Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-452-20150306003738/@comment-452-20150623214153

Thanks for catching that, I'll look into when that was changed and update this comment with a note.

It may have been a while ago and I just didn't notice.
 * Edit: It appears that the change was made 5 days ago, so thanks again.

Regarding images under 212 not being resized, I suspect you're also right about that, I'll do some further investigation into this also. I know I had tested with a few <100px images originally, but I may have never tested with images between 106 and 212.
 * Edit: Totally.