User talk:Angela

Welcome to my talk page. Please put new messages at the end. Please note that I might reply on this page, or I might reply on your own wiki. If you have a preference for where I reply, please let me know. If I've left a message for you on another wiki, please reply here since I won't be notified on messages outside of this wiki. Thanks!

If you don't need a personal response from me, please consider leaving a message on the Community portal instead, or sending an email to Wikia's community support staff via the form at Special:Contact.

Japan Wiki
The Japanese Wiki has already been created but I am making an English version. Oh and can I be admin on all the projects I create? General Eisenhower (war) 21:13, 8 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Which wiki are you talking about? The war wiki is in English, not Japanese. Angela (talk) 08:36, 9 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I meant the Japn Wiki in an English version. General Eisenhower (war) 14:53, 3 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Where has it already been created? Angela (talk) 22:23, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

AIDS Dissent Wikcity

 * It is dead and redundant. Even worse, it's interfering with our google rankings. Thank you. Revolver 04:57, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I've emailed Jason to ask him to close it. Angela (talk) 00:39, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Could you kindly remind him again? I hate to be a pain in the rear, but the project has moved on elsewhere, and when someone comes along, it gives them the appearance that nothing is happening. Thanks. Revolver 00:47, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Picture Vandalism on Memory Alpha
Hi Angela. I'm an admin over at Memory Alpha. Earlier today one for our pictures (MemoryAlpha:Image:United Federation of Planets logo.png) was vandalized. It was quickly reverted, however, some problems remaine. I use the picture in my signature, and naturally, it is on hundreds of talk pages. For some reason, all talk pages seem to be showing the vandalized version. Any help would be greatly, greatly apreciated. -- Jaz (please respond on my MA talk page) Jaz 01:15, 25 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I expect refreshing your cache might solve it. Angela (talk)

SPAM users added
I just got my wiki created and already there are 28,695 registered users ! Obviously this is a SPAM bot or something. How to I delete all of them and prevent it from happening again?

Thanks.


 * You're probably looking at the users for all of Wikia. To see just the ones on an individual wiki, use Special:Activeusers instead. Angela (talk) 20:50, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

SW Fanon Sysops
We've had 3 vandal attacks in three days on the SW Fanon wiki and we need sysops. If you could check our sysops page and make some of those people sysops, that would be nice. MaulYoda


 * We need some people on the WarWiki to become sysops and I am the most likely to become one. General Eisenhower (war) 14:44, 3 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I suggest to both of you that you encourage more users to join these wikis first. Building up a basis of trusted editors is more important than adminship, and it makes it easier to find admins if you have a community who can assess which people should have that role. Angela (talk)

Thing is, we've already had an election and we have two very capable people leading the election, I'm in first and Gnosis is knowledge is in second. We've now had 5 or 6 vandal attacks and really need some sysops to control them. So, even though our community has some 6500 users, we really need sysops and fast and we would really appreciate if you could make Gnosis is knowledge and I admins. MaulYoda 18:38, 4 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Page moves are now limited, which will decrease the vandalism. Considering some of the people asking for adminship are the same people involved in the vandalism, it wouldn't help to fulfill those adminship requests right now. There is a lot of work you can do on the site without needing adminship. Both you and Gnosis have only been editing since late last month, so it's very early for the community there to see whether you can be trusted. Angela (talk) 22:10, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Yes, but I'd like to remind you I'm winning the election and Gnosis is in second. MaulYoda 02:34, 5 June 2006 (UTC)


 * You are winning the election. However, it doesn't count when 5 of the voters are running multiple accounts on that wiki. Angela (talk) 04:10, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Real Names
Hello, Angela! Thanks for joining our discussion. It's always good to know that users like yourself and Sannse are paying attention to activity on all the various Wikias.

I have moved the discussion on real names from my talk page to the talk of a new page, policies and practices. I did this so that other users who want to put in their two cents could find the discussion in the logical place.

I wanted to know, though - is it considered poor form to move stuff around like this? (Before I moved it to my talk page, it was originally on the talk of the Main Page.) I realize that by moving it, I am deleting the edit history of this discussion. I feel, though, that this early on, Activism doesn't have a well-defined place for everything, so sometimes content and discussions have to be moved as new, appropriate pages are created. Well, I would like to hear what you think about the issue of moving stuff around, and if I should refrain from this in the future.


 * – Nicholas Barry 06:52, 2 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I don't think it's a problem to move discussions as long as you leave a link to where they've gone, especially in the early stages of a wiki where things don't yet have a correct place. Unlike articles, the edit history isn't all that important since everyone should be signing what they write anyway, so you still have attribution of who wrote what. Angela (talk) 08:37, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

war wiki
I have requested for adminship on the WarWiki along with Gangsta-Easter-Bunny, General Eisenhower (war) 14:41, 3 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I closed our RfA's as successful (that's for GeneralE, too).--Gangsta-Easter-Bunny 15:24, 3 June 2006 (UTC)


 * I hesitate to mention it, but there appears to be a bit of sockpuppetry going on the War wiki. It's harmless at this point, but I just want it reiterated that this isn't allowed on Wikia. - Nhprman 16:55, 3 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Yes... it's not exactly subtle either . The wiki needs to build up a trusted userbase before getting admins. Angela (talk) 22:23, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
 * True. And when you see a user nominating featured articles for removal and asking for votes on the matter, something's wrong. Especially problematic when there's 3 active users. :-\ - Nhprman 03:41, 5 June 2006 (UTC)