Thread:KLR101/@comment-3056456-20160222015416

I was recently blocked for ten years on the Thunderbirds wikia by an administrative user known as "Sigmund 2014" with an accusation that I falsified information on administrative user "Guyus24"'s talk page in a question (written by myself) that was intended to quiz if there were any unstated ground rules on this particular wikia. The conversation in question is transcribed in full below and I was banned before I could reply to the accusation of lying. I have made edits here and there on other wikis, but truly had no idea what the standing rules were for the Thunderbirds wikia. In all honesty, I feel that still makes me a novice in such matters, irrespective of the amount of times I've made edits on other forums. That is why I, out of politeness, said I was new to the Wikipedia editing scheme because, for all intents and purposes, I am. I do not consider myself a particularly prolific contributor with countless articles to my name. It was a remark intended to make both the asking and answering of the question easier for both parties and appears to have been interpreted by a third party as otherwise. However more importantly, the resulting punitive measures where I have been banned for ten years for this infraction seem unnecessarily brutal for a single perceived violation. Reviewing Wikipedia's blocking policy, my current ban feels as though it does not "encourage a more productive, congenial editing style within community norms", is "to disparage" and is "as punishment" rather than for any constructive means.

Nevertheless, I hope to resolve this in a manner that will appeal to both parties. 