User blog comment:Rupert Giles/Global Navigation Update/@comment-17725354-20141203230218/@comment-1175135-20141205044835

A theory like a set of hýpotheses (model) consists of theorems (laws) supported by correlations within the conditions statistically significant to warrant causation, or direct correlation. A theory may be supplemented or complemented by other theories with other conditions, but cannot be disproven (replaced) as it's already been proven. A model that has not been proven may not be called a theory or it's a misnomer. What room for doubt is there for big bang that it can be replaced by another model? Your speculation is not proof; proof consists of iterative and combinative conditions of trials with the designer. With this problem the trials can reduce to one question.

The sky isn't blue; the sea is blue. The sky is blea or blee.