User blog comment:Semanticdrifter/Updates to COPPA/@comment-5691231-20130624194032/@comment-1216259-20130624211701

Utter Solitude: I agree with that.

452:

1. I see that hypothetical as being more fair, not less.

2. Of course they need information on the selection criteria. How are they supposed to realistically argue their case if they don't even know how to determine whether or not it applies to them? Moreover, these "conversations" are usually phrased as "we're doing it." Being in 2 such conversations, I can tell you that the threads aren't worth much besides headaches.

3. I don't really think that anyone should have to justify their decision to comment anonymously. There may be cases where you have problems accessing your account & it's just easier to edit anonymously. But it just shouldn't matter in the first place.

4. Yes, that is exactly what I said.

5. Thanks.