Board Thread:Technical Updates/@comment-24006128-20200709172956/@comment-134861-20200714174726

No, we won't be providing a comprehensive list of all feedback collected I'm not asking for a comprehensive list of all feedback collected, but a list of all known features removed or changed with solutions on workarounds is a pretty basic ask. Surely y'all keep some sort of changelog somewhere so you can know what changes you actually made?

we're not wikipedia or wikimedia and our user flow is different I don't understand how that's relevant. Being able to communicate with anons is an important part of wiki editing, and the core justifying premise of UCP, as far as I can tell from the PR, is to bring us in line with the current wikimedia setup, so why doesn't it allow us to leave messages for anon editors like on wikimedia?

we switched to MediaWiki standard keybinds Which are what?

use of baseline stock source editor not intended, but it has been raised as a desired option, since it's stock anyway Can you please give insight into why new approaches are being pushed as standard that are not a necessary part of being compatible with the newest wikimedia setups? If it's not what the newest wikimedia stuff is doing, wouldn't that push us right back into the "heavily customized wikimedia version makes it difficult to update" situation?

believe this is intended functionality to help SEO, but will double check Is there a way to turn it off? This functionality is a huge pain, both as an editor and as a reader