Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-1409530-20170424120651/@comment-1409530-20170424221629

31dot wrote: My name was left out but I am willing to identify myself as the person Jdogno7 is discussing. This person has disrupted many Wikis (a history of which has been posted on their Law and Order Wiki user talk page) and if they don't know what they have done wrong now, after having been told by many people, me repeating it will lead nowhere. Note their post above "I have been more unfortunate than others to have to deal with abusive admins and general unreasonable users". Everyone else is the problem and not them. I've told them I would reconsider the block in a year; I don't think that's unreasonable.

"My name was left out but I am willing to identify myself as the person Jdogno7 is discussing.": I suppose I was trying to be nice by focusing on the block and not the blocker.

"This person has disrupted many Wikis (a history of which has been posted on their Law and Order Wiki user talk page) and if they don't know what they have done wrong now, after having been told by many people, me repeating it will lead nowhere.": Well treating me like an idiot who should know the obvious is not going to help me understand any better. Some of these accusations have not being fully discussed. That is the point I am trying to make. I have not being given a chance to full defend myself against the accusations made against me on the LAO wiki.

"Note their post above "I have been more unfortunate than others to have to deal with abusive admins and general unreasonable users". Everyone else is the problem and not them.": I have never claimed to be incapable of making mistakes.

"I've told them I would reconsider the block in a year; I don't think that's unreasonable.": It is unreasonable to block someone for a year if the person has not been given a full chance to defend themselves against the things they have been accused of.