Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-28016152-20160323133454

I am doing this for the community, I ask myself  How to make this better, how to work with the admin but from a statement at the end I felt it was a way to provoke a fight with false facts. I think voting in demoting this admin would be best since fit all the common reasons why a bureauctat needs to go : If trying to resolve a dispute and saying what you see as a problem following wikia wishes, is now spamming and disruptive. This is not about my argument but it about my argument being changing into another argument still shows at the end. This was about how Kobayashi was treated, they probally are the first nor the last. I admit this comes from a problem I started and then the admin seemed to treat Kobayashi, as if they were me and forcing them into that was their argument well the argument the admin statements kept changing it to. Actually Kobayashi had no argument in this, Kobayashi saw a problem and as wikia encourages if you see a problem it is ideally to talk on their wall or talk page. They come in for a third opinion, like wikia wants Kobayashi was within their rights and punished severely for trying to work though a problem and standing up against what they believe were harsh comments to them. Lord Hyōga blocked Hontou Kobayashi with an expiry time of 3 days (account creation disabled, cannot edit own talk page) (Continues to unapologetically display combative and harassing behavior despite numerous, repeated warnings) Kobayashi was following policies  regrading of the actions and standing up to what they had been accused of.
 * They suppress opinions they don’t like, e.g. by deleting discussions and blocking users who criticize them
 * They block users without warning and for unacceptable reasons
 * They refuse to talk about what they could be doing better
 * They set unreasonable rules for other users but don’t stick to the rules themselves
 * They keep reverting perfectly good edits
 * They create a hostile, unproductive atmosphere on the wikia

Here is the end of the dispute, this has a summary of what happen and shows how my argument was still something else. http://inuyasha.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:18911

Please don't read mine, this is not about me or my actually arugment.

http://inuyasha.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:18871

http://inuyasha.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:18892

http://inuyasha.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:18900

Examples  The admin comments on a sentence from the policy. " Making statements just to provoke me" That's exactly what I'm talking about. How is anyone supposed to have a calm, rational conversation when you make hateful comments like that? another one from the policy "Honestly, I don't get what you think you're accomplishing by constantly repeating "X is a point of view, not fact". Ultimately a discussion is an exchange of viewpoints, so this is somewhat redundant."

A reply to Kobayashi first comment "I have told both of you what the policy is;" "since most of it is just an attempt to justify your irresponsible behavior." Both are falsed facts, This shows Kobayashi was forced into being me, fighting an past argument.

more comments "If you continue to disparage me and refuse to discuss the actual issue and edits under review, I will assume you are trolling and will ignore you. I will not demean myself by involving myself in this endless spiral of immature shenanigans and accusations any longer."" I am closing the thread to prevent further immaturity and trading of crude insults ' falsed facts.

"But that's my point. You were talking about how offended you were by my tone, rather than actually discuss the issue (which, of course, you couldn't, since you had no persuasive arguments)." If that was your original objective, making distracting and unsubstantiated accusations of me being offensive or hurting your feelings did nothing except to undermine your efforts to institute those edits'     The actually issue was how they felt they were treat not an agrument that was not theirs or mine.

his claim "You can stand on a soapbox all day long and preach about tolerance, but your overall demeanor is highly uncivil. Before you leave another laundry list of complaints, I would keep that in mind.'

Most of the statements toward Kobayashi have been a personal attack to have I see it and Kobayashi.. Kobayashi was in regard of the actions, two different things. Their last message was in regard of the actions of what the personal attacks from statements. Kobayashi did not get any warning, nor spammed his wall.

I got "It's not up to individual users to try and re-interpret policy on their own to overrule the judgment of an administrator." and  "As a person with eyes and a brain,"  not sure where the overrule come from.

If I wrote the statements from above, I would been block. That is not how an admin should treat others. Attacking others when they can't attack back or be block or banned, and then in what seemed to be setup to block them. This is not right. that is not equality to all.

This community had two opitons 1) to demote him  or 2) allow him to do this to anyone. Please help remove him and handle it over to Tsukiyaksha or who the community wants it to be. The community picks who they want. 