User blog comment:Jenburton/2016 Tournament of Giving/@comment-1142365-20161011071145

I am wondering if an equal donation of 1/64th the original planned amount to each of the listed charities would be more beneficial in the grand scheme of things than a lump sum to a "winner". I wish these charities did not have to compete, nor have their shot at a donation be placed in the hands of people who do not know anything about them.

So long as all 64 of these charities have been appropriately vetted and are confirmed to spend their donations effectively and transparently, why do they have to compete like this? I am sure all of them would appreciate even a small donation from Wikia.