Thread:SirBlaze/@comment-46877839-20200914074216/@comment-36264757-20200914171534

This is the last time I'm saying this to you.

If we have never received any reports or seen any information proving that one of our admins was underaged at the time she joined before she turned thirteen in 2019, we cannot do anything anymore. And even if we saw an update that she just turned thirteen, if there have been no concerns about her sent out to us before that time came, then we don't see a point in taking action.

I can see that Sannse made a couple of replies in your thread now. While you did mention that in some wikis the admins demoted users after finding out they are underaged, Sannse did say, and I quote, "[we] can de-admin if that's right for the wiki, and [we] can ban too, but [we] don't have to - it's a local admin decision."

Remember when I said we would base our actions on what Sannse and the others involved said on the thread? I showed the thread to the other admins recently to keep them updated on the situation, and based on the responses I got so far, they're agreeing with what Sannse, Tupka217, and the other users said. There is nothing we have to do at this point, and that it's up to us to decide. We also have to take into consideration that she had posed no threats to the wiki. There were no blocks or warnings administered to her during her stay there.

At this point, since I now have all the information I need, I'm making my final decision. I'm not taking action against anyone. I'm moving on from this situation now, and you should too. You can complain about the decision all you want, but the decision is final, and as a couple of other users mentioned, it is pointless to bring this up to any of us now when it could have been reported way before she reached the legal age.

Please do not bring this discussion up to me or the other admins anymore. We're done; we're moving on.