Board Thread:Technical Updates/@comment-24006128-20200709172956/@comment-92.255.137.33-20200714185724

About the same time they said it's not appropriate to give feedback on the absence of these features – features that are important for developers on legacy Fandom and on Gamepedia, which has all of them, meaning their absence on UCP would be a major regression.

Staff never said UCP will have exact feature parity with vanilla MW.

Staff never said it's inappropriate to give feedback on missing features.

UCP will be implemented on Gamepedia too, so unless it has been positively stated or shown that some feature will remain undamaged, Gamepedia community members can be expected to be concerned if the current Fandom!UCP version does not have these features.