Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-13301-20170502181922/@comment-168424-20170509221937

Gray Catbird wrote: It seems to me that this debate boils down to whether you consider infoboxes to be content or not. If you consider them to be part of the underlying wiki design, and I guess that's Fandom's view of it and that of those sympathetic to their "side", then this is just another design update like there have been plenty in Wikia's history. Forcefully reverting such design changes on your wiki is, if I recall correctly, a terms of use violation (my only experience with that is that when Wikia introduced fluid layout, it was strictly forbidden to add CSS that fixed the width).

However, if you consider infoboxes to be part of the wiki content, then Fandom enforcing PI without or against community consensus appears as a violation of the idea that we contributors have the control over our content. Hence the fear some have expressed here that Fandom begins enforcing bigger content changes.

Disclaimer: I'm not a regular CC visitor. Apologies if I appear to be ill-informed...

Unfortunately, your argument sounds similar to the bogus one Microsoft used for IE for years.