Board Thread:Support Requests - Community Management/@comment-24460960-20200810104852/@comment-38078079-20200810135030

HumansCanWinElves wrote: The point is, the question whether or not a certain information is factual or speculative, can be a matter of debate too.

Incorrect.

"Tupka replied to this thread" is factual, as I can prove it.

"Tupka is secretly a fan of 'My Little Pony'" is pure speculation.

The latter could be true, but it can't be stated as fact on a Tupka Wiki without proof/evidence, as - until it can be proven - it is and always will be speculative. It doesn't matter how realistic, how much circumstantial evidence exists, or what the consensus may be, as the fact is it cannot be proven with anything that exists at present. "Fact" is simply what can be proved.

It's common fanon that Severus Snape is Draco Malfoy's godfather, but I doubt any respectable wiki worth its salt will include that on its articles, as it's not in the texts, supplementary materials, interviews, etc., and thus cannot be proved to be fact and remains speculation.

I have no say about the topic mentioned on this thread, since I have no knowledge about the subject. I just say in general, you may state your opinion while respecting other opinions and the admins' authority. It is always good to express an opinion.

As you said, Discuss/Forums/Discord are great choices for that.

The admin isn't forbidding opinion, though, but merely ''opinion on factual articles. ''