Board Thread:New Features/@comment-43596541-20200821135532/@comment-43596541-20200821181638

You seem to speak from a devleopper's perspective ... IMO the Users who see the same ICON  in a SIMILAR interface, are right to  expect the SAME RESULTS... Thus having the "sinusoidal Logo" suddenly pointing to RecentChanges  instead of an EQUIVALENT to WikiActivity feels like a BUG to users because it FAILS to show any comments later than the migration date while displaying the Comments PRIOR to the MIGRATION since they were made using Talk:Page-Name/@Comments pages  that were listed in the database ( and included in the DUMPS) ...

So to Users the Migration is "preventing" the Comments from showing in the "Activity" page ... That's why I called it a "technical feature" (^) ... It may be that the software is "working as designed "  but for a User a major deisgn flaw IS a BUG not because it BUGS them but because it ROBS them from functionalities they come to expect without any  sign or heads up that the functionality has been discarded ... The day they CHANGE the frigging  "sinusoida" LOGO, I'll stop calling it a BUG  (^) ... But I agree that it was "only" a MAJOR DESIGN OVERSIGHT not to replace that "functiionality" when they decided to move Comments from Talk: pages to FEEDS as you call them ...