Thread:CzechOut/@comment-20607870-20170227225655/@comment-20607870-20170312091355

Before you read this, I want you to know that a reply would be most appreciated. 🙂🙂

Look mate, I'm absolutely heartbroken at the way I've been treated at TARDIS recently. I don't want to create a sour atmosphere between us, as I personally have nothing against you.

This is the reason I get blocked for three months.

'Look mate, you got what you wanted. FP is now included, so I'd appreciate it if you didn't change the topics of the threads to "fighting c**ks".'

Look, I went by what the wiki told me, it says "topic changed by AndrewHickey four days ago"...

So believe me it wasn't an unjust accusation - If I'm wrong, I'm sorry - my intention wasn't to upset you.

'Though Stuart Douglas (aka User:Obverse) has been blocked for personal attacks on User: CzechOut. And yes, he said it was him in an earlier contribution.'

To quote:

(a user asked) Are you Cody Schell?

To which he responded: God no, he's the handsome one.

Followed by him saying who he is.

'I'm sorry if I've offended you in anyway, however your colleague Stuart is far from innocent. Apologies, best wishes and a happy new year. Denchen ☎ 20:20, January 1, 2017 (UTC)'

As you can see I tried to maintain a civil atmosphere. I did get blocked by SOTO for personal attacks. However as it has been said, it wasn't actually a personal attack and just an unjust accusation.

The following paragraph is something I sent to a fellow user

I do honestly believe that "T:Sock" is unjust, yeah a short ban, but say when you were blocked - before this you had logged into a never changing, multiple usage isp address - then you're blocked and then another person could log onto that ISP as themselves - you'd end up being blocked for no fault of your own. "T:SOCK" is floored, maybe a short block is warranted just-in-case but no infinite.

As I've pointed out many a time, I genuinely never went against T:SOCK. The thing is though, that when I message you. I don't get any "evidence" shown my way, it's really unfair... especially since I didn't do it.

You seemed to ignore my last message, so please pal, don't ignore this one.

Even though I one hundred percent claim innocence, I'm not asking to be unblocked - just given a time limit (benefit if the doubt).

As I've stated before, I have nothing against you - this could just be a mistake I'm sure.

Thanks for your time, best wishes.

p.s. During the Christmas period, when most admins were with their loved ones, there were many unconstructive edits, I'd often correct and revert them. One of the reasons I messaged the user was that I became over protective of the wiki (anagram of Kiwi 🥝).

I was subject to quite a few "personal attacks". Ones I'd often let slide, as one struggles to interpret what one is implying through text, that's why I often sign "best wishes pal" - so people know when I'm trying to come off as pleasant.

Another thing is that I was originally blocked for unjust accusations with poor evidence, this is why I'm slightly upset is that I've had accusations against me... with no evidence.

Anyways, best wishes. 🙂

I also have some evidence to support I'm 100% against personal attacks.

Shame this wiki isn't run like a proper wiki, by community decision making, but exists solely to boost the ego of one admin with an agenda... User: Obverse

To which I replied

Probably shouldn't butt in, but that comment obverse, is a personal attack. I can only suggest you remove it. I don't know which admin you're referring too but none of what you've said applies to any admin. I'm suggesting it, merely on a user to user basis, to warn you that you'll probably end up getting blocked under Tardis:No personal attacks. I wish you all the best. - DENCH-and-PALMER

To which he responded

''Sorry, it was aimed at CzechOut, a sad little man who appears to run this place like a personal fiefdom and takes no notice of either common sense, reasoned argument or, frankly, the way a wiki is supposed to be run. Being blocked from a site ruled by him, with a handful of regular posters all scared of his pettiness - no huge deal. (this is not aimed at you byw as you seem to be a sensible sort of person - I admire your patience working for - sorry, with - such a pathetic individual.) But in reality when every poster on a Wiki inclusion thread supports inclusion, and covers - in detail - every point required for inclusion, and one admin comes along an unilaterally closes down all discussion on the basis that (a) it'd be hard for him to correct his initial mistake and (b) it'll please those who want less content on the wiki - well, that wiki is effectively a useless space. Please understand, I have no interest really in whether Fp is on this wiki or not from a publishing POV - it'll not lead to one more sale or one more reader, but I've never been a fan of tiny fish in little ponds throwing their weight about.'' User: Obverse

I responded with

Look. I'm upset that FP hasn't been included - really - I'm really upset. But attacking someone seems unfair. Yes the discussion was long and well backed up with evidence. Yes the end result was really upsetting. However CzechOut doesn't "run" the wiki, the admins do. I mean some non admins help more than some of the admins such as OS12, CoT and I.

CzechOut's reasons weren't what I expected but insulting him is unwarranted and darned unfair. I here propose that you delete your last comment. Not in fear that you'll get banned but so User:CzechOut doesn't have to read those vile comments. On a brighter note, thanks for publishing FP. You've made a lot of Who fans happy. - DENCH-and-PALMER

This was me defending you, which I 100% still stand by today. I really never wanted you to read that but it's needed as evidence.

Of course, you're probably not aware I did that, I don't want to be thanked nor reconsidered because of that alone.

I just want you to understand that when I messaged User: AndrewHickey, my accusations were mainly at the above user Obverse - which happens to be an FP author too.

I have looked over the revision History, I did find out who changed it to "fight c*cks", it was an anonymous user that had earlier claimed to be an FP author, whom I shalln't name.

So I was getting at tad annoyed at FP authors for a bit.

Honestly though, I can't stand personal attacks, and I never meant my original post to come off that way.

I also want to say that, I also used to log in at my place of work - which has an ISP which'd go unchanged for donkey's years. There is a possibility that someone has visited the core at that place, under either the ISP or as a user - either way, it'd look to most that that isp had been active again.

Again, the above is just more speculation, as I have no idea what went on. This is primarily the reason I'm sending you this. Not that I want to come back (I do. 😉) but that I want this unfortunate accusation to be resolved.

Thanks for your time, best wishes.