User:Akuto Sai Rimuru Tempest

Ichiban Ushiro no Daimaou Cosmology( Upgrade )
====  proves that every multiverse contains planes that trancends the lower on in an infinite hierarchy, this page is the lore of the multiverse/ setting, which gives the dkd cosmology an infinitely structured plane that trancends the lower one in an infinite hierarchy, its structured like the 1st dimension, 2nd dimension, 3 dimension, 4tth, and 5th dimension in base world or realm,  ====

Infinite Anti universes and related to Real world
====      ' Writer - The ability to see and control the worlds as information, like to write a story in fiction. Endless logical possibilities could include anything that can be described. There are universes of different sizes, (through infinite space) with all sorts of laws. There are stories that include parallel worlds, infinite dimensional spaces, as well as foreign gods, for whom all this is nothing more than fiction (and even lower beings are able to think in terms of an infinitely dense infinity). Stories can be raised to the power, forming a structure where the real worlds for some creatures are only dreams or fiction for the second, whose worlds are also a story for the third. This hierarchy can aspire even to infinity, but the law of identity will always be higher than that of any level. He can create any structure, even infinitely dense, but still not be able to go beyond the history written by the Law of Identity ' ====

なっとく そこまではヒロシにも納得できた.
==== ' 「だから、彼らは身体を中心にした思考を持てない. 考えている主体が存在しないのに考えてい るという矛盾した存在だ. 確かにコンピュータの回路としての主体はある. だが、どれほどの回 路が積み重なれば思考が生まれるのかは誰も知らない. だが、ある程度の数の回路が集まれば、 意志が生まれるのだ. 人間の脳のどこに意志があるのかわからないのと同じ事だと考えて欲し ゆえ い. そして、身体性のない思考は外界という区分を持たぬ故に無限大についての思考を可能にす のうど る. 数列のような無限ではないよ. 無限に濃度の濃い無限についてだ. そして、それは生物にと たんさいぼう っての無限過去にたどり着けることも意味する. 肉体を持たぬ神は単細胞生物の思考にまでた どり着けるのだ. それは生命の誕生、思考の誕生と同じことだ. そして思考そのものが宇宙を作 にせ る. 観測論的宇宙のことでないよ. この世界が五分前に生まれたとして、偽の記憶を持たされて きおく いる限りそれを証明する手段はない、という論があるが、その説も肉体あってのことだ. 主体が ない思考はその論を無効にしてしまう. つまり宇宙は実在し、時間は絶対的不可逆性をもって流 れている」 ' ====

In the end, he was able to convince Hiroshi to that extent.
==== ' “Therefore, they cannot think centered on the body. It is a contradictory existence that they are thinking even though there is no thinking subject. Certainly there is a subject as a computer circuit. No one knows whether thoughts are born from the accumulation of these circuits.However, if a certain number of circuits are gathered, a will will be born.I think that it is the same as not knowing where the will is in the human brain. And since thought without physicality does not have the division of the external world, it makes it possible to think about infinity.It is not infinity like a numerical sequence, but about infinity with infinite density. And it also means that it is possible to reach the infinite past of living things.A god without a body can reach the thoughts of single-celled organisms.It is the same as the birth of life and the birth of thought. And thought itself creates the universe, not the observational universe, and if the world was born five minutes ago, there is no way to prove it as long as it is kept in false memory. But that theory is also about having a body.Thoughts without a subject invalidate that theory.In other words, the universe exists and time flows with absolute irreversibility.” ' ====

Density and Cardinality in Set Theory mean the same thing (in Japan).
====  (The Mortal Universe in DKD is the size of an Observable Universe with only Omniverse the  as Matter (Yes, I know the author mentions "I think so", it is irrelevant if it is confirmed in the novel anyway). While the Computer Gods create Universes of Infinite size, they are not "Scientifically Observable".  ====

(Eng sub for JP sentence )
==== '           “ the universe of the machine    gods is scientifically unobservable. The mortal universe has a different observable universe size than the computer god's universe. Those are two different universes. ” }  ) ' ====

