Thread:Reg Boy/@comment-26092363-20180420123048/@comment-26092363-20180420144848

The edits were fixing sentences. If i edit something like plot then its subjective if it is better, if i fix grammar that's objective.

saying you want to punch the user in the face (which is far from being "critical" as you so lightly put).

I used the emote thing there. It's obviosly not very seriously said if i use the emote thing.

''You can't just go around throwing shade at every person who you think has some sort of personal vendetta against you just because they reverted an edit you thought was good. You are expected to have common decency and to follow the rules which repeatedly state that you are not allowed to cause disruption of any kind or taunt/provoke/disrespect/insult/abuse/harass/flame other editors.''

I know.

Also, nothing says "I wanted to solve the problem in a civilized manner" like starting your appeal with the word "lol" and then simply ending it with a screenshot of the issue in question like you don't even care.



Nice response there buddy.

disingenuous.

Not quite sure what it means.

''And when I say your history, I mean your past violations which led you to your first block. Your block log plays a factor in how long you get blocked for the next time you commit a rule violation.''

I'm a changed man. Actually i still think that pages for all of the minor organisations should be created.

Anyway you should be more transparent when you delete someones profile. Not just put surprise there... And not ignore questions about it,  closing threads and deleting them immeaditely.