Thread:Tokina8937/@comment-4360159-20200610010552/@comment-9136029-20200610201137

"inserting insults, inappropriate text whatever for which wiki it would be, page blanking"

Said in the earlier post, but these ones are vandalism. Clearly, the first one linked it's easily identifiable, the second one however is more mixed but it's not really this edit that gave me a doubt. All that is false info is not something we can normally deal with. :/

When a VSTF member has a doubt over someone, technically if there are admins active they'll redirect towards them ; if there are none active they may redirect towards staff.

Hope this can help you understand a bit better. So:

- pornography/R18 content, blanking articles, inserting insults in general (replacing text with these works too) or inappropriate text or pictures: we can deal with it

- false info, edit warring, local dispute with admins: these ones we can't intervene

- racial slurs: staff directly

And when we have a doubt over "maybe something is more in the field of a false info" for some contributions (it's what happened) -> it's always local admins to decide about it first, otherwise staff if there is really nobody, but we can't decide for local admins and we can't step over their decisions.