Thread:Tupka217/@comment-25523075-20151116140916/@comment-1038387-20151117172650

It's a great framework, but as FT said, empty.

If you're not interested in SEO, chances are noone's going to find you, noone's going to help you, and you're going to have to do all the work yourself.

Just some notes on your five pages large wiki:
 * I know you're not native or near-native, but "You also find very old names used for 100 years ago!" isn't English. Also, in terms of human history, 100 years isn't a very long time ago. Most of the names used then are still in used now.
 * If you just want a list of names, that's fine. But if you want to include meanings as well, you should at least mention it on your main page. No mention of "etymology", "meaning", or anything else that it's supposed to be an onomastic endeavor. That's necessary for SEO.
 * Also, that line I cited in the first point, as well as the "Cooper" article... they look unprofessional.
 * As for Anglo-Saxon - think of what I mentioned above about removing unnecessary information. Not just that... it's a huge pile of text with no paragraphs or sections. Even if you don't care about being found, you've got to care about being READ. That haphazard heap of words is not a pleasant read.
 * In addition to work, you've also have to have knowledge. Basic knowledge of onomastical terms and historical linguistics. Who the Anglo-Saxons were isn't really relevant to the onomastical side of things. Just that Old English, the language of the Anglo-Saxons, is in the Germanic language family. It's an Ingvaeonic language, if you want to be more precise. Only 2,5 of those still in use.

Some suggestions:
 * You can further categorize names by origin; for example, Cooper can go in a category for surnames used as first names, as well as names based on professions.
 * The key to building a big database is getting your work structured. For example, make a list of all the names starting with A you know, same for B, etc. In Excel, Access, or whatever program replaced them (I'm old). Alphabetize them, and then make articles on them. You can always expand the list later, it just gives you some meat at the start.
 * Determine what non-name articles you need (along the lines of Anglo-Saxon), and what priority they have.