User blog comment:MisterWoodhouse/Unified Community Platform: The Vision, Purpose, and Process/@comment-175.176.19.89-20200711161846

The new unified community platform was REALLY TOO COMPLICATED to use and really patient-emptying now, unlike the old one (which was way smooth and no problems at all) which I had to give up my newly built wiki immediately because of these observations: 1. The Visual Editor in this kind of platform is not really reliable to use since not everyone know how it really functions well. Yeah there was also a feature like that one in Wikipedia, but you had to admit Visual Editing was still too advance and some editors still relying to make a proper edit on Source Mode; 2. The source editor of UCP is not convenient to use; whenever I want to make a correction on a wrong context, or whenever I want to erase an unecessary word to the wiki, the higight itself was not aligned on the context I want to be highlighted, and instead the line which I was supposedly not to be modified or erased was THE ONE WHICH ERASED instead which really BUGS ME AND PISSES ME OFF BIGTIME! 3. Cannot find the add image buttons, videos, switching it to gallery and other functions which only the legacy editor can do such things and makes it easier than typing it manually. If you keep this up, you might lose some of the editors from this site since you've pushing through a project that still need to consult a majority of editors here whenever they liked it or not. Sure you may not listen to what we've said, but you guys might to have a fact check and suggestion from us contributors first.