Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment--20150814190019/@comment-5065259-20150814193232

so by code library, couldn't we just use dev wiki for that purpose?

I really do hope that any CSS written will also be reviewed as well in addition to personal css/js, never know when someone's able to mess something up without being able to fix it on their own, ie no ability to click edit button because its covered up.

@Dessamator well now giving out codeeditor is decided by cqm so should be more secure, besides the experienced people test their code elsewhere before importing it. perhaps removal of codeeditor rights from those who were just copy-paste code should be considered. i agree that admins/bureaucrats are all competent in css or js or even both.

the best outcome would be to have codeeditors, volunteer developers or even staff review if this "code library" is to be the dev wiki.

if the editinterface user right is removed from admins/Bcrats and given to competent people, might be trouble some to ask them for help - would get annoying to request something or just to import scripts. the wikis are not independant which makes having a dedicated group harder, there are not that many people competent anyways.