Adoption:Mixels Fan Wiki

Adoption requests →

What is your username? Dadaw

Please link to the wiki here: http://mixels-fan.wikia.com/wiki/Mixels_Fan_Wiki

How many edits have you made on that wiki? 652 but still editing.

How many days/months have you been editing there? 3 months

On the Special Pages → Special:ListUsers when was the last time an admin edited, and who was it? 13:34, December 31, 2014 by Dadaw

Any other information: The Founder is blocked globaly so I know who is the founder, he told me to adopt it because he trusting me about protect on the Wiki. --Nurp-Naut and Kraw. (talk) 13:48, December 31, 2014 (UTC)

Hi Dadaw. It looks like there are other active editors on that wiki. You will need to create a public discussion, such as a blog or forum post, stating your intentions to gain bureaucrat rights and allow users a week to respond. Make sure to also link to your post on your adoption request and continue to edit the wiki daily.

Also, two bureaucrats - while not active - have recently logged into Wikia on 31 December 2014. You could request bureaucrat rights from them if you ask on their message walls as this can be faster then waiting for an adoption request to be processed. Good luck! --

The most basic and prime rule about adopting a wiki is for none of the Admins to be inactive for 60 days. But it appears that several administrators and a bureaucrat on your wiki have edited within that timeframe. Ignore LegendFPS's message above, as the wiki ineligible to adopt. However, you can request for a promotion from the active bureaucrat on the wiki. If you choose to directly request the rights from them, you should check out this fantastic blog written by Sannse, which provides stellar advice on receiving rights. Cheers!
 * Although a bureaucrat "technically" edited within the past 60 days, a single message wall post doesn't really constitute as an edit (in the same sense as a mainspace edit) or make them active. As for the other active admins, if they, and the rest of the community, agree to Dadaw receiving bureaucrat rights then the request should become eligible. Is this correct? --
 * It's somewhat correct. I have seen adoptions made ineligible because of bureaucrats responding to messages. I'm not entirely sure in this case, but I think the best course would be to make a blog announcing his desire to receive bureaucratic rights, contact the "active bureaucrat," and then see what Staff says when they respond to this request.