Board Thread:Support Requests - Community Management/@comment-33029135-20191009155710/@comment-1807002-20191010185108

Tupka217 wrote: Hollowness wrote: Love Robin wrote:

The logistics are just against the idea. Instead, Staff has to hold the view of "Badly administrated wikis will drive off users, wither, and fail" while "Better administrated wikis will attract users, grow, and succeed".

In other words, sink or swim. Survival of the fittest. Etc. I disagree with this, if the wiki subject is popular enough or already highly established with enough complicit editors and/or a revolving door of editors coming and going they won't ever die even if you have Hilter running it.

It's okay to disagree with it, but unless you come up with a practical, workable solution, nothing is going to change. I disagree a wiki would fail if admins are bad- I don't disagree with how staff deals with it. I think the current structure is fine but if others want to suggest other things they are free to.

edit: that is why I only clipped that one section of the post- I was only referring to that one mindset.