User blog comment:MisterWoodhouse/Social Activity, the 2010 Editor, and Unpausing Migrations/@comment-7891699-20201013202332/@comment-26939652-20201014134936


 * Well, when it goes to UCP, it should definitely have the classic editor option. All UCP wikis should.

Welcome to the comments. You should read the post and related posts before commenting. Classic editor isn't going to come back, 2010 editor is the concession they made. If there's enough backlash, even then they can't bring back the classic editor, as their main argument for migrating without feature parity in the first place would be nullified.