User blog comment:MisterWoodhouse/Unified Community Platform: The Vision, Purpose, and Process/@comment-44751373-20201224161725/@comment-1038387-20201230125519

Just for completeness sake, I'll cover the others as well:

1. Yep. There might be a new feature in the future, but in the mean time, try this script

2. AjaxPolls were a server drain and not really useful as they could easily be gamed. There are polls in Discussions.

3. That's not WikiActivity, that's Recent Changes. It's the updated version of the page that has always existed. This script emulates some of the functionality of the old feature.

4. Yep. Feeds are not built on MediaWiki, so they do not have the same markup.

5. The new 2017 Visual Editor isn't perfect, which was why the 2010 Source Editor was brought in as a stopgap. Visual Editor has performance issues on older devices. It's not optimized for mobile but you can use the mobile editor for that. It's also not optimized for Fandom's skin but they're working to fix that.

6. They always could create spam pages. I'm not sure what you mean, other than perhaps Titleblacklist no longer working? You can implement an AbuseFilter instead.

7. Not sure what your qualm is here.

8. Fandom is still for the Fans, by the Fans. But it was never paid for by the Fans.

9. 2020 is a write-off for many. What does that have to do with this?

10. Global chat usage was so low it did not warrant the investment of updating it. It doesn't pay itself back. It's a business decision, which is sour for the handful of wikis that did use it.

11. Discord troubles are not really an argument against Fandom.

12. I'm not sure what's wrong with that? If anything adding that extra step of having to save it to your device first prevents people spamming images.