User blog comment:MisterWoodhouse/Community Contract for the New Fandom Platform/@comment-1807002-20190627192529

'''Seek solution parity or better. Take on the responsibility of saying “no” sometimes.'''

These worry me, I already have been told in the past a technique I have used in many wikis was and had to be eventually phased out that basically would break several wikis (perhaps more and we aren't just talking a couple non-important pages in some cases every page) and when I asked if any thing similar would replace it- it was never exactly answered (and I am still waiting).

So if that is the past attitude and now you are giving a contractual get-out-of-jail-free-card version of: we are going to take it away for you because we have to say "no" sometimes. I am worried. I have a feeling moving forward this technique could be going with these new updates.

That being said, I am glad at least you are addressing probably far more important and needed updates that far overshadow the little guy problems. And as long as you have complete transparency and accept that maybe you may have to consider contributors consensus before making drastic changes or removals- I can't see too much going wrong- unless it creates a community schism.