Thread:Dean27/@comment-14250-20160720084654

Isn't that a bit extreme simply for engaging in community discussion? Admins are supposed to foster that sort of thing. I think the spirit of https://wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:OWN should probably apply here too. I get that you guys have collectively done ~700k edits compared to maybe the ~70k everyone else has, but others would share the burden more if the heavy-handed punishments you dole out didn't create a chilling effect where we have to weigh the risk of irking you guys if you slightly disapprove on thoroughness or necessity.

A lot of wrestler pages remain behind and missing a lot of events, and this is probably why the Wikipedia pages stay more current for major wrestlers. The benefit of this Wikia is largely it's exploration of per-episode events and wrestlers and teams not necessarily considered notable enough to describe on Wikipedia. But it could be even better if you embraced community instead of rejecting it. Something done in good spirit that takes seconds to undo (when it even needs to be) doesn't deserve days, much less the weeks/months/years you've applied, as punishment. 