Thread:Andrewds1021/@comment-45310000-20200414034500/@comment-45310000-20200415064514

I was trying to think of a good terminology for that. If my Wiki ever takes off, I want an assigned group of users to take on that task, I was trying to think of a good way to centralize this, like a single point to ask questions, that's not completely public and subject to the types that may make curt, snide comments. I realize that the Wiki is going to be run by a bunch of nerds competing to show each other how much more knowledgeable they are than anyone else, but I really want to set up procedures that would minimize that and make the Wiki, as a whole, much more welcoming and encourage participation. I've spent a lot of time writing down the rules, because this reflects my experience with other Wikis on fandom. I had a page removed on what I thought was an important minor topic, so I asked where was the document that I could refer on what is important enough to have its own page, but was met with deafening silence. When I added that information to another page, as suggested by the content moderator, that got reversed, likely due to page territorialism. That's why I'm here now: currently struggling to get my own Wiki up and running, starting with no prior power user experience on MediaWiki, and I don't want users of my Wiki to go through the same experience. But aside from that, I do see your important point about making the local staff distinct from Fandom staff to avoid confusion. I just don't know what to call it, because that kind of job can be handled by power Users that are not yet part of the local admin staff, but may eventually become one.

re Intra-wiki link. I probably used this word because I was thinking about the distinction between inter-wiki links and external links. You're right, internal link is a much more understandable term.