Forum:TOC becoming multi row (full page width) possible?

I have searched far and wide but did not find the answer to my question yet. However, i might have searched at the wrong places.

Fairly recently, a new user at Swords and Potions wiki has been adding a nice new page with loads of good information. However, due to the nature of the page i have split it into header 2 and 3 paragraphs. The Table of Content (TOC) now runs over a screen large, which in my believe is against the nature of a TOC (easy to use, giving you the ability to fast scroll through a page).

I am talking about this page (but this page was ahead of it, and shows even worse TOC, so it's not something i have been looking into yust now)

I have seen a suggestion by Uberfuzzy at the CC forum talking about this page.

Sadly however, Uberfuzzy never got around to responding to the question directed at him and has since start of november stopped working for Wikia and since then is unreachable. Going through the 5700 lines of coding is so much, even for me, that i quit doing it after about line 2500, since coding got to me and it all began to spin in front of my eyes.

I do hope some here do know how to make a TOC multi row or full page width. That would help improve those pages.

Thanks


 * With CSS you can, but not necessarily widely supported. Here's an example for Firefox support:

-moz-column-count: 5; /* maximum count of columns, there will be less if there's no room for all 5 */ -moz-column-width: 25em; /* reasonable width for single column */ }
 * 1) toc ul {
 * – Tm_T@Community Central:&#126;$ 10:34, November 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * And related standard is located here. (: – Tm_T@Community Central:&#126;$ 10:37, November 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Dear Tm_T,
 * Thanks for your response, but that would make all TOC wikiwide have a full page width. I was looking for a way to make single pages have a TOC with that option. Because currently only 2 of the over 500 pages have a TOC which needs this, but the other TOC do not.
 * Do you happen to know a solution to that? Would love to hear it!
 * Unfortunately I don't know any pretty solution for that, sorry. – Tm_T@Community Central:&#126;$ 13:43, November 23, 2011 (UTC)
 * Similar to the  template, you could set up a   template that would contain   inside a   containing those CSS rules. Unfortunately, I have my doubts about how well they'll work.
 * Similar to the  template, you could set up a   template that would contain   inside a   containing those CSS rules. Unfortunately, I have my doubts about how well they'll work.