Thread:Simsilikesims/@comment-30698137-20161211231306/@comment-417288-20161213091229

Also, about your ban on Uncyclopedia: We generally don't ban just because we found something unfunny. The usual reasons that we ban are outlined in Uncyclopedia:Ban Policy. One of those reasons is recreating deleted articles, and another is incivility. Replying to a rude message with a rude answer usually doesn't lead to anything good.

Also, I do agree with Spike on one point: the Jack Whitehall article you started needs improvement. I believe it has potential, but it seems to go about it the wrong way. One thing you should know: Spike detests humor related to anal functions. When I looked at the article on your userpage, it seemed to me that your comedic strategy was only that Jack Whitehall is a stuck-up, snobby arsehole. The entire article is written around this premise. However, "Jack Whitehall is a stuck-up, snobby arsehole" is not a good joke. Instead, it makes for a ranty article. Ranty is not the same as funny.