Thread:Merrystar/@comment-166269-20141223140411/@comment-166269-20141224160400

That was something of a bad choice of words on my part; I can't even remember why I wrote it to be honest (and in fact I forgot I'd written it shortly after posting that comment).

I'm not currently an active editor on the JP Builder wiki and have no immediate plans to start (though, as with all things, this could well change unexpectedly =) ), and since there is no present urgent need for an administrator who is regularly active wherever (much less one who is regularly active on that wiki specifically), I'm fine with the request staying closed; if the situation changes in the future, I can always open a new request (or reopen that one if you'd prefer).

More generally speaking, though, aside from the pagemove fix needing done, the main reason I made the request in spite of not meeting the adoption criteria is because I've been led to understand in the past that these criteria are mostly guidelines meant to help weed out and prevent requests where the requester is probably not ready for the admin tools or obviously doesn't have the local community's interests or the interests of the wiki in mind, and that they may be relaxed in cases where the requester is already an established and trusted member of the Wikia community; I probably wouldn't have made the request if I thought the criteria were absolute requirements, instead filing a S:C request to have the pagemove fixed.