Thread:Tupka217/@comment-29970809-20200609034043/@comment-29970809-20200609070858

How can you say Tupka banned me for good reason when you have no idea what happened? It's wrong to blame someone without knowledge. And that said I did say very explicitly "I did heed Tupka's warnings regarding my behavior on forums."

Yet when I improved my behavior on forums, Tupka tries to cite that as a reason, that too when I asked him why he blocked me. Not when he blocked. Blocks should be clearly explained. Tupka never had any reason for banning me.

Not to mention Tupka himself has reverted me and others many times. He refuses to listen to others in an editing dispute often and thinks because he is an admin, he can do what he want as he runs the wiki. There should be a system and admins shouldn't impose their adminship over personal disputes.