Thread:Sammm鯊/@comment-27401266-20160106234612/@comment-30384903-20160107050307

Hey there. No, I did not think you are stupid, and I did not intentionally make you look extra stupid, I was just describing the situation how I saw it was, I thought absurd and miscommunicated perhaps, which is why I saw no point of continuing the conversation with you as we clearly did not have the rapport, seeing that your reply to me was along the lines of "I didn't mention anything about other requests and was focusing on that specific request, so of course you thought I was only talking about that request"; to me, that wasn't even the point, and if I had to spell it out to you, I see no point in continuing as you made it seem like it was my fault for not being clear.

Now, back to my "strange obsession with this adoption request"; let's say that you were just unlucky to have touched a request that happened to be on my watchlist. I mean, I'm still a firm believer of following the rules and I wish for fairness, but I wouldn't be clicking on every single request to see if someone else did what you did. What I find embarrassing, is how you admit messing up, but you aren't trying to fix it, and you are antagonizing me, who obviously is trying in their own way of fixing it. You say you get the "cutting in line" part, yet you also claimed "the issue was resolved" when it clearly wasn't (before both request were merged once more, if you had checked the queue, you would have seen your second request was indeed placed in a much higher position than the other one); Wendy's response is the type of attitude I would hope any leader would display, even though the end result is unfortunately the same, at least she explained that's how it's preferably done when this undesirable situation occurred; what you did, was just letting it happen, and only explaining when asked afterwards. I am not questioning your effort on the actual adoption, in fact, I'm fully aware you have spent more effort than Lyra did, having asked two former admins about the position. You've clearly done your homework and you seem to care about the wiki if not more, I respect all that, but what I did not like and what prompt me to butt in, was like I said, you didn't give credit to the original requester at all and the "well, it wouldn't have gone through anyway" brush off. So what that it would fail? I don't believe in completely discrediting the (albeit supremely minimal) effort others did.

Next time, if there's a poor soul did what you did, rest assure I'm going to do what I did, regardless how a soap opera it is to you; I guess we are just gonna agree and disagree on how to handle stuff.