Thread:Nintendon't/@comment-25448820-20200805105037/@comment-37949401-20200805211751

Pegakid2012 wrote: Nintendon&#039;t wrote: Pegakid2012 wrote: pardon me for a sec, but i might want to have a few words here.

so werten... i know there is a difference between impeachment and ban, and jenna and nintendon't were simply impeached for the "delete greeny" post. however today i noticed that jenna and nintendon't were banned by ben again to prevent them from causing drama on the wiki and vandalizing, as what kam told me.

i don't want to defend anyone or anything, but i think it's best to kind of keep them banned for some time, until perhaps they might agree to not vandalize? ben basicaly banned them again to prevent drama.

i don't wanna defend anyone but i just want to have a word here to prevent further drama between you and kam and dfw... i apologize for interrupting in the thread but i felt a need to say something. and nintendon't... i apologize for this but... would you not cause drama or vandalize in the dfw if you get unbanned? I didn't cause drama. Well, barely. It was normally someone else, agreed with them or not.

Also, i wouldn't vandalize. Although a day ago i was super angry to the point i wanted to. But that is because of the ban. But if i got unbanned i would not vandalize. oh... Whoops, i mean 3.