Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-24531999-20160514180240/@comment-957747-20160526163610

All scripts were scanned for keywords that would need to be used to be malicious and found benign.

The engineer that wrote ImportJS is currently on vacation and I have a few questions put in for him on his return. I think there was something lost in translation somewhere down the line. There are a few issues, but some are side-effects... IE: A function call in Wikia.js calling a function that's declared in an import from ImportJS... this isn't a bug, just bad configuration... and it's not known without a deep-dive into the code.

There's two sides of this: ImportJS as an easy way to import local and Dev scripts or ImportJS as an importArticles replacement. If it was not meant to be the latter, then the tool is not quite as useful.

As far as the post above your last, I really do like the can't save/can't submit for review on critical errors (any red X's in the parser). I will talk to the team about this and see if this is a possibility. It would certainly reduce the reviewer's time in having to deal with those cases (and yes, I see them all the time - from CSS placed into JS or simple missing braces).