Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25925134-20150614192105/@comment-8117023-20150615195613

Seeing as this is in a public forum, I hope you don't mind me adding my thoughts to the situation Jammer? Nightmare9188 wrote: Probably some of your editors even fear you. The key word here is "probably". Please could you provide a speck of proof that shows any sign of fear within the RangerWiki community instigated by Nbajammer? And a bureaucrat also has to be favored by the community. Indeed, though Nbajammer has been "favored by the community" otherwise he wouldn't be a bureaucrat. When I see your harsh and unfriendly behaviour it doesn't seem like you are favored by the community. See my above point. Even Joseph said the rules seem harsh. Nbajammer's reply above clearly addresses this 'point'. And as I have told it you several times, there is no plan of overthrowing you. Even if that was the case, there appears to be a large amount of effort being put into harassing and defaming him, which is equally as bad as, if not worse than, 'overthrowing'. The members of my wikis will probably watch your wiki and see every occassion when your members are treated bad. That is nothing but opinion. In my eyes, Nbajammer's actions are tactful and in good faith. He is an administrator of a considerably large wiki, he needs to enforce the rules. It can be stressful so it would be understandable if he sometimes responds to a troublesome user with a hostile (to a certain degree) remark - it's natural. You can say this is just my opinion but to me, mine seems more rational. Some will even speak to them. None of them are probably involved with this so if you do try to get other users to rally other users, that would be considered meat-puppetry. And one day you will get back all the hatred you give now. Once again, that is nothing but opinion. Nbajammer would not be a bureaucrat on any wiki if he was known to attack other users in the way you portray him to act. If you are smart in history you know that the French Revolution happened because of the selfishness of the French royalty. This is irrelevant, because this is not the case here.