Thread:Noreplyz/@comment-24.0.127.22-20171206203615

There seems to be a dispute going on at the awesome games on whether or not it should be on wiki as the game has a low metacritic user score and average scores from web reviewers. However, the game also positive scores but those are from IGN and Gamespot. Which, the rules and guidelines state not to rely on such sites due to heavy corruption in gaming journalism. I'm telling you this because the person who put the game in the awesome games wiki was one if the Admins. The admin says the game should be there because it brings the series back to it's roots. The game has many flaws according to users that it should not be on the page. I'm telling you this because I don't know who else to go to. If it's possible, can you please don't tell them my username? I'm only voicing my concerns. I don't want to get anyone in trouble.

Rules and Guildlines on review scores from the respective wikis:

http://awesome-games.wikia.com/wiki/Awesome_Games_Wikia#Rules_and_Guidelines Due to heavy corruption in gaming journalism, avoid unreliable sources for determining if a game is good or not. When using GameFAQs, the game needs to have a rating of at least 3.60.

http://crappy-games.wikia.com/wiki/Crappy_Games_Wiki#Rules_and_Guidelines Because of the corruption in gaming journalism, as of September 4, 2015, the only reliable sources of game reviews will be user sites like GameFAQs and web reviewers. Game journalists supported by GamerGate are welcome so be sure to check out DeepFreeze for sites supported by GamerGate. As for GameFAQs, a game will be put on as long as it has a rating of 2.90 or lower. 