Thread:Sophiedp/@comment-38288843-20200628222642/@comment-26884178-20200630202141

Good afternoon Sophiedp. I hate to butt in this message but I must do this to explain and expose Jamiethejame2's passive aggressive behavior.

From what I understand, Jamie's behavior is highly questionable: he has a quick temper, condescending attitude, makes taunting and disrespectful remarks to users in edit summaries (even when his edits get removed without reasons), hardly shows a clear sign of accepting warnings when getting talked out for his actions, playing a victim card to make everyone look like bad guys, sometimes will remove warnings to attempt censoring his wrongdoings, and use both wikis and Discord servers to mockingly backbite everyone and even me. Here are the contribution logs from few wikis I can show about his behavior and how he treated me and the others that way (especially back since March and onward):
 * https://bendy.fandom.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/Jamiethejame2
 * https://baldis-basics-in-education-and-learning.fandom.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/Jamiethejame2
 * https://freddy-fazbears-pizza.fandom.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/Jamiethejame2
 * https://showdown-bandit.fandom.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/Jamiethejame2

Since June 9th, the latest cross-wiki incident occurs. At first, from the Unidentified Wikia.org, Jamie posted a page about a real deceased person with a rather rude content: "Finish this page people im busy". This is very outrageous for the viewers to see this, and as well a very disrespectful way to make a page, so the admin removed the page and punish him. He then tries to defend his own actions by making excuses and act innocent, as you can see his messages: (You can still view what he said from the deleted message) https://unidentified.wikia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Jamiethejame2

The user, Grungster, who is aware of Jamie's passive aggressive attitude, joins the FNaF Wiki where I worked at and gave me a heads up about Jamie's suspicious behavior to look after, and he even called Jamie out for his gross method he did at the Unidentified Wikia.org. When he saw Grungster's message, Jamie snapped and vulgarly accused Grungster for following him (which he isn't) before Jamie removed his message to censor while calling him an idiot, but I restored the thread and blocked Jamie for the insult: https://freddy-fazbears-pizza.fandom.com/wiki/Thread:2748801

Things start to get worse, he followed Grungster to the Unsolved Mysteries Wiki and sends him a message to call him a very vulgar name while guilt-tripping: https://unsolvedmysteries.fandom.com/wiki/User_talk:Grungster?diff=prev&oldid=46832

You can also view what else Jamie said: https://unsolvedmysteries.fandom.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/Jamiethejame2

He's trying to paint me and Grungster as scandals just because we're justifiably calling him out for his harassment/cyberbulling and me punishing him for that.

He then plots to stalk/follow Grungster and me around the wikis, as what he said from the Unidentified Wikia.org: https://unidentified.wikia.org/wiki/Thread:Gourami_Watcher/@comment-45318975-20200609152154/@comment-38288843-20200610195458?diff=prev&oldid=105189

At the Showdown Bandit Wiki, Jamie then tries to do a cross-wiki issue by slandering Grungster behind his back, falsely claiming that he's following him and causing cross-wiki dramas. After few offenses, I have to block Jamie to prevent further issues: https://showdown-bandit.fandom.com/wiki/Banker?diff=prev&oldid=3449

Jamie then followed Grungster to the Community Wiki and butted in his message report, baiting and playing victim by stating we're following him and making chaos across the wiki, while in reality we're actually reporting Jamie for cyberbullying with cross-wiki harassment and disgraceful behavior. So the only one who's following and making chaos is Jamie, but not me and Grungster: https://community.fandom.com/wiki/Thread:1888981

And finally, Jamie unrighteously banned me and Grungster out of Jamie's Baldi Mod Wiki just because me and Grungster were reporting him and exposing him for his highly inappropriate behavior: https://baldimod.fandom.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/GJ-Lewis_X https://baldimod.fandom.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/Grungster

Since both me and Grungster made NO contributions at Jamie's Baldi Mod Wiki, Jamie is clearly violating the Wiki FANDOM's Terms of Service about banning unjoined people with zero edits.

That's not all. Jamie also maintained his Baldi Mod Wiki very poorly, such as replying the user with this: https://baldimod.fandom.com/wiki/Thread:2766 And also maliciously changing the user's word from their blog post and said "lol" from his edit summary in a mocking way: https://baldimod.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:GrandFleent56/Now_i_am_leaving_for_real?diff=prev&oldid=4423

And I believe he blocked this user for a ridiculous reason and his message for the user's block reason looks a little off: https://baldimod.fandom.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/GrandFleent56OnWindowsXP

The staff has accepted my report and globally blocked Jamiethejame2 temporally while undoing Jamie's unacceptable actions at the Baldi Mod Wiki. After Jamie's global block got expired, I don't think a temporary global block really helped him improve his attitude.

Now for the explanation about Jamie's block from Baldi's Basics Wiki: Before his infinite block, he was blocked for two weeks for resuming to act impolite to users by communicating with edit summaries negatively, and he was blocked before for also using his OCD as an excuse for his edit-wars and unacceptable attitude besides disrespecting the editors. Later on, I found out he was attempting to dig for my past info to make me uncomfortable at the FNaF Wiki since March, and I wasn't aware until next month. This was outrageous and attempt doxxing, as doxxing is highly unwelcoming to do at the Wiki FANDOM, so one of the admins (Im Somebody) of Baldipedia decided to block him out of Baldipedia for good, as well as a way to protect the Baldipedia users from Jamie's aggressive/abrasive behavior and we don't think he's appropriate enough to be a part of the Baldipedia community.

That's everything I can tell other than sharing my displeased views on Jamie's "on-and-off" behavior.