Board Thread:New Features/@comment-5275700-20150722200934/@comment-1279279-20150803170424

Are there any 'actual statistics' as to signed in/IP activity and the amounts of 'more or less relevant material' and 'non-relevant material' on various types of wiki? 'Named persons' with particular opinions that cause disruption?

From #my# experience what some anonymous contributors contribute more than makes up for the few others that are disruptive: and, as said above, there are occasions when it is not possible to sign in, or one does not wish to (for reasonably valid grounds) - and who here has never corrected something in passing without signing in?