Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-33447400-20191022235335/@comment-9605025-20191024022922

Just because something is worth doing doesn't mean it is worth doing as soon as possible. There can be things that are really nice to have but not critical. Also, if you are making a wiki about something like a current TV show, maybe new stuff comes out every day. My point is that you can't say edits lack value just because they are made frequently.

On a broader level, if the "spirit" of the award were to really be upheld, I would think the counter shouldn't be so strict. My understanding is that the series is supposed to reward consistant/frequent participation on the wiki. If I particiate 364 days, is it really "in the spirit" to nit-pick me over that one day in the dead of winter when I lost power (for example)? I would think not. However, since the counter doesn't have that leniency, I think it is fair to allow users to occassionally make a minor edit just to keep the counter going. The only time I think it would be against the spirit is if the user is making nothing but small edits (like correcting "it's" to "its"). However, small edits are a cheat for the Achievements system as a whole, not just this specific award.