Thread:Undead.exe/@comment-24751918-20170914200933/@comment-5454372-20170915013411

Considering what my thoughts are at this point, I'm not going to discuss the extension with you specifically at this point, since I don't trust you to be truthful considering how you deliberately avoided owning up when I gave you a chance to explain yourself. So let me instead focus on a couple of other facts about the situation right now:


 * 1) The bulk of your edits to the main articles added little to no new information, and were primarily grammar/wording edits which were very hit-and-miss in terms of improving the readability of the content. It really wasn't contributing anything if I were to be blunt, but I recognised that your edits were in good faith (albeit possibly driven by your desire to "make as many edits as I can" as written in your Wikia profile while I'm typing this, but I don't see that as an issue in and of itself). In either case, I suggested you try writing some blogs because I wanted to give you a space where you could write freely without having your edits constantly reverted for dropping the page quality more than improving it on the whole.
 * 2) I've already explained elsewhere about why I won't tolerate inaccurate information that tries to present itself as proven fact, even within a personal blog. The fact that you did not own up to not having proof for your numbers or try to explain whatever inaccurate means you used to make those guesses suggests to me that your desire to not be proven wrong is so great that you'll willingly jeopardise the accuracy of information on the wiki to save face -- at this point, you've already lost whatever faith and trust I had in you for adding anything reliably constructive to the wiki (and saying that you now admitted to making up the numbers is far too late to be worth anything when you'd only do so after incurring a penalty).

As for why I brought up these two points: their combined effect is that even if the ban expires, I will likely not trust any edits you make at all as an admin, which is going to make it incredibly difficult for you to contribute anything. I also no longer have the patience to have to keep looking over every edit you make for both factual accuracy and readability, so practically speaking, the ban would probably be even longer if I set it for a point where I felt it was likely you'd have developed the humility and responsibility to make all efforts in backing up your facts, and to be mature enough to admit when you've made a mistake (before needing to be called out on it).

If your main desire on the wiki was simply to "make as many edits as you can" as per your profile, I'd actually have to strongly recommend considering shifting your focus to another wiki of your interest -- because I'm not going to make accommodations for that interest over on our side if I doubt your commitment to factual accuracy on top of your edits being hit-and-miss with their readability. If it's truly our specific wiki that you're deadset focused on, then all I can suggest to you is to wait, and hope nothing else compromises my impressions of you as an editor even further (because if I don't trust you right now, I'm likely not going to trust anything you say to try and defend yourself from what suspicions I may have).

I believe that's all I've got to say on the matter at this point. While I won't ask you not to contact me any further (though that will change if you start spamming me in any way), I will reserve the right not to respond if I don't feel the need to.