User talk:Gil

Slightly belated welcome
Welcome to the Central Wikia!

We are a friendly community here, most of us active on an individual Wikia or more than one. Use the Community portal to ask for help.

Please keep an eye on the Special:Recentchanges to see what the community is up to and to help reverse spam and vandalism. And look at the overall organisation starting at Category:Browse.

If you have ideas for a new Wikia, please add a paragraph under an appropriate heading on Proposed wikis.

Enjoy!

Hey, you crept in quietly so nobody noticed at first!

Thanks for the note on my talk page (which I didn't see at first because it was at the top; I may move it down to fit the chronological order of the others). As for a Wikia of websites, I think someone proposed and started one. Have a look at Proposed_wikis. I'm now doing a little on IllumiRate, which is a small-scale Zeal.

Robin Patterson 20:24, 25 May 2006 (UTC)

Welcome!
Best of luck in your new position! I wish you the best of luck. - Nhprman 00:56, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Question re: Travel and Scotland Wikia(s)
Gil, I like your Europe travel page a lot. But WOW, talk about synchonicity! I came upon the Scotland Wikia just the other day and after thinking it through a bit, I put together a main page for it and began planning the next step.

However, I wonder if you would weigh in on this question I have before I move forward: After doing this, I came upon the travel Wikia, which I'd heard about but never visited. The Scotland Wikia was approved back in August, but is it duplication to have this and a Travel wikia? Where does something like this properly belong, or can both co-exist? Note that I kind of envision this as an interactive guide, not just a strictly touristy guide, but perhaps that's what the Travel wikia is, too. I'll be looking forward to your opinion on this. - Nhprman 04:30, 10 June 2006 (UTC)


 * There might be some duplication at first. The travel wiki is an experiment at the moment, and we're going to look at what sort of content we could merge from the place wikis, but what I'm expecting we'll find is that there is a lot of information in those that doesn't fit a tourist-focused wiki. One solution might be to have a "locals" wiki to accompany travel, where everything else could go, but we'd love to know the opinions of users of those place wikis on whether that seems a good solution or not. Please don't be concerned about the place wikis disappearing. We're not intending to "lose" any content regardless of which wiki that might end up on. Angela (talk) 06:21, 10 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks to both of you for responding. The travel wiki seems like a good idea, since it's a central location for travel info. Of course there seems to be a "city" wiki as well to which some of those place wikis have migrated, so there seems to be a good deal of duplication, but I'm sure it will sort itself out. The one thing I would urge Gil to do is develop a policy in which "Rapid Consensus" can be reached here both on the executive and "community" level, so you can avoid facing a Wikia in which, a year from now, a Travel wiki is competing with the City wiki and individual Place wikis, all with very strong supporters stubbornly holding onto "their" versions and refusing to adopt a standard Wikia guideline on place/travel wikis. (Of course a large, passionate group of supporters for ANY of them would be seen as a blessing, I'm sure!)
 * Without such a well-defined process of consensus, you may end up going through ENDLESS votes and revotes trying to seek consensus among users (many of them, it must be remembered, are brand new to Wikia and some will be voting/weighing in anonymously. The experience on Wikipedia has shown that all decision-making can easily be crippled by 1) an extremely high standard for what "consensus" means and 2) a failure to make decisions, for fear they will not be well received. As a business person, Gil, I think you bring a unique understanding as to what is required to diplomatically and promptly break impasses like this, when they arise, and that's yet another reason I'm delighted you are aboard! Sorry for the long post, I usually try to keep them to 200 words or less. - Nhprman 15:49, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Homestar Runner Wiki offer
I just wanted to let you know I've replied to your offer at HRWiki:User talk:JoeyDay. Thanks for making it, and please don't just make a donation to our wiki because I've posted this message here. Thanks again. -- Tom 22:13, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Emailing you
Hi,

Matthew Somerville of mySociety here. My emails to you and John (both @wikia.com) are bouncing as undeliverable - do you have an alternative address I could contact you on? Thanks.

Thanks!
Thanks, Gil! I'll let you know when the FEP is ready!!'

Churches of Rome
Gil, thanks for the note at the Churches of Rome Wiki. If you're interested in helping out, there's a lot of information that's ready to be move from my old website at http://roma.katolsk.no. Although that site says it's copyrighted, all the text has been written by me and I release it under GFDL as it's moved to the Wiki (the photos are another matter, only my photos can be moved directly; I'm waiting for an answer from some other photographers). I also see that you're active on the Travel Wikia; perhaps some sort of cooperation between the two wikis will be in order in the not so distant future; I'm sure the travel wiki would like to cover Rome eventually, in which case I can help out, and the Churches wiki would benefit from being able to link somewhere for more general tourist information. Cnyborg 15:58, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for stopping by the Psychology Wiki
We are very interested in your ideas for building the profile of the site.


 * We could do with a bit of showcasing!!! Whats the mechanism for this?


 * How do we get Mr Wales to endorse us?


 * We have done a press release to the academic press in UK without an luck. We have made some links with bloggers and have a page ourselves where bloggers get linked to in return. Our google ranking is one of our main concerns at the moment.


 * I am building a list of all the psychology journals{with their web addresses) on the site with a view to emailing them. It would be great to have the PR firm back us up. Who are they? how do we get access to them to discuss a campaign?

We would be really grateful if you could help us out further. Cheers Lifeartist 18:35, 10 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks Gil, we do need some more contributors. I think the main thing is raising awareness at present.  I'll ask Jim Wales to have a look at our Wiki and see what he thinks, as this is exactly the sort of project that I think he had in mind with Wikia and Wikipedia in general. Mostly Zen 20:58, 10 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Sounds good - I also saw lifeartist's note on my talk page. Let me try to cover all the ideas here:
 * Come up with a few ideas for quotes or endorsements and I will ask jimmy to wordsmith
 * When you have a list of journals, we'll work with the PR agency to have them do the contacts for you
 * We will put a note on our home page in conjunction with a "release" on the site talking about the mission of your project and how excited we are to help
 * These are ideas, feel free to improve them or suggest others Gil


 * Well I left a message on Jim's talk page here: Psychology Wiki mention
 * You are right that we need some quotes etc. Me and Lifeartist are working hard to get the goals of the Psychology Wiki sorted out and clearly explained, but I think that message on Jim's page does it fairly well.  We will try to sort things out and grow a bit more organically over the next 3 weeks, and then perhaps in August we can have some PR stuff done?  I'll keep thinking as marketing is not my strong point. Mostly Zen 23:09, 10 July 2006 (UTC)