User blog comment:Rupert Giles/Layout Changes: Breakpoints and Typography/@comment-3544775-20150528170547/@comment-452-20150528200732

"No, it ain't meaningless filler."

In English, especially Australian English - which is what Imamadmad speaks - it is common to append meaningless insults, especially the word "bastard", "bugger" and other words starting with "b", such as in the phrase "lucky bastard", which has no ill-intent. There are also far more colourful words commonly appended in casual conversation, which are not fit to repeat on Wikia, as Wikia are prudes.

"If they haven't spoken here, it doesn't mean they are no such people."

Whether or not they exist, they have not posted here, so there is no point discussing our opinions of them, whether or not they exist.

"And if it's pointless to discuss it, why did you even started? It doesn't matter if someone said it or not. Both sides are "bad", and you shouldn't attack only one side and "blame" it for all."

You brought it up.

As I said, I agree that they are hypothetically selfish, and at such time that someone from the "other side" stops being hypothetical and posts a comment, I will respond to it.

"You also blamed the update happening due to people making their pages for larger screens. So you think that's justified? It's like banning/restricting/changing things for a whole country, because 10% of the users from there are causing issues."

This is an odd change of topic, considering I've made no such comment in this particular thread, but thanks for bringing up something I've actually said elsewhere, instead of things hypothetical people haven't said.

The fact that the update occurred due to those reasons is a fact. Whether or not I think it's justified is irrelevant, as I do not work for Wikia. In fact, it's so irrelevant that I refuse to even consider whether or not I think it's justified. I'm only here to explain reality, not justify it.

But your comparison is interesting, because: So, what you're saying is actually how things are done.
 * When a small percentage of people in a country misuse guns, gun regulations are tightened.
 * When a small percentage of people in a country misuse drones, drone regulations are tightened.
 * When a small percentage of people in a country misuse chemicals, chemical regulations are tightened.
 * When a small percentage of people in a country misuse aeroplanes, aeroplane regulations are tightened.
 * When a small percentage of people in a country misuse buckyballs, buckyballs are banned completely.

I think it sucks that no-one can buy buckyballs any more due to the few who fed them to their children, and I've said multiple times that I think it sucks that people with large screens can no longer take advantage of them, due to the few who abused the privilege.

edit: "I never-ever saw a person to design layouts from his iPhone."

That's the point. I made up a hypothetical person, just like you did.

edit: There is more than one country in the world, the fact that your particular country does not tighten gun regulation does not mean that others do not. I said "a", not "every".