Board Thread:Support Requests - Community Management/@comment-95.85.55.198-20170504111127

I have perfectly morally legitmate reasons for not currently using a stable, singular IP right now, I can defend this right on both Thomist or modern-Kantian meta-ethical grounds. Yet I am blacklisted automatically by abusive editors simply owing to this, regardless of what I can contribute -

Please clarify the "official" line here -

Does this entity believe every libertarian of cyber-privacy individualist (only partially truthful in my own case - I am very conservative) or case-personalized existence of users who do not wish to be statically IP-imprisoned (e.g. certain ethically upright, government-guarded trial witnesses AHEM involving McMafia cyber-racketeering, etc.) is A PRIORI "deviant" and "outlaw"...? 