User blog comment:Cristina7/Introducing Discussions, a New Platform For Engaging Your Community/@comment-27014396-20170116015001/@comment-26402117-20170116134717

They can't/won't add new features to a product whose architecture doesn't facilitate that efficiently, which isn't unreasonable from a tech perspective.

A moderation workflow is only one feature compared to numerous features. But between the FAQ demonstrating that these features are coming, I struggle to see a potential issue outside of it being rolled out to new wikis. Even then, the needs that are to be addressed are based on personal usage rather than that of the wiki. The use of a wiki-style forum is probably advisable for the rendering of templates, technical discussion that involves exchanging code (any code block formatting in Discussions gets rid of that problem) and prototyping big wiki changes at this point in time.

I am admittedly struggling to find a further issue outside of what you are probably personally used to in regards to Discussions, which isn't exactly a bad reason to be disappointed at losing something - except that before it is changed for the 90%, we can kindly push for it to be in a better shape. We also won't have been blind to Fandom producing a completed user product that doesn't meet our needs, so there isn't an agenda there.