User blog:TheAtomicLight/Marvel Cinematic Universe Wiki

Go and read from https://marvelcinematicuniverse.wikia.com/wiki/Marvel_Cinematic_Universe_Wiki, but don't believe the things they say, because they back things up with no credible source, essentially people who babble about stuff that isn't validating anything more than how it started. Tessa Thompson's character on Ragnarok may be called Brunnhilde, this is never confirmed onscreen or even really off-screen. Oh, wait! Tessa Thompson does confirm this on Twitter, though, right? No she doesn't. She doesn't reply back and agreeing that her character's name is really Brunnhilde after all. She does reply back, but it isn't to confirm this. In fact, it's a tweet denying the possibility at all. It's this tweet that the MCU Wiki is using to validate that her name is in fact Brunnhilde.

Uhhh, what? Exactly. As a reader of that site and going to so-called source, I was surprised to read that it confirms no such thing. Too bad, because I'd like her character to have a real name, the same way Pinocchio wanted to be a real boy, but I bet if Tessa Thompson confirmed that Pinocchio isn't a real boy, they would go round saying Tessa Thompson confirmed that Pinocchio is a real boy.

The site is a big disappointed in other ways, as it doesn't acknowledge that certain comics aren't canon and they don't refer to the mixed up timeline of Agent Carter short film versus the TV series. (I've already figured that myself that even though they both begin at the same year cancelling each other out, the short film just is set in another year further down the line.) But you are not even allowed to discuss this in any which way, because of some rule that it's just fanboy talk. No, this is actually important deciphering because otherwise things are not going to match up. It's not like saying "I really hated that ending" or "I really loved that character."

Maybe if the guy in charge was more understanding of these issues I would be a regular contributor or someone who just goes to message walls and tries to reason with this person. But that has failed and reasoning with people using credible facts does not work no matter how much you try to point out the incredible obviousness of it. 'Nuff said.