User blog comment:FishTank/Refining Your Editing Experiences/@comment-10637-20200423173803/@comment-20644-20200423175010

By and large the issues present with the Visual Editor/WYSIWYG on Fandom right now are the result of an older editor and outdated code. We anticipate the number of issues to drop significantly and be more in line with the Gamepedia experience, which to my knowledge doesn't have any significant issues or require any meaningful time to be spent having to fix edits.

Likewise when it comes to mobile editing on Gamepedia, I'm not aware of any complaints that have come through about cleanup work for mobile editing. Which isn't to say there haven't been issues, just not ones that rise to the level of staff notice (a low threshold to cross). We ran a UX survey on Gamepedia several months back that also showed a significant amount of editors got their start on mobile before shifting to bigger desktop edits. That's pretty encouraging and we're interested to see how that works on Fandom.

And on Wikipedia, there are even global admins who operate entirely via mobile editing.

Finally, it's pretty clear what you mean by "Answers only from those who find value in wiki markup, please" so please let this be a reminder that you do not get to dictate whether a staff member can reply to you (or brazenly misrepresent their point of view) just because you disagree with what they're saying.