User blog comment:Ciencia Al Poder/Portable Infoboxes, the first step into Wikia taking control over our content/@comment--20170510200248/@comment-104.131.93.134-20170510215738

You blocked a now former admin because he's been accused of transcluding the wikitext templates on some articles. Since the community supported the old templates and rejected the PI change, and admins weren't allowed to revert the templates, it's reasonable to think admins won't revert those actions.

Even being demoted, Ciencia Al Poder was doing maintenance and patrolling. I don't know how solid are those accusations about running that bot, but it doesn't matter, because Ciencia Al Poder can't demonstrate that he didn't do that (what would be a valid proof of not doing that?), while the Staff won't provide any proof of Ciencia Al Poder being the responsible of running the bots. Basically, there's no possible defense against this. But it doesn't matter. Fandom can block users for any reason, or no reason at all, according to the Terms of Use.

So let me see if I understand: The user (under the Ciencia Al Poder account) hasn't vandalized, but he's been blocked. Seeing how easy is to circumvent the blocks, and how Ciencia Al Poder seems to know about MediaWiki in general, isn't it a risky move? I mean, without anything more to lose here, he can do much more damage now if he knows how to circumvent the block. The block was done as a punishment, or to allow the Staff to sleep peacefully at night? If the reason was the latter, I think this was not the best move :)