Thread:Sarah Manley/@comment-4839035-20130102221216

Hi, I would like to know what requirements a wiki has to pass before getting a link at the top, under one of your "hubs". I've clicked on a few of these links, and if you look at this page on the Taylor Swift wiki, it appears you are spotlighting wikis with pages copy-pasted from Wikipedia, with no apparent category structure and with a completely unaccustomed monobook skin, rubbish logo and a textured background one could probably find at the top of google images. I'd like to know how Wikis are picked for the header, as I am admin of a much nicer wiki that could take Swiftipedia's spot. Can you also comfirm wether I am right or wrong in these two statements: "You pick wikis for the top that are of highest public interest, not of highest article quality" and "You pick wikis for the top bar that are related to the highest-paying adverts you are wanting to display". Also, if it is possible, can I nominate a wiki for inclusion in the top bar.

Thanks for your time  http://images.wikia.com/central/images/a/ac/Lachlan5963.png   22:12, January 2, 2013 (UTC) 