Community Central:RfA/Charitwo 2

RfA Blurb
Hello, I'm Charitwo. This is my second time running for Central adminship here, I previously ran at the start of October last year. Although intentions were well meaning, I didn't really have enough experience at Wikia or on Central to be qualified. I started out on Wikia by moving here from self-hosting for the wiki known as FFXIclopedia, I joined there in November of 06 and started actively editing in February. After spending a good deal of too much time there, I was given the Wikia equivalent of rollback in July and made an admin in September. I have since been there as my "home wiki". Outside of FFXIclopedia, I have started to focus on wikis in the Gaming hub and helping out wherever needed, especially on games due for release soon. My current area of focus in the gaming network is the Super Smash Bros. wiki, it's currently due for March release.

I feel I am ready this time. I have had experience spending time tracking down spam with the help of google and the #cvn-wikia channel on freenode. Reporting it to janitors and/or the Spam Blacklist talk page and getting relevant links blacklisted. I feel it would be helpful to my efforts and Wikia for me to have access to the spam and title blacklist. I also monitor recent changes here for vandalism, spam, and marking irrelevant images for a 1-week expiry.

I am also almost always on #wikia on freenode when I am online helping out people who need help, interacting with the community, and just overall having a good time with others; except on bad days like Tuesday, in which I really should not have signed on. I apologize for those around for that. It would be a great privilege to be selected for Central adminship and I hope you consider me.

Sincerely, --Charitwo 14:07, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Support

 * Strong support -- Tomsen (talk) 17:55, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Support, I have no objections. Медиа (Wassily Steik) 03:44, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong support While he does have some off days (but, hey: who doesn't?), he is generally a very responsible person as well as a strong part of the Wikia community. I feel that he would be responsible in using the newfound buttons and that Wikia would benefit by him having them. --Skizzerz talk 15:13, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong support - you have worked hard since your last RfA, and it seems its about time that you get what you deserve though you need to learn to tag images/articles accordingly and properly..I opposed your last RfA due to lack of edits on Central and looking through your impressive contribution, its clear you have been very hard-working ..good.luck ..well deserving :) ..-- Cometstyles 00:35, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Good luck. Vagstar (leave me a message) 04:10, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Support Temperment is still an issue, but the helpfulness of this user has outweighed this facet of his personality. Go get 'em! Razorflame 04:21, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Support Recent developments have enlightened me. Yes, he still has a bit of what to work on, but i think he'll make a fine admin. Good luck, man! 01:26, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

 * Strong oppose - In my limited dealings with Charitwo in #wikia and elsewhere, it has struck me that he does not possess the temperament to serve as an admin at Central. In his anti-vandalism duties, rather than make polite requests of me as a Wookieepedia admin, Charitwo simply demands that I block IPs or users with little or no explanation, which doesn't fly at a wiki where a large body of users cooperates with one another. When I recently attempted to intervene on behalf of a user that was hastily blocked by Charitwo from #wikia for making a single, non-personal-attack post in the channel, Charitwo seemed more eager to make certain his authority was noted than to reason with me. As far as "off days" go, all in all I haven't seen Charitwo outside of an "off day" as I would see it so far, and that is not the sort of cooperative behavior I would recommend in a Central admin. In fact, I imagine that his idea of being an admin is trying to get others into trouble. Regarding this "my way or the highway" attitude I've frequently received from Charitwo: I'd rather take the highway. Graestan ( Talk ) 02:09, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Graestan, I defended you on that talk page. -- 02:17, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry if that was a misunderstanding, but to me it read like you were saying that I should know better. At any rate, I took exception to your nosing into the affairs of others in that manner. Angela can speak to me directly if there is a concern, and since there wasn't, she didn't. Graestan ( Talk ) 22:45, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry if you felt that way, I'll refrain from doing so in the future. -- 02:54, 28 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong oppose - as per Graestan. Temperment is a big issue that he needs to work on before I will support him becoming an administrator on here. Razorflame 02:15, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Razorflame, you stalk me on IRC, you're obsessed with me. You tried to force private information from a checkuser by harassing her also. I've politely asked you to not badger me on a daily basis. I can't even /ignore you because I make a habit of keeping people off ignore in case they have a question. -- 02:22, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Just to let you know, I've already apologized to that checkuser about that and have ceased communications with her. As for stalking on the IRC channel, the only thing I do is say hi to you whenever you log on, and you never respond.  I do not stalk you.  In fact, I haven't talked to you much in the past week (with the exception for today).  Just from being on #wikia, I have noted that your temperment is an issue, and that's why I posted this here.  If you think my vote is bad faith, then go ahead and take it up with the staff, but I am telling you that this has nothing to do with the way you treated me on #wikia today.  I will say this though: When it comes to Wikia, you are very knowledgable.  That is a good thing.  I am not opposing you because of a personal vendetta against you, I am opposing you because I have concerns about your ability to handle users on a daily basis.    Razorflame 02:28, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't say hi to you because I don't like you, but that still doesn't mean I won't answer your questions (like I did about your question about wiki requests). You need to stop pretending that I'm your friend because I'm not. You constantly highlight me with unrelated banter that I really don't have time for, even when I ask you not to. You even try to butt into my personal life which is frankly none of your business. I'll respond to wikia related questions but I don't wish to respond to anything else, that is my choice and you can't understand that, and you continue to highlight me and harass me in PM trying to get me to "be your friend". Furthermore, I don't see how IRC has anything to do with this RfA or what I do on Wikia. Stalking is neither flattering nor appreciated. I'd appreciate it if you left me alone. -- 02:36, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * As I've already stated, I am NOT stalking you. And just because you don't like me doesn't mean that you still can't say Hi to me.  I do not consider you a friend.  If you think I am stalking you, then that is your opinion, but I am not stalking you.  As for your question about how IRC doesn't have anything to do with this RfA, it does.  It shows what kind of person you are, and that is important when trying to determine if an applicant is worthy of the adminship.  If you think I am pretending to be your friend like you said, that is untrue.  You are neither a friend, nor acquaintance of mine.  I have heard you the first time about not asking any questions other than wikia questions.  I only asked you that question to advance the discussion more.  If you can't even say Hi to a user on #wikia, then what chance do you have of making good logical decisions on here? Razorflame 02:42, 27 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong oppose - I agree with Graestan. There is more to being a good admin than being a good editor, and Charitwo does not have the self-control or patience required for such a position. 04:38, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
 * weak oppose i still think that he has what to work on, but i was judging by a single event that was an isolated incident. Yes, he does come off as harsh quite a lot, but it's not really as bad as all that, changing to weak oppose. 00:17, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Comments
I cannot speak to a person's ability or lack of ability in editing Central Wikia, which is why I am not commenting in either the support or oppose sections of any central Rfa. In point of fact, I feel hideously out of place commenting on one at all. That having been said, I'm taking a chance that "just some schmoe" is welcome to comment, even though they don't hang out on Central. Charitwo has made a sincere effort to keep me and other people happy. In my case, there have been several times when conversations and text-based actions on the #wikia IRC support channel have forced me to leave the channel. On many occasions, Charitwo made the effort to contact me privately, ask me how I was doing (in some cases if I needed something), and always to inform me when the "unpleasantness" had passed. I appreciate those efforts.--Kodia 06:13, 27 January 2008 (UTC)