User blog comment:Rappy 4187/Technical Update: August 5, 2014/@comment-452-20140806141958/@comment-452-20140806174735

I fixed the problem immediately after posting here.

I can't seem to work out why this change was even made. I can't find a single case where .image is used which requires display: inline-block; and it is not already set by a more specific style.

For instance, all image and videos thumbnails are overridden by this style: .article-thumb a.image-thumbnail, .article-thumb a.video-thumbnail, .article-thumb img[data-image-key], .article-thumb img[data-video-key] { display: block; } And images which aren't thumbs don't appear to need the class.

Do you have an example of why this style was added?