Board Thread:Support Requests - Getting Technical/@comment-33992053-20200723121942/@comment-34942639-20200730035028

Fandyllic wrote: Having just the age question isn't so bad, but it also doesn't really need to be that specific. And yes, you should consider never trying to answer any question on the internet, but it isn't practical. However, random surveys from companies you've never heard of isn't quite the same thing. Which leads to my problem that the survey is never explained when you click the learn more about button. You are just taken directly to the survey. Like for example, I had no idea that Fuel Cycle was involved. I thought it was at the very most just fandom involved. Any information you find is going to be in this thread. "But taking that logic to an extreme, you should never answer any question of any type on the internet. I think we can both agree that it is an acceptable risk to answer some types of questions" a typical survey isn't really that bad but they go too specific on every single one of the questions. A lot of questions are asked before they even find out if you are qualified. Then after you sign up you are asked countless other survey questions. To the point that I am assuming that it is a 50+ question survey. As Randomgirl said "Fuel Cycle, a research and marketing company that claims to have powered Hulu and Google, along with dozens of lesser companies. The Fan Lab is, from what I've pieced together, essentially a large reference pool where you share opinions on various entertainment-related things with both the "Company" and other "Members." Google is known for being "Google!" you can see where I am going with this. We have no idea what exactly is being logged. Adding that Fandom, unfortunately, seems shady in this case. Because the user doesn't even get an explanation of a single thing before being thrown into the survey and they are the only ones named with Fuel Cycle being somewhat involved in the background.