Help:Reverting

All versions of an article are stored, so it is easy to revert a bad edit and return the article to its previous state.

How do I revert vandalism?
All users have the ability to revert to a previous version of a page.

Important: in the case of vandalism, take the time to make sure that you are reverting to the last version without the vandalism; there may be multiple vandal edits.
 * Go to the page, click on "history" at the top ("Page history" in some skins), and click on the time and date of the earlier version you want to revert to. It will not work if you click on 'cur' or 'last'.
 * Then when that page comes up, you'll see something like "(Revision as of 23:19 Aug 15, 2002)" below the title.
 * Verify that you've selected the correct version, and click to edit the page, as you would normally.
 * You'll get a warning, above the edit box, about editing an out-of-date revision.
 * Once you are sure the revision you are looking at is good, save the page. Be sure to add the word "revert" to the edit summary (often abbreviated as "rv"). On some wikis it is common practice to mention the date/time of the version of the page that you're reverting back to in the description as well.  (See also Wikipedia:Edit summary.)

How do I revert edits that are not vandalism?
Be very cautious about using this revert process to return to a previous version of the page. While non-vandal edits can be reverted in the same way if you think an older version of a page is better than the current version, an editor whose work is undone this way is likely to perceive your action as rude, if not as an outright accusation of vandalism.

A normal edit, which includes the best bits of the previous version and the new edit and combines them to get the best of both worlds, will often be preferable to reverting a genuine edit. You should save reverts for cases where the new version is plainly worse.

What is rollback, and how do I use it?
Administrators and users with rollback rights have an extra "rollback" link on diff pages and on user contributions lists that lets them revert vandalism faster, without the extra steps of going to the page history and opening an earlier revision.

Clicking on the link reverts to the last edit not authored by the user concerned. An edit summary will be added automatically stating that a reversion was made, and the edit will be marked as minor.

Can I hide flood vandalism reverts from recent changes?
A "flood" occurs when a vandal makes edits to many pages very quickly in an attempt to make the recent changes page unusable, by filling it with their own nonsense edits (and the reversions which fix the damage). In these cases, admins can choose to hide vandalism from recent changes. To do this, add &bot=1 to the end of the url used to access a user's contributions. For example, http://www.wikia.com/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=SomePersistentVandal&bot=1. When the rollback links on the contributions list are clicked, the revert, and the original edit that you are reverting will both be hidden from the default recent changes display.

This means that they will be hidden unless you click the "bots" link on the Recent changes page to set hidebots=0. The edits are not hidden from contributions lists, page histories or watchlists. The edits remain in the database and are not removed, but they no longer flood recent changes. The aim of this feature is to reduce the annoyance factor of a flood vandal with relatively little effort. This should not be used for reverting a change you just don't like, but is meant only for massive floods of simple vandalism.

What behavior guidelines should I follow when reverting?
You should always explain why you are reverting an article. This helps the reverted person to fix whatever problem it is that you've identified and explains to other people whether they need to even view the reverted version. If your reasons for reverting are too complex to explain in the edit summary, explain it on the talk page.

Revert wars are not acceptable. High-frequency reversion wars make the page history less useful, waste space in the database, make it hard for other people to contribute, and flood recent changes and watchlists. Unless it's simple vandalism, when someone undoes a reversion you've made you should stop and talk to them using the article talk page or their user talk page before reverting again. Assume good faith, communicate the problem you see in their edit, and you will almost always be able to find a compromise that allows editing on the article to move forward without further disruption.

See the advice on staying cool when the editing gets hot at Wikipedia.