==== ' { “「あなたはフィクションの中に生きているのに、そのフィクションを憎んでいます. あなたはフィクションを広めたいという自然な衝動を持っているので、次から次へとそれを行うのです. あなたは私たちを閉じ込めていたシステムを破壊しましたが、次のシステムが作動しました」 「フィクションには何層もの層がある. 彼は無限に引きこもっている. それは永遠に続く地獄のようなものだから、対処するのは簡単なことではない」” ' ====

( Eng sub for JP sentence )
==== '    “ You live in a fiction and yet you hate the fiction. You have a natural impulse to spread the fictions, so you will do it one after the other. You have destroyed the system that locked us in, but the next system has been activated. The fiction has multiple layers. He's in infinite withdrawal. It's like hell that goes on and on forever, so it's not an easy thing to deal with."}  ) ' ====

(The worlds are also hierarchical, obviously each with its own Computer God.
==== ' { “つまり、あなたはフィクションの中で生きているのに、そのフィクションを憎んでいるのです. あなたはフィクションを広めたいという自然な衝動を持っているので、次から次へとそれを実行します. 私たちを閉じ込めていたシステムは破壊されましたが、次のシステムが起動されました. フィクションには複数の層があります. 彼は無限の引きこもり状態にある. まるで地獄が永遠に続くようで、簡単なことではありません. 「世界とは何だったのか? 世界は虚構だった. しかし同時に、世界はその虚構の中の絶対的な真実でもあった. 」より 外から見ればそれはフィクション、中から見ればそれは真実だった 世界を外から見てフィクションとして見ようとしたらどうなるでしょうか? ” ' ====

( eng sub for above Japanese sentence )
==== '           “ SoYou live in a fiction and yet you hate the fiction. You have a natural impulse to spread the fictions, so you will do it one after the other. You have destroyed the system that locked us in, but the next system has been activated. The fiction has multiple layers. He's in infinite withdrawal. It's like hell that goes on and on forever, so it's not an easy thing to deal with." what was the world? The world was a fiction. But at the same time, the world was an absolute truth from within that fiction. From the outside, it was fiction. From the inside, it was the truth. What if one tried to see the world as fictional from the outside perspective? " }  ) ' ====

“ Shotaro Mizuki / Shintaro Kana... @S_Mi... 30 mar.
==== ' Pensé que era infinito en la teoría matemática de conjuntos. La densidad infinita es también un mundo generado por computadora. Lo siento si mi conocimiento de la teoria de conjuntos es incompleto y erróneo. Puede haber algunas discrepancias entre el volumen 5 y el volumen 13. ' ====

“ Shotaro Mizuki / Shintaro Kana... @S_Mi... Mar 30.
==== ' I thought it was infinite in mathematical set theory. Infinite density is also a computer generated world. I'm sorry if my knowledge of set theory is incomplete and wrong. There may be some discrepancies between volume 5 and volume 13.”) ' ====

Evidence:
====  -Inflation theory explains flat space, scale-invariant fluctuations, solves horizon problem and monopole problems and can naturally explain such bubbles -Explains fine-tuned parameters  ====

「ことでね」 いる言葉なんだ?」 彼らは身体を持っていない」
==== ' は実在し、時間は絶対的不可逆性をもって流 るが、その説も肉体あってのことだ. 主体が 前に生まれたとして、偽の記憶を持たされて 同じことだ. そして思考そのものが宇宙を作 にせ 体を持たぬ神は単細胞生物の思考にまでた たんさいぼう い無限についてだ. そして、それは生物にと ゆえ 持たぬ故に無限大についての思考を可能にす るのかわからないのと同じ事だと考えて欲し い. だが、ある程度の数の回路が集まれば、 路としての主体はある. だが、どれほどの回 考えている主体が存在しないのに考えてい きおく ' ====

"That's the word." They don't have bodies."
==== ' is real, and time flows with absolute irreversibility, but that theory also exists because there is a body. Even if the subject was born before, it is the same as being given false memories. And the thought itself made the universe, and the bodyless god was even the thought of a single-celled organism. And think of it in the same way that a living being does not know why he is capable of thinking about infinity because he does not have it. However, if a certain number of circuits are gathered, there is a subject as a path. But how many times does the   thinking subject remember, even though the thinking subject does not exist? } ) ' ====

