Board Thread:Support Requests - Community Management/@comment-2060498-20160711025106

So for a while, I've been trying to get my community's opinion on a destructive admin we have, who is our main translator (keeping the wiki anonymous, but it's a game that releases first in Japanese, and later in English) and because of that, many don't seem to care about this admin's abuse or they'd just complain and leave it at that (we do have other translators, but the admin in question is known for deleting pages if they didn't make them [even if they are up to standard] and deleting random comments if they deem them to be pointless, even if the comments aren't spam. The admin doesn't even need to be banned, just demoted to remove their power to delete). I've come to the conclusion that the community is toxic to the point of not wanting to do anything but continue to complain. Now, I'm not an admin myself, but I do care about this community, and am a frequent editor. I feel like we get our fair amount of trolls, and I still want to work on this community, so I was wondering, how hard is it to lock 12,000+ pages, or is it possible to only allow people with a certain edit count to edit pages? We do allow comments so people can build up their edit count, and although it could allow for more spam, it'd be a lot of work for any trolls to do just to troll some pages. I'd like to at least throw some ideas out to the admins of that wiki, but I want to know if they're possible or not, and for other frequent editors like myself, is there some kind of staff position to allow us to edit locked pages without being an admin? 