Board Thread:Darwin/@comment-3974211-20140507025406/@comment-3974211-20140507033505

I mean that the article gets thinner than the advertised "minimum width" before actions are taken to allow for a larger width (e.g. shrinking the background and automatically hiding the sidebar). Either the editor is erroneously using a minimum width that is larger than intended, or the darwin functionality is triggering too late.

I have a large resolution screen, but I create a lot of visual content and so I need to take into account users with smaller resolutions to make sure the content is correct for everyone. I have been using the editor's minimum width function, but have only recently been informed that users with between 900-1100 width screens (predominantly 1024) actually get less than the minimum article width. Users with less than ~900px viewing space have the sidebar hidden to free up more space for the article, and below 746px a horizontal scroll bar appears. This means people with 1024-resolution would get larger articles by manually resizing their web browser smaller - which is silly.