Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-24949460-20160103044359/@comment-24949460-20160103050925

Tupka217 wrote: It also depends on what you mean by "factual". Because that word can be very subjective. It might be something you think is correct, but others dispute. But all that is irrelevant: admins can run a wiki as they see fit.

It would help if you were to elaborate which wiki this was on, so we could see for ourselves in which category this falls in. The only other wiki in your masthead is Naruto, where you're blocked for intimidating behavior/harrassment. I can't make out a full picture of everything that went down, but you were blocked for making an idle threat. I didn't make threats, I made a promise to inform the admins of the moderators bad behavior. Because they as people who know the source material know that the edit that user made was both 100% true and 100% LEGAL. They didn't need to undo the edit because it was all true. I even backed the user up saying that the image was both true and appropiate for the page. But instead of taking our 2 vs 1 vote, they just plain ignored us. And when I planned on informing his admin he banned me until until next Monday. So far only two moderators on that site was shown to have a monopolizing attitude with what information goes in or out of the wikia site. If mods have the ability to just ignore us then why does the wikia even allow users in the first place?