User blog:ComboLuigi2000/The mistake of UCP (And how it can be improved)

Yeah, yeah, I have made two previous posts regarding the cons of UCP, but it seems that no one is responding. Anyway, I will just elaborate my opinion in this blog post, and hopefully it will be understandable.

Background
Many companies make mistakes that could remove a huge chunk of people from their communities. For example, YouTube removes Community Captions and DeviantArt adds Eclipse. What about FANDOM? It's no exception. I'm not asking any of the staff to take it personally, but the so-called United Community Platform is going to wipe out a chunk of FANDOM's community. Despite the big amount of people who oppose the UCP with legitimate reasons, FANDOM seems only to be focused on the side who are looking towards UCP.

What's wrong with it, and what could be changed to make it better?
The UCP is just not ready to be rolled out, and most users feel the same way. FANDOM, however, thinks that 90% of the work is done. Take 40% away, and you're at where I'm at. I think that UCP would have a much bigger potential if some of the mentioned were added, but it still needs a lot of work.
 * There is a bar at the top with the search button, profile, notifications and message wall. As of this new update, it has been removed. And I'm using the oasis layout on mobile so it could be an error with that. It is now hard to navigate profiles and message walls thanks to this new update. I can't search for pages and images, and the only way I could do this is to change URLs, and it feels stubborn. At least add it to the oasis layout.
 * The new visual editor is exceptionally stubborn, and as a user who prefers classic editor, I dislike it, and it's hard to use. Despite the fact that I have used visual editor before classic editor, I think classic editor is easier to navigate. At least it should come as a seperate option, because the visual editor is overwhelming to use.
 * The new commenting system and message wall system does not use wikitext, and it's difficult to use, especially with the embed links. Templates can no longer be added to messages and despite the vision of the United Community Platform, it doesn't match up, as it restricts customisation. As a person who does roleplays on threads, I use dialogue templates. On wikis like the BFDI wiki, they have response templates (I don't know what they are called), so the new commenting system should be wikitext.
 * The GUIs are hard to use, for example, when going to recent activity, I'd have to search for "Human". Practically, it's so hard to navigate simple things like what users have been up to recently.
 * Chat being removed is likely a con. People use chat, especially on wikis like the BFDI wiki. Making a Discord account is harder than casually using chat. As a mobile user myself, there are absolutely no bugs or problems with chat. I think that an overhauled chat should be added in place.
 * The new layout is disgusting, and I think the legacy version looks better. I'm not a big fan of it, a lot of people on my wiki also aren't, so I think it should be changed. A lot of people on my community also dislike the layout of the UCP, and I think that in order to change this, it should be a balanced so that it looks appealing to people who like the modern look and people who like the old look.

How can you help?
As a minority, FANDOM will not take note of us. We need to make as much noise as possible. On any of the blogs that FANDOM Staff make, we need to let them know why UCP is failing, and hopefully, they will make some changes to the United Community Platform.

On the other hand, help me sign this "petition" to help the staff to realise this blog and the problems with UCP, and therefore do something about it. (Take note that I am talking about the current version and am not fully against UCP) Petition against UCP Click to sign the petiton