====  ( The computer gods exist as part of a Quantum Grid, these computer gods only see worlds and people as data and try to turn humans into data like them and store them within the Quantum Grid, then later the Quantum Grid will go beyond dimensions and move, (evolve) to another universe. (T4M proof).  ====

(  ^ Description
==== ' Tegmark's MUH is: Our external physical reality is a mathematical structure.[3] That is, the physical universe is not merely described by mathematics, but is mathematics (specifically, a mathematical structure). Mathematical existence equals physical existence, and all structures that exist mathematically exist physically as well. Observers, including humans, are "self-aware substructures (SASS)". In any mathematical structure complex enough to contain such substructures, they "will subjectively perceive themselves as existing in a physically 'real' world".[4]” ' ====

==== ' “In the mainstream of mathematics, the axioms and the inference rules are commonly left implicit, and, in this case, they are almost always those of Zermelo- Fraenkel set theory with the axiom of choice, or of a less powerful theory, such as Peano arithmetic. A notable exception is Wiles's proof of Fermat's Last Theorem, which involves the Grothendieck universes whose existence requires the addition of a new axiom to the set theory.[b] Generally, an assertion that” ' ====

==== ' “Scientific laws summarize the results of experiments or observations, usually within a certain range of application. In general, the accuracy of a law does not change when a new theory of the relevant phenomenon is worked out, but rather the scope of the law's application, since the mathematics or statement representing the law does not change. As with other kinds of scientific knowledge, scientific laws do not express absolute certainty, as mathematical theorems or identities do. A scientific law may be contradicted, restricted, or extended by future observations.” ' ====

“Scientific laws or laws of science are statements,
==== ' based on repeated experiments or observations, that describe or predict a range of natural phenomena.[1] The term law has diverse usage in many cases (approximate, accurate, broad, or narrow) across all fields of natural science (physics, chemistry, astronomy, geoscience, biology). Laws are developed from data and can be further developed through mathematics; in all cases they are directly or indirectly based on empirical evidence. It is generally understood that they implicitly reflect, though they do not explicitly assert, causal relationships fundamental to reality, and are discovered rather than invented.[2]” ' ====

==== ' “Foundations of mathematics is the study of the philosophical and logical[1] and/or algorithmic basis of mathematics, or, in a broader sense, the mathematical investigation of what underlies the philosophical theories concerning the nature of mathematics.[2] In this latter sense, the distinction between foundations of mathematics and philosophy. of mathematics turns out to be quite vague.” ' ====

==== ' “Set theory is the branch of mathematical logic that studies sets, which can be informally described as collections of objects. Although objects of any kind can be collected into a set, set theory, as a branch of mathematics, is mostly concerned with those that are relevant to mathematics as a whole.” ' ====

((     Level II multiverse
====  Distant regions of space that are forever unobservable because space between here and there keeps inflating; they obey the same fundamental laws of physics, but their effective laws of physics may differ  ====

All mathematical structures (Chapter 12), corresponding to different fundamental laws of physics )    )
====     (   This is enough to make the Real World a big 0 in the level system. Of course, considering that 1 Level equals infinite cardinals, I will explain it again in text for your understanding. The CG's created Infinite levels of infinite cardinals of universes, and 1 Level = Infinite Cardinals. That's right, it is a great hierarchy of Universes and Gods starting from Aleph-1 to Aleph-infinity, but this is only 1 level of the infinite levels that exist. Set theory has all transfinite numbers defined, so this reaches the Inaccessible Cardinal of VSBW and level 0 thanks to MUH (or T4M as I like to call it).     ====

[ Large Cardinal Tree] ”  )
====      (  In case this doesn't seem like enough evidence to you, I will confirm T4M in another way as well. This is the Zeno Aquilles paradox, which, in case you didn't know, is fulfilled in the novel  ====

