Thread:Veenster7/@comment-5558012-20161229181503/@comment-5558012-20161230161056

I'm surprised you didn't mentioned any of the instances in articles in the warning. Whether he truly means to change is up for debate considering the time length of the edits, we'll see.

I don't really want to speak for the other Admins but perhaps they aren't as concerned about more than the few issues listed in the wiki's slim policy or just want to take a background role. As long as it's clear you have the wiki's best interests in mind (you are clear about why you are doing what you are doing), I'm confident others will recognize and respect that. Of course everything you do isn't guaranteed to satisfy everyone, especially those that are issued warnings and/or blocks (that account was probably a sockpuppet). Some degree of caution is always wise though retaliation doesn't mean what you did was wrong. Admins have opinions just like "normal" editors, just because you are an Admin doesn't mean you can't speak your opinions or that users should always agree with you in discussions, such as demotion proposals.