Template talk:Wikia Gaming Footer

Request
Is there a way to request to have your wiki on this template as I do not want to add without permisson--Tama63 Talk Twitter 17:15, June 19, 2011 (UTC)

Template Use
I think that all wikis listed on this Template should have this template on their main page. Would anyone mind if I added this any of the wikis which are missing it? -User452 21:50, June 19, 2011 (UTC)


 * Today I have added the template to several wikis which were missing it, and left messages with the wikis which are locked.


 * 1) Fable - present
 * 2) Fatal Fury - present
 * 3) Lord of the Rings Online - present
 * 4) Ninja Gaiden - present
 * 5) Professor Layton - present
 * 6) Saints Row - present
 * 7) Spore - present
 * 8) Dead or Alive - outdated
 * 9) Grand Theft Auto - outdated
 * 10) Touhou Project - outdated
 * 11) Warhammer Online - outdated
 * 12) Age of Conan - Added
 * 13) Bloodrayne - Added
 * 14) Guild Wars - Added
 * 15) Killzone - Added
 * 16) Lego Pirates the Video Game - Added
 * 17) Metroid - added
 * 18) Okami - added
 * 19) Soul Calibur - added
 * 20) Mario - added
 * 21) StarCraft - added
 * 22) Assassin's Creed - missing
 * 23) Donkey Kong - missing
 * 24) Elder Scrolls - missing
 * 25) Fallout - missing
 * 26) Halo - missing
 * 27) Metal Gear - missing
 * 28) Pokemon - missing
 * 29) Sonic the Hedgehog - missing
 * 30) Street Fighter - missing
 * 31) World of Warcraft - missing
 * 32) Zelda - missing declined request to re-add the footer
 * I think it's disgusting that these wikis are listed in the Wikia Gaming Footer, but do not carry the Wikia Gaming Footer on their wikis. -User452 04:45, August 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * Only 7 wikis listed in the footer used the current version of the footer, 4 of them are using old versions. A total of 21 wikis did not have the footer at all, but I have now added the footer to 10 of those.  Now, 17 wikis in total have the footer, and 11 wikis still do not have the footer. -User452 04:53, August 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * It's "disgusting", eh? Well, if you think that we're taking unfair advantage of the traffic without reciprocating or similar, I don't think anyone on Zeldapedia would mind being taken off of this. Of course, it does benefit Wikia for people to have access to a maximum amount of content so that they spend more time browsing and look at more advertisements, so they probably won't remove us even if we ask, but whatever. At least we won't be disgusting anymore! - Is drak  thül  05:33, August 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * As I said on your wiki, no-one is forcing you to be listed in the footer. You should have removed yourselves from the footer when you removed the footer from your wiki. -User452 05:35, August 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * Only 7 wikis listed in the footer used the current version of the footer, 4 of them are using old versions. A total of 21 wikis did not have the footer at all, but I have now added the footer to 10 of those.  Now, 17 wikis in total have the footer, and 11 wikis still do not have the footer. -User452 04:53, August 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * It's "disgusting", eh? Well, if you think that we're taking unfair advantage of the traffic without reciprocating or similar, I don't think anyone on Zeldapedia would mind being taken off of this. Of course, it does benefit Wikia for people to have access to a maximum amount of content so that they spend more time browsing and look at more advertisements, so they probably won't remove us even if we ask, but whatever. At least we won't be disgusting anymore! - Is drak  thül  05:33, August 31, 2011 (UTC)
 * As I said on your wiki, no-one is forcing you to be listed in the footer. You should have removed yourselves from the footer when you removed the footer from your wiki. -User452 05:35, August 31, 2011 (UTC)