off to Wikia for publication. I'm very thorough, so I take quite a while to write articles, and peer review would only slow down the process. Also, I only write about things that I already know a lot about, then I pile more research on top of that. This results in a very accurate article.

For reference, here are both of the articles that I've done so far: http://fandom.wikia.com/u/M67PattonZippo

Your example is still anecdotal and has very little bearing on other Fandom writers. Fandom review has gotten better, but bad links to wikis should be the last problem a reader should find. The feedback mechanism for Fandom is broken to non-existent. I only got some fixes and Fandom articles pulled or the author rebuked based on my internal contacts.

All that said, it's good to hear some responsibility from an author from them directly. I still think you should consider peer review from a community member. Slowing you down to make a better article is worth it.