Board Thread:New Features/@comment-24739709-20150929231108/@comment-6341451-20160113002420

Yeah, that's the counting approach. But as soon as someone adds another field, who hasn't read the css code residing at a totally different location, things break down. That is what I meant by fragile, being able to assign a class name directly would be more robust.

I can do something like

when I'd wish I could just use

And the approach does not work at all with image tags at the moment. At the image fotmatting/combining front I currently find myself using data/format tags to do stuff with images (probably not recommended by staff at all) and it feels like fighting against PIs. So I'm looking for a cleaner way.

Oh, I tried ".pi-image", which did nothing. But using this css, an originally 206×366px image gets resized out of proportion to 206x250px. While does a bit of wikimedia magic and fits the image into a 240x250px box honoring it's proportions - a 140x250px image is the result. Probably the answer will be reuploading the images as square versions, but it is a question of finding all the images suddenly misbehaving.

Anyway, thanks for the replies so far, they give me something to think about and try.