Thread:Tony di bugalu/@comment-38729545-20190531140934/@comment-38729545-20190531144308

They were  not irrelevant for the 1As as what you say is opposite of what has been say in that thread.

You guys making a claim. A claim that is not even backed up by anything other than interpreting it one sided. No offense, but this logic doesn't suit well with me.

Specially this part: "“ 1-A itself already breaks from this. It is quite a bit different than the tiers before it (you can't reach it by stacking anything), and already provides a tier for things that are well beyond normal ideas of "power", in most cases."

Then went later explaining how how this goes for the metaphysical stuff:

"“ I'd say they definitely are. We're not measuring High 1-A characters based on how "strong" they are, or how much they can blow up, or any of that. Even in 1-A, transcendence and "strength" are a lot more metaphysical than they are in any tier below, though at that point, there are still some characters who "fight" and all that jazz. They also aren't above tiering systems if we actually have a tier for them, since we're not claiming "complete omnipotence" or something."

So yeah, not sure how they are not irrelevant to 1A bois anyway.