Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-168424-20200526180610/@comment-9605025-20200526184803

It will only help if they re-evaluate prior to actual migration. If they already have decided to migrate a wiki and don't recheck, then making changes now won't make a difference. -
 * 1) What’s new since UCP initial release and coming soon?
 * Not a whole lot of significant new information. The one exception was the section on Discussions updates. Even then, not a lot of details. Also, the information they gave on mobile editing aligns pretty well with the information previously given. It sounds to me that less than 50% of users actually do mobile editing so I don't see why they are making it out like this will help the majority of editors. Perhaps they are confusing viewers (which I can believe would be mostly mobile) with editors. So losing features just to have mobile compatibility is much less beneficial to editors than to viewers; I would guess. Or perhaps they are thinking that the barrier to editing is a lack of mobile editing. If that is the case, I haven't seen them claim any stats to support that hypothesis.
 * 1) How are wikis selected?
 * Sounds like this pretty much excludes older wikis. However, I share Fandyllic's skepticism regarding UCP's readiness for migrating legacy-platform wikis. With so many unfixed bugs, it will still be a pain even if they don't use the yet-to-be-migrated features.
 * 1) How will migration work?
 * Sounds like a reasonable process. However, why is there no timeline given? I agree with Fandyllic that this is concerning. Though I don't see a reason why one would expect the advance warning to be only a few days prior. Was that in a comment?