Thread:Eizen/@comment-188432-20170913222306/@comment-188432-20170914035930

Though I disagree that JS Review has been around for all that long, I agree that it was an unusual rejection. Of the 100 or so cases I've seen in the last 36 hours, it's the only the one where a change in licensing was actually a part of the requested review.

If the header gets changed and then you submit the code for review, what's commented-out becomes a noticeable part of the review. In most cases, the commented-out bit gets "locked" at the outset, and by the time someone comes around later for the incremental JS Review, it's not the thing we're specifically reviewing.