Thread:S3r0-Ph1i/@comment-2118191-20190615145116/@comment-36009152-20190720152222

CrashBash wrote: We've told him, quite bluntly, several times, that no, his information is not valuable because it's NOT reliable. This one is good but let’s trim the ‘several times’ down to one time. A single response that the information is not reliable, the poll settles it if it does need to be voted on, onto other areas.

If there are negative reactions to an outcome, pay it no mind. No need for further explanation, the answer has already generously been provided and a back and forth is an unproductive use of time than can be invested into something nicer.

“The community has voted that this information is not reliable, but we can revisit this matter at a later date if new sources come to light. Meanwhile these pages could benefit from development.”

The first part for the decision, one answer nothing more to be said but a chance it could be reopened should reduce any possible indignation. Even better it is not a roadblock “you cannot do this”, recommending pages makes it a guiding “try this instead if you like” which also helps a wiki.