Thread:Sannse/@comment-45042885-20200213045204/@comment-44853292-20200213073621

TimeShade wrote: There are part-time staff assigned to communities, they're Wiki Managers. Though we are still unable to be involved with most instances, we can always take a look if it violates terms of use. No offence but if that is the case then it is not helping. How about this? And its really so simple im shocked its not already a thing, make it a rule that admins can only ban users for breaking the rules and should the ban be disputed, the admin will have to point out exactly where the rules were broken. Because as it stands, you have admins who are banning people for simply proving them wrong over whatever they are debating. Do you know how easy it is for an admin to get proved wrong and say right, im banning you for starting a flame war, even though the admins were previously adding to the flame war? Im not saying it happens on every wikia but you know for a fact it has happened and will happen. Banning people for no reason also costs fandom money, probably not enough to make staff care, but if they continue to let it happen, more and more childlike admins will feel safer doing it, meaning more and more people will leave fandom, meaning more and more money will be lost, all because some kid got his ego bruised.