Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-45571174-20200917215136/@comment-45571174-20200922133835

Lifevault wrote: TheMcBruiser6000 wrote: Masterkitty5450 wrote: I mean, its wrong that they are not allowed online. It just depends on maturity. If a 10 year old doesn't spam or give away info, they should be allowed. The whole point is to protect kids' info online. NOT ban them from being online because they were born on 2008. So what? Are you stalking me lol

Anyway, does it actually make a difference if someone is 12 or 13? Either way, they're still kids, they act pretty much the same. How does it make a difference if fandom is taking info from a 12 year old or a 13 year old? So then what is the difference between a 12 and an 11 yr old? Then keep going, so then it would be what is the difference to a 1 and 2 yr old?

Here is another thing. When people are younger, they don't know about the internet. So if they find out this site, they may give all personal info possible. They will say "you stupid". They may vandalize. They may do whatever they want. They will block evade, and vandalise pages just because they didn't get what they want, and see things that are just-. Say to the admins. "give admin stupid. I better". and stuff. They are too immature to be on wikis. I don't agree with COPPA being at age 13, but I would rather it be 10 or 11, as that is when most mature. Like I said before, you can't say ALL kids are dumb enough to do that. Besides, those traits could very easily apply to people that are 13+.