Board Thread:Technical Updates/@comment-24006128-20200319160218/@comment-1807002-20200319163303

MisterWoodhouse wrote: Hollowness wrote:

I noticed no notes on Source Editor being more than lackluster (no colour diferentation, small @rse box, preview/public needing to be locked at top and not scroll to bottom and if we are possibly getting a wikitext toolbar back) and that was my more important concern. But maybe that is still being looked at.

We're definitely tracking feedback on the new editor. At the risk of sounding blunt, things which are objectively broken are easier to triage than subjective preferences, since the latter requires much more consideration and more teams involved. Oh no you miss understand me, that is completely and absolutely understandable and I wouldn't have it any other way. But even knowing it's (or what things are) being looked at as a footnote is helpful information. Especially, when people are posting raging comments. I like to reassure myself but also others when I see them freaking out :P

It is less a worry (to me at least) when it is a bug or broken because I know it will take precedence. That is why the little other things concern me (and perhaps others) more. Because waiting months just to know it is being looked into is a long time to fret over something.