Thread:Master Ceadeus 27/@comment-452-20150520125705

Posting here, because my original aside in the thread was not intended to derail the thread. Master Ceadeus 27 wrote: Personally, if it's something I can justify taking care of myself, I like to block for underagedness, simply because I think having their account disabled permanently is a bit harsh.

However, if they're problematically spreading their age on wikia, I think it's best to report them.

That's just my two cents. I think a local admin blocking them is "a bit harsh". If they have done nothing that would merit a block if they were 18, then what's the purpose?


 * Q1: Under what conditions you can you "justify" blocking them?
 * Q2: What is "problematically spreading their age on wikia"?
 * Q3: Imagine that Setheo, Gojira57, or Cottonmouth255 is actually 12. They each have thousands of edits, so it's safe to say the wiki wouldn't be the same without either of them - so how would it help the wiki to block them simply for being 12?

I'm not looking for an argument, or to convince you of anything, I would just like to understand your opinion. 