User blog comment:MisterWoodhouse/The first migrations to the Unified Community Platform/@comment-45140188-20200811173239/@comment-27047411-20200814140445

The Classic legacy all-we-know classic editor is literally 10x better then the "new ones". I found it to be difficult to do anything and I ditched a wiki I hoped I would make. I greatly like the old legacy format as it's simple, just the way I like it. The new UCP turns that upside down, everything I ever know is thrown away and I need to learn something I also considered garbage. Coding on articles is an hassle because both source and visual are literally the same thing. Also this even appeared as a message "The editor will now load. If you still see this message after a few seconds, please reload the page." THIS is something the legacy what-we-all-love never has done and loaded instantly, while the new format takes longer.

Idk why ya lot are doing this, but let me assure you that's causing more problems as the old one literally was not broken. The old one, the one WE LOVE is much more intuitive, and best of all simple with the classic editor. If you can provide me why because I very much prefer the classic editor as it's so much more easier to do anything, visual/source are the same thing in UCP honestly.