Thread:Sannse/@comment-24703240-20140613074734/@comment-4059089-20140613164045

50.125.178.191 wrote: Sannse wrote: I don't remember for sure, it was a long time ago, but I think they were also trying to fool people into thinking they actually were an admin here I did consider that a little bit funny, but every user is required to have the rights. If that username named "Admin" had administrative rights here, it would be an admin and wouldn't be a violation. That deceptive username should be promoted instead of just blocked and disabled. Um... no. No one is required to have admin rights. And how does giving a vandal MORE RIGHTS fix anything? Are we going to ignore the fact that he blanked the home page at one point?