User blog comment:Ducksoup/Why We Don't Unblock You/@comment-26161650-20150918163512/@comment-26161650-20150921151056

Actually I think you completely missed the point.

Its about people that "think" they are banned for the wrong reason and whine to wikia to be unblocked. Whether they are truly banned for the wrong reason or not, is something we wont know but in general no-one bans someone for no reason, otherwise this community would have crumbled years ago. Exceptions are not the rule.

Then this article further explains why they will not unblock a blocked person, and also that the rules from one page/community what have you to another are not always the same.

Anonymity is not knowing who the other person is, it has nothing to do with registered users or not. Most registered users have a strange handle and are thus, anonymous, but that is besides the point.

End of the day, those that get banned, 9 out of 10 times, deserve it. So "admins blocking registered users who haven't done anything wrong" is hardly a reason to write an article/mail or whatever this is called over it.

Bans that have no explanation or warning are seemingly more common by opinion of those being bloked, when in fact half the time even those prove that there was some warning or some description/explanation somewhere with the rules that they completely whiped their a$$ with and then complained for a ban.

And even to that I agree. If an Admin bans someone after having made it clear what the reasons for banning someone are, then they simply do not have time and should not have to waste any explaining to someone that disregarded all this the reason to "why the were banned".

(p.s, sorry for some of the grammar man, just woke up and I am still stumbling abouts the keyboard)