Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-22224-20180521161500/@comment-26923519-20180617150044

Reguyla wrote: Yeah I do totally agree with that. I would rather they dropped oasis and redeveloped monobook or made a newer better skin. Unfortunately, if they removed Oasis instead of Monobook, a LOT more problems would've been caused then you think: I'm not saying I'm with Oasis, but I'm just saying that there would've been a lot more chaos and a lot more problems being created if Oasis was removed.
 * So much CSS/JS customization would go into a waste. Sure, no customization policy, but the problem is, dozens of minutes to hours were wasted on exclusive customization for Oasis, not to mention that some customizations would actually not be portable for both skins, meaning that in Oasis, the customization is perfect, but it would be completely messed up in Monobook.
 * Some parts of FANDOM would be a lot more inaccessible. Sure, no ads, no TFA, no Fan Feed and no hubs, but look at something like the toolbar. It's an extremely useful feature Monobook doesn't have. However, Monobook could've be re-developed and with the toolbar being included.
 * Only 250-500 people (guessing including you) many prefer Monobook, but there are so much more people who prefer Oasis, and if Oasis got removed instead, there would've been a lot more people complaining about its removal.
 * More wikis and communities would move out from FANDOM. 1 or 2 have done this with Monobook's removal, but imagine with Oasis's removal. Many more communities would've moved out, and in this case, FANDOM would have more outdated and incomplete information, and in this case, no longer being the best wiki farm.