User blog comment:Rappy 4187/Technical Update: November 30, 2015/@comment-11733175-20151201085517/@comment-11733175-20151201170749

To clarify I was referring to modules in the sense of NS_MODULE or the namespace added by Scribunto.

@Dessamator Last I checked Flags do absolutely nothing irrespective of platform, screen size, browser, etc. I can't justify making the templates managed by flags nigh impossible for bot operators to interact with for the vague promise of something changing in the future. If that's changed, then I'm sure RSW will be happy to re-evaluate them, but until then they have no real use as far as we're concerned.

@Kirkburn I don't disagree that unorganised templates is valid, but only if you consider template disorganisation, as defined by template classification, valid. As of right now, there's no benefit to having templates classified other than not interrupting the edit-save flow of anyone making changes to a template.

The automated classification isn't perfect, so it's prudent to check each classification was correct (as we can't tell who classified the template). Going by Special:AllPages, it appears there's ~6000 templates to classify (including redirects, it was kind of difficult to exclude them), which is obviously far more than your average wiki.

As with Flags, when it becomes advantageous to have this classification, I'm sure we'll look at it further. In the mean time I've been providing feedback on it based on the minimal usage that's been forced upon me during my normal editing in the hope that it will become more useful. But until then, as with Flags and this new module (here referring to the sidebar in oasis), it's of no use to RSW.