User blog comment:Brandon Rhea/Fandom and Curse Media are joining forces/@comment-32281471-20181213022506/@comment-5956954-20181215052437

"Wikia's design is very generic, and it cannot be that much customized."

I think this looks pretty unique (shout out to its homepage as well). The TARDIS homepage also looks pretty nice to me though not as seemingly complex. I think from this, it is possible that Wikia can be very customisable. Do you know of any good-looking Gamepedia wikis?

"Gamepedia's design looks much better, more like, an encyclopedic site, not a fan site where everyone is likely post fan-arts and dumb stuff."

FANDOM looks like both to me: a place where knowledge can be curated while also being a social platform like a subreddit. I welcome such a prospect personally.

"And in Gamepdia, you can change a lot of things. In Wikia, you can only change color, background, and a few CSS things like page width, etc."

I have provided the links above. I'll be waiting for some other examples I couldn't find.

"Even importing cool features from the Dev Wiki, all wikis will look the same."

What about with MobileChat or other available scripts? Since such scripts do exist, it should be possible. Though I do recognize that the script is for personal use only and not allowed wiki-wide, I don't think it's against the rules to recommend such imports for the wiki to try.

"It was WAY better when Wikia had monobook..."

I suppose I am in the wrong crowd here. Oasis helps with my reading because it narrows the text enough not to have my eyes marathon my screen. Furthermore, because the text is aligned to the left than the right, it helps people who only read starting from the right (like myself because I write English than Arabic). There is also this Gamepedia element. Can you explain it?