Thread:LOLSKELETONS/@comment-10319977-20151011201901/@comment-10319977-20151011204240

So what you're saying is, when an admin responds, whether he's made a mistake or not, that's it? That's the final word? No responding to correct them, or defend my work or else it's "stirring drama"?

The fact of the matter isn't that I'm stirring drama. I've honestly had nothing but the best intentions despite the biased treatment from admins since the beginning. The problem here is that you, the admins, don't want to be questioned. You want the power to make quick work of all your problems on the wiki via quick assumptions, correct or not, and not be questioned about the actions that follow them.

Whether it's seeing a story re-uploaded by an ignorant, well-meaning user who an admin assumes deserves to be banned or, like in this instance, an admin seeing a wall of text and assuming the user is malicious. You guys just want less work, and the site is suffering from it.