Board Thread:New Features/@comment-20644-20170522203248/@comment-26402117-20170529165420

My issue with those wikis is that they were under a different circumstance with the previous skin changes. Considering the customisation policy hasn't been updated, it is a touch early to bust out the pitchforks. To my understanding, the comments about corporate intrigue and the death of customisation outright are likely what Techno describes as "flaming".

I don't see entirely eye to eye with limited opportunity for header CSS, but I don't sense the intention is part of some greater plot like some people said. Those comments didn't stand out to me for their cogency like the others did. The recent rail module redesign didn't disallow people from restoring borders and backgrounds to it.

I personally think cascading customisations (like a font change for the whole page) should be allowed to affect the header too. I still would like to know more details about what limited customisation is allowed. More options in the Theme Designer would be welcome:
 * I'd be interested in having an adjustable picture-to-gradient ratio.
 * The image in the test header above is more opaque than most of the other 30. A transparency option would be welcome - doing so through image editing is less versatile in the event of a colour scheme change.
 * Full-width background images would also be a welcome option.