User blog comment:Sannse/Calm Over Conflict/@comment-206.190.70.130-20180118175901

Here is the crux of the problem. Person X submits information into a wikia page. Editor/Admin Y watches for any new edit of any page, irrespective of personal knowledge and attempts to revert it, distill it, or edit it based on personal belief/opinion 90% of the time and obvious problems 10% of the time. It's the personal belief/opinion that is the heart of the conflict. These are people that are passionate enough to become a volunteer admin and "write history" the way they want it written, not necessarily the way it happened. Once you as an editor inject your personal opinion into somebody elses submission, then you are asking for ridicule from the originator. No doubt that there is a need for editing, but too often, it has become an excuse for simply removing information because the editor just doesn't personnally like it being on a page.