User blog comment:JustLeafy/Wikia VS Wikipedia/@comment-25867149-20170915142348

Wikipedia puts itself out there as being unbiased and based entirely in factual source finding; this is blatantly untrue. Wikipedia's basis in "fact" comes solely from general consensus - and as has been demonstrated before, common consensus isn't necessarily correlative to unbiased and established fact. And that's without even foraying into the territory of willful manipulation of the facts within the articles by parties for purposes of misinformation, such as the adding false or misleading information to the database. And I've even heard from some sources that nowadays people are actually hired in quantity to do that sort of thing for whatever reasons. I'm not sure why people would go out of their way to do that sort of thing, but I know one thing - Wikipedia takes itself too seriously and thus sets itself up as a prime target. Wikia, on the other hand, has a much more inviting and inclusive approach. If you don't like the atmosphere in one community you can always move to another one - or even create your own.