User blog comment:Zambiealex/Wiki Inspector/@comment-26402117-20160607124000

The "Big Wikis" hub has been the target of zero-effort Wikipedia mirrors with stupidly large pagecounts, just to say "we have thousands of non-stub pages". If something like that can be prone to abuse, this might be the target of the same kind of manipulation.

In most cases, its easy to detect though. (Immature appointment, loads of stubs etc)

I see quite a few threads in CC forums asking "How's my wiki theme?" and "Anything wrong with my wiki?". Its much less organised though it attracts open discussion and the right advice in time, whereas formal inspection is more challenging to do in a fair manner.

There's also the issue of finding experienced users to be inspectors. I can think of a few people who do loads of different kinds of requests like adoption, portability mentoring and design. Having CC run another request-based system can affect this activity.