Thread:Meganerd18/@comment-1439943-20140622041633/@comment-6028837-20140705172507

Meganerd18 wrote: Trigger009 wrote: Meganerd18 wrote: Tupka217 wrote: A wiki can set their own policy on speculation. If they say they don't wany it, they can do that. If you break it, you can get blocked. This has nothing to do with the Terms of Use whatsoever, so complaining won't lead to an unblocking. I'd prefer a chance to talk to the idiot who blocked me in the first place. And the wiki has a lot of speculation on it, for some reason I was singled out to be blocked after only doing it once. That should be grounds for a temporary block at worst, and a warning at best.

The state of wikia-based wikis can often be quite deplorable. It's a shame the quality of staff on various wikis can't be raised more, because most of them are extremely immature, controlling, and sometimes oversensitive to suggestions. It leads to very poor communities where where friends of the admins are given much more free reign than strangers, or where editing simply becomes impossible because staff will just ban anyone who does anything they dislike, regardless of severity. Ouch, you know we are very strict over there due to constant flow of troublemakers, trolls cyberbullies etc. But your ban was accidental as i have just explained on the message you left me, im sorry. But i just wanted to tell you words hurt and i dont appreciate being called an idiot, it was all a big mistake. I wrote this before I wrote the message to you, and I was still angry at the time. I'm sorry for it, but as I said I hadn't even found your profile here on Community Central when I wrote this up.

Its ok, i mean it is pretty much my fault this whole thing started. I shouldve payed more attention as to who i meant to block, because you did nothing wrong. I accept your apology and i hope we can move on from this :)