Thread:Sannse/@comment-31527938-20170723051200/@comment-8-20170724163722

Hi, I'm not really sure what you mean by "checks and balances" here.

There are two in place that I can think of. There are three admins, which should mean that they have a way to make a majority decision where that's necessary. Of course, coming to a full consensus is better, and often that consensus should include the community. But three is better than two or four where discussions might get totally stalled with no way to break the tie.

The other one is the community's ability to remove admins if they decide it's necessary. That should be an absolute last resort of course, it's a serious and very divisive thing to do, or even to talk about. I would also not recommend it with such new admins they need time to settle into the role.

Outside of those two, maybe you mean policies on what admins can and can't do? Those can be created and discussed by the community. Although, again, I think the admin team needs more time to settle before it will be clear what policies are needed.

I hope that helps