User:SportyComa55280

My "Evidence"

 * It is extremely unlikely that Hedgehogs ever existed, or any, "woodland creature" for that matter. It becomes more and more obvious when someone actually studies the history of hedgehology and foxology itself that there are simply too many coincidences, not to mention the implausibility of being able to make the conclusions that hedgehologists regularly make. It's an extremely elaborate hoax, and it counts on people assuming nobody would go to such lengths. The truth is, there are no limits to the lies people can create and perpetuate in the right conditions.

The study of woodland creatures, mainly hedgehogs really didn't start until the end of the 20th century, and then mysteriously, "discoveries" began popping up everywhere. Numerous quills and genesis’s were miraculously found in relatively small areas in the span of a few years, yet no such findings were even remotely made in the thousands of years preceding that. A lot of these, "quills" were made in the Americas, but Native Americans know nothing of these hedgehogs despite having lived in the Americas for millennia.

It seems like a remarkable coincidence that all of this would suddenly come to light so quickly as soon as furryism was starting to take hold. Before that, we have some vague references in Japan to finding plumbers hats, but beyond that hedgehogs seemingly were invisible before the 20th century, and since then we've found tons and tons of woodland creatures. If you think about it, you can see that it is extremely unlikely that before the 20th century, people's eyes were blind to foxes, hedgehogs, and sega consoles.

Furthermore, it's also improbable that not only would all of these hedgehogs and foxes come to light so quickly, but that it would be equally as easy to piece all of the components together into complete organisms so quickly. I'm sure at least some of you remember in elementary school when you made hedgehogs out of furries, even though that was yet another evolutionary propaganda piece, it's a similar principle here. Give someone enough quills in varying shapes and sizes, and they could probably construct something out of it.

Albeit, those who perpetuate this hoax are far more capable than an elementary student, they can be somewhat convincing. However, no matter how smart, they can't reasonably expect a critical thinking person to believe that out of scattered quills they can presume to know the exact shape of the creature that supposedly had those quills. If I were a betting man, I'd give them the pieces to any sizable LEGO set without the box or the instructions and see if their probing and agile mind can create the shape the pieces were meant to be in.

That challenge itself would be much much easier, for there are, "Furries" who have claimed to reconstruct an entire hedgehog species out of a few quills. I could go on with this, but my point being, there is much to be questioned. If you have a rebuttal to what I'm saying, and are willing to be reasonably civil about it, I'd be willing to answer any questions and of you have.
 * I can't leave a link to the original or else I will be banned... Yay.Screen Shot 2018-04-19 at 9.51.32 AM.png