Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-3184244-20200117005313/@comment-39856447-20200123175716

Fandyllic wrote: VanityFiend wrote: Fandyllic wrote: Suggesting most admins are of mental or physical age of 13 seems pretty far off topic to me.

Evilcivilian has not replied, so most of it is just useless commentary from what I can tell. Well, the useless commentary bit I can agree with; particularly your responses to this seem to fit that to a T. Trying to downplay a perfectly valid concern the community has, are we, Fandylic? Surely not, I would hope. Other than that, I'm sure that, given the fact that you have over 17 thousand edits on this wiki alone, you're well aware that the OP replying to their thread is not a prerequisite for fruitful discussion to ensue.

Because I have that many edits, and I've been watching these boards for many years that I know people who insert themselves into other people's threads are either socks or have an axe to grind that is largely irrelevant to the topic.

VanityFiend wrote: Tupka217 wrote: Vanity, drop it. You were out of line, accept it and move on. I'd watch that imperious tone, Tupka. The one out of line is you. From what I can see, you are neither a discussions moderator nor an administrator, but merely a helper and councilor. Telling people to move on is not in your job description. I suggest you drop it and move on, if this conversation is not to your liking.

Vanity, you don't have any authority to judge people's tone. Tupka has more credibility than you could ever hope to have on FANDOM. You're the one who needs to check the attitude.

However, I noticed you are blocked on CC by someone who is an admin, so I guess that settles that. I don't agree with what Vanity said, but what you said in the last paragraph sounds like "Tupka is more experienced therefore he treats you however he wants"