Thread:Neuabuermorgan/@comment-11533671-20130911135537

Thank you for your post and defense of me. Paul used my first quote out of the proper context. I wasn't blaming the victims at all. Here is my first post:

"Just now heard about it here today...of course I've not been on here for a couple of days so that may be why. As far as ppl not believing that others would do this? We really don't know what or how this really took place. IDK what the alleged vid consists of but we need to keep in mind that there are those that have leaked their own vids privately but publicly announced they were allegedly "stolen." Not saying that is the case here but we simply do NOT know the facts. IF it was indeed a hack or something, well it sucks that it happened but not surprising that people would do this. We live in an age where nothing surprises me much anymore when it comes to human indecency and violation of another's privacy."

Do you see where I am blaming the victim? He quotes the first portion but leaves the very next line that states, "Not saying that is the case here but we simply do NOT know the facts." Besides this, he has now changed the reason for my ban 3 times in this thread. First it was a banned topic, then it was because I was saying it wasn't a crime NOW he says it's cause I am blaming the victim. Which one is it? Blaming the victim would be more along the lines of me saying that there was no hack at all and this is all their fault for posting it. I did no such thing. He is twisting my words and trying to get others to follow his logic which is flawed and inconsistent with both of my posts.

Thank you yet again though. You are right, I do feel like he is abusing me in particular. There is no other way around it. The very first person to post alluded to the contents of the video which is a CLEAR violation of his and yet they weren't blocked at all. The Dissmaster now thinks, based on Paul's partial reference, that I was blaming the victim. Also if you see Paul's first post under the thread, it says in reply to #6...my post was the #5 position. What did he warn anyone including me about that I violated? Nothing at all was violated. His original post wasn't violated at all. His second post said not to minimize the crime and I didn't do that either. I didn't violate any "rule" whatsoever according to both of his posts.

So it all comes down to this....I said and do think that it is a horrible crime that took place. I feel sorry that it happened to these two actors BUT I don't take it personally. At the time of this incident I don't believe anyone knew the facts about it as one person said they thought it was just a rumor. I didn't defend the crime, blame the victims nor talk about a banned topic. So what justifies my ban? I only questioned how he determines to what extent we could talk about it and remain within his rules since our feelings on the matter can't be adequately measured. Sorry for the long post....I just can't believe his childish behavior and abusive manner. 