Board Thread:Support Requests - Getting Technical/@comment-24753895-20190602032256/@comment-9605025-20190602070006

Unfortunately for you, it doesn't look like the user is committing any ToU violations. So Wikia probably won't do anything about it. Your best shot is to try to contact the user here on Community Central and try to have a polite discussion about your differences in opinion. From what I can tell, most of your conflict with the user seems to be over the quality of the information posted on the site (from official sources v. speculation). It is a bit hard to get a picture of the user's position given the really vague and brief comments they left; all the more reason to actually discuss it with them if possible.

If the user doesn't respond, you can try contacting the other bureaucrats of the wiki about this. However, keep in mind that no one owes it to you to unblock you. So long as they aren't violating the ToU, wiki admins are allowed more or less free reign over the wiki. They can choose to use unreliable sources if they want.

I do have some opinions on the situation but most are irrelevant. The key part is that, though your edits do seem reasonable (to an outsider), the user somehow disagrees with them to the point that they feel justified in reverting them. I noticed in the first few reverts interactions, the reasoning was more along the lines of "well, that's what another admin posted so it must be right". I think it is possible they may just be assuming the other admins' preferences are law or something like that; or trying to gain favor with the other admins by "having their back". It isn't really clear though. Since this is a possibility, this is why it is worth talking to the other bureaucrats if the user doesn't respond to you. Chances are they are completely unaware of what has transpired between you and this particular user.