Thread:Hey1234/@comment-5091911-20181104134650/@comment-1635429-20181104175642

How are my arguments convoluted? Everytime I point out a flaw with one of her arguments, she brings up an entirely new argument that makes even less sense.

Silver went from arguing that Sugar Rush is the same situation, which I debunked because SR is completely fictional. Then she tried to bring up HM, which I debunked because HM does not have an infobox, sections or even categories relating to its fictional depictions. Just a few points of Trivia.

I'm not agreeing with her here because her arguments don't make sense. I've answered all her concerns, but all she does is try to bring up new issues (all of which just keep getting debunked with facts). Usually, yes, Silver does change my mind because her points are usually sound. In this case, they're anything but. And for the last time, separating real life and fiction isn't anything new. The real-life and fictional Hans Christian Andersens have had seperate articles on the wiki for years.

As a side note, I'd rather take this topic back to the wiki rather than dragging it out on Community Central