Thread:Josevazq1994/@comment-2602:306:BCAE:4750:4D3F:E097:3079:1632-20190123181327/@comment-2118191-20190209171114

"For the last time no, I will not let this go and never will. Blocking me from Jurassic Park wiki will never change my attitude." - Wrong answer. I have a good mind to block you for an additional year on top of what I've given you already.

"Also T-Rex did have bad vision in the movie because of frog DNA mixture in it's genetic code." It's means it is, not its. Also, you still haven't posted proof that it was because of the frog DNA mixture that T. rex had bad vision. I've asked you to provide a source for this countless times now, and yet you keep moving the goalposts. We can include the part about the bad vision, but you have no proof it was because of the frog DNA specifically.

"Besides there is still no evidences in museums that Pachycephalosaurus standing upright and adult Triceratops have triangular epoccipitals on their frills.". It. Is. Irrelevant. Let. It. Go.

"Did you check both YouTube and gizmodo.com?" No, because neither of those are reliable sources, are they? I keep mentioning this, don't I?

"Besides all the other dinosaurs in Jurassic Park wiki already have speculation about their inaccuracies and accuracies like Brachiosaurus, Spinosaurus, Velociraptor, Ankylosaurus, Dilophosaurus, Stegosaurus, Parasaurolophus, Pteranodon, Dimorphodon, Gallimimus, and Mosasaurus but unfortunately you keep putting Tyrannosaurus, Triceratops, and Pachycephalosaurus behind and leaving them in the shadows". Once again, you're missing the point. As I clearly explained, the Tyrannosaurus thing had unsourced information (the frog DNA being responsible) and the Triceratops/Pachycephalosaurus thing was irrelevant. We have explained this to you countless times.

Now please, let it go and move on. I am sick of having this discussion with someone who blatantly refuses to listen to a word anyone else says.

EDIT: Also, here's a thing...the T. rex hunting by sight thing? That's already mentioned in the article itself. So you're effectively posting repeat information. Thus, we haven't just ignored T. rex. It's there.