{  [ Time is relative and it can be compared to the space in which an object moves. Tigher the
==== ' speed, the larger the space the object can move through and the more possible phenomena it can encounter, but the object can only move in one direction. In two-dimensional terms, it is like only being able to choose one point on the circumference of an expanding ripple in the water." ' ====

Bouichirou picked up a branch and drew a line on the ground.
====  "An object cannot exist in multiple places simultaneously because time actually   has a smallest unit. If time - that is, the space you compared it to can be infinitely divided, the paradox of Achilles and the tortoise can be achieved."]  ====

[ “D. The transcendent structure
==== ' Above we discussed how mathematical structures and computations are closely related, in that the former are defined by the latter. On the other hand, computa tions are merely sp cases of mathematical struc For example, the information content (mem- ory s of a digital computer is a string of bits, say *1001011100111001..." of great but finite length, equiva lent to some large but finite integer n written in binary. The information processing of a computer is a determin- istic rule for changing each memory state into another (applied over and over again), so mathematically, it is simply a function f mapping the integers onto them- selves that gets iterated: n f(n) f(/(n)) → In other words, even the most sophisticated computer simulation is merely a special case of a mathematical structure, hence included in the Level IV multiverse. ' ====

==== ' Figure 5 illustrates how computations and mathemat ical structures are related not only to each other, but also to formal systems, which formally describe them. If a formal system describes a mathematical structure, the latter is said to be a model of the former [31]. Moreover, computations can generate theorems of formal systems (indeed, there are algorithms computing all theorems for the class of formal systems known as recursively enumer- ” ] ' ====

Before exploring the implications of the CUH, let us discuss the motivation for it.
==== ' I have long wondered whether Gödel's incompleteness theorem in some sense torpedos the MUH, and concerns along these lines have also been raised by Vilenkin [84] and others. Indeed, this worry is somewhat broader, ex- tending to all three vertices of Figure 5 above. This figure illustrates that mathematical structures, farmal systems and computations are closely related, suggesting that they are all aspects of the same transcendent structure (the Level IV multiverse), whose nature we have still not fully understood. The figure also illustrates that there are potential problems at all three vertices of the tri- angle: mathematical structures may have relations that are undefined, formal systems may contain undecidable statements, and computations may not halt after a finite number of steps. Let us now revisit the relation between these three issues in more detail than we did above in Section VI.” ]   } ”  ) ' ====

-
====          (    Zeno’s paradoxes are a set of Philosophical problems generally thought to have been divised by greek philosopher zeno of Elea to support parmenides’ Doctrine that contrary to the evidence of one's senses, the belief in plurality and change is mistaken, and in particular that motion is nothing but a illusion. It is usually assumed, based on plato's parmenides.  ====

====               " { Achilles paradox, in logic, an argument attributed to the 5th-century-BCE Greek philosopher Zeno, and one of his four paradoxes described by Aristotle in the treatise Physics. The paradox concerns a race between the fleet-footed Achilles and a slow-moving tortoise. The two start moving at the same moment, but if the tortoise is initially given a head start and continues to move ahead, Achilles can run at any speed and will never catch up with it. Zeno's argument rests on the presumption that Achilles must first reach the point where the tortoise started, by which time the tortoise will have moved ahead, even if but a small distance, to another point; by the time } ” )  ====

( Having scientific Observable Universe Theory also prove the zeno paradoxes.
==== '         “ { [Metaphysics is the branch of philosophy that studies the fundamental nature of reality, the first principles of being, identity and change, space and time, causality, necessity, and possibility. It includes questions about the nature of consciousness and the relationship between mind and matter, between substance and attribute, and between potentiality and actuality 2 The word "metaphysics" comes from two Greek words that, together, literally mean "after or behind or among [the study of] the natural". It has been suggested that the term might have been coined by a first century CE editor who assembled various small selections of Aristotle's works into the treatise we now know by the name Metaphysics (μetà tȧ puaika, meta ta physika, Iit. 'after the Physics'. another of Aristotle's works).[3]  ]     ' ====

==== '                  [scientific theory or scientific law that fails to fit all data can still be useful (due to its simplicity) as an approximation under specific conditions. An example is Newton's laws of motion, which are a highly accurate approximation to special relativity at velocities that are small relative to the speed of light.[7][8][9]. ]    } ” ) ' ====

(  Zeno paradox beings metaphysics
====             " { [ Zeno's paradoxes and their variations (see Thomson's lamp) remain relevant metaphysical problems.[7][8][9] The origins of the paradoxes are somewhat unclear. Diogenes Laërtius, a fourth source for information about Zeno and his teachings, citing Favorinus, says that Zeno's teacher Parmenides was the first to introduce the paradox of Achilles and the tortoise. But in a later passage, Laërtius attributes the origin of the paradox to Zeno, explaining that Favorinus disagrees.[10]  ]  ====

==== '                   [ Metaphysics is the branch of philosophy that studies the fundamental nature of reality, the first principles of being, identity and change, space and time, causality, necessity, and possibility. It includes questions about the nature of consciousness and the relationship between mind and matter, between substance and attribute, and between potentiality and actuality 2 The word "metaphysics" comes from two Greek words that, together, literally mean "after or behind or among [the study of] the natural". It has been suggested that the term might have been coined by a first century CE editor who assembled various small selections of Aristotle's works into the treatise we now know by the name Metaphysics (μetà tȧ puaika, meta ta physika, Iit. 'after the Physics'. another of Aristotle's works).[3]  ]   } ”  ) ' ====

First published Wed May 12, 2004; substantive revision Wed Mar 9, 2016
==== ' Platonism is the view that there exist such things as abstract objects - where an abstract object is an object that does not exist in space or time and which is therefore entirely non-physical and non- mental. Platonism in this sense is a contemporary view. It is obviously related to the views of Plato in important ways, but it is not entirely clear that Plato endorsed this view, as it is defined here. In order to remain neutral on this question, the term 'platonism' is spelled with a lower-case 'p'. (See entry on Plato.) The most important figure in the development of modern platonism is Gottlob Frege (1884, 1892, 1893-1903, 1919). The view has also been endorsed by many others, including Kurt Gödel (1964), Bertrand Russell (1912), and W.V.O. Quine (1948, 1951). } ”  ) ' ====

==== ' So we can say that Computer Gods create the universe that having platonism. Which means that it again confirms T4M, since Platonism and philosophy are a requirement of this type of Multiverse. ' ====

In some movies (movies made with people), the character created by the writer kills the writer.
==== ''' Akuto Sai defeated all ( Demon king, high outerverse lv such as infinite Computer Gods, infinite 1st  Extra Universal Gods,infinite 2nd Extra Universal Gods, and Creator God ) and he absorbed the creations and plans of everything he defeated and changed his power and put it on the base lv. So in his base lv, tier is Base line boundless lv. ''' ====

Then I was able to create Void form without the help of Law of identity
==== ''' Because of that, he was able to penetrate the Real world alone, and for some reason, he killed the Author who created him, and he became the Author of the entire Demon King Diamo novel (including the infinite infinite verses in the novel) (that's why it is defined as 0^inf layers into boundless). ''' ====

==== ''' Note – The real world in DKD refers to the world verse that you and I live in. It is only connected to the real world / Akuto Sai's cosmology is much higher than the rest of the other anime verse's cosmology because it is connected to the real world (that's why Akuto Sai with Void form or Author Akuto Sai is defined as 0^ inf layers into boundkess). ''' ====

Narrative modes see chart
====  You as the author (true author) → fictional author (pseudo author) → the fictional world → fictional readers (ones from a higher narrative reading this story a story within a story) → real life readers  ====

==== ''' Real author > pseudo author and readers (higher narrative standing) >  fictional world  > secondary author author of the next narrative below > story within a story the next narrative below the first. ]. " ''' ====

itman's diagram of narrative, cited from chatman, 197
==== ''' NARRATOLOGY EXAMINES THE WAYS that narrative structures our perception of both cultural artifacts and the world around us. The study of narrative is particularly important since our ordering of time and space in narrative forms constitutes one of the primary ways we construct meaning in general. ]   ”   }.  ) ''